Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. North Korea Defection

North Korea Defection

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmldatabasecomquestiondiscussion
27 Posts 13 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Ravi Bhavnani

    Bill, I'm sure you remember East German refugees defecting to West Germany?  The situation in North Korea is orders of magnitude worse.  Systematic starvation and brainwashing.  The North Korean population is cut off from the rest of the world.  Information is restricted from flowing into the country - most North Koreans are unaware of the moon landing, basic human rights and the ability to purchase as much food as you need. :( /ravi

    My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

    B Offline
    B Offline
    BillWoodruff
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    Hi Ravi, Yes, I am quite aware of the facts you cite, but I cannot see what the point was in your stating them, in this context, as a response to this particular message. Did you infer, from my vote for option three, that I would advocate sending this defector back to North Korea: if so, I ask you to examine that, because: to me, that inference does not logically follow from my choice of option three :) It is also a fact that both North and South Korea are engaged in significant espionage against each other using human agents, and every other means possible. And, of course, the US maintains intense surveillance of N. Korea, as well as probably collaborating with (in ways we'll never know) S. Korean intelligence services. best, Bill

    ~ Confused by Windows 8 ? This may help: [^] !

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Ravi Bhavnani

      Except, nobody defects to North Korea. /ravi

      My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

      R Offline
      R Offline
      R Giskard Reventlov
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      Didn't Leonard's girlfriend in Big Bang Theory do just that? :-)

      "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R R Giskard Reventlov

        Didn't Leonard's girlfriend in Big Bang Theory do just that? :-)

        "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Ravi Bhavnani
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        mark merrens wrote:

        Big Bang Theory

        Haven't seen the show. :(  (I don't watch much TV). /ravi

        My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Ravi Bhavnani

          mark merrens wrote:

          Big Bang Theory

          Haven't seen the show. :(  (I don't watch much TV). /ravi

          My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

          R Offline
          R Offline
          R Giskard Reventlov
          wrote on last edited by
          #19

          Big Bang Theory is considered mandatory for geeks.

          "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Roger Wright

            Interesting - just like something out of a movie. A North Korean guard killed his superiors[^], then defected to South Korea. Technically speaking, the two countries are still at war, and "all's fair..." as the saying goes. But the guy admits to committing what would be classified as murder for a civilian in a civilized country. Not wanting to start a political discussion, let's keep it civil - I'm curious about world opinion, and we have a great cross-section here. Do you think South Korea should give him back to stand trial, or risk elevating the "war" by giving him asylum? If I was making the decision, I honestly don't know what I'd do.:confused: So, no discussion here, just vote: 1. Send him back. 3. I dunno, I'm confused, too. 5. Protect him at all cost.

            Will Rogers never met me.

            W Offline
            W Offline
            wizardzz
            wrote on last edited by
            #20

            Would North Korea send him back if he did the opposite? No, they'd give him a medal.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Roger Wright

              Interesting - just like something out of a movie. A North Korean guard killed his superiors[^], then defected to South Korea. Technically speaking, the two countries are still at war, and "all's fair..." as the saying goes. But the guy admits to committing what would be classified as murder for a civilian in a civilized country. Not wanting to start a political discussion, let's keep it civil - I'm curious about world opinion, and we have a great cross-section here. Do you think South Korea should give him back to stand trial, or risk elevating the "war" by giving him asylum? If I was making the decision, I honestly don't know what I'd do.:confused: So, no discussion here, just vote: 1. Send him back. 3. I dunno, I'm confused, too. 5. Protect him at all cost.

              Will Rogers never met me.

              J Offline
              J Offline
              JimmyRopes
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              How does this not fall under posting rule number 4?

              Posting rules for the lounge:

              4. No politics ... This is a community for software development. There are plenty of other sites that are far more appropriate for these discussions.

              The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
              Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
              Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
              I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J JimmyRopes

                How does this not fall under posting rule number 4?

                Posting rules for the lounge:

                4. No politics ... This is a community for software development. There are plenty of other sites that are far more appropriate for these discussions.

                The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Roger Wright
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                Actually, it was a test directed specifically at programmers. One of the most important skills a programmer must develop is the ability to read and understand requirements accurately, then faithfully implement them. The instructions were: "... no discussion here, just vote:" By my count, 6 people passed, at most. It's possible that some of the 6 who voted also posted a comment, thus failing the test, but hopefully a few clicked a number and moved on, as required. How'd you do? ;)

                Will Rogers never met me.

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Roger Wright

                  Actually, it was a test directed specifically at programmers. One of the most important skills a programmer must develop is the ability to read and understand requirements accurately, then faithfully implement them. The instructions were: "... no discussion here, just vote:" By my count, 6 people passed, at most. It's possible that some of the 6 who voted also posted a comment, thus failing the test, but hopefully a few clicked a number and moved on, as required. How'd you do? ;)

                  Will Rogers never met me.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  JimmyRopes
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  Roger Wright wrote:

                  How'd you do?

                  Really good. I saw through all your bullshit and recognized you were posting political commentary in the lounge. :doh: Shame on you. You should know better.

                  The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                  Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                  Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                  I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J JimmyRopes

                    Roger Wright wrote:

                    How'd you do?

                    Really good. I saw through all your bullshit and recognized you were posting political commentary in the lounge. :doh: Shame on you. You should know better.

                    The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                    Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                    Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                    I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Roger Wright
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    I do know better, and I specifically requested no discussion, which was largely ignored. I offered no commentary whatsoever, merely pointed out that I would be hard pressed to make a decision. I was curious to learn whether the general population would be troubled by indecision, or find it easy to make a judgement call. Most of those who ignored my request and posted a discussion, I found, were quite able to reach a decision, based on preconceived notions, yet of those who followed instructions and voted, the result was balanced, with the average falling in the center. Quite interesting, and the more so because so many found it impossible to read and follow directions, including yourself. Have you always been a consummate ass, or was there a time when you were a reasonable human being? Do you ever miss the simple things in life, like respect and credibility? ;P Honestly, Jimmie, I have long read and enjoyed your commentary, but you've really over-reached on this one. Resorting to insult and crude language is beneath you - you're a better man than that.

                    Will Rogers never met me.

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Roger Wright

                      I do know better, and I specifically requested no discussion, which was largely ignored. I offered no commentary whatsoever, merely pointed out that I would be hard pressed to make a decision. I was curious to learn whether the general population would be troubled by indecision, or find it easy to make a judgement call. Most of those who ignored my request and posted a discussion, I found, were quite able to reach a decision, based on preconceived notions, yet of those who followed instructions and voted, the result was balanced, with the average falling in the center. Quite interesting, and the more so because so many found it impossible to read and follow directions, including yourself. Have you always been a consummate ass, or was there a time when you were a reasonable human being? Do you ever miss the simple things in life, like respect and credibility? ;P Honestly, Jimmie, I have long read and enjoyed your commentary, but you've really over-reached on this one. Resorting to insult and crude language is beneath you - you're a better man than that.

                      Will Rogers never met me.

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      JimmyRopes
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      Roger Wright wrote:

                      I do know better, and I specifically requested no discussion, which was largely ignored.

                      Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                      Roger Wright wrote:

                      I offered no commentary whatsoever, merely pointed out that I would be hard pressed to make a decision.

                      Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                      Roger Wright wrote:

                      I was curious to learn whether the general population would be troubled by indecision, or find it easy to make a judgement call.

                      Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                      Roger Wright wrote:

                      Most of those who ignored my request and posted a discussion, I found, were quite able to reach a decision, based on preconceived notions, yet of those who followed instructions and voted, the result was balanced, with the average falling in the center.

                      Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                      Roger Wright wrote:

                      Quite interesting, and the more so because so many found it impossible to read and follow directions, including yourself.

                      Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                      Roger Wright wrote:

                      Honestly, Jimmie, I have long read and enjoyed your commentary, but you've really over-reached on this one. Resorting to insult and crude language is beneath you - you're a better man than that.

                      Sorry Rodger but I have to call you out on this one. I hope you can respect me because I did.

                      The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                      Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                      Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                      I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J JimmyRopes

                        Roger Wright wrote:

                        I do know better, and I specifically requested no discussion, which was largely ignored.

                        Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                        Roger Wright wrote:

                        I offered no commentary whatsoever, merely pointed out that I would be hard pressed to make a decision.

                        Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                        Roger Wright wrote:

                        I was curious to learn whether the general population would be troubled by indecision, or find it easy to make a judgement call.

                        Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                        Roger Wright wrote:

                        Most of those who ignored my request and posted a discussion, I found, were quite able to reach a decision, based on preconceived notions, yet of those who followed instructions and voted, the result was balanced, with the average falling in the center.

                        Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                        Roger Wright wrote:

                        Quite interesting, and the more so because so many found it impossible to read and follow directions, including yourself.

                        Feinding stupidity. I didn't know that posting a controversial subject would cause people to respond.

                        Roger Wright wrote:

                        Honestly, Jimmie, I have long read and enjoyed your commentary, but you've really over-reached on this one. Resorting to insult and crude language is beneath you - you're a better man than that.

                        Sorry Rodger but I have to call you out on this one. I hope you can respect me because I did.

                        The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                        Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                        Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                        I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Roger Wright
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        Apparently spelling isn't your forte, nor is logic or rational thinking. I apologize for having overestimated you for so long...

                        Will Rogers never met me.

                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Roger Wright

                          Apparently spelling isn't your forte, nor is logic or rational thinking. I apologize for having overestimated you for so long...

                          Will Rogers never met me.

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          JimmyRopes
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          Roger Wright wrote:

                          Apparently spelling isn't your forte

                          In my business misspelled words that are consistent are just another variable name. Oh, that's right, you're not a computer scientist. :doh: I was always told by teachers in high school that if I didn't learn to spell that I wouldn't be able to go to university. When I was admitted to university in the mathematics curriculum I found out that not being able to spell was almost a requirement for getting into the program. People that could spell didn't have the right aptitude for the program and went into liberal arts or engineering.

                          Roger Wright wrote:

                          nor is logic or rational thinking

                          Says the liberal atrs, err, engineering graduate.

                          Roger Wright wrote:

                          I apologize for having overestimated you for so long

                          Don't be. I have known for quite some time that you are delusional.

                          The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                          Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                          Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                          I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups