Stop the madness Steve Jobs
-
Recalling our discussion here about developing for Apple devices I just came across this: http://stopthemadnessstevejobs.com/wordpress/[^]
Yesterday they said today was tomorrow but today they know better. - Poul Anderson
I'm sorry... I have to say it... Madness? THIS... IS...APPLE!
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
Recalling our discussion here about developing for Apple devices I just came across this: http://stopthemadnessstevejobs.com/wordpress/[^]
Yesterday they said today was tomorrow but today they know better. - Poul Anderson
Well, there goes the DragonFire SDK[^]... X| Flynn
-
Recalling our discussion here about developing for Apple devices I just came across this: http://stopthemadnessstevejobs.com/wordpress/[^]
Yesterday they said today was tomorrow but today they know better. - Poul Anderson
And Windows Phone 7 will only run apps written in C#. So should Ballmer stop it, too? [edit] So will the dumbass with the 1 vote provide evidence to the contrary? Admittedly, that would require a bit of intelligence, something you're probably seriously short of. [/edit]
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
modified on Monday, April 12, 2010 1:01 PM
-
And Windows Phone 7 will only run apps written in C#. So should Ballmer stop it, too? [edit] So will the dumbass with the 1 vote provide evidence to the contrary? Admittedly, that would require a bit of intelligence, something you're probably seriously short of. [/edit]
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
modified on Monday, April 12, 2010 1:01 PM
-
You're joking right?
Yesterday they said today was tomorrow but today they know better. - Poul Anderson
Nope. A quote from the Petzold e-book available from the WinMo developer portal - The Windows Phone 7 Series operating system exposes classes defined by the .NET Compact Framework. All programs for the phone are written in managed code. At the present time, C# is the only supported programming language.
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
-
And Windows Phone 7 will only run apps written in C#. So should Ballmer stop it, too? [edit] So will the dumbass with the 1 vote provide evidence to the contrary? Admittedly, that would require a bit of intelligence, something you're probably seriously short of. [/edit]
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
modified on Monday, April 12, 2010 1:01 PM
Clearly someone doesn't like you... 5'ed to balance.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
You're joking right?
Yesterday they said today was tomorrow but today they know better. - Poul Anderson
-
And Windows Phone 7 will only run apps written in C#. So should Ballmer stop it, too? [edit] So will the dumbass with the 1 vote provide evidence to the contrary? Admittedly, that would require a bit of intelligence, something you're probably seriously short of. [/edit]
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
modified on Monday, April 12, 2010 1:01 PM
-
I wasn't the one vote and I apologize I read that as windows 7, not windows phone 7. Is it a technical issue or a legal restriction like Apple is enforcing?
Yesterday they said today was tomorrow but today they know better. - Poul Anderson
-
Nope. A quote from the Petzold e-book available from the WinMo developer portal - The Windows Phone 7 Series operating system exposes classes defined by the .NET Compact Framework. All programs for the phone are written in managed code. At the present time, C# is the only supported programming language.
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
-
Clearly someone doesn't like you... 5'ed to balance.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
Nope. A quote from the Petzold e-book available from the WinMo developer portal - The Windows Phone 7 Series operating system exposes classes defined by the .NET Compact Framework. All programs for the phone are written in managed code. At the present time, C# is the only supported programming language.
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
-
You don't see a difference between MS only supporting C# and Apple saying you are in breach of your Terms of service agreement if you write an app in assembly?:confused: You aren't a mac fanboy, are you?
Opacity, the new Transparency.
No, I'm not a mcfan boy. ;) And no, I don't see any significant differece in these policies. The end result is the same - they're restricting the language and API that can be used, beyond restrictions that existed in earlier versions.
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
-
There's a huge difference between "we only support one language" and "all other languages are banned". It's the difference between "4.0" and the previous version. :laugh:
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
Dan Neely wrote:
There's a huge difference between "we only support one language" and "all other languages are banned".
Oh, really? :laugh: The end result is the same in both cases. The semantics of their statements may differ, but that's about all.
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
-
I wasn't the one vote and I apologize I read that as windows 7, not windows phone 7. Is it a technical issue or a legal restriction like Apple is enforcing?
Yesterday they said today was tomorrow but today they know better. - Poul Anderson
Probably they don’t want to support an SDK for C\C++. Wonder when this going to happen with the Desktop OS. X|
The narrow specialist in the broad sense of the word is a complete idiot in the narrow sense of the word. Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
-
Dan Neely wrote:
There's a huge difference between "we only support one language" and "all other languages are banned".
Oh, really? :laugh: The end result is the same in both cases. The semantics of their statements may differ, but that's about all.
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
No it's not. Under the prior version of the iPhone SDK licence you were allowed to use MonoTouch, etc, etc, etc to create iPhone apps; now you're not. It's like how MS only supports C#, VB, F#, C++ (debatably), any any other languages in visual studio for writing windows apps, but you can write an app in Python, Lua, Perl, etc as long as it can call the needed APIs.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
And Windows Phone 7 will only run apps written in C#. So should Ballmer stop it, too? [edit] So will the dumbass with the 1 vote provide evidence to the contrary? Admittedly, that would require a bit of intelligence, something you're probably seriously short of. [/edit]
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
modified on Monday, April 12, 2010 1:01 PM
First reports are that Windows Phone 7 is extremely unstable so it doesn't really matter what language you use. :) (BTW, to my horror, I tend to agree with Jobs, and Microsoft, on this up to a point. I see no problem with using third party libraries if they were certified and ultimately used only the required languages/system calls. As way of explanation: when an application breaks on the iPhone, the user doesn't blame the app writer, they blame Apple and they call Apple and all that costs reputation and money . While this won't stop applications from breaking, it will mitigate it somewhat and create an overall more stable platform.)
-
No it's not. Under the prior version of the iPhone SDK licence you were allowed to use MonoTouch, etc, etc, etc to create iPhone apps; now you're not. It's like how MS only supports C#, VB, F#, C++ (debatably), any any other languages in visual studio for writing windows apps, but you can write an app in Python, Lua, Perl, etc as long as it can call the needed APIs.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
And Windows Phone 7 will only run apps written in C#. So should Ballmer stop it, too? [edit] So will the dumbass with the 1 vote provide evidence to the contrary? Admittedly, that would require a bit of intelligence, something you're probably seriously short of. [/edit]
L u n a t i c F r i n g e
modified on Monday, April 12, 2010 1:01 PM
Only because of this part:
LunaticFringe wrote:
So will the dumbass with the 1 vote provide evidence to the contrary? Admittedly, that would require a bit of intelligence, something you're probably seriously short of.