Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Extra Extra, read all about it! NVidia unveils its first CPU for PCs

Extra Extra, read all about it! NVidia unveils its first CPU for PCs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questionphpcomhardware
23 Posts 11 Posters 5 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Mustafa Ismail Mustafa

    http://infoworld.com/d/hardware/nvidia-unveils-denver-its-first-cpu-pcs-746[^]

    If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Playing Star Craft II. Don't bother me, eh? Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]? Food[]

    C Offline
    C Offline
    Corporal Agarn
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    With the luck I have had installing NVidia drivers, this is scary! :sigh:

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Dalek Dave

      I do not foresee the end of them, economies of scale and all that, but ARM will become a major force. Nice to see a British company do well!

      ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC League Table Link CCC Link[^]

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rob Philpott
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      Quite - a simply brilliant company at that. As a big fan of Acorn it's a pitiful shame it got destroyed by the likes of IBM and Microsoft when it was so far ahead. At least it lives on in everyone's mobile phones.

      Regards, Rob Philpott.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Dave Parker

        "The downside is that software written for x86 chips will need to be tweaked before it can run on ARM systems." Tweaked or completely rewritten? Still it'd be good if it could run managed .NET code I guess.

        N Offline
        N Offline
        NormDroid
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        Dave Parker wrote:

        Tweaked or completely rewritten? Still it'd be good if it could run managed .NET code I guess.

        For .net it just mean a CLR being written against the ARM chip.

        Software Kinetics - Moving Software

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N NormDroid

          Dave Parker wrote:

          Tweaked or completely rewritten? Still it'd be good if it could run managed .NET code I guess.

          For .net it just mean a CLR being written against the ARM chip.

          Software Kinetics - Moving Software

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dan Neely
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          That's only true for apps not p/invoking 3rd party C/C++ libraries...

          3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

          N 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Dalek Dave

            Way to late with that gag, see above.

            ------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC League Table Link CCC Link[^]

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Maximilien
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            well. nobody can say the way I say it! :rolleyes:

            Watched code never compiles.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Mustafa Ismail Mustafa

              http://infoworld.com/d/hardware/nvidia-unveils-denver-its-first-cpu-pcs-746[^]

              If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Playing Star Craft II. Don't bother me, eh? Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]? Food[]

              T Offline
              T Offline
              The Cake of Deceit
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              x86 is an unstoppable juggernaut; every time to dethrone it has failed. The sheer amount of apps, OSes, backwards compatiblity, I don't see ARM becoming a de facto desktop CPU standard. Maybe if you port Windows (desktop Windows, CE is crap) it will be used.

              People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world. - Calvin (from Calvin and Hobbes)(The Indispensable Calvin and Hobbes, p105-3)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Dan Neely

                That's only true for apps not p/invoking 3rd party C/C++ libraries...

                3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                N Offline
                N Offline
                NormDroid
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                So you'd have to make ARM Windows OS fully compatible against the windows SDK, which it would implicitly would be because you'd be running windows :rolleyes:

                Software Kinetics - Moving Software

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N NormDroid

                  So you'd have to make ARM Windows OS fully compatible against the windows SDK, which it would implicitly would be because you'd be running windows :rolleyes:

                  Software Kinetics - Moving Software

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dan Neely
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  No. I was referring to native code binaries. If you don't have the code, you can't recompile it for arm; MS'd need to implement a virtual x86 to run them, and that isn't in the cards.

                  3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                  N 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Dan Neely

                    No. I was referring to native code binaries. If you don't have the code, you can't recompile it for arm; MS'd need to implement a virtual x86 to run them, and that isn't in the cards.

                    3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                    N Offline
                    N Offline
                    NormDroid
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    Dan Neely wrote:

                    ; MS'd need to implement a virtual x86 to run them,

                    Or some kind of WOW subsystem.

                    Software Kinetics - Moving Software

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N NormDroid

                      Dan Neely wrote:

                      ; MS'd need to implement a virtual x86 to run them,

                      Or some kind of WOW subsystem.

                      Software Kinetics - Moving Software

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Dan Neely
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      WOW only works because x64 CPUs can run 32 x86 code. ARM can't so they'd need a full blown emulator, and all pure software emulators of different architectures have on thing in common: performance is an epic fail.

                      3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups