Anyone seen Human Centipede?
-
It's crap!
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.” I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus! When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.
Waste definitely.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
-
A bit off topic, but....
Peter Mulholland wrote:
Just reading in todays paper that the British Board of Film Classification has banned the sequel to 'The Human Centipede'.
I wasn't aware that there were any civilized democracies that still banned films; that's the sort of thing I would expect in a dicatorship or theocracy.
It hasn't banned it, it has been refused a classification - which is not quite the same thing. The reason being the sexual content, which they apparently fear would contravene the obscene publications act.
Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends.
-
A bit off topic, but....
Peter Mulholland wrote:
Just reading in todays paper that the British Board of Film Classification has banned the sequel to 'The Human Centipede'.
I wasn't aware that there were any civilized democracies that still banned films; that's the sort of thing I would expect in a dicatorship or theocracy.
The BBFC is a film board, not a government. It has nothing to do with democracy - all they have done is banned it because they, in part, feel that it breaches the Obscene Publications Act. In other words, they feel that failure to do so would fall foul of the law. This[^] is worth reading because it explains what the film is about, and why they have decided to ban it.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility
-
It hasn't banned it, it has been refused a classification - which is not quite the same thing. The reason being the sexual content, which they apparently fear would contravene the obscene publications act.
Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends.
ChrisElston wrote:
It hasn't banned it,
It has actually banned it. The film is believed to breach the Obscene Publications Act and therefore has no merit to be allowed distribution. If the producers can shos it is not in breach of the act then it will be distributable but un-classified.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
-
A bit off topic, but....
Peter Mulholland wrote:
Just reading in todays paper that the British Board of Film Classification has banned the sequel to 'The Human Centipede'.
I wasn't aware that there were any civilized democracies that still banned films; that's the sort of thing I would expect in a dicatorship or theocracy.
-
Peter Mulholland wrote:
Is this film worth watching or is it just gross filth?
It's a waste.
"Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forward." Kierkegaard, Søren
Mike Hankey wrote:
Peter Mulholland wrote:
Is this film worth watching or is it just gross filth?
It's a waste.
No, it's a waste-management system.
Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. My Mu[sic] My Films My Windows Programs, etc.
-
Just reading in todays paper that the British Board of Film Classification has banned the sequel to 'The Human Centipede'. Reading what the first film is about: Mad scientist grafts the mouths of captives to the bottoms of other captives to create a many legged entity that recycles bodily waste. Is this film worth watching or is it just gross filth? Is it scary? (I can't remember the last time a 'horror' film scared me)
Pete
Seen the first one and wasn't anything special really, just somewhat overhyped and pretty dull. Haven't seen the 2nd.
-
It's not so much censorship [tries to muffle giggles] but the ratting of the material. The BBFC rarely refuses a release license, but this is for public release. In about 3 1/2 seconds it will be available on a torrent to download.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
Nagy Vilmos wrote:
In about 3 1/2 seconds it will be available on a torrent to download.
Exactly, all I bet this will do is lead to more people watching it than otherwise would, just to see what all the fuss is about.
-
It's crap!
Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.” I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus! When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.
-
It hasn't banned it, it has been refused a classification - which is not quite the same thing. The reason being the sexual content, which they apparently fear would contravene the obscene publications act.
Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends.
ChrisElston wrote:
It hasn't banned it, it has been refused a classification - which is not quite the same thing.
Ah, ok. While the US has a rating system, movie producers can decline to have a movie rated. Most chains have a policy against showing movies that are unrated or which have a rating of NC-17 (Not for Children) which makes for an effective ban, but the movie can still be shown publicly. Much more common is for a movie to get a NC-17 rating, be reedited, then get the less restrictive R rating.
-
ChrisElston wrote:
It hasn't banned it,
It has actually banned it. The film is believed to breach the Obscene Publications Act and therefore has no merit to be allowed distribution. If the producers can shos it is not in breach of the act then it will be distributable but un-classified.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
The film hasn't been banned, its been denied classification and the board refused to consider reclassification, no matter what edits were made; "There is little attempt to portray any of the victims in the film as anything other than objects to be brutalised, degraded and mutilated for the amusement and arousal of the central character, as well as for the pleasure of the audience." I am being a little pedantic as the decision effectively means the film is banned as it cannot be distributed or legally supplied anywhere in the UK but technically the BBFC cannot impose a 'ban' per se.
Rhys "I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees"
-
Just reading in todays paper that the British Board of Film Classification has banned the sequel to 'The Human Centipede'. Reading what the first film is about: Mad scientist grafts the mouths of captives to the bottoms of other captives to create a many legged entity that recycles bodily waste. Is this film worth watching or is it just gross filth? Is it scary? (I can't remember the last time a 'horror' film scared me)
Pete
-
Just reading in todays paper that the British Board of Film Classification has banned the sequel to 'The Human Centipede'. Reading what the first film is about: Mad scientist grafts the mouths of captives to the bottoms of other captives to create a many legged entity that recycles bodily waste. Is this film worth watching or is it just gross filth? Is it scary? (I can't remember the last time a 'horror' film scared me)
Pete
It pops up on SyFy from time to time, which right there tells you all you need to know. Having heard about it but not bothered watching it, I watched some of it when I noticed it was on SyFy. Not worth the time. Basically it's a movie that relies on a shocking premise to generate column inches. It didn't do anything for me as a movie. But then, you're talking to the wrong guy. I'm generally not a fan of that kind of stuff. If you're into Gorenography, maybe you might get something from it. Like I always say, it's better to watch a great film twice than a crap film once. Grab a DVD off the shelf, and forget this one. -Richard
Hit any user to continue.
-
Just reading in todays paper that the British Board of Film Classification has banned the sequel to 'The Human Centipede'. Reading what the first film is about: Mad scientist grafts the mouths of captives to the bottoms of other captives to create a many legged entity that recycles bodily waste. Is this film worth watching or is it just gross filth? Is it scary? (I can't remember the last time a 'horror' film scared me)
Pete
If it's fiction, I don't ever see the need to "not classify," which essentially is banning the distribution of the film. Reading the story: It is the Board’s conclusion that the explicit presentation of the central character’s obsessive sexually violent fantasies is in breach of its Classification Guidelines and poses a real, as opposed to a fanciful, risk that harm is likely to be caused to potential viewers. Ah, protecting the public from themselves I see.
Craigslist Troll: litaly@comcast.net "I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
-
If it's fiction, I don't ever see the need to "not classify," which essentially is banning the distribution of the film. Reading the story: It is the Board’s conclusion that the explicit presentation of the central character’s obsessive sexually violent fantasies is in breach of its Classification Guidelines and poses a real, as opposed to a fanciful, risk that harm is likely to be caused to potential viewers. Ah, protecting the public from themselves I see.
Craigslist Troll: litaly@comcast.net "I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
Hey, you could end up with hospitals inundated with guys with sandpaper burns in places they shouldn't have if the film ever got out. :laugh: I'm not sure Pete's link to the BBFC ealier passes the KSS rule. Jus treading about what's in the film doesn't seem KSS.
Pete
-
Mike Hankey wrote:
Peter Mulholland wrote:
Is this film worth watching or is it just gross filth?
It's a waste.
No, it's a waste-management system.
Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. My Mu[sic] My Films My Windows Programs, etc.
You're the first one to catch the pun. :thumbsup:
"Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forward." Kierkegaard, Søren
-
Hey, you could end up with hospitals inundated with guys with sandpaper burns in places they shouldn't have if the film ever got out. :laugh: I'm not sure Pete's link to the BBFC ealier passes the KSS rule. Jus treading about what's in the film doesn't seem KSS.
Pete
Peter Mulholland wrote:
Hey, you could end up with hospitals inundated with guys with sandpaper burns in places they shouldn't have if the film ever got out. :laugh:
Perfect example of Darwinism!
Craigslist Troll: litaly@comcast.net "I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson
-
Just reading in todays paper that the British Board of Film Classification has banned the sequel to 'The Human Centipede'. Reading what the first film is about: Mad scientist grafts the mouths of captives to the bottoms of other captives to create a many legged entity that recycles bodily waste. Is this film worth watching or is it just gross filth? Is it scary? (I can't remember the last time a 'horror' film scared me)
Pete
Better watch South Park's Episode on the same thing, much more hilarious.
-
Just reading in todays paper that the British Board of Film Classification has banned the sequel to 'The Human Centipede'. Reading what the first film is about: Mad scientist grafts the mouths of captives to the bottoms of other captives to create a many legged entity that recycles bodily waste. Is this film worth watching or is it just gross filth? Is it scary? (I can't remember the last time a 'horror' film scared me)
Pete
Peter Mulholland wrote:
I can't remember the last time a 'horror' film scared me
The scariest movie I have ever seen is The Indian in the Cupboard. When the rat jumped out from the floorboards, I nearly had a heart attack (though, I was about 10 at the time).
-
It did make me laugh how they changed it from Sci-Fi channel to the SyFy channel.... I can only assume people were mispronouncing it as the 'Scivvy' channel.
Apparently it was due to copyright claims :doh:
See if you can crack this: b749f6c269a746243debc6488046e33f
So far, no one seems to have cracked this!The unofficial awesome history of Code Project's Bob! "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."
