Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Random Thoughts on Time Travel

Random Thoughts on Time Travel

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpdiscussionlounge
47 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Dalek Dave

    Becasue the TARDIS travels through the vortex, where time and space are one! And of course for what TARDIS stands for; Time And Relative Dimensions In Space. As one moves through one, one moves through the other. Then of course you have to remember that you are already moving through time. You are travelling forward in time at one second per second, and yet also moving through space at the same time. You are locked onto a multidimensional framework, and movement through space is movement through time also. (This is proven by flying atomic clocks around the world and noting the differences, or by the fact that the geostaionary GPS satellites are constantly being updated to cancel out the relativity) So if movement through space is a movement through time, then it follows that movement through time necessitates a movement through space. Therefore ones position in the space-time continuum is constistant regardless of how far into future or past.

    --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live

    K Offline
    K Offline
    Karl Sanford
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Good point. However, if you were still to travel through time, thereby manipulating space, you would be moving at a different 'speed' than your current location on the earth. Wouldn't this still mean that you would not end up in the same 'place'?

    Be The Noise

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Karl Sanford

      Good point. However, if you were still to travel through time, thereby manipulating space, you would be moving at a different 'speed' than your current location on the earth. Wouldn't this still mean that you would not end up in the same 'place'?

      Be The Noise

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Dalek Dave
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      No, because you would 'tied' to that particular point in space, and that space would be moving with you. Simple extrapolation of Special Relativity.

      --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live

      K E 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • K Karl Sanford

        So I've been watching a certain TV show that has recently (recently to me, the show has been over for a while now) delved into the topic of time travel. In this time travel scenario, a group of people are forced through time (forward and backward) but they always end up in the same geographical location when they do so. This made me think about other shows and movies that deal with time travel as well, and most of them have the same concept of time travel. However, this got me thinking about time and space. The earth is constantly spinning and orbiting the sun (69K MPH), the sun is moving through the galaxy and orbiting the galactic center (505K MPH), and the galaxy is moving through the universe (1,339K MPH). So if I were to move forward through time by 5 minutes, and end up occupying the exact same space as I had before I moved through time, the earth would be about 160K miles away from me (not even accounting for universal expansion). So to create an effective time machine (absurdity and feasibility aside), it couldn't purely move through time, it would have to travel through time AND space simultaneously. Thank goodness the good Dr. has already figured this out with his TARDIS, which is the only show I can think of that even begins to address this issue.

        Be The Noise

        C Offline
        C Offline
        CPallini
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Time travel does exist[^]. :)

        Veni, vidi, vici.

        D L 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • K Karl Sanford

          So I've been watching a certain TV show that has recently (recently to me, the show has been over for a while now) delved into the topic of time travel. In this time travel scenario, a group of people are forced through time (forward and backward) but they always end up in the same geographical location when they do so. This made me think about other shows and movies that deal with time travel as well, and most of them have the same concept of time travel. However, this got me thinking about time and space. The earth is constantly spinning and orbiting the sun (69K MPH), the sun is moving through the galaxy and orbiting the galactic center (505K MPH), and the galaxy is moving through the universe (1,339K MPH). So if I were to move forward through time by 5 minutes, and end up occupying the exact same space as I had before I moved through time, the earth would be about 160K miles away from me (not even accounting for universal expansion). So to create an effective time machine (absurdity and feasibility aside), it couldn't purely move through time, it would have to travel through time AND space simultaneously. Thank goodness the good Dr. has already figured this out with his TARDIS, which is the only show I can think of that even begins to address this issue.

          Be The Noise

          R Offline
          R Offline
          R Giskard Reventlov
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Look, we already talked about this tomorrow.

          "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

          V 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C CPallini

            Time travel does exist[^]. :)

            Veni, vidi, vici.

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Dalek Dave
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            General relativity proves it.

            --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Karl Sanford

              So I've been watching a certain TV show that has recently (recently to me, the show has been over for a while now) delved into the topic of time travel. In this time travel scenario, a group of people are forced through time (forward and backward) but they always end up in the same geographical location when they do so. This made me think about other shows and movies that deal with time travel as well, and most of them have the same concept of time travel. However, this got me thinking about time and space. The earth is constantly spinning and orbiting the sun (69K MPH), the sun is moving through the galaxy and orbiting the galactic center (505K MPH), and the galaxy is moving through the universe (1,339K MPH). So if I were to move forward through time by 5 minutes, and end up occupying the exact same space as I had before I moved through time, the earth would be about 160K miles away from me (not even accounting for universal expansion). So to create an effective time machine (absurdity and feasibility aside), it couldn't purely move through time, it would have to travel through time AND space simultaneously. Thank goodness the good Dr. has already figured this out with his TARDIS, which is the only show I can think of that even begins to address this issue.

              Be The Noise

              P Offline
              P Offline
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              Indeed. Other things to consider if you travel through time are inertia and orientation -- you may slam into a wall (at great velocity) or wind up on your head (before you slam into a wall). One must travel through time well away from all other bodies.

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P PIEBALDconsult

                Indeed. Other things to consider if you travel through time are inertia and orientation -- you may slam into a wall (at great velocity) or wind up on your head (before you slam into a wall). One must travel through time well away from all other bodies.

                D Offline
                D Offline
                Dalek Dave
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                One could argue the Pauli Exclusion Principle would not let that happen.

                --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Karl Sanford

                  So I've been watching a certain TV show that has recently (recently to me, the show has been over for a while now) delved into the topic of time travel. In this time travel scenario, a group of people are forced through time (forward and backward) but they always end up in the same geographical location when they do so. This made me think about other shows and movies that deal with time travel as well, and most of them have the same concept of time travel. However, this got me thinking about time and space. The earth is constantly spinning and orbiting the sun (69K MPH), the sun is moving through the galaxy and orbiting the galactic center (505K MPH), and the galaxy is moving through the universe (1,339K MPH). So if I were to move forward through time by 5 minutes, and end up occupying the exact same space as I had before I moved through time, the earth would be about 160K miles away from me (not even accounting for universal expansion). So to create an effective time machine (absurdity and feasibility aside), it couldn't purely move through time, it would have to travel through time AND space simultaneously. Thank goodness the good Dr. has already figured this out with his TARDIS, which is the only show I can think of that even begins to address this issue.

                  Be The Noise

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  Kschuler
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  So that's what the flux capacitor does.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C CPallini

                    Time travel does exist[^]. :)

                    Veni, vidi, vici.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    lewax00
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Of course it does. I time travel at exactly 1 second per second everyday.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K Karl Sanford

                      So I've been watching a certain TV show that has recently (recently to me, the show has been over for a while now) delved into the topic of time travel. In this time travel scenario, a group of people are forced through time (forward and backward) but they always end up in the same geographical location when they do so. This made me think about other shows and movies that deal with time travel as well, and most of them have the same concept of time travel. However, this got me thinking about time and space. The earth is constantly spinning and orbiting the sun (69K MPH), the sun is moving through the galaxy and orbiting the galactic center (505K MPH), and the galaxy is moving through the universe (1,339K MPH). So if I were to move forward through time by 5 minutes, and end up occupying the exact same space as I had before I moved through time, the earth would be about 160K miles away from me (not even accounting for universal expansion). So to create an effective time machine (absurdity and feasibility aside), it couldn't purely move through time, it would have to travel through time AND space simultaneously. Thank goodness the good Dr. has already figured this out with his TARDIS, which is the only show I can think of that even begins to address this issue.

                      Be The Noise

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      PROOF: Man never gains the ability to travel through time. Fact #1: If man at some future date gained the ability to time travel then eventually some crackpot would gain said ability. Fact #3: The crackpot would screw with us - probably enslave us. Fact #2: We've not been screwed with by time travelers. Therefore, man never will develop the ability to time travel.

                      P K 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        PROOF: Man never gains the ability to travel through time. Fact #1: If man at some future date gained the ability to time travel then eventually some crackpot would gain said ability. Fact #3: The crackpot would screw with us - probably enslave us. Fact #2: We've not been screwed with by time travelers. Therefore, man never will develop the ability to time travel.

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        PIEBALDconsult
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        Yes, or you could put some sort of stipulation in your will that requires your descendants to come back and tell you. I also believe that time travel as envisioned in such stories will never be achieved. Probably not teleportion either.

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          PROOF: Man never gains the ability to travel through time. Fact #1: If man at some future date gained the ability to time travel then eventually some crackpot would gain said ability. Fact #3: The crackpot would screw with us - probably enslave us. Fact #2: We've not been screwed with by time travelers. Therefore, man never will develop the ability to time travel.

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          Karl Sanford
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          either that, or the future holds things that are so interesting that no one bothers to come back this far for the boring stuff. ;P

                          Be The Noise

                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • K Karl Sanford

                            So I've been watching a certain TV show that has recently (recently to me, the show has been over for a while now) delved into the topic of time travel. In this time travel scenario, a group of people are forced through time (forward and backward) but they always end up in the same geographical location when they do so. This made me think about other shows and movies that deal with time travel as well, and most of them have the same concept of time travel. However, this got me thinking about time and space. The earth is constantly spinning and orbiting the sun (69K MPH), the sun is moving through the galaxy and orbiting the galactic center (505K MPH), and the galaxy is moving through the universe (1,339K MPH). So if I were to move forward through time by 5 minutes, and end up occupying the exact same space as I had before I moved through time, the earth would be about 160K miles away from me (not even accounting for universal expansion). So to create an effective time machine (absurdity and feasibility aside), it couldn't purely move through time, it would have to travel through time AND space simultaneously. Thank goodness the good Dr. has already figured this out with his TARDIS, which is the only show I can think of that even begins to address this issue.

                            Be The Noise

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            BRShroyer
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            I'm guessing if they figured out time travel, then they figured out how to do it properly. Just like we don't crash cars into buildings... well, most of the time. I'm sure there will be some mishaps with time travel also. Maybe the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs was really a time machine that miscalculated over the course of 100 million years? The velocity made the impact appear like something a lot larger but slower moving was the cause.

                            Brad If you think you can, you will. If you think you can't, you won't. Either way, you're right.

                            R 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dalek Dave

                              No, because you would 'tied' to that particular point in space, and that space would be moving with you. Simple extrapolation of Special Relativity.

                              --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live

                              K Offline
                              K Offline
                              Karl Sanford
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              ...damn... you made my brain explode

                              Be The Noise

                              D 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D Dalek Dave

                                One could argue the Pauli Exclusion Principle would not let that happen.

                                --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live

                                P Offline
                                P Offline
                                PIEBALDconsult
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                You go first. :-D

                                D 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • K Karl Sanford

                                  So I've been watching a certain TV show that has recently (recently to me, the show has been over for a while now) delved into the topic of time travel. In this time travel scenario, a group of people are forced through time (forward and backward) but they always end up in the same geographical location when they do so. This made me think about other shows and movies that deal with time travel as well, and most of them have the same concept of time travel. However, this got me thinking about time and space. The earth is constantly spinning and orbiting the sun (69K MPH), the sun is moving through the galaxy and orbiting the galactic center (505K MPH), and the galaxy is moving through the universe (1,339K MPH). So if I were to move forward through time by 5 minutes, and end up occupying the exact same space as I had before I moved through time, the earth would be about 160K miles away from me (not even accounting for universal expansion). So to create an effective time machine (absurdity and feasibility aside), it couldn't purely move through time, it would have to travel through time AND space simultaneously. Thank goodness the good Dr. has already figured this out with his TARDIS, which is the only show I can think of that even begins to address this issue.

                                  Be The Noise

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  As someone pointed out (however jokingly), space and time are both relative. Futhermore they are coupled variables. For example if you say you will time travel back 1000 years you have given the time relativity of now and are targetting 1000 years ago. Instead you could say you will time travel to 1012 which has a relativity of our calander start date. Same goes for spacial positioning. You need a reference point. Simply put, if one could time travel they could also travel from point A to point B in no time. Therefore they could position themselves where ever need be when ever need be. Most theories around faster than light travel deal with worm holes. The same would be true for "time" travel in that time bends in on itself and you would just step through to the other point (a time and a space location)

                                  Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R R Giskard Reventlov

                                    Look, we already talked about this tomorrow.

                                    "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                                    V Offline
                                    V Offline
                                    Vark111
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    Would that be a prepost?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • K Karl Sanford

                                      ...damn... you made my brain explode

                                      Be The Noise

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      Dalek Dave
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      It is easier to think about it if you deal with a smaller universe, a four dimensional one, then as you travel laterally through time one is fixed to a point on the hypersurface of the present. All time runs forward and backward from any point in a manifold. The point on this surface is fixed, so no matter how far forward or back in time you travel there is no spatial transfer, the space occupied moves correspondingly to the point vector of the temporal cone. (Of course one has to accept the non euclidean nature of space, otherwise it all falls apart!)

                                      --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B BRShroyer

                                        I'm guessing if they figured out time travel, then they figured out how to do it properly. Just like we don't crash cars into buildings... well, most of the time. I'm sure there will be some mishaps with time travel also. Maybe the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs was really a time machine that miscalculated over the course of 100 million years? The velocity made the impact appear like something a lot larger but slower moving was the cause.

                                        Brad If you think you can, you will. If you think you can't, you won't. Either way, you're right.

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        R Giskard Reventlov
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        Time travel has not yet been invented or we'd be overwhelmed with obnoxious tourists form tomorrow. Besides, you can't travel backwards past the point that time travel is made to work. Or so my future great-great-great-great-great-grandson told me next week.

                                        "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                                        T P 3 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • P PIEBALDconsult

                                          You go first. :-D

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          Dalek Dave
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #30

                                          As an extension to the normal understanding of the PEP, wherein no particle in the universe may occupy the same quantum state as any other particle. So if a new particle is formed (in a particle accelerator for example) then it instantly has to compareitself with EVERY SINGLE PARTICLE in the universe so as to make sure it conforms to the PEP. Given that particles cannot occupy the same quantum state then they also cannot occupy the same space time, so at any moment you stop whilst time travelling then all the particles would compare themselves with those there and if there was any in the samespace then you would be phase shifted.

                                          --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live

                                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups