Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Gun crime even in Britain [modified]

Gun crime even in Britain [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
htmlcomannouncementlounge
60 Posts 23 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C code_wiz

    http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20100603/tuk-police-may-never-know-motive-for-mas-dba1618.html[^] I can't believe this can happen in Britain. I have heard of mentally retarted twits like this in USA killing people at random for fun, but i cannot believe this can happen in Britain. There have never been random shooting rampage like this in the UK for a long time. Its a shame that this b*****d goes aroun dkilling people at random who are not connected to him in any way, just because he has had a family fued. I wonder if innocent people can even dare to walk in the streets in day light anymore. Such a non-sensical barbaric act.

    modified on Thursday, June 3, 2010 4:20 PM

    C Offline
    C Offline
    CaptainSeeSharp
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    Why don't you petition the government to ban guns?

    Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C code_wiz

      http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20100603/tuk-police-may-never-know-motive-for-mas-dba1618.html[^] I can't believe this can happen in Britain. I have heard of mentally retarted twits like this in USA killing people at random for fun, but i cannot believe this can happen in Britain. There have never been random shooting rampage like this in the UK for a long time. Its a shame that this b*****d goes aroun dkilling people at random who are not connected to him in any way, just because he has had a family fued. I wonder if innocent people can even dare to walk in the streets in day light anymore. Such a non-sensical barbaric act.

      modified on Thursday, June 3, 2010 4:20 PM

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      (The following is only partially tongue in cheek...) Hey, look at it this way - at least people in the US would be able to give accurate testimony regarding the weapon(s) used. Can't find the BBC story at the moment, but... one witness, widely quoted, described how the perp stalked his first victims around a taxi stand. The witness repeatedly described the weapon, which he saw up close, as a 'shotgun with a scope'. First, come on - a shotgun and a scope are kind of mutually exclusive concepts. The police said he had a .22 with a scope, and a shotgun. Anyone with the faintest knowledge of firearms would never mistake a .22 for a shotgun, especially when viewing the business end from up close. Admittedly, the witness was probably a little rattled, but still. A likely explanation is that the guy is only familiar with long guns in the context of skeet shooting clubs (that he would never belong to), so he had no idea what kind of weapon he was looking at and he called it the only type he was even vaguely familiar with. Now, an American would have been able to distinguish the guage or caliber of the weapon ... and a good American would have used his own large-caliber handgun to take the bastard down. I mean this guy drove around for how long (?) through rural areas, from town to town... while the radio broadcast warnings to all and sundry. Crowds were hiding in pubs... if that had been Wyoming, fucker would have had his head blown off within minutes of the alarm having been raised. ;P

      L u n a t i c F r i n g e

      modified on Thursday, June 3, 2010 8:23 PM

      R L 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • D Distind

        code_wiz wrote:

        I wonder if innocent people can even dare to walk in the streets in day light anymore.

        Check the odds of getting hit by something like this to the odds of dying in a car accident, or perhaps falling down your own stairs. It's a safe bet that someone like this won't find you, but you can lose even safe bets some of the time.

        R Offline
        R Offline
        RichardM1
        wrote on last edited by
        #21

        We don't agree often, but thanks for rationality.

        Opacity, the new Transparency.

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Q QuiJohn

          code_wiz wrote:

          I can't believe this can happen in Britain. I have heard of mentally retarted twits like this in USA killing people at random for fun, but i cannot believe this can happen in Britain.

          Here's a list you should maybe read.[^]


          He said, "Boy I'm just old and lonely, But thank you for your concern, Here's wishing you a Happy New Year." I wished him one back in return.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          RichardM1
          wrote on last edited by
          #22

          Interesting, it has the murder of Arabs by a Jewish guy under hate crimes, but none of the attacks against Jews by Arabs.

          Opacity, the new Transparency.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            (The following is only partially tongue in cheek...) Hey, look at it this way - at least people in the US would be able to give accurate testimony regarding the weapon(s) used. Can't find the BBC story at the moment, but... one witness, widely quoted, described how the perp stalked his first victims around a taxi stand. The witness repeatedly described the weapon, which he saw up close, as a 'shotgun with a scope'. First, come on - a shotgun and a scope are kind of mutually exclusive concepts. The police said he had a .22 with a scope, and a shotgun. Anyone with the faintest knowledge of firearms would never mistake a .22 for a shotgun, especially when viewing the business end from up close. Admittedly, the witness was probably a little rattled, but still. A likely explanation is that the guy is only familiar with long guns in the context of skeet shooting clubs (that he would never belong to), so he had no idea what kind of weapon he was looking at and he called it the only type he was even vaguely familiar with. Now, an American would have been able to distinguish the guage or caliber of the weapon ... and a good American would have used his own large-caliber handgun to take the bastard down. I mean this guy drove around for how long (?) through rural areas, from town to town... while the radio broadcast warnings to all and sundry. Crowds were hiding in pubs... if that had been Wyoming, fucker would have had his head blown off within minutes of the alarm having been raised. ;P

            L u n a t i c F r i n g e

            modified on Thursday, June 3, 2010 8:23 PM

            R Offline
            R Offline
            R Giskard Reventlov
            wrote on last edited by
            #23

            Guns are illegal here in the UK. The only people who have them are the police and the army. Of course criminals have them. And farmers, who are allowed. You can apply for a license but that is quite hard to get. I have never handled a real weapon whilst in the UK. What would be the point? The vast majority of people have no need of them, for any reason. The gunman, apparently, had a gun license for many years though I've not seen why he needed them.

            LunaticFringe wrote:

            if that had been Wyoming, f***er would have had his head blown off within minutes of the alarm having been raised.

            Really? Many people who carry guns have never actually had to use them. To draw your weapon and shoot at another person, never having done so before, even if directly threatened, is not most peoples first instinct unless you have been highly trained to do so.

            me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

            T S L 4 Replies Last reply
            0
            • R R Giskard Reventlov

              Guns are illegal here in the UK. The only people who have them are the police and the army. Of course criminals have them. And farmers, who are allowed. You can apply for a license but that is quite hard to get. I have never handled a real weapon whilst in the UK. What would be the point? The vast majority of people have no need of them, for any reason. The gunman, apparently, had a gun license for many years though I've not seen why he needed them.

              LunaticFringe wrote:

              if that had been Wyoming, f***er would have had his head blown off within minutes of the alarm having been raised.

              Really? Many people who carry guns have never actually had to use them. To draw your weapon and shoot at another person, never having done so before, even if directly threatened, is not most peoples first instinct unless you have been highly trained to do so.

              me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

              T Offline
              T Offline
              Tom Deketelaere
              wrote on last edited by
              #24

              digital man wrote:

              even if directly threatened

              I believe a person threatened is a very dangerous person and would most likely shoot (if he / she would hit anything that's another thing). Self preservation is one of men's primal instincts so... But never having been in a situation where I was threatened to the point of becoming dangerous and not owning a gun I can't really say what I would do.

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T Tom Deketelaere

                digital man wrote:

                even if directly threatened

                I believe a person threatened is a very dangerous person and would most likely shoot (if he / she would hit anything that's another thing). Self preservation is one of men's primal instincts so... But never having been in a situation where I was threatened to the point of becoming dangerous and not owning a gun I can't really say what I would do.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                R Giskard Reventlov
                wrote on last edited by
                #25

                Tom Deketelaere wrote:

                But never having been in a situation where I was threatened to the point of becoming dangerous and not owning a gun I can't really say what I would do.

                I think that is entirely the point. The vast majority of people, when threatened with violence, freeze and are incapable of doing anything further to protect themselves, regardless of how capable or well armed they are or they will attempt to flee. The instinct to stand and fight is, I would imagine, rare and proportionate to the perceived level of threat. e.g. I might stand and fight you if we are unarmed but I would probably try to run if you had a knife. I'd probably still run, if I could, even if I had a knife. A gun makes the argument moot: you can't outrun a bullet. On the other hand most people are pretty poor shots and couldn't hit a barn door from 20 feet, never mind aiming and firing at another person.

                me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C code_wiz

                  http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20100603/tuk-police-may-never-know-motive-for-mas-dba1618.html[^] I can't believe this can happen in Britain. I have heard of mentally retarted twits like this in USA killing people at random for fun, but i cannot believe this can happen in Britain. There have never been random shooting rampage like this in the UK for a long time. Its a shame that this b*****d goes aroun dkilling people at random who are not connected to him in any way, just because he has had a family fued. I wonder if innocent people can even dare to walk in the streets in day light anymore. Such a non-sensical barbaric act.

                  modified on Thursday, June 3, 2010 4:20 PM

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #26

                  code_wiz wrote:

                  There have never been random shooting rampage like this in the UK for a long time.

                  Hungerford. The dude in the school with the knife. There was another one just before that, but I forget where.

                  Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T thrakazog

                    I have a fair understanding of the kettle of crazy the rest of world believes America to be. My comment was more about how he didn't think anyone in darling old Britain could ever be batshit crazy. Those people are everywhere. And yes, the US does take the prize for heavily arming as many as possible... myself included :-D

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Simon_Whale
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #27

                    oh there are many people that you could label "fruit loops!" but rarely does it involve guns.

                    Marc Clifton wrote:

                    That has nothing to do with VB. - Oh crap. I just defended VB!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R R Giskard Reventlov

                      Guns are illegal here in the UK. The only people who have them are the police and the army. Of course criminals have them. And farmers, who are allowed. You can apply for a license but that is quite hard to get. I have never handled a real weapon whilst in the UK. What would be the point? The vast majority of people have no need of them, for any reason. The gunman, apparently, had a gun license for many years though I've not seen why he needed them.

                      LunaticFringe wrote:

                      if that had been Wyoming, f***er would have had his head blown off within minutes of the alarm having been raised.

                      Really? Many people who carry guns have never actually had to use them. To draw your weapon and shoot at another person, never having done so before, even if directly threatened, is not most peoples first instinct unless you have been highly trained to do so.

                      me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Simon_Whale
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #28

                      yes its known that the UK is one of the hardest places to get a gun licence you apply for one through the police. they then check the following 1. your want to have a licence for 2. your mental state and abuse of booze and drugs if they think your of sound mind and body then your home is then checked to see where and what your going to store the guns in, if thats ok then you get given a licence for 5 yrs. but after hungerford i believe anything that isn't for general farm use is to be kept at a gun club.

                      Marc Clifton wrote:

                      That has nothing to do with VB. - Oh crap. I just defended VB!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Q QuiJohn

                        code_wiz wrote:

                        I can't believe this can happen in Britain. I have heard of mentally retarted twits like this in USA killing people at random for fun, but i cannot believe this can happen in Britain.

                        Here's a list you should maybe read.[^]


                        He said, "Boy I'm just old and lonely, But thank you for your concern, Here's wishing you a Happy New Year." I wished him one back in return.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #29

                        16. Copeland, DavidDavid Copeland, 22 04.30 April 30 1999 London U.K. 3 79 79 O Sentenced to 6 concurrent life sentences 16. Stone, Michael, 32 03.16 March 16 1988 Belfast U.K. 3 68 68 F O Sentenced to 682 years Both killed the same number of people, yet the sentences were wildly different. Of course one is Irish, the other English...

                        Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                        L S 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • R R Giskard Reventlov

                          Guns are illegal here in the UK. The only people who have them are the police and the army. Of course criminals have them. And farmers, who are allowed. You can apply for a license but that is quite hard to get. I have never handled a real weapon whilst in the UK. What would be the point? The vast majority of people have no need of them, for any reason. The gunman, apparently, had a gun license for many years though I've not seen why he needed them.

                          LunaticFringe wrote:

                          if that had been Wyoming, f***er would have had his head blown off within minutes of the alarm having been raised.

                          Really? Many people who carry guns have never actually had to use them. To draw your weapon and shoot at another person, never having done so before, even if directly threatened, is not most peoples first instinct unless you have been highly trained to do so.

                          me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #30

                          digital man wrote:

                          The only people who have them are the police and the army. Of course criminals have them. And farmers,

                          And people who hunt, or shoot, or do target shooting, or just collect old guns (which dont need a permit), or schools which have cadet forces. So, in my time in the UK I have fired: Rifles: Lee Enfield MK1V .303 Remingtion .308 Martini Henry .22 Anschutz .22 Lee Enfield .22 Remington .22 Pistols: Remington 9mm Colt .36 Navy A .22 target pistol Shotguns: Winchester 12 gauge repeater Remington 12 gauge semi automatic Various 12 gauge side by sides and over unders And an 8 gauge goose gun (with rather nice Damascus twist barrles) .410 The school also had a Bren gun but I never fired it. My father in law (who is an avid hunter and gun dealer has an extraordinary selection of guns rifles and pistols, (even a Smith and Wesson .359) none of which I have ever used). During all this time I have never had a license for a weapon, nor have I ever owned one. SO you can see there are rather a lot knocking around the UK.

                          Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            16. Copeland, DavidDavid Copeland, 22 04.30 April 30 1999 London U.K. 3 79 79 O Sentenced to 6 concurrent life sentences 16. Stone, Michael, 32 03.16 March 16 1988 Belfast U.K. 3 68 68 F O Sentenced to 682 years Both killed the same number of people, yet the sentences were wildly different. Of course one is Irish, the other English...

                            Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #31

                            The difference is one was also a member of a terrorist organisation and one was a nutter acting alone. Also Stone was released in 2000 as part of the Good Friday Agreement with 670 years left to serve he must hold some sort of early release record.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              16. Copeland, DavidDavid Copeland, 22 04.30 April 30 1999 London U.K. 3 79 79 O Sentenced to 6 concurrent life sentences 16. Stone, Michael, 32 03.16 March 16 1988 Belfast U.K. 3 68 68 F O Sentenced to 682 years Both killed the same number of people, yet the sentences were wildly different. Of course one is Irish, the other English...

                              Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Simon_Whale
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #32

                              Micheal Stone was a terrorist Copeland was the nail bomber that targeted the blacks and gays

                              Marc Clifton wrote:

                              That has nothing to do with VB. - Oh crap. I just defended VB!

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                digital man wrote:

                                The only people who have them are the police and the army. Of course criminals have them. And farmers,

                                And people who hunt, or shoot, or do target shooting, or just collect old guns (which dont need a permit), or schools which have cadet forces. So, in my time in the UK I have fired: Rifles: Lee Enfield MK1V .303 Remingtion .308 Martini Henry .22 Anschutz .22 Lee Enfield .22 Remington .22 Pistols: Remington 9mm Colt .36 Navy A .22 target pistol Shotguns: Winchester 12 gauge repeater Remington 12 gauge semi automatic Various 12 gauge side by sides and over unders And an 8 gauge goose gun (with rather nice Damascus twist barrles) .410 The school also had a Bren gun but I never fired it. My father in law (who is an avid hunter and gun dealer has an extraordinary selection of guns rifles and pistols, (even a Smith and Wesson .359) none of which I have ever used). During all this time I have never had a license for a weapon, nor have I ever owned one. SO you can see there are rather a lot knocking around the UK.

                                Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                R Giskard Reventlov
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #33

                                fat_boy wrote:

                                And people who hunt, or shoot, or do target shooting, or just collect old guns (which dont need a permit), or schools which have cadet forces.

                                You are correct - just thought my list was already getting too long but worth you adding the others.

                                me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Simon_Whale

                                  Micheal Stone was a terrorist Copeland was the nail bomber that targeted the blacks and gays

                                  Marc Clifton wrote:

                                  That has nothing to do with VB. - Oh crap. I just defended VB!

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #34

                                  Simon_Whale wrote:

                                  Copeland was the nail bomber that targeted the blacks and gays

                                  Is that not terrorising blacks and gays then?

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Simon_Whale wrote:

                                    Copeland was the nail bomber that targeted the blacks and gays

                                    Is that not terrorising blacks and gays then?

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Simon_Whale
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #35

                                    techincally yes, but he was a lunatic acting alone, rather than being a member of a terrorist organisation.

                                    Marc Clifton wrote:

                                    That has nothing to do with VB. - Oh crap. I just defended VB!

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Simon_Whale

                                      techincally yes, but he was a lunatic acting alone, rather than being a member of a terrorist organisation.

                                      Marc Clifton wrote:

                                      That has nothing to do with VB. - Oh crap. I just defended VB!

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lost User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #36

                                      I was just about to point out that that was my point above and then I noticed we wrote them at about the same time so I'll let you off! ;)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R RichardM1

                                        We don't agree often, but thanks for rationality.

                                        Opacity, the new Transparency.

                                        D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        Distind
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #37

                                        It seems to happen more than either of us expect, just never politics.

                                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R R Giskard Reventlov

                                          fat_boy wrote:

                                          And people who hunt, or shoot, or do target shooting, or just collect old guns (which dont need a permit), or schools which have cadet forces.

                                          You are correct - just thought my list was already getting too long but worth you adding the others.

                                          me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #38

                                          Yeah, even though the UK is very restrictive. In France I have seen hunting rifles just hanging above the fireplace in peoles houses, and I believe in Belgium it is very easy to get guns of all sorts. (The son of the Vlams Belang guy who shot the Muslim woman with a shotgun in Antwerp a few years back had apparently just gone in and bought it.)

                                          Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups