Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. North Korea Defection

North Korea Defection

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmldatabasecomquestiondiscussion
27 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Roger Wright

    Interesting - just like something out of a movie. A North Korean guard killed his superiors[^], then defected to South Korea. Technically speaking, the two countries are still at war, and "all's fair..." as the saying goes. But the guy admits to committing what would be classified as murder for a civilian in a civilized country. Not wanting to start a political discussion, let's keep it civil - I'm curious about world opinion, and we have a great cross-section here. Do you think South Korea should give him back to stand trial, or risk elevating the "war" by giving him asylum? If I was making the decision, I honestly don't know what I'd do.:confused: So, no discussion here, just vote: 1. Send him back. 3. I dunno, I'm confused, too. 5. Protect him at all cost.

    Will Rogers never met me.

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Ravi Bhavnani
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    North Korea has been opressing its citizens (both physically and mentally) ever since Korea was divided in two.  South Korea has always welcomed refugees from North Korea and continues to strive to unite families cut apart by North Korea's dictatorial regime.  The situation is similar to orders of magnitude worse than what existed in pre-1989 Germany.  Hence, my vote of 5. /ravi

    My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Maximilien

      Prison in South Korea is probably better than life in North Korea.

      Nihil obstat

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Ravi Bhavnani
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Absolutely. /ravi

      My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R R Giskard Reventlov

        Give him a medal.

        "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Ravi Bhavnani
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        :thumbsup: /ravi

        My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Rob Graham

          i would ask myself "what would the North Koreans do if the situation were reversed"? The answer is then obvious: pin a medal on him and declare him a national hero. Honor him with parades and free stuff.

          "People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them." Eric Hoffer "The failure mode of 'clever' is 'asshole'" John Scalzi "Only buzzards feed on their friends" Patrick Dorinson

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Ravi Bhavnani
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Except, nobody defects to North Korea. /ravi

          My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B BillWoodruff

            I'll go with number three: "I dunno, I'm confused, too." Too many "loose ends here:" 1. The defector may be a plant, the killings of his officers a staged, phony event. No one in S. Korea has direct evidence as to what happened (?). 2. The defector may have been a S. Korean spy who killed the officers because he was warned they were on to him (?). 3. The defector may have been approached by one, or both, of the officers with a plan for them all to defect, but it was a subterfuge to test his loyalty; at some point he realized that, and murders them before they can send him, and his family, to the gulags (?). 4. The defector had reported plans by his two officers to defect, and they intercepted them before they could reach the N. Korean secret police: somehow he was lucky enough to shoot them before they shot him (?). Too many possibilities, too little information. Sources of information suspect: information present not verifiable. best, Bill

            ~ Confused by Windows 8 ? This may help: [^] !

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Ravi Bhavnani
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Bill, I'm sure you remember East German refugees defecting to West Germany?  The situation in North Korea is orders of magnitude worse.  Systematic starvation and brainwashing.  The North Korean population is cut off from the rest of the world.  Information is restricted from flowing into the country - most North Koreans are unaware of the moon landing, basic human rights and the ability to purchase as much food as you need. :( /ravi

            My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Ravi Bhavnani

              Bill, I'm sure you remember East German refugees defecting to West Germany?  The situation in North Korea is orders of magnitude worse.  Systematic starvation and brainwashing.  The North Korean population is cut off from the rest of the world.  Information is restricted from flowing into the country - most North Koreans are unaware of the moon landing, basic human rights and the ability to purchase as much food as you need. :( /ravi

              My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

              B Offline
              B Offline
              BillWoodruff
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              Hi Ravi, Yes, I am quite aware of the facts you cite, but I cannot see what the point was in your stating them, in this context, as a response to this particular message. Did you infer, from my vote for option three, that I would advocate sending this defector back to North Korea: if so, I ask you to examine that, because: to me, that inference does not logically follow from my choice of option three :) It is also a fact that both North and South Korea are engaged in significant espionage against each other using human agents, and every other means possible. And, of course, the US maintains intense surveillance of N. Korea, as well as probably collaborating with (in ways we'll never know) S. Korean intelligence services. best, Bill

              ~ Confused by Windows 8 ? This may help: [^] !

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Ravi Bhavnani

                Except, nobody defects to North Korea. /ravi

                My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                R Offline
                R Offline
                R Giskard Reventlov
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                Didn't Leonard's girlfriend in Big Bang Theory do just that? :-)

                "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R R Giskard Reventlov

                  Didn't Leonard's girlfriend in Big Bang Theory do just that? :-)

                  "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Ravi Bhavnani
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  mark merrens wrote:

                  Big Bang Theory

                  Haven't seen the show. :(  (I don't watch much TV). /ravi

                  My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Ravi Bhavnani

                    mark merrens wrote:

                    Big Bang Theory

                    Haven't seen the show. :(  (I don't watch much TV). /ravi

                    My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    R Giskard Reventlov
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Big Bang Theory is considered mandatory for geeks.

                    "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Roger Wright

                      Interesting - just like something out of a movie. A North Korean guard killed his superiors[^], then defected to South Korea. Technically speaking, the two countries are still at war, and "all's fair..." as the saying goes. But the guy admits to committing what would be classified as murder for a civilian in a civilized country. Not wanting to start a political discussion, let's keep it civil - I'm curious about world opinion, and we have a great cross-section here. Do you think South Korea should give him back to stand trial, or risk elevating the "war" by giving him asylum? If I was making the decision, I honestly don't know what I'd do.:confused: So, no discussion here, just vote: 1. Send him back. 3. I dunno, I'm confused, too. 5. Protect him at all cost.

                      Will Rogers never met me.

                      W Offline
                      W Offline
                      wizardzz
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Would North Korea send him back if he did the opposite? No, they'd give him a medal.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Roger Wright

                        Interesting - just like something out of a movie. A North Korean guard killed his superiors[^], then defected to South Korea. Technically speaking, the two countries are still at war, and "all's fair..." as the saying goes. But the guy admits to committing what would be classified as murder for a civilian in a civilized country. Not wanting to start a political discussion, let's keep it civil - I'm curious about world opinion, and we have a great cross-section here. Do you think South Korea should give him back to stand trial, or risk elevating the "war" by giving him asylum? If I was making the decision, I honestly don't know what I'd do.:confused: So, no discussion here, just vote: 1. Send him back. 3. I dunno, I'm confused, too. 5. Protect him at all cost.

                        Will Rogers never met me.

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        JimmyRopes
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        How does this not fall under posting rule number 4?

                        Posting rules for the lounge:

                        4. No politics ... This is a community for software development. There are plenty of other sites that are far more appropriate for these discussions.

                        The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                        Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                        Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                        I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J JimmyRopes

                          How does this not fall under posting rule number 4?

                          Posting rules for the lounge:

                          4. No politics ... This is a community for software development. There are plenty of other sites that are far more appropriate for these discussions.

                          The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                          Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                          Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                          I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Roger Wright
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          Actually, it was a test directed specifically at programmers. One of the most important skills a programmer must develop is the ability to read and understand requirements accurately, then faithfully implement them. The instructions were: "... no discussion here, just vote:" By my count, 6 people passed, at most. It's possible that some of the 6 who voted also posted a comment, thus failing the test, but hopefully a few clicked a number and moved on, as required. How'd you do? ;)

                          Will Rogers never met me.

                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Roger Wright

                            Actually, it was a test directed specifically at programmers. One of the most important skills a programmer must develop is the ability to read and understand requirements accurately, then faithfully implement them. The instructions were: "... no discussion here, just vote:" By my count, 6 people passed, at most. It's possible that some of the 6 who voted also posted a comment, thus failing the test, but hopefully a few clicked a number and moved on, as required. How'd you do? ;)

                            Will Rogers never met me.

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            JimmyRopes
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            Roger Wright wrote:

                            How'd you do?

                            Really good. I saw through all your bullshit and recognized you were posting political commentary in the lounge. :doh: Shame on you. You should know better.

                            The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                            Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                            Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                            I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                            R 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J JimmyRopes

                              Roger Wright wrote:

                              How'd you do?

                              Really good. I saw through all your bullshit and recognized you were posting political commentary in the lounge. :doh: Shame on you. You should know better.

                              The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                              Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                              Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                              I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Roger Wright
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              I do know better, and I specifically requested no discussion, which was largely ignored. I offered no commentary whatsoever, merely pointed out that I would be hard pressed to make a decision. I was curious to learn whether the general population would be troubled by indecision, or find it easy to make a judgement call. Most of those who ignored my request and posted a discussion, I found, were quite able to reach a decision, based on preconceived notions, yet of those who followed instructions and voted, the result was balanced, with the average falling in the center. Quite interesting, and the more so because so many found it impossible to read and follow directions, including yourself. Have you always been a consummate ass, or was there a time when you were a reasonable human being? Do you ever miss the simple things in life, like respect and credibility? ;P Honestly, Jimmie, I have long read and enjoyed your commentary, but you've really over-reached on this one. Resorting to insult and crude language is beneath you - you're a better man than that.

                              Will Rogers never met me.

                              J 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R Roger Wright

                                I do know better, and I specifically requested no discussion, which was largely ignored. I offered no commentary whatsoever, merely pointed out that I would be hard pressed to make a decision. I was curious to learn whether the general population would be troubled by indecision, or find it easy to make a judgement call. Most of those who ignored my request and posted a discussion, I found, were quite able to reach a decision, based on preconceived notions, yet of those who followed instructions and voted, the result was balanced, with the average falling in the center. Quite interesting, and the more so because so many found it impossible to read and follow directions, including yourself. Have you always been a consummate ass, or was there a time when you were a reasonable human being? Do you ever miss the simple things in life, like respect and credibility? ;P Honestly, Jimmie, I have long read and enjoyed your commentary, but you've really over-reached on this one. Resorting to insult and crude language is beneath you - you're a better man than that.

                                Will Rogers never met me.

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                JimmyRopes
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                Roger Wright wrote:

                                I do know better, and I specifically requested no discussion, which was largely ignored.

                                Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                                Roger Wright wrote:

                                I offered no commentary whatsoever, merely pointed out that I would be hard pressed to make a decision.

                                Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                                Roger Wright wrote:

                                I was curious to learn whether the general population would be troubled by indecision, or find it easy to make a judgement call.

                                Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                                Roger Wright wrote:

                                Most of those who ignored my request and posted a discussion, I found, were quite able to reach a decision, based on preconceived notions, yet of those who followed instructions and voted, the result was balanced, with the average falling in the center.

                                Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                                Roger Wright wrote:

                                Quite interesting, and the more so because so many found it impossible to read and follow directions, including yourself.

                                Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                                Roger Wright wrote:

                                Honestly, Jimmie, I have long read and enjoyed your commentary, but you've really over-reached on this one. Resorting to insult and crude language is beneath you - you're a better man than that.

                                Sorry Rodger but I have to call you out on this one. I hope you can respect me because I did.

                                The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                                Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                                Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                                I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                                R 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J JimmyRopes

                                  Roger Wright wrote:

                                  I do know better, and I specifically requested no discussion, which was largely ignored.

                                  Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                                  Roger Wright wrote:

                                  I offered no commentary whatsoever, merely pointed out that I would be hard pressed to make a decision.

                                  Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                                  Roger Wright wrote:

                                  I was curious to learn whether the general population would be troubled by indecision, or find it easy to make a judgement call.

                                  Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                                  Roger Wright wrote:

                                  Most of those who ignored my request and posted a discussion, I found, were quite able to reach a decision, based on preconceived notions, yet of those who followed instructions and voted, the result was balanced, with the average falling in the center.

                                  Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                                  Roger Wright wrote:

                                  Quite interesting, and the more so because so many found it impossible to read and follow directions, including yourself.

                                  Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                                  Roger Wright wrote:

                                  Honestly, Jimmie, I have long read and enjoyed your commentary, but you've really over-reached on this one. Resorting to insult and crude language is beneath you - you're a better man than that.

                                  Sorry Rodger but I have to call you out on this one. I hope you can respect me because I did.

                                  The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                                  Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                                  Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                                  I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Roger Wright
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  Apparently spelling isn't your forte, nor is logic or rational thinking. I apologize for having overestimated you for so long...

                                  Will Rogers never met me.

                                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R Roger Wright

                                    Apparently spelling isn't your forte, nor is logic or rational thinking. I apologize for having overestimated you for so long...

                                    Will Rogers never met me.

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    JimmyRopes
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    Roger Wright wrote:

                                    Apparently spelling isn't your forte

                                    In my business misspelled words that are consistent are just another variable name. Oh, that's right, you're not a computer scientist. :doh: I was always told by teachers in high school that if I didn't learn to spell that I wouldn't be able to go to university. When I was admitted to university in the mathematics curriculum I found out that not being able to spell was almost a requirement for getting into the program. People that could spell didn't have the right aptitude for the program and went into liberal arts or engineering.

                                    Roger Wright wrote:

                                    nor is logic or rational thinking

                                    Says the liberal atrs, err, engineering graduate.

                                    Roger Wright wrote:

                                    I apologize for having overestimated you for so long

                                    Don't be. I have known for quite some time that you are delusional.

                                    The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                                    Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                                    Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                                    I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups