Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. FoxIt Reader [modified]

FoxIt Reader [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
adobequestionannouncement
26 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 0 0x3c0

    There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?

    Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

    modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Mustafa Ismail Mustafa
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    Huh? Its like you're describing Adobe Acrobat. I've been using FoxIt for a while now, and not one hiccup.

    If the post was helpful, please vote! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 0 0x3c0

      Mike Mullikin wrote:

      P.S. When did FireFox become "Fx" ?

      It's the preferred abbreviation for Firefox, as opposed to FF

      Mike Mullikin wrote:

      Wow! I seem to recall dozens & dozens of posts over the years with exactly the opposite experience.

      I'm probably just jinxed ;)

      Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

      H Offline
      H Offline
      hairy_hats
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Computafreak wrote:

      It's the preferred abbreviation for Firefox

      It might be preferred but you're the first person I've ever seen to use it!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H hairy_hats

        Never had a problem with Foxit Reader, ever.

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dan Neely
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Does the current version of foxit have a vista/weven compatible updater? The one I installed around the start of the year pukes every time it tries to update itself.

        It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies

        H 0 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • D Dan Neely

          Does the current version of foxit have a vista/weven compatible updater? The one I installed around the start of the year pukes every time it tries to update itself.

          It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies

          H Offline
          H Offline
          hairy_hats
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Dunno but the website says "Foxit Reader supports Windows 2000/XP/2003/Vista." so maybe just download and install it?

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • 0 0x3c0

            There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?

            Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

            modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Douglas Troy
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            :omg: Wow. I've never heard of anyone having a problem using Foxit, as you've just described. I run it on several machines here at the office and at home, and I'll take Foxit over Adobe Reader any day of the week. There are at least 10 developers here, that I know of, that use it, and no one has ever said it's been a problem. You running IE8 or something?


            :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
            Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

            0 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Dan Neely

              Does the current version of foxit have a vista/weven compatible updater? The one I installed around the start of the year pukes every time it tries to update itself.

              It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies

              0 Offline
              0 Offline
              0x3c0
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              That happened too. I think I'm the only person here who prefers Adobe Reader. Then again, spending a few hours trying to manually remove as much as possible of that stupid program does usually have that effect

              Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 0 0x3c0

                There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?

                Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

                modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM

                N Offline
                N Offline
                Nemanja Trifunovic
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                Funny. I was using FoxIt for a while and it felt much lighter than Acrobate Reader. However, I hit some PDFs that it would not display properly so I switched back to Acrobate.

                Programming Blog utf8-cpp

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Douglas Troy

                  :omg: Wow. I've never heard of anyone having a problem using Foxit, as you've just described. I run it on several machines here at the office and at home, and I'll take Foxit over Adobe Reader any day of the week. There are at least 10 developers here, that I know of, that use it, and no one has ever said it's been a problem. You running IE8 or something?


                  :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                  Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

                  0 Offline
                  0 Offline
                  0x3c0
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  Douglas Troy wrote:

                  You running IE8 or something?

                  No. I'm using Fx 3.5 RC 2 at the moment, but the problem was also with version 3.0.11. Ironically, IE7 had no problem with the pages

                  Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 0 0x3c0

                    There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?

                    Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

                    modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    Phil J Pearson
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    No problem here. Works perfectly on Win7, always has.

                    Phil


                    The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • 0 0x3c0

                      Douglas Troy wrote:

                      You running IE8 or something?

                      No. I'm using Fx 3.5 RC 2 at the moment, but the problem was also with version 3.0.11. Ironically, IE7 had no problem with the pages

                      Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Douglas Troy
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      I found this similar issue posted on their tech boards: http://forums.foxitsoftware.com/showthread.php?t=14241&highlight=FoxitReaderOCX.ocx[^] Basically says: Reinstall, that should fix it ...


                      :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                      Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

                      0 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Douglas Troy

                        I found this similar issue posted on their tech boards: http://forums.foxitsoftware.com/showthread.php?t=14241&highlight=FoxitReaderOCX.ocx[^] Basically says: Reinstall, that should fix it ...


                        :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                        Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL

                        0 Offline
                        0 Offline
                        0x3c0
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        That's very interesting. I got the exact same undefined error when updating, and that's what caused the problem. It's odd that I was one of the only people to get it though - perhaps it was a blue moon

                        Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • H hairy_hats

                          Dunno but the website says "Foxit Reader supports Windows 2000/XP/2003/Vista." so maybe just download and install it?

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Dan Neely
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          It made that claim 6 mo ago, but was somewhat buggy. I was wondering if anyone who installed it more recently knew it they fixed it...

                          It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • 0 0x3c0

                            That happened too. I think I'm the only person here who prefers Adobe Reader. Then again, spending a few hours trying to manually remove as much as possible of that stupid program does usually have that effect

                            Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            Dan Neely
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            I prefer adobe reader for very large tech manuals. It's search sidebar with context information around every hit is much easier than a modal find dialog with next/preb buttons. For smaller documents foxit's faster loading time is much preferred. Neither is permitted to blight my browsers as a plugin.

                            It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains. -- Pride and Prejudice and Zombies

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • 0 0x3c0

                              There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?

                              Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

                              modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM

                              H Offline
                              H Offline
                              Henry Minute
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              The only complaint I have about Foxit, is that it nags me to download, usually non free, add ons, rather too frequently.

                              Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • 0 0x3c0

                                There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?

                                Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

                                modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                The thing I hate most about it is its horrible font rendering though. So bad that I even complained to them. Geez what a joke. It makes most of the text look purple with "Clear"Type enabled and it makes all the text look bold when it's disabled. Actually not just bold, but bold with crappy artifacts. I have not yet decided what's worse - the purple or the bold+artifacts. Both are very bad. Reminds me of WPF's font rendering. How about actually clear font rendering instead of BlurryRainbowType(tm) that passes for "cleartype"? Is it too much to ask? It should in fact be easier to implement. Yea ok, that was a rant, sorry ;P

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • 0 0x3c0

                                  There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?

                                  Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

                                  modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mark_Wallace
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  Knowing Adobe, I wouldn't be surprised if they included something in their recent acrobat reader installations that sabotaged FoxIt. Dig into your registry, and look at the settings that Adobe puts in there (of course, you'll have to do it logged on as an administrator, and change the permissions for the Adobe entries -- they seem to believe that they have the right to deny you permission to view whole chunks of your registry). Like everyone else, I've never had a problem with Foxit -- and the sheer joy of seeing an 800-page PDF open in about a second, then not stall when I try to do such foolish things as scroll past graphics, is wonderful. What makes me laugh is that the full version of Acrobat, which I have to use, requires more disc space than MS Word, but it can't even create a file. I remember I used to carry around two separate postscript interpreters on a single floppy disc; Acrobat needs a DVD.

                                  I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • 0 0x3c0

                                    Judging by the results Google found, no-one else has. I couldn't find the correct solution anywhere

                                    Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

                                    B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    Brady Kelly
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    People don't post real problems. It's the schadenfreude of knowing nobody can Google it because you couldn't. That's why there are so few articles on ASP.NET data binding that don't use the built in collection based binding.

                                    rules

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • 0 0x3c0

                                      There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?

                                      Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

                                      modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mike_V
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      I read CodeProject forums a lot... and I hardly ever, ever comment. But this just struck a chord with me. I am one of the proctors at a set of computer labs. There are three labs, each with about 20-30 computers in them. During a recent re-imaging of the labs, one of our supervisors decided to replace Adobe Reader with Foxit Reader. Then all hello broke loose. Certain PDF documents were declared by Foxit to be "corrupt" even when they would open in Adobe just fine. This seemed to be related to professors that put large images into their lecture slides. It's kind of difficult to run a computer lab that most students use for printing lecture slides without them being able to open their lecture slides! And then the network started having issues, to where we couldn't sustain a multi-gigabyte data transfer to reimage the workstations. Without the nuclear option, we had to resort to manually uninstalling Foxit on all the computers. It left behind plugins, ActiveX objects, and the like, and I kid you not, months after the 'foxit incident' I still had students coming up to me with PDF problems - caused by Foxit! I know many people have had good luck with it - obviously the sup that decided to install it had good luck. Why else would he have suggested it? But those stories ARE out there!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • 0 0x3c0

                                        There are no words to describe this vile monstrosity of a codebase. I installed it to try and read specifications a little quicker. It's infested my Fx installation, and now nothing happens when I navigate to any PDF file, whether it's locally stored or available elsewhere. Uninstalling it only seems to make things worse. At the moment, I've got an Adobe Reader plugin, and a disabled FoxIt Reader plugin. If I enable the FoxIt Reader, every PDF file loaded displays the message "FoxitReaderOCX.ocx failed to load". No wonder most people use Adobe Reader. I've upgraded Fx to the release candidate for 3.5, and have purged all my temporary files. I'm about to try reinstalling and then uninstalling FoxIt. I hate FoxIt like the plague [edit] Installing, then uninstalling seemed to do the trick. Isn't that intuitive?

                                        Between the idea And the reality Between the motion And the act Falls the Shadow

                                        modified on Monday, June 22, 2009 3:50 PM

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        peterchen
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        Been using FoxIt for years now, never had real troubles. Sometime,s display quality and typographic alignment doesn't match the quality of Adobe, but the latter has given me much more browser plugin problems in a month than FoxIt did in all the time I use it.

                                        Don't attribute to stupidity what can be equally well explained by buerocracy.
                                        My latest article | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups