Why I Hate Visual Studio 2010 RC
-
RC stand for Real Crap. If you build an App that will not intall correctly - why not give the opportunity to completely uninstall everything before committing the install to the OS. Oh, I'm sorry this M$ were talking about!
-
RC stand for Real Crap. If you build an App that will not intall correctly - why not give the opportunity to completely uninstall everything before committing the install to the OS. Oh, I'm sorry this M$ were talking about!
And what exactly are your problems? My experience has been very good. I migrated a real life project and it had worked great so far. It is pretty fast and has not crashed for me a single time.
-
RC stand for Real Crap. If you build an App that will not intall correctly - why not give the opportunity to completely uninstall everything before committing the install to the OS. Oh, I'm sorry this M$ were talking about!
Virtual Machine. I installed in Windows 7 XP Mode, installed like a charm, runs ok. I know this doesn't help - but after all the talk about the Beta it would be *cough*foolish*cough* to install it on anything but a sacrificable system.
Agh! Reality! My Archnemesis![^]
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server. -
RC stand for Real Crap. If you build an App that will not intall correctly - why not give the opportunity to completely uninstall everything before committing the install to the OS. Oh, I'm sorry this M$ were talking about!
"Real Crap" is harsh. :) My experience with VS 2010 RC has been unable to edit a simple SQL stored procedure without the program blowing up. Every time. Without fail. Though the project worked fine in VS 2010 BETA, it cannot be used in VS 2010 RC because the program is not stable enough to edit. I tried backing out the installation by reverting the OS to a former state but that is broken too. I have been editing my database with SQL Server management studio with VS 2010 RC sitting in the task bar about as useful as teats on a bull. To tell the truth, I have not had the opportunity to confirm if RC means "Real Crap".
-
And what exactly are your problems? My experience has been very good. I migrated a real life project and it had worked great so far. It is pretty fast and has not crashed for me a single time.
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:
worked great
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:
pretty fast
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:
experience has been very good
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:
not crashed ... a single time
Your life is *completely* different from that of CG, and I'm sure you're just trying to make him feel like crap with this post. And, that is irrespective of the product/service being discussed about. :rolleyes:
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
-
"Real Crap" is harsh. :) My experience with VS 2010 RC has been unable to edit a simple SQL stored procedure without the program blowing up. Every time. Without fail. Though the project worked fine in VS 2010 BETA, it cannot be used in VS 2010 RC because the program is not stable enough to edit. I tried backing out the installation by reverting the OS to a former state but that is broken too. I have been editing my database with SQL Server management studio with VS 2010 RC sitting in the task bar about as useful as teats on a bull. To tell the truth, I have not had the opportunity to confirm if RC means "Real Crap".
Member 2358451 wrote:
"Real Crap" is harsh.http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/smiley_smile.gif
Where is your smiley? ;P
-
And what exactly are your problems? My experience has been very good. I migrated a real life project and it had worked great so far. It is pretty fast and has not crashed for me a single time.
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:
My experience has been very good.
Mine too. The installation crashed at exactly the same point as yours did - maybe that's why it's working great for both of us :laugh:
Regards Senthil _____________________________ My Home Page |My Blog | My Articles | My Flickr | WinMacro
-
Member 2358451 wrote:
"Real Crap" is harsh.http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/smiley_smile.gif
Where is your smiley? ;P
Hmm, perhaps that should be reported as a bug.
-
Hmm, perhaps that should be reported as a bug.
Done [^]
-
Done [^]
:) It works fine to me.
-
:) It works fine to me.
:) Even works fine for me. But the message to which I have replied had a link displayed instead of graphical smiley.
-
RC stand for Real Crap. If you build an App that will not intall correctly - why not give the opportunity to completely uninstall everything before committing the install to the OS. Oh, I'm sorry this M$ were talking about!
Actually, I think it is a very good product (I have to admit I haven't used it extensively). :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
:) Even works fine for me. But the message to which I have replied had a link displayed instead of graphical smiley.
Maybe he posted the link instead of the emotion :~ weird
-
Virtual Machine. I installed in Windows 7 XP Mode, installed like a charm, runs ok. I know this doesn't help - but after all the talk about the Beta it would be *cough*foolish*cough* to install it on anything but a sacrificable system.
Agh! Reality! My Archnemesis![^]
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server.Even the beta did nothing to my projects or my system. It did, howvere, very serioulsy endanger my patience and therefore my sanity.
-
Actually, I think it is a very good product (I have to admit I haven't used it extensively). :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]CPallini wrote:
I have to admit I haven't used it extensively
Therefore, your opinions about the product are ignored instantly. ;P PS: To be honest, I actually did not like 2010 at all. The debugger was slightly better, but I think that the "6 is the new 10" is a blatant lie, or they have no idea what 6 was like.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
-
CPallini wrote:
I have to admit I haven't used it extensively
Therefore, your opinions about the product are ignored instantly. ;P PS: To be honest, I actually did not like 2010 at all. The debugger was slightly better, but I think that the "6 is the new 10" is a blatant lie, or they have no idea what 6 was like.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:
PS: To be honest, I actually did not like 2010 at all. The debugger was slightly better, but I think that the "6 is the new 10" is a blatant lie, or they have no idea what 6 was like.
Nah, it is good: the
Ccompiler ( :rolleyes: ) for instance, is wonderful. :-DIf the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
Hmm, perhaps that should be reported as a bug.
aspdotnetdev wrote:
Hmm, perhaps that should be reported as a bug.
I wonder if we can blame it on VS2010...
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
