Did Julian Assange Rape These 2 Women
-
I believe the idea of not keeping the mans name from the press is that it allows any other victims to realise that he has been caught and encorages them to come forward. oh and the "women" movements do not feel that a man should be treated equal to a women
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
-
Couldnt agree more, and as the damage that can be done in a false accusation is such that I feel it should be anonymous
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
-
-
I agree entirely. I can recall at least one case recently of a serial accuser who had different men accused. While they were named, she has not been named.
I'm not a stalker, I just know things. Oh by the way, you're out of milk.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
-
Ever communicate much? So, twigman, Jeff and James were happy with government scripture ending discussion on guilt or innocence? Keep reading those quotes!
jumumu wrote:
Ever communicate much?
Not with you, so far you have made very little sense. But when you descend to the level of name-calling based on someone's username, I somehow doubt you have an intention of communicating. Indeed, it begs the question as to your ability to do it at all.
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
Either both parties should be anonymous, or both should be public, anything else is wrong.
Sounds fair to me, but that probably means we'll never see it happen.
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
-
I believe the idea of not keeping the mans name from the press is that it allows any other victims to realise that he has been caught and encorages them to come forward. oh and the "women" movements do not feel that a man should be treated equal to a women
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:
I believe the idea of not keeping the mans name from the press is that it allows any other victims to realise that he has been caught and encorages them to come forward.
I thought that, at least in the U.S. of A, a man was presumed innocent until proven guilty. You seem to be saying that the law has become that the accusation of rape (at least by a prosecutor) is tantamount to a finding of guilty - reminds me of the Red Queen: "Sentence first, then the trial!" (I am not saying you're wrong, by the way.)
Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:
oh and the "women" movements do not feel that a man should be treated equal to a women
Noticed that, have you? Amazing how often the concept of an equal playing field quickly becomes "let's give the advantage to the other side!"
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
-
Read a fairly full account of the charges here. Do you think Julian Assange raped these 2 women? I personally think he may have violated their trust (unless they're lying, in which case they violated his), but I wouldn't go so far as to call what he supposedly did rape. I don't think I read anywhere in there that either of them said "no" (though the accusation of him having sex with one of the girls while she was asleep may change that somewhat). And one more queston. Do any of you know of a similar case we could compare this to?
It seems unlikely that we will ever find out. The desire to see Wikileaks and Assange silenced is so important that any validity to these accusations is suspect. It's quite possible that Sweden will chose to allow the US to extridite extradite without trying the charges against him.
-
It seems unlikely that we will ever find out. The desire to see Wikileaks and Assange silenced is so important that any validity to these accusations is suspect. It's quite possible that Sweden will chose to allow the US to extridite extradite without trying the charges against him.
-
If the US had a case to extradite with they would do so now. Do the UK and US not have extradition treaties? Can't see Sweden being more of a pushover than the UK. Just the opposite.
-
4 people voted me a 1 because they disagreed with the idea that women should be respected, even if they claim to be raped by a hero of the progressives. But not one of those 4 had the guts to say anything. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
Either both parties should be anonymous, or both should be public, anything else is wrong.
Sounds fair to me, but that probably means we'll never see it happen.
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
Wow. Somebody really doesn't like you. Have a 5 to compensate.
I'm not a stalker, I just know things. Oh by the way, you're out of milk.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
-
Wow. Somebody really doesn't like you. Have a 5 to compensate.
I'm not a stalker, I just know things. Oh by the way, you're out of milk.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
Thanks Pete. There are folks who can disagree, even strongly, by voicing their convictions. And then there are the little bunnies who hide behind the voting mechanism. A 1 from them, I would venture to guess, is high praise, like 5 from a grown up; but I appreciate a grownup's 5, all the more.
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
-
And here's why: You think you can read the minds of 4 people you don't know and have never met. Not that knowing them or meeting them would make any difference. I hate to break it to you, but you can't read minds. Not even over the internet.
Majerus wrote:
I hate to break it to you
You'll be relieved to hear that I know that, but actually, most of the time, I was judging their actions. It is cowardly to hide behind 1's for instance. Whatever motives they use to justify their actions really is of very little interest to me. You're correct, I believe, when it comes to Trollslayer. But then again, in the years I have been around here, I have seen enough of her posts, and read enough of her blog, to have a pretty good grasp of her political persuasion. The reason I didn't turn voting on in Soap Box 1.0 is that I have found consistently that it cheapens debate, and allows the folks who cannot defend their convictions to think that they are the equals of those who, like you, can and do speak up. So, I hate to break it to you, but you can't read minds, either. ;)
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
-
Majerus wrote:
I hate to break it to you
You'll be relieved to hear that I know that, but actually, most of the time, I was judging their actions. It is cowardly to hide behind 1's for instance. Whatever motives they use to justify their actions really is of very little interest to me. You're correct, I believe, when it comes to Trollslayer. But then again, in the years I have been around here, I have seen enough of her posts, and read enough of her blog, to have a pretty good grasp of her political persuasion. The reason I didn't turn voting on in Soap Box 1.0 is that I have found consistently that it cheapens debate, and allows the folks who cannot defend their convictions to think that they are the equals of those who, like you, can and do speak up. So, I hate to break it to you, but you can't read minds, either. ;)
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
-
Thanks Pete. There are folks who can disagree, even strongly, by voicing their convictions. And then there are the little bunnies who hide behind the voting mechanism. A 1 from them, I would venture to guess, is high praise, like 5 from a grown up; but I appreciate a grownup's 5, all the more.
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
No probs. Glad to help.
I'm not a stalker, I just know things. Oh by the way, you're out of milk.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
-
Oakman wrote:
So, I hate to break it to you, but you can't read minds, either.
Unlike yourself, I haven't been pretending I could.
Majerus wrote:
Unlike yourself, I haven't been pretending I could.
How pray tell do you know I have been pretending to read minds? Did you, perhaps, tread my mind? Truly, I expected better from you.
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
-
Majerus wrote:
Unlike yourself, I haven't been pretending I could.
How pray tell do you know I have been pretending to read minds? Did you, perhaps, tread my mind? Truly, I expected better from you.
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
Oakman wrote:
Truly, I expected better from you.
C'mon... Now really... I had to look at this guys posting history to verify, but I'm convinced that you are being far, far too generous by expecting better from him.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
Majerus wrote:
Unlike yourself, I haven't been pretending I could.
How pray tell do you know I have been pretending to read minds? Did you, perhaps, tread my mind? Truly, I expected better from you.
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
-
Oakman wrote:
Truly, I expected better from you.
C'mon... Now really... I had to look at this guys posting history to verify, but I'm convinced that you are being far, far too generous by expecting better from him.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
Marcus Kramer wrote:
I had to look at this guys posting history to verify, but I'm convinced that you are being far, far too generous by expecting better from him.
ROFL. Ninety percent of my posts are unavailable to you since they are in a private forum. You are a fraud I am an idiot. Occasionally a paranoid idiot. Marcus, my sincere apologies for totally misunderstanding you. Mea Culpa, mea Culpa, mea maxima culpa!
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin
modified on Tuesday, December 21, 2010 1:13 PM