Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Did Julian Assange Rape These 2 Women

Did Julian Assange Rape These 2 Women

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
comquestion
56 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F fjdiewornncalwe

    Oakman wrote:

    Truly, I expected better from you.

    C'mon... Now really... I had to look at this guys posting history to verify, but I'm convinced that you are being far, far too generous by expecting better from him.

    I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #44

    Marcus Kramer wrote:

    I had to look at this guys posting history to verify, but I'm convinced that you are being far, far too generous by expecting better from him.

    ROFL. Ninety percent of my posts are unavailable to you since they are in a private forum. You are a fraud I am an idiot. Occasionally a paranoid idiot. Marcus, my sincere apologies for totally misunderstanding you. Mea Culpa, mea Culpa, mea maxima culpa!

    "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

    modified on Tuesday, December 21, 2010 1:13 PM

    F 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Majerus

      I expected nothing better from you and was not disappointed. In fact, I expected this exact response. I've had enough of this noise.

      O Offline
      O Offline
      Oakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #45

      Majerus wrote:

      I expected nothing better from you and was not disappointed. In fact, I expected this exact response.

      Wow, you must be a superb mind-reader! But I balanced the 1 someone gave you with a 5. I never vote 1's and you at least have the balls to speak up.

      "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • O Oakman

        Marcus Kramer wrote:

        I had to look at this guys posting history to verify, but I'm convinced that you are being far, far too generous by expecting better from him.

        ROFL. Ninety percent of my posts are unavailable to you since they are in a private forum. You are a fraud I am an idiot. Occasionally a paranoid idiot. Marcus, my sincere apologies for totally misunderstanding you. Mea Culpa, mea Culpa, mea maxima culpa!

        "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

        modified on Tuesday, December 21, 2010 1:13 PM

        F Offline
        F Offline
        fjdiewornncalwe
        wrote on last edited by
        #46

        I think an explanation is in order for your statement, don't you???

        I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

        O 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O Oakman

          Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

          I believe the idea of not keeping the mans name from the press is that it allows any other victims to realise that he has been caught and encorages them to come forward.

          I thought that, at least in the U.S. of A, a man was presumed innocent until proven guilty. You seem to be saying that the law has become that the accusation of rape (at least by a prosecutor) is tantamount to a finding of guilty - reminds me of the Red Queen: "Sentence first, then the trial!" (I am not saying you're wrong, by the way.)

          Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

          oh and the "women" movements do not feel that a man should be treated equal to a women

          Noticed that, have you? Amazing how often the concept of an equal playing field quickly becomes "let's give the advantage to the other side!"

          "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

          B Offline
          B Offline
          Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
          wrote on last edited by
          #47

          innocent untill proven guilty applies to countries that have thier laws based on the English, europe however base them on Germanic/Napolionic, this would mean adversarial where once you enter the court room you are not guilty or innocent it is upto each side to argue the case and the judge/jury decides which they believe(like the look of, feel sorry for etc etc) so the idea that he is innocent untill proven guilty is wrong as he choose a country that doesnt work that way.

          You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

          O 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

            innocent untill proven guilty applies to countries that have thier laws based on the English, europe however base them on Germanic/Napolionic, this would mean adversarial where once you enter the court room you are not guilty or innocent it is upto each side to argue the case and the judge/jury decides which they believe(like the look of, feel sorry for etc etc) so the idea that he is innocent untill proven guilty is wrong as he choose a country that doesnt work that way.

            You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #48

            I wonder if Europe will ever see the light? ;)

            "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F fjdiewornncalwe

              I think an explanation is in order for your statement, don't you???

              I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

              O Offline
              O Offline
              Oakman
              wrote on last edited by
              #49

              I founded Soap Box One as a place where people could have civil discourse - or semi-civil discourse, at least, and where trolls would be denied access. Had you actually looked up my posts, you would have discovered that you were denied access to them since entrance to SB1 is not permitted without approval. Had you even accessed my profile, you would have discovered I was the moderator of SB1 and not needed to ask this question. Your claim of looking at my posting record is an out-and-out lie, and you, sir, are a fraud. I am an idiot. Occasionally a paranoid idiot. Marcus, my sincere apologies for totally misunderstanding you. Mea Culpa, mea Culpa, mea maxima culpa!

              "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

              modified on Tuesday, December 21, 2010 1:13 PM

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • O Oakman

                I wonder if Europe will ever see the light? ;)

                "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

                B Offline
                B Offline
                Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                wrote on last edited by
                #50

                hey Napolean was a friend of your lot not ours, you adopted the drive on the wrong side so it highly possible that you may have adopted the legal system as well

                You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                O 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  I founded Soap Box One as a place where people could have civil discourse - or semi-civil discourse, at least, and where trolls would be denied access. Had you actually looked up my posts, you would have discovered that you were denied access to them since entrance to SB1 is not permitted without approval. Had you even accessed my profile, you would have discovered I was the moderator of SB1 and not needed to ask this question. Your claim of looking at my posting record is an out-and-out lie, and you, sir, are a fraud. I am an idiot. Occasionally a paranoid idiot. Marcus, my sincere apologies for totally misunderstanding you. Mea Culpa, mea Culpa, mea maxima culpa!

                  "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

                  modified on Tuesday, December 21, 2010 1:13 PM

                  B Offline
                  B Offline
                  Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #51

                  Am I missing something here? from the way I read these posts he seems to be refering to the other guys previous posts not yours. and that you were wrong to expect better from him. But then again I am full of cold and wanting to go home so it is possible I have it wrong

                  You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                    hey Napolean was a friend of your lot not ours, you adopted the drive on the wrong side so it highly possible that you may have adopted the legal system as well

                    You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Oakman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #52

                    Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                    hey Napolean was a friend of your lot not ours, you adopted the drive on the wrong side so it highly possible that you may have adopted the legal system as well

                    We drive our cars on the left; you drive your countries on the left. Perhaps we should both switch to see if it lessens the number of crashes?

                    "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Bergholt Stuttley Johnson

                      Am I missing something here? from the way I read these posts he seems to be refering to the other guys previous posts not yours. and that you were wrong to expect better from him. But then again I am full of cold and wanting to go home so it is possible I have it wrong

                      You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.

                      O Offline
                      O Offline
                      Oakman
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #53

                      Bergholt Stuttley Johnson wrote:

                      Am I missing something here?

                      Nope, I was. I am an idiot. Occasionally a paranoid idiot. Marcus, my sincere apologies for totally misunderstanding you. Mea Culpa, mea Culpa, mea maxima culpa!

                      "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F fjdiewornncalwe

                        Oakman wrote:

                        Truly, I expected better from you.

                        C'mon... Now really... I had to look at this guys posting history to verify, but I'm convinced that you are being far, far too generous by expecting better from him.

                        I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                        O Offline
                        O Offline
                        Oakman
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #54

                        Marcus, I am an idiot. Occasionally a paranoid idiot. I have so defined myself in every one of my misbegotten responses to you. :-O Marcus, my sincere apologies for totally misunderstanding you. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa!

                        "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

                        F 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • O Oakman

                          Marcus, I am an idiot. Occasionally a paranoid idiot. I have so defined myself in every one of my misbegotten responses to you. :-O Marcus, my sincere apologies for totally misunderstanding you. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa!

                          "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

                          F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fjdiewornncalwe
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #55

                          No worries, Oakman... Have a great Christmas. Your original response just confounded me a bit... Cheers.

                          I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                          O 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F fjdiewornncalwe

                            No worries, Oakman... Have a great Christmas. Your original response just confounded me a bit... Cheers.

                            I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

                            O Offline
                            O Offline
                            Oakman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #56

                            Marcus Kramer wrote:

                            No worries, Oakman... Have a great Christmas. Your original response just confounded me a bit... Cheers.

                            Thanks for your graciousness. Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year to you!

                            "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth. I have observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." ~ Benj Franklin

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups