Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Saving money: A phrase management cannot resist

Saving money: A phrase management cannot resist

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpcssasp-netdatabasebusiness
25 Posts 21 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • X Xiangyang Liu

    We have a fixed number of web servers running various ASP.NET applications in production. Over the years we keep adding new applications and getting more and more users. Now they found out that memory useage on the servers are only 20% to 30% at normal time (the one time they looked), so they came up with an excellent idea: Why not reduce the number of the servers to save money? I think human heart may only be used at 20% to 30% of its maximal capacity when we are not chased by green faced monsters. Why don't we cut out 70% of our hearts to save money (smaller heart means less food consumption, etc.)? :-D

    My .NET Business Application Framework My Home Page My Younger Son & His "PET"

    P Offline
    P Offline
    PIEBALDconsult
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    Isn't that what virtual servers do? Ask them if they ever let their gas tank (or bank account) reach empty. If you never let your gas drop below a half tank you could install a smaller tank, thereby reducing the maximum weight of your car and improving your fuel economy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • X Xiangyang Liu

      We have a fixed number of web servers running various ASP.NET applications in production. Over the years we keep adding new applications and getting more and more users. Now they found out that memory useage on the servers are only 20% to 30% at normal time (the one time they looked), so they came up with an excellent idea: Why not reduce the number of the servers to save money? I think human heart may only be used at 20% to 30% of its maximal capacity when we are not chased by green faced monsters. Why don't we cut out 70% of our hearts to save money (smaller heart means less food consumption, etc.)? :-D

      My .NET Business Application Framework My Home Page My Younger Son & His "PET"

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rama Krishna Vavilala
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      So what is the plan with the discarded servers?

      Click here to get a Google Wave Invite.

      0 X 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

        So what is the plan with the discarded servers?

        Click here to get a Google Wave Invite.

        0 Offline
        0 Offline
        0x3c0
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        I'll take them off his hands, as long as he pays for the shipping.

        OSDev :)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • X Xiangyang Liu

          We have a fixed number of web servers running various ASP.NET applications in production. Over the years we keep adding new applications and getting more and more users. Now they found out that memory useage on the servers are only 20% to 30% at normal time (the one time they looked), so they came up with an excellent idea: Why not reduce the number of the servers to save money? I think human heart may only be used at 20% to 30% of its maximal capacity when we are not chased by green faced monsters. Why don't we cut out 70% of our hearts to save money (smaller heart means less food consumption, etc.)? :-D

          My .NET Business Application Framework My Home Page My Younger Son & His "PET"

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Micky Finn
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          I believe I recall a "Stupid IT Tricks" story about admin's removing or re-purposing some of their servers because they were "hardly being used". Then some process they ran caused the network server usage to increase. Without the extra servers, the whole network began to crawl. Perhaps if someone has that link, you might want to forward the story to managment. Or perhaps just hand them a scalpel. :wtf:

          Sometimes, expecting users to be technically savy is like training your cat to tap-dance. There is often a disconnect between theory and practice.

          T 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

            So what is the plan with the discarded servers?

            Click here to get a Google Wave Invite.

            X Offline
            X Offline
            Xiangyang Liu
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            The servers, as well as all of our workstations, are leased.

            My .NET Business Application Framework My Home Page My Younger Son & His "PET"

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Dalek Dave

              Funnily enough it was once suggested that Nuclear Submarines should be crewed by woman as they require less food, water and air than all male crews. A Fine Idea. But... Would you want the nuclear trigger in the hands of a bunch of PMS women who are stuck in a can 100 metres below the sea for 6 months at a time? Sometimes spending the money on resources works out in the end! (Incidentally, the views expressed were the navy's views on women in submarines)

              ------------------------------------ In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms. Stephen J Gould

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Brady Kelly
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              Dalek Dave wrote:

              crewed by woman as they require less food, water and air than all male crews.

              In popular perception, they also require less men women than male submarine crews. :suss:

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • X Xiangyang Liu

                We have a fixed number of web servers running various ASP.NET applications in production. Over the years we keep adding new applications and getting more and more users. Now they found out that memory useage on the servers are only 20% to 30% at normal time (the one time they looked), so they came up with an excellent idea: Why not reduce the number of the servers to save money? I think human heart may only be used at 20% to 30% of its maximal capacity when we are not chased by green faced monsters. Why don't we cut out 70% of our hearts to save money (smaller heart means less food consumption, etc.)? :-D

                My .NET Business Application Framework My Home Page My Younger Son & His "PET"

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Member 1709723
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                they're just a bunch of idiots - tell them i said so!

                Opium is my business. The bridge mean more traffic. More traffic mean more money. More money mean more power. Speed is important in business. Time is money. You said opium was money. Money is Money. Well then, what is time again? icalburner.net

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Member 1709723

                  they're just a bunch of idiots - tell them i said so!

                  Opium is my business. The bridge mean more traffic. More traffic mean more money. More money mean more power. Speed is important in business. Time is money. You said opium was money. Money is Money. Well then, what is time again? icalburner.net

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dan Neely
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  "Hello Boss, Bosses Boss, and Bosses Bosses Boss. Some anonymous person on the intarweb said you're a bunch of idiots." Somehow I don't see this going well....

                  3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Dalek Dave

                    Funnily enough it was once suggested that Nuclear Submarines should be crewed by woman as they require less food, water and air than all male crews. A Fine Idea. But... Would you want the nuclear trigger in the hands of a bunch of PMS women who are stuck in a can 100 metres below the sea for 6 months at a time? Sometimes spending the money on resources works out in the end! (Incidentally, the views expressed were the navy's views on women in submarines)

                    ------------------------------------ In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms. Stephen J Gould

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Roger Wright
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    Dalek Dave wrote:

                    the views expressed were the navy's views on women in submarines

                    Conversely, the Army thinks women are ideally suited for combat duty in desert regions. They'll fight at the drop of a hat, won't negotiate, and retain water.

                    "A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Dalek Dave

                      Funnily enough it was once suggested that Nuclear Submarines should be crewed by woman as they require less food, water and air than all male crews. A Fine Idea. But... Would you want the nuclear trigger in the hands of a bunch of PMS women who are stuck in a can 100 metres below the sea for 6 months at a time? Sometimes spending the money on resources works out in the end! (Incidentally, the views expressed were the navy's views on women in submarines)

                      ------------------------------------ In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms. Stephen J Gould

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      RCoate
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      It is even worse than that. If you put a bunch of women together in the same house, their cycles start to synchronize. Stick an all woman crew in a sub and they will all have pms at the same time! (That is one love boat that would be no fun!)

                      X 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • X Xiangyang Liu

                        We have a fixed number of web servers running various ASP.NET applications in production. Over the years we keep adding new applications and getting more and more users. Now they found out that memory useage on the servers are only 20% to 30% at normal time (the one time they looked), so they came up with an excellent idea: Why not reduce the number of the servers to save money? I think human heart may only be used at 20% to 30% of its maximal capacity when we are not chased by green faced monsters. Why don't we cut out 70% of our hearts to save money (smaller heart means less food consumption, etc.)? :-D

                        My .NET Business Application Framework My Home Page My Younger Son & His "PET"

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Muneeb R Baig
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        :laugh:

                        -muneeb A thing of beauty is the joy forever.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Dalek Dave

                          Funnily enough it was once suggested that Nuclear Submarines should be crewed by woman as they require less food, water and air than all male crews. A Fine Idea. But... Would you want the nuclear trigger in the hands of a bunch of PMS women who are stuck in a can 100 metres below the sea for 6 months at a time? Sometimes spending the money on resources works out in the end! (Incidentally, the views expressed were the navy's views on women in submarines)

                          ------------------------------------ In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms. Stephen J Gould

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          Caslen
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          Dalek Dave wrote:

                          below the sea

                          Really? :)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R RCoate

                            It is even worse than that. If you put a bunch of women together in the same house, their cycles start to synchronize. Stick an all woman crew in a sub and they will all have pms at the same time! (That is one love boat that would be no fun!)

                            X Offline
                            X Offline
                            Xiangyang Liu
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            RCoate wrote:

                            Stick an all woman crew in a sub and they will all have pms at the same time!

                            If I were the enemy, I would be very afraid. :)

                            My .NET Business Application Framework My Home Page My Younger Son & His "PET"

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • X Xiangyang Liu

                              We have a fixed number of web servers running various ASP.NET applications in production. Over the years we keep adding new applications and getting more and more users. Now they found out that memory useage on the servers are only 20% to 30% at normal time (the one time they looked), so they came up with an excellent idea: Why not reduce the number of the servers to save money? I think human heart may only be used at 20% to 30% of its maximal capacity when we are not chased by green faced monsters. Why don't we cut out 70% of our hearts to save money (smaller heart means less food consumption, etc.)? :-D

                              My .NET Business Application Framework My Home Page My Younger Son & His "PET"

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Andreas Mertens
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              Just a thought, but look at this as an opportunity? Perhaps some of these servers could be consolidated as a number of virtual servers on a single box? This signature left intentionally blank

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R ragnaroknrol

                                The big picture is always green grass and shy but peaceful deer walking up and eating out your hand while rainbows are in the sky and a little fairy come and say hi and has a present in a box for you. Of course that grass is all green because of the manure and decomposing bodies, the wolves are hiding in a bush waiting for the deer, the storm causing that rainbow is destroying someone's house and that's actually Red Cap come to hack you to pieces with the axe he's hiding in the box.

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                sketch2002
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                Do us all a favor... don't write children's books. :)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • X Xiangyang Liu

                                  We have a fixed number of web servers running various ASP.NET applications in production. Over the years we keep adding new applications and getting more and more users. Now they found out that memory useage on the servers are only 20% to 30% at normal time (the one time they looked), so they came up with an excellent idea: Why not reduce the number of the servers to save money? I think human heart may only be used at 20% to 30% of its maximal capacity when we are not chased by green faced monsters. Why don't we cut out 70% of our hearts to save money (smaller heart means less food consumption, etc.)? :-D

                                  My .NET Business Application Framework My Home Page My Younger Son & His "PET"

                                  P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  peterchen
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  Tricky, because application performance and ressource usage is often counter-intuitive. You could do a calculation: if for 10% of the day, 80% of the user cannot reach the web service, you basically increase pay by 8% (that's not really true, but who are you teaching management calculating percentages). You could simulate reduction of available CPU and memory (I don't think good old CPUSTRES.EXE does any good on a mdoern server, but something similar should exist or not to hard to cough up).

                                  Personally, I love the idea that Raymond spends his nights posting bad regexs to mailing lists under the pseudonym of Jane Smith. He'd be like a super hero, only more nerdy and less useful. [Trevel]
                                  | FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Dalek Dave

                                    Funnily enough it was once suggested that Nuclear Submarines should be crewed by woman as they require less food, water and air than all male crews. A Fine Idea. But... Would you want the nuclear trigger in the hands of a bunch of PMS women who are stuck in a can 100 metres below the sea for 6 months at a time? Sometimes spending the money on resources works out in the end! (Incidentally, the views expressed were the navy's views on women in submarines)

                                    ------------------------------------ In science, 'fact' can only mean 'confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent.' I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms. Stephen J Gould

                                    T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    TrudyH
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    And not at all influenced by the Navy's chauvanistic attitudes about women. They weren't at all afraid of trapping men in a submarine with some really pissed off women. . .no where to run and all that. :omg: :laugh:

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Micky Finn

                                      I believe I recall a "Stupid IT Tricks" story about admin's removing or re-purposing some of their servers because they were "hardly being used". Then some process they ran caused the network server usage to increase. Without the extra servers, the whole network began to crawl. Perhaps if someone has that link, you might want to forward the story to managment. Or perhaps just hand them a scalpel. :wtf:

                                      Sometimes, expecting users to be technically savy is like training your cat to tap-dance. There is often a disconnect between theory and practice.

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      TrudyH
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      When it comes to server usage it is a hope for the best, but plan for the worst kind of thing. If you don't assume the worst will happen. . .it will happen! I mean seriously, how many IT horror stories are there were a bean counter thinks he knows more about IT than the IT guy, then he does something stupid and it all crashes down. We have one server that, other than a few small nothing programs is pretty much just to run this one program. Not because it is a resource hog, but just because it doesn't play well with others and tends to crash some important systems when not on its own. It's not all about resources.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups