Not sure what to think
-
Right but with some forms of fusion don't you need a boat load of energy to at least initiate the fusion? So the concern would be some sort of accident with the initial power source. Granted I don't really pretend to understand what this guy is claiming either so who knows.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
Jim Crafton wrote:
Right but with some forms of fusion don't you need a boat load of energy to at least initiate the fusion? So the concern would be some sort of accident with the initial power source.
So as long as the power source is say... the same as a utility power you are fine? Most of these systems merely take electricity. Whether powering lasers or other systems, you are simply powering the equipment. One of my friends in high school build a miniature nuclear accelerator, now that is a little more difficult, and a little more dangerous.... fusion? naw... about the only danger is drawing a little too much electricity than you can pay for. As long as he is paying his bills let him tinker. :) Most people don't know the difference between fission and fusion, or they think of fusion only as hydrogen to hydrogen fusion which does require lots of energy. What most of these guys are doing is trying to find fuel sources, usually hydrogen and some other element, that requires less energy to fuse, but still get enough energy out to make it effective. You aren't likely to get any extremely violent bursts of energy without getting a direct feed from Palo Verde, and I am not letting him touch mine. ;P In most cases these guys are dealing with the hope of getting say 10% more energy than they put in.... so put in a kilowatt and get out 1.1 kilowatt. And that is still only hope.
_________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....
-
Jim Crafton wrote:
Right but with some forms of fusion don't you need a boat load of energy to at least initiate the fusion? So the concern would be some sort of accident with the initial power source.
So as long as the power source is say... the same as a utility power you are fine? Most of these systems merely take electricity. Whether powering lasers or other systems, you are simply powering the equipment. One of my friends in high school build a miniature nuclear accelerator, now that is a little more difficult, and a little more dangerous.... fusion? naw... about the only danger is drawing a little too much electricity than you can pay for. As long as he is paying his bills let him tinker. :) Most people don't know the difference between fission and fusion, or they think of fusion only as hydrogen to hydrogen fusion which does require lots of energy. What most of these guys are doing is trying to find fuel sources, usually hydrogen and some other element, that requires less energy to fuse, but still get enough energy out to make it effective. You aren't likely to get any extremely violent bursts of energy without getting a direct feed from Palo Verde, and I am not letting him touch mine. ;P In most cases these guys are dealing with the hope of getting say 10% more energy than they put in.... so put in a kilowatt and get out 1.1 kilowatt. And that is still only hope.
_________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....
Anything over Q1 is good, although given the energy requirements for ancillary equipment, and large scale distribution and allowing for voltage drop, Q4 is the goal for a fusion reaction.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
-
A small reaction is common but has he looked at the engineering required to scale up? Interesting though.
Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]
Trollslayer wrote:
A small reaction is common but has he looked at the engineering required to scale up? Interesting though.
Most have. As mentioned in the article there are many tiny one or two man shops trying to find the holy grail of fusion. Since the big attempts at large scale systems have all been on hydrogen to hydrogen which requires so much energy in to get started, most of these small shops have focused on finding alternative fusion fuels that require less energy input but still get energy out. If you start looking at the chart of elements as a many to many relationship.... they have lots of combinations to try.
_________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....
-
Anything over Q1 is good, although given the energy requirements for ancillary equipment, and large scale distribution and allowing for voltage drop, Q4 is the goal for a fusion reaction.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
Dalek Dave wrote:
Anything over Q1 is good, although given the energy requirements for ancillary equipment, and large scale distribution and allowing for voltage drop, Q4 is the goal for a fusion reaction.
Right which is why all the large scale groups are focusing on the large scale production of hydrogen/hydrogen fusion. It has the most hope for gain. these small timers are trying to find the penny ante stuff at the bottom end, they aren't focused the same as the big efforts.
_________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
Anything over Q1 is good, although given the energy requirements for ancillary equipment, and large scale distribution and allowing for voltage drop, Q4 is the goal for a fusion reaction.
Right which is why all the large scale groups are focusing on the large scale production of hydrogen/hydrogen fusion. It has the most hope for gain. these small timers are trying to find the penny ante stuff at the bottom end, they aren't focused the same as the big efforts.
_________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....
Indeed, and it is the many little steps of the micro generators that will make up the leaps of the industrial scale reactors.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
-
Is this guy[^] brilliant or just a Darwin candidate in waiting? On the on handing, building a small fusion reactor has a serious cool factor, as well as bonus man points. On the other, doing this in Brooklyn, where a lot of people live, maybe not the best idea.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
I've done this experiment with nothing more than a bottle of Coke Cola. You just shake it up real good, pop the top and *WHOOSH!* fusion all over the place. :rolleyes:
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL -
I've done this experiment with nothing more than a bottle of Coke Cola. You just shake it up real good, pop the top and *WHOOSH!* fusion all over the place. :rolleyes:
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTLSurely that is a Fizzon reaction?
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
-
Trollslayer wrote:
A small reaction is common but has he looked at the engineering required to scale up? Interesting though.
Most have. As mentioned in the article there are many tiny one or two man shops trying to find the holy grail of fusion. Since the big attempts at large scale systems have all been on hydrogen to hydrogen which requires so much energy in to get started, most of these small shops have focused on finding alternative fusion fuels that require less energy input but still get energy out. If you start looking at the chart of elements as a many to many relationship.... they have lots of combinations to try.
_________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....
-
I've done this experiment with nothing more than a bottle of Coke Cola. You just shake it up real good, pop the top and *WHOOSH!* fusion all over the place. :rolleyes:
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTLDouglas Troy wrote:
You just shake it up real good, pop the top and *WHOOSH!* fusion all over the place.
It is much better with Mentos[^]!
_________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....
-
Indeed, and it is the many little steps of the micro generators that will make up the leaps of the industrial scale reactors.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
Dalek Dave wrote:
Indeed, and it is the many little steps of the micro generators that will make up the leaps of the industrial scale reactors.
That is one reason that I prefer to let these guys work on their stuff. You never know what they might find too. It is entirely possible you could build up through the micro fusion reactors to power the big guys. Or they might stumble across a really nice combination of fuels. As long as they don't use large quantities of flammables and expect them not to be ... energetic... when applied with a heating laser... :)
_________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....
-
Douglas Troy wrote:
You just shake it up real good, pop the top and *WHOOSH!* fusion all over the place.
It is much better with Mentos[^]!
_________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....
Gotta love those guys. There are some really great videos on YouTube of Mento/Coke experiments put to music. Diet Coke + Mentos[^] There's also the Coke Zero Rocket Car ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-hXcRtbj1Y[^]
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL -
Is this guy[^] brilliant or just a Darwin candidate in waiting? On the on handing, building a small fusion reactor has a serious cool factor, as well as bonus man points. On the other, doing this in Brooklyn, where a lot of people live, maybe not the best idea.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
-
Is this guy[^] brilliant or just a Darwin candidate in waiting? On the on handing, building a small fusion reactor has a serious cool factor, as well as bonus man points. On the other, doing this in Brooklyn, where a lot of people live, maybe not the best idea.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
Jim Crafton wrote:
Is this guy[^] brilliant or just a Darwin candidate in waiting? On the on handing, building a small fusion reactor has a serious cool factor, as well as bonus man points. On the other, doing this in Brooklyn, where a lot of people live, maybe not the best idea.
Jim, I could set up a local viewing of "Chain Reaction" for you and all your neighbors if you would like. It'll make you feel much better! :laugh: :laugh:
_________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....
-
Jim Crafton wrote:
Is this guy[^] brilliant or just a Darwin candidate in waiting? On the on handing, building a small fusion reactor has a serious cool factor, as well as bonus man points. On the other, doing this in Brooklyn, where a lot of people live, maybe not the best idea.
Jim, I could set up a local viewing of "Chain Reaction" for you and all your neighbors if you would like. It'll make you feel much better! :laugh: :laugh:
_________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....
Are you a Diana Ross fan then?
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
-
Are you a Diana Ross fan then?
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
Dalek Dave wrote:
Are you a Diana Ross fan then?
I didn't even know about that album... i had to google. Nope, worse.... Chain Reaction[^]
_________________________ John Andrew Holmes "It is well to remember that the entire universe, with one trifling exception, is composed of others." Shhhhh.... I am not really here. I am a figment of your imagination.... I am still in my cave so this must be an illusion....
-
All we need is plenty of helium III - a trip to the Moon anyone?
Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]
IIRC Helium3 fusion requires significantly more energy than tritium fusion; its advantage is that it produced very few neutrons. (The main chain is neutron free, at least one of the side chains can produce them.) H1 + B11 is the first completely anuetronic reaction; it only requires ~10x the energy of tritium. :sigh:
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
Is this guy[^] brilliant or just a Darwin candidate in waiting? On the on handing, building a small fusion reactor has a serious cool factor, as well as bonus man points. On the other, doing this in Brooklyn, where a lot of people live, maybe not the best idea.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
If I remember correctly from my physics lessons at school one of the fundamental laws of physics says that energy can neither be created or destroyed only converted from one form to another. Therefore, to get more energy out than was put in requires its efficieny to be greater than 100% as yet, totally unachievable.
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image. Stephen Hawking
-
IIRC Helium3 fusion requires significantly more energy than tritium fusion; its advantage is that it produced very few neutrons. (The main chain is neutron free, at least one of the side chains can produce them.) H1 + B11 is the first completely anuetronic reaction; it only requires ~10x the energy of tritium. :sigh:
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
Don't know why that got a down vote, it seemed ok to me. Did what I could do.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
-
If I remember correctly from my physics lessons at school one of the fundamental laws of physics says that energy can neither be created or destroyed only converted from one form to another. Therefore, to get more energy out than was put in requires its efficieny to be greater than 100% as yet, totally unachievable.
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image. Stephen Hawking
This is true, however this process converts matter to energy, and there is a lot of energy in matter. E=mc^2, so even a small amount of matter produces a lot of energy because c^2 is a truly massive number.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
-
Don't know why that got a down vote, it seemed ok to me. Did what I could do.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave