So anyway, Linux IDEs...
-
There is no such thing as 'Idiot Linux User'... :) Is there any reason you chose Codelite over Eclipse or Qt Creator?
-
I would consider QtCreator or KDevelop.
John
-
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
takes forever to start even on my monster workstation. Plus, it is pretty buggy and not very intuitive.
Are you sure you are not talking about Visual Studio?
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
not very intuitive.
Intuitive IDE? sounds interesting...
-
For those who are not into the OS for its "freedom", it's usually about saving 50 bucks on OS costs and spending 100+ hours across a couple of years in maintenance and just getting it to work.
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
..there's more reasons; for one, it's a great platform for Windows-developers. I kid thee not; it makes one re-think a bit more than just the UI. Small example; Don't you hate installing all tools on a Windows-machine? All those little setups, installers, asking the same bullshit; what location and do you want a Toolbar for IE? Wouldn't it be great if you could
apt-getunder Windows? Write a simple batchfile to install all crap in one go on a fresh system? Well, there's already two applications that provide such a service under Windows. I think we'll see more environments in the future where you find different Operating Systems, partly due to that economic fact and the current state of affairs. 50 bucks might not sound like much, but once you're talking about an entire department.. (and think of all the people you'd make happy if you were to announce the company will *not* upgrade to Windows 8 with a touchscreen!*) *) then tell them to sudo their work, and run like HellBastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] They hate us for our freedom![^]
-
:) I like Linux, it is VERY configurable, VERY flexible, and easy to code for. And fortunately there is loads of good documentation, unlike with Windows, in the net, and a load of good forums. Which makes up for the lack of toughness of installers.
Yep. To the point where you have to configure again and again, almost never in the same way. Loads of good documentation? I agree that MSDN is not anymore what it used to be (lately improving, though), but Linux docs I've saw are HTML versions of man . Very scarce samples and not anyways compiling... It can be better than that.
Nuclear launch detected
-
..there's more reasons; for one, it's a great platform for Windows-developers. I kid thee not; it makes one re-think a bit more than just the UI. Small example; Don't you hate installing all tools on a Windows-machine? All those little setups, installers, asking the same bullshit; what location and do you want a Toolbar for IE? Wouldn't it be great if you could
apt-getunder Windows? Write a simple batchfile to install all crap in one go on a fresh system? Well, there's already two applications that provide such a service under Windows. I think we'll see more environments in the future where you find different Operating Systems, partly due to that economic fact and the current state of affairs. 50 bucks might not sound like much, but once you're talking about an entire department.. (and think of all the people you'd make happy if you were to announce the company will *not* upgrade to Windows 8 with a touchscreen!*) *) then tell them to sudo their work, and run like HellBastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] They hate us for our freedom![^]
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Don't you hate installing all tools on a Windows-machine? All those little setups, installers, asking the same bullsh*t; what location and do you want a Toolbar for IE? Wouldn't it be great if you could
apt-getunder Windows? Write a simple batchfile to install all crap in one go on a fresh system? Well, there's already two applications that provide such a service under Windows.That's what Chocolatey is good for :-) Doesn't work for everything, and you are left with adding product keys to "buyware" apps, but it sure takes a lot of the pain out of package management. The simplest script to install a bunch of packages would look something like this [Powershell - I don't use cmd anymore]:
//or load a list from a text, CSV or JSON file or whatever you wish
$apps = @("git", "SublimeText2", "GoogleChrome", "thunderbird", "skype", "VisualStudio2012Professional", "WHATEVER" )
$apps | %{ cinst $_ }If you use Windows, use it to its fullest! EDIT: :doh: "Well, there's already two applications that provide such a service under Windows." - I should read fully before I reply. Well, leave this as an example of what you were saying.
-
I ended up with Codelite. Its OK, after realising you have to install a load of stuff to make it work, 6 sub packages and plugins.... Why isnt this made obvious at the start? COme on guys, of you want Linux to work for an idiot end user you need to sort this out.
I try Ubuntu on a pen drive every time a new version comes out. I was never able to use it beyond a few days. Seriously, I can't play my MP3s without having to install extra stuff? It's even more unlikely now that I will go back to Ubuntu. I used to have a DSL connection at my previous apartment and just plugging in the cable was enough to get Ubuntu online. I don't have DSL at my new place (get lost, Airtel :mad: ) and my MTS data card doesn't work with anything other than Windows.
Cheers, विक्रम "We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread :doh:
-
Yeah, for the corporates and home end users Linux just isnt going to fly. Its a good tecchie OS though, and good for bespoke embedded stuff.
Big corporates could actually more easily utilise it to save money, as it would be cost effective to have administrators that can customise and standardize the internal Linux. One corporate I know of have a network boot Linux distro and any change to the end users can be rolled out in a matter of minutes and a rollback of that is also quite easy, as compared to Windows and yeah I know with an centralized update server the same could potentially be achieved with Windows...
-
..there's more reasons; for one, it's a great platform for Windows-developers. I kid thee not; it makes one re-think a bit more than just the UI. Small example; Don't you hate installing all tools on a Windows-machine? All those little setups, installers, asking the same bullshit; what location and do you want a Toolbar for IE? Wouldn't it be great if you could
apt-getunder Windows? Write a simple batchfile to install all crap in one go on a fresh system? Well, there's already two applications that provide such a service under Windows. I think we'll see more environments in the future where you find different Operating Systems, partly due to that economic fact and the current state of affairs. 50 bucks might not sound like much, but once you're talking about an entire department.. (and think of all the people you'd make happy if you were to announce the company will *not* upgrade to Windows 8 with a touchscreen!*) *) then tell them to sudo their work, and run like HellBastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] They hate us for our freedom![^]
-
Yep. To the point where you have to configure again and again, almost never in the same way. Loads of good documentation? I agree that MSDN is not anymore what it used to be (lately improving, though), but Linux docs I've saw are HTML versions of man . Very scarce samples and not anyways compiling... It can be better than that.
Nuclear launch detected
Cristian Amarie wrote:
have to configure again and again, almost never in the same way.
Have to configure each piece of software you get [if you don't prefer the defaults], and the options/configs/settings get pretty regular so it's pretty to get the hang of.
Cristian Amarie wrote:
but Linux docs I've saw are HTML versions of man
You should always click more than one link when you do a google search. Lots of things will start getting a lot better if you do.
If it moves, compile it
-
For those who are not into the OS for its "freedom", it's usually about saving 50 bucks on OS costs and spending 100+ hours across a couple of years in maintenance and just getting it to work.
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
Nish Sivakumar wrote:
For those who are not into the OS for its "freedom",
Just need to accent that first part.
Nish Sivakumar wrote:
it's usually about saving 50 bucks on OS costs
It's usually about $200 if you don't go with an OEM copy isn't it? Up until I got past the introductory period of my programming career, that was still to much money. I used all the open source software that I could anyway, made sense to use the OS that it was built for. Lots of the free stuff people enjoy was made for Linux to begin with, then ported to windows.
If it moves, compile it
-
..there's more reasons; for one, it's a great platform for Windows-developers. I kid thee not; it makes one re-think a bit more than just the UI. Small example; Don't you hate installing all tools on a Windows-machine? All those little setups, installers, asking the same bullshit; what location and do you want a Toolbar for IE? Wouldn't it be great if you could
apt-getunder Windows? Write a simple batchfile to install all crap in one go on a fresh system? Well, there's already two applications that provide such a service under Windows. I think we'll see more environments in the future where you find different Operating Systems, partly due to that economic fact and the current state of affairs. 50 bucks might not sound like much, but once you're talking about an entire department.. (and think of all the people you'd make happy if you were to announce the company will *not* upgrade to Windows 8 with a touchscreen!*) *) then tell them to sudo their work, and run like HellBastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] They hate us for our freedom![^]
-
I try Ubuntu on a pen drive every time a new version comes out. I was never able to use it beyond a few days. Seriously, I can't play my MP3s without having to install extra stuff? It's even more unlikely now that I will go back to Ubuntu. I used to have a DSL connection at my previous apartment and just plugging in the cable was enough to get Ubuntu online. I don't have DSL at my new place (get lost, Airtel :mad: ) and my MTS data card doesn't work with anything other than Windows.
Cheers, विक्रम "We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread :doh:
I think that some of us appreciate not having things like this installed by default. Most of the audio programs/software you will get to play music will support mp3 [though some of them the codecs for it are separate due to licensing issues]. Get vlc player?
If it moves, compile it
-
Cristian Amarie wrote:
have to configure again and again, almost never in the same way.
Have to configure each piece of software you get [if you don't prefer the defaults], and the options/configs/settings get pretty regular so it's pretty to get the hang of.
Cristian Amarie wrote:
but Linux docs I've saw are HTML versions of man
You should always click more than one link when you do a google search. Lots of things will start getting a lot better if you do.
If it moves, compile it
What's pretty? To scour the file system for options/configs/settings? Let me make this clear: I don't care WHERE are the settings; this is the software's business, not mine. I want to *change* settings, not figure out where the file is. I want to add a new update location, not to ls -l the hell out the disk for sources.lst; I want to do sudo apt-get install, not to figure out why after installing debian on my netbook no valid deb sources were present. (That's from a 4 hours ago semi failed debian install - one hour later Mint 12 was downloaded/installed immediately. Go figure.) Thanks for the "click more than one link" hint - I suppose you think I'm dumb, lazy, or both. However, I am considering myself an educated person, with a good sense of what A element click() does.
Nuclear launch detected
-
What's pretty? To scour the file system for options/configs/settings? Let me make this clear: I don't care WHERE are the settings; this is the software's business, not mine. I want to *change* settings, not figure out where the file is. I want to add a new update location, not to ls -l the hell out the disk for sources.lst; I want to do sudo apt-get install, not to figure out why after installing debian on my netbook no valid deb sources were present. (That's from a 4 hours ago semi failed debian install - one hour later Mint 12 was downloaded/installed immediately. Go figure.) Thanks for the "click more than one link" hint - I suppose you think I'm dumb, lazy, or both. However, I am considering myself an educated person, with a good sense of what A element click() does.
Nuclear launch detected
Cristian Amarie wrote:
What's pretty? To scour the file system for options/configs/settings?
Let me make this clear: I don't care WHERE are the settings; this is the software's business, not mine.might be a language barrier. Making changes to preferences is what my statement was about. And the fact that they are all similar, so it's not like a new challenge every time.
Cristian Amarie wrote:
I don't care WHERE are the settings; this is the software's business, not mine.
Then use the GUI to change them.
Cristian Amarie wrote:
I want to *change* settings, not figure out where the file is.
Settings and configuration files are in the same place all the time. It's a file system standard.
Cristian Amarie wrote:
I want to do sudo apt-get install, not to figure out why after installing debian on my netbook no valid deb sources were present.
I thought you were talking about changing preferences, configurations, or settings. Handling dependancies for apt is another thing entirely.
Cristian Amarie wrote:
That's from a 4 hours ago semi failed debian install - one hour later Mint 12 was downloaded/installed immediately. Go figure.)
I don't even know what to say. It sounds like you need Mint, not debian. This is not the software's fault. Mint and Ubuntu are made for a more "windowsy" experience. I'm happy you got Mint installed.
Cristian Amarie wrote:
Thanks for the "click more than one link" hint - I suppose you think I'm dumb, lazy, or both. However, I am considering myself an educated person, with a good sense of what A element click() does.
I was just saying that you didn't search very hard. Each distro has a website with forums, and all the workings are very well documented in easy to read ways. I have only seen a couple of HTML versions of the man page when searching.
If it moves, compile it
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Don't you hate installing all tools on a Windows-machine? All those little setups, installers, asking the same bullsh*t; what location and do you want a Toolbar for IE? Wouldn't it be great if you could
apt-getunder Windows? Write a simple batchfile to install all crap in one go on a fresh system? Well, there's already two applications that provide such a service under Windows.That's what Chocolatey is good for :-) Doesn't work for everything, and you are left with adding product keys to "buyware" apps, but it sure takes a lot of the pain out of package management. The simplest script to install a bunch of packages would look something like this [Powershell - I don't use cmd anymore]:
//or load a list from a text, CSV or JSON file or whatever you wish
$apps = @("git", "SublimeText2", "GoogleChrome", "thunderbird", "skype", "VisualStudio2012Professional", "WHATEVER" )
$apps | %{ cinst $_ }If you use Windows, use it to its fullest! EDIT: :doh: "Well, there's already two applications that provide such a service under Windows." - I should read fully before I reply. Well, leave this as an example of what you were saying.
-
I ended up with Codelite. Its OK, after realising you have to install a load of stuff to make it work, 6 sub packages and plugins.... Why isnt this made obvious at the start? COme on guys, of you want Linux to work for an idiot end user you need to sort this out.
Eclipse! Though Document Integration for C was bad at the time i was coding with it.
Behzad
-
I ended up with Codelite. Its OK, after realising you have to install a load of stuff to make it work, 6 sub packages and plugins.... Why isnt this made obvious at the start? COme on guys, of you want Linux to work for an idiot end user you need to sort this out.
I've been using VIM for a few years, but now hands down for SlickEdit. I fall in love from the very first try. It lets you code in more than 40 programming languages giving good support for autocompletion, refactoring, code navigation, truly awesome multi-head utilization and ability to smoothly handle multi-million line codebases.
-
Big corporates could actually more easily utilise it to save money, as it would be cost effective to have administrators that can customise and standardize the internal Linux. One corporate I know of have a network boot Linux distro and any change to the end users can be rolled out in a matter of minutes and a rollback of that is also quite easy, as compared to Windows and yeah I know with an centralized update server the same could potentially be achieved with Windows...
Got to disagree here, or at least point out that its not as clear-cut as you're suggesting. Even if the techs in a big corporate are developing *for* linux, the rest of the company are going to be using windows and some corporate type is not going to want to put up with linux office tools and the rest, especially if they're not technical themselves. There's a good chance they've not even heard of linux either. Then you've got the fact that the IT department that's been hired is trained and experienced in windows admin, the infrastructure is already in place for SMS management and the like. Inertia is a big problem. Kev
-
I think that some of us appreciate not having things like this installed by default. Most of the audio programs/software you will get to play music will support mp3 [though some of them the codecs for it are separate due to licensing issues]. Get vlc player?
If it moves, compile it
Some people appreciate not having MP3 support by default? :confused:
loctrice wrote:
Get vlc player?
Yep, that's what I usually end up doing - but I don't like it that there's no out-of-the-box support for MP3 playback. Linux had a super chance to eat into the desktop market when MS released Vista but bungled it. Maybe they're getting a second chance with Windows 8? ;)
Cheers, विक्रम "We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread :doh: