Variable Names
-
dexterama wrote:
Wayne_Gretsky
Probably a variable that could stick handle. See Wayne Gretzky[^]. :)
Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
It is hard replying to the correct message. :-D
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
-
After 10 years of experience I've a tendency to fully spell out variable names in my code and in field names in my databases. I used to shorten things but I found over time that abbreviated names have a tendency to be very inconsistent from class to class or database to database. I'm getting too old to remember clever naming conventions. For example, in a production database that I'm currently slogging through (designed by someone else) the word OBJECT in some field names is OBJECT, while in others it's OBJ much like this: FIN_OBJ_CODE, OBJECT_CD_NM. As you can see, CODE also changes from CODE to CD depending upon the field. For a field that holds 'object code name' you could have: OBJ_CD_NM OBJECT_CD_NM OBJECT_CODE_NM OBJECT_CODE_NAME OBJ_CODE_NM OBJ_CODE_NAME OBJ_CD_NAME WTF_I_FORGOT_TEH_NAME By the time you spread that nonsense through parameters, objects, object properties, fields and so forth one might end up with a dozen or more names for the exact same field. objCodeName _OBJECT_CODE_NAME ObjectCodeName _strObjectCodeName @INeedANewJob NameObjectCode It may get a wee bit tedious that times but now I just spell out the entire name of the field whether I'm naming a table, field, property, parameter or whatever. In the long run I find it less confusing. In the example above, everything is ObjectCodeName. Does anyone else do this or is it just us early onset Alzhemier's victims?
I generally like descriptive names, one developer that I worked with use to abbreviate them so much it was more of a decipher his variable names before you could work out his code.
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
whatTheFrickAmIDoingNestingLoopsThisDeep
Shouldn't it be whatTheElephantAmIDoingNestingLoopsThisDeep?
No, my coding standards specifically ban swear words.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
-
I generally like descriptive names, one developer that I worked with use to abbreviate them so much it was more of a decipher his variable names before you could work out his code.
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
...that comes with methods longer than 400 lines. And then one tries to remember what that abbreviation was and looses it X|
regards Torsten When I'm not working
-
...that comes with methods longer than 400 lines. And then one tries to remember what that abbreviation was and looses it X|
regards Torsten When I'm not working
it normally takes me a day and a notepad to work it out oh and a large supply of :java:
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
-
After 10 years of experience I've a tendency to fully spell out variable names in my code and in field names in my databases. I used to shorten things but I found over time that abbreviated names have a tendency to be very inconsistent from class to class or database to database. I'm getting too old to remember clever naming conventions. For example, in a production database that I'm currently slogging through (designed by someone else) the word OBJECT in some field names is OBJECT, while in others it's OBJ much like this: FIN_OBJ_CODE, OBJECT_CD_NM. As you can see, CODE also changes from CODE to CD depending upon the field. For a field that holds 'object code name' you could have: OBJ_CD_NM OBJECT_CD_NM OBJECT_CODE_NM OBJECT_CODE_NAME OBJ_CODE_NM OBJ_CODE_NAME OBJ_CD_NAME WTF_I_FORGOT_TEH_NAME By the time you spread that nonsense through parameters, objects, object properties, fields and so forth one might end up with a dozen or more names for the exact same field. objCodeName _OBJECT_CODE_NAME ObjectCodeName _strObjectCodeName @INeedANewJob NameObjectCode It may get a wee bit tedious that times but now I just spell out the entire name of the field whether I'm naming a table, field, property, parameter or whatever. In the long run I find it less confusing. In the example above, everything is ObjectCodeName. Does anyone else do this or is it just us early onset Alzhemier's victims?
My favorite variable names are:
$_
$#
$^W
@ARGVThe full list can be found here: http://affy.blogspot.com/p5be/ch12.htm[^]
-
After 10 years of experience I've a tendency to fully spell out variable names in my code and in field names in my databases. I used to shorten things but I found over time that abbreviated names have a tendency to be very inconsistent from class to class or database to database. I'm getting too old to remember clever naming conventions. For example, in a production database that I'm currently slogging through (designed by someone else) the word OBJECT in some field names is OBJECT, while in others it's OBJ much like this: FIN_OBJ_CODE, OBJECT_CD_NM. As you can see, CODE also changes from CODE to CD depending upon the field. For a field that holds 'object code name' you could have: OBJ_CD_NM OBJECT_CD_NM OBJECT_CODE_NM OBJECT_CODE_NAME OBJ_CODE_NM OBJ_CODE_NAME OBJ_CD_NAME WTF_I_FORGOT_TEH_NAME By the time you spread that nonsense through parameters, objects, object properties, fields and so forth one might end up with a dozen or more names for the exact same field. objCodeName _OBJECT_CODE_NAME ObjectCodeName _strObjectCodeName @INeedANewJob NameObjectCode It may get a wee bit tedious that times but now I just spell out the entire name of the field whether I'm naming a table, field, property, parameter or whatever. In the long run I find it less confusing. In the example above, everything is ObjectCodeName. Does anyone else do this or is it just us early onset Alzhemier's victims?
public class MehGerbilToldMeToEvenThoughItFeelsWrong_Record
{
public string MehGerbilWouldBeProudOtherwiseIWouldntDoThis_RecordID { get; set; }
public void ImStartingToThinkIMightHaveAProblem();
} -
After 10 years of experience I've a tendency to fully spell out variable names in my code and in field names in my databases. I used to shorten things but I found over time that abbreviated names have a tendency to be very inconsistent from class to class or database to database. I'm getting too old to remember clever naming conventions. For example, in a production database that I'm currently slogging through (designed by someone else) the word OBJECT in some field names is OBJECT, while in others it's OBJ much like this: FIN_OBJ_CODE, OBJECT_CD_NM. As you can see, CODE also changes from CODE to CD depending upon the field. For a field that holds 'object code name' you could have: OBJ_CD_NM OBJECT_CD_NM OBJECT_CODE_NM OBJECT_CODE_NAME OBJ_CODE_NM OBJ_CODE_NAME OBJ_CD_NAME WTF_I_FORGOT_TEH_NAME By the time you spread that nonsense through parameters, objects, object properties, fields and so forth one might end up with a dozen or more names for the exact same field. objCodeName _OBJECT_CODE_NAME ObjectCodeName _strObjectCodeName @INeedANewJob NameObjectCode It may get a wee bit tedious that times but now I just spell out the entire name of the field whether I'm naming a table, field, property, parameter or whatever. In the long run I find it less confusing. In the example above, everything is ObjectCodeName. Does anyone else do this or is it just us early onset Alzhemier's victims?
I agree 100% But I also try to find names that are as short as possible, but accurate and descriptive. I also hate underscores, I much prefer camelCasing and PascalCasing. I use camelCasing for private names & local variables, and PascalCasing for public and class names.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
My favorite variable names are:
$_
$#
$^W
@ARGVThe full list can be found here: http://affy.blogspot.com/p5be/ch12.htm[^]
ah, perl, a synonym for "line noise".
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun -
After 10 years of experience I've a tendency to fully spell out variable names in my code and in field names in my databases. I used to shorten things but I found over time that abbreviated names have a tendency to be very inconsistent from class to class or database to database. I'm getting too old to remember clever naming conventions. For example, in a production database that I'm currently slogging through (designed by someone else) the word OBJECT in some field names is OBJECT, while in others it's OBJ much like this: FIN_OBJ_CODE, OBJECT_CD_NM. As you can see, CODE also changes from CODE to CD depending upon the field. For a field that holds 'object code name' you could have: OBJ_CD_NM OBJECT_CD_NM OBJECT_CODE_NM OBJECT_CODE_NAME OBJ_CODE_NM OBJ_CODE_NAME OBJ_CD_NAME WTF_I_FORGOT_TEH_NAME By the time you spread that nonsense through parameters, objects, object properties, fields and so forth one might end up with a dozen or more names for the exact same field. objCodeName _OBJECT_CODE_NAME ObjectCodeName _strObjectCodeName @INeedANewJob NameObjectCode It may get a wee bit tedious that times but now I just spell out the entire name of the field whether I'm naming a table, field, property, parameter or whatever. In the long run I find it less confusing. In the example above, everything is ObjectCodeName. Does anyone else do this or is it just us early onset Alzhemier's victims?
I usually use GUIDs for a variable names – secure and consistent.
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
-
I usually use GUIDs for a variable names – secure and consistent.
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
And easy to remember for any real geek :)
-
After 10 years of experience I've a tendency to fully spell out variable names in my code and in field names in my databases. I used to shorten things but I found over time that abbreviated names have a tendency to be very inconsistent from class to class or database to database. I'm getting too old to remember clever naming conventions. For example, in a production database that I'm currently slogging through (designed by someone else) the word OBJECT in some field names is OBJECT, while in others it's OBJ much like this: FIN_OBJ_CODE, OBJECT_CD_NM. As you can see, CODE also changes from CODE to CD depending upon the field. For a field that holds 'object code name' you could have: OBJ_CD_NM OBJECT_CD_NM OBJECT_CODE_NM OBJECT_CODE_NAME OBJ_CODE_NM OBJ_CODE_NAME OBJ_CD_NAME WTF_I_FORGOT_TEH_NAME By the time you spread that nonsense through parameters, objects, object properties, fields and so forth one might end up with a dozen or more names for the exact same field. objCodeName _OBJECT_CODE_NAME ObjectCodeName _strObjectCodeName @INeedANewJob NameObjectCode It may get a wee bit tedious that times but now I just spell out the entire name of the field whether I'm naming a table, field, property, parameter or whatever. In the long run I find it less confusing. In the example above, everything is ObjectCodeName. Does anyone else do this or is it just us early onset Alzhemier's victims?
I do that as well. I tend to use complete words in most of my names. The only ones that get abbreviated tend to be
forloop index variables:PHiinstead of 'printhead index', for example.Software Zen:
delete this; -
for ( int i=0; i<10; i++)
{
for ( int eye=0; eye<10; eye++)
{
for (int aye=0; aye<10; aye++ )
{
}
}
}for ( int i=0; i<10; i++)
{
for ( int eye=0; eye<10; eye++)
{
for (int aye=0; aye<10; aye++ )
{
for (int aargh=0; aargh<10; aargh++ )
{
}
}
}
}Sorry, couldn't resist
Light moves faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright, until you hear them speak. List of common misconceptions
-
"Object" smells of Hungarian notation and elderberries. ;P I'm on a crusade at my workplace to stamp out Hungarian, so I'm just particularly sensitive to those sorts of things. Anyway, Hungarian aside, I use full and complete names. Pascal case or camel case depending on context. The only abbreviation I use is "Id".
-
I usually use GUIDs for a variable names – secure and consistent.
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
-
I seem to remember using a version of Basic (TRS-80?) where i and j were predeclared integers and x, y floats?? Or maybe I was dreaming...
-
I once used Hungarian notation in a project and another developer looked at it, rolled his eyes, and then sighed 'oh, Hungarian notation'. He was one of those self-aggrandizaing pricks who looked down on everyone else. He eventually went off and got a job at a prestigious company earning twice what I make. I hate that guy. :-D
MehGerbil wrote:
earning twice what I make.
Because the code fairies saw no reason to punish him because he did not use hungarian notation. It's like an OSS project I worked on - the hungarian notation for a class was 'x' followed by a capital letter (which is two extra keystrokes). Pretty-much everything was a class and therefore 'x' was used for pretty-much any variable. It added absolutely no value to the quality of the code because everything was just 'x'. New developers would think that we just added them in front of everything so they didn't ever use the usual 'i', 'd', 'f', 'h' etc. It was completely wrong in the first place because a 'reference type' (class) should be an 'h' because it's a pointer. I only have a limited amount of keystrokes available in my life and I quickly decided to expend them on other things. Some nights I dream about each dying kitten as a developer uses hungarian notation. I don't think the code fairies will ever forgive me: the dreams won't stop.
He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Chineese Proverb] Jonathan C Dickinson (C# Software Engineer)
-
Not at all. Fortran had pre-declared integer and float variables.
Wagham I'm just too old to really give a damn!!
-
"x" and "y" are perfectly valid variables: particularly when you are talking about co-ordinates:
foreach (Control c in Controls)
{
c.Location = new Point(x, y);
x += horizontalSpacing;
y += verticalSpacing;
}Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
*ONLY when you are talking about co-ordinates. Fixed that for you.
