Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. You are not paid to think...

You are not paid to think...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
designquestionlearning
33 Posts 22 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L leppie

    It really depends. I like developing rather than designing. For anyone to be productive they need to do one of the 2, but never both. That just leads to high unproductivity.

    ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    leppie wrote:

    For anyone to be productive they need to do one of the 2, but never both. That just leads to high unproductivity.

    That may be true for you. It doesn't mean it's true for all.

    “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” ~ H.L. Mencken

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jun Du

      One of our supervisors posted this at his cubicle (as a joke, of course). Seriously, are we or should we be paid to think in our daily work? By "think", I mean spending a lot of time in great details, something we call "over-design".

      Best, Jun

      R Offline
      R Offline
      RTS WORK
      wrote on last edited by
      #25

      Seems like more companies these days are hiring Business Analysts to think and Developers to code. I think the theory is that business analysts cost less and can relate to the business better than a developer. At my current and previous job developers have little or no contact with users and all issues are mitigated through a BA. Some of this may also have to do with the personality of the department managers. Does anyone else work with BAs and what role do they play in your organization?

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jun Du

        One of our supervisors posted this at his cubicle (as a joke, of course). Seriously, are we or should we be paid to think in our daily work? By "think", I mean spending a lot of time in great details, something we call "over-design".

        Best, Jun

        F Offline
        F Offline
        Fabio Franco
        wrote on last edited by
        #26

        It depends on your role of the company. If someone simply implements stuff that has already been designed by others, temptation to do it differently might kick in, but this person is not paid to "think" a better way to do stuff, he simply needs to do it. Unfortunatelly it's usually how it is. In past times I had really nasty fights with team leaders because I didn't agree the way something was beeing done, and I felt really mad to do stuff I knew wouldn't work. This fights looked bad for me, none of the times I convinced them to do it my way and when the time came to say "I told you so", my salary didn't rise and I didn't get a promotion. So thinking in my case was pointless and has done more harm than good to my career. A very good example is JSOP, that thinked and it didn't matter anyway, he still had to convert stuff from C# to VB, no matter how insane that sounded.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Single Step Debugger

          Do you imagine how smooth the flight will be with some 200 vibrating chairs onboard? Pilot: “T-t-t-t-tower, tower-r-r-r here is LZ-Z-Z-Z-700 we have a p-p-p-p-problem! All my tooth fillings just fell t-t-t-t-together with the left engine”.

          There is only one Ashley Judd and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Sterling Camden independent consultant
          wrote on last edited by
          #27

          Maybe not, if the phase differences can be properly managed to cancel out each others' effects.

          Contains coding, but not narcotic.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F fjdiewornncalwe

            I consider that I'm paid to get out customer requests based on deadlines and LOE's that I suggest. If I say a job will take 2 weeks, it is then my responsibility to get it out in that time. How much time to "think" depends on how much time I can convince the customer a project will take.

            I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

            E Offline
            E Offline
            Earl Truss
            wrote on last edited by
            #28

            I'm no good at word games and I hate acronymns. What's an LOE?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jun Du

              One of our supervisors posted this at his cubicle (as a joke, of course). Seriously, are we or should we be paid to think in our daily work? By "think", I mean spending a lot of time in great details, something we call "over-design".

              Best, Jun

              S Offline
              S Offline
              SeattleC
              wrote on last edited by
              #29

              Yes: you are paid to think. You are paid to think of the most efficient way to do things, regarding all factors including design time, delivered code quality, timliness to market, etc. Spending an extended time in contemplation is only to the point when the product of such contemplation is expected to be justified against all the constraints you are meant to consider. I mean, Duh!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R RTS WORK

                Seems like more companies these days are hiring Business Analysts to think and Developers to code. I think the theory is that business analysts cost less and can relate to the business better than a developer. At my current and previous job developers have little or no contact with users and all issues are mitigated through a BA. Some of this may also have to do with the personality of the department managers. Does anyone else work with BAs and what role do they play in your organization?

                S Offline
                S Offline
                SeattleC
                wrote on last edited by
                #30

                Yeah, that's the dark side of agile. It was scaring the crap out of the beer-drinking crowd back in the 90's when the geeks were suddenly sought-after employees and even desirable mates. Something Had To Be Done, and the Business Analyst was the answer. The BA stood between the geeks and the customer, so there was no way for the geeks to check to see if he knew his stuff or not. Then tighten up the schedule, and blame the developers if the product was unsuccessful in the market, or better yet, punish the devs further with late-night catch-up coding as requirements "changed". I mean honestly, do you really think an add/change/delete screen isn't a thing that can be spec'd out once and for all?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jun Du

                  One of our supervisors posted this at his cubicle (as a joke, of course). Seriously, are we or should we be paid to think in our daily work? By "think", I mean spending a lot of time in great details, something we call "over-design".

                  Best, Jun

                  F Offline
                  F Offline
                  Frank W Wu
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #31

                  "over-design" is Jun Du’s interpretation; not his manager’s. You have to ask your manager’s definition. And different manager will tell you different definition. This will force you think harder.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jun Du

                    One of our supervisors posted this at his cubicle (as a joke, of course). Seriously, are we or should we be paid to think in our daily work? By "think", I mean spending a lot of time in great details, something we call "over-design".

                    Best, Jun

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Steve Naidamast
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #32

                    Yes, let's not think and simply become machines... Who says SkyNet is dead!?!?

                    Steve Naidamast Black Falcon Software, Inc. blackfalconsoftware@ix.netcom.com

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Steve Naidamast

                      Yes, let's not think and simply become machines... Who says SkyNet is dead!?!?

                      Steve Naidamast Black Falcon Software, Inc. blackfalconsoftware@ix.netcom.com

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      GAMerritt
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #33

                      "Cogito Ergo Spam"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups