Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Scanning Documents with a Digital Camera

Scanning Documents with a Digital Camera

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
lampadobehelpquestion
34 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Maximilien

    1. use a tripod; have the camera and paper at 90o (have the paper flat on the table for example). 2. If you want to use a glass, you look at your local framing shop for "museum" quality glass that have less reflection (there are different quality of those) 3. Use ambient lighting and/or a diffuser for your flash or point your flash at the ceiling for an indirect flash; this will reduce the amount of shadowing of the folds and crinkles. 4. Shoot raw and adjust the white balance in post-processing. Also, don't try to iron out the crinkles...

    Nihil obstat

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Maximilien wrote:

    Also, don't try to iron out the crinkles...

    This is also sound advice on scrotum care.

    Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends. Shed Petition[^]

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Brady Kelly

      I have several important and private documents I would like to try 'scanning' with my digital camera. On or two very quick experiments shows image quality and size are excellent. Two problems I found though were the yellowing of white paper - I was advised not to use the flash, so the the ambient light colour in the room seems to have dominated. What should I do about lighting? Use an artificial electric lamp with a very white light, or use sunlight in a much more brightly lit room? My other problem is crinkles and folds in the documents that clearly show in the 'scans'. One's first though is to place a piece of glass over the document to flatten it, but that brings the risk of reflections. Is there some kind of material I can use in place of glass that is highly transparent, but non-reflective? Something I could get from a photography or art shop, or maybe a printing supply shop?

      S Offline
      S Offline
      SinghUlarity
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      If you have a half decent phone camera, try this.... CamScanner[^] Works well.

      I are n00b.

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Brady Kelly

        I'm a contractor that's been here a month and attracted attention by taking too much leave, and being late from transport problems. I don't think I'll be ordering anything until I release some software.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jimmy Savile
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        Brady Kelly wrote:

        I'm a contractor that's been here a month and attracted attention by taking too much leave, and being late from transport problems

        And when you are at work, spending all your time dicking about with your phone and personal documents?

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B Brady Kelly

          I have several important and private documents I would like to try 'scanning' with my digital camera. On or two very quick experiments shows image quality and size are excellent. Two problems I found though were the yellowing of white paper - I was advised not to use the flash, so the the ambient light colour in the room seems to have dominated. What should I do about lighting? Use an artificial electric lamp with a very white light, or use sunlight in a much more brightly lit room? My other problem is crinkles and folds in the documents that clearly show in the 'scans'. One's first though is to place a piece of glass over the document to flatten it, but that brings the risk of reflections. Is there some kind of material I can use in place of glass that is highly transparent, but non-reflective? Something I could get from a photography or art shop, or maybe a printing supply shop?

          N Offline
          N Offline
          Nish Nishant
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          You can use a white-balance correction tool during post-processing to get the yellow color whitened up :-)

          Regards, Nish


          My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S SinghUlarity

            If you have a half decent phone camera, try this.... CamScanner[^] Works well.

            I are n00b.

            N Offline
            N Offline
            Nish Nishant
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            SinghUlarity... wrote:

            Works well.

            Uhm, it won't work on any non-Android phone.

            Regards, Nish


            My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Nish Nishant

              SinghUlarity... wrote:

              Works well.

              Uhm, it won't work on any non-Android phone.

              Regards, Nish


              My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

              S Offline
              S Offline
              SinghUlarity
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              You deserve it if you're using a non-android phone ;P

              I are n00b.

              N 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S SinghUlarity

                You deserve it if you're using a non-android phone ;P

                I are n00b.

                N Offline
                N Offline
                Nish Nishant
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                Well I've used iPhones and now a Windows Phone, and I rarely install apps. So even if I had an Android phone, I'd not install this. I only use the browser and email apps irrespective of the phone I use!

                Regards, Nish


                My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jimmy Savile

                  Brady Kelly wrote:

                  I'm a contractor that's been here a month and attracted attention by taking too much leave, and being late from transport problems

                  And when you are at work, spending all your time dicking about with your phone and personal documents?

                  B Offline
                  B Offline
                  Brady Kelly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  I'm not dicking about at work with the scanning, simply asking so that I might have a few responses when I get home and really get scanning.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Nish Nishant

                    Well I've used iPhones and now a Windows Phone, and I rarely install apps. So even if I had an Android phone, I'd not install this. I only use the browser and email apps irrespective of the phone I use!

                    Regards, Nish


                    My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    SinghUlarity
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    I don't know much about IE on Windows phone but Safari on the iPhone is terrible, when I was on iOS I avoided it at any cost. Any particular reason for avoiding apps or you're just too lazy to be arsed into installing any? :confused:

                    I are n00b.

                    N 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S SinghUlarity

                      I don't know much about IE on Windows phone but Safari on the iPhone is terrible, when I was on iOS I avoided it at any cost. Any particular reason for avoiding apps or you're just too lazy to be arsed into installing any? :confused:

                      I are n00b.

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Nish Nishant
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      Part of it is being lazy, the other bit is I am not very tech-savvy when it comes to using gadgets (mostly due to lack of interest). Kinda ironic I guess given that I spend most of my time writing code, including on mobile devices. That said, I did get a Nexus 7 for my son and helped him install several games. So I am familiar with Google's app store.

                      Regards, Nish


                      My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Brady Kelly

                        I have several important and private documents I would like to try 'scanning' with my digital camera. On or two very quick experiments shows image quality and size are excellent. Two problems I found though were the yellowing of white paper - I was advised not to use the flash, so the the ambient light colour in the room seems to have dominated. What should I do about lighting? Use an artificial electric lamp with a very white light, or use sunlight in a much more brightly lit room? My other problem is crinkles and folds in the documents that clearly show in the 'scans'. One's first though is to place a piece of glass over the document to flatten it, but that brings the risk of reflections. Is there some kind of material I can use in place of glass that is highly transparent, but non-reflective? Something I could get from a photography or art shop, or maybe a printing supply shop?

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Rajesh R Subramanian
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #23

                        I set the camera on a tripod and use long exposure times. I've succeeded in 'scanning' even nearly unreadable papers using this method. This works even in a dark room, given the exposure times are long enough, and the sensor in your camera is powerful enough. I use a DSLR though, but I presume that even a point-and-shoot camera should be able to produce good results. PS: You'll need to do some post processing. But it will be simple enough, and you could get it done with something like Picasa or Paint .NET.

                        "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Brady Kelly

                          I have several important and private documents I would like to try 'scanning' with my digital camera. On or two very quick experiments shows image quality and size are excellent. Two problems I found though were the yellowing of white paper - I was advised not to use the flash, so the the ambient light colour in the room seems to have dominated. What should I do about lighting? Use an artificial electric lamp with a very white light, or use sunlight in a much more brightly lit room? My other problem is crinkles and folds in the documents that clearly show in the 'scans'. One's first though is to place a piece of glass over the document to flatten it, but that brings the risk of reflections. Is there some kind of material I can use in place of glass that is highly transparent, but non-reflective? Something I could get from a photography or art shop, or maybe a printing supply shop?

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          R Giskard Reventlov
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #24

                          You could iron the page if it is badly creased. Or get some of that non-reflective glass/plastic that picture framing shops are always trying to sell. Wouldn't it be a lot easier just to use a scanner? I mean printers with scanners are so cheap these days that they are almost disposable.

                          "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B Brady Kelly

                            I have several important and private documents I would like to try 'scanning' with my digital camera. On or two very quick experiments shows image quality and size are excellent. Two problems I found though were the yellowing of white paper - I was advised not to use the flash, so the the ambient light colour in the room seems to have dominated. What should I do about lighting? Use an artificial electric lamp with a very white light, or use sunlight in a much more brightly lit room? My other problem is crinkles and folds in the documents that clearly show in the 'scans'. One's first though is to place a piece of glass over the document to flatten it, but that brings the risk of reflections. Is there some kind of material I can use in place of glass that is highly transparent, but non-reflective? Something I could get from a photography or art shop, or maybe a printing supply shop?

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Andrew Rissing
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #25

                            Could you just take it to a Kinkos or some such and ask for the document to be scanned. It'd probably be pretty cheap. I think you'll get a more professional result out of something like that than doing all this work to use your camera.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Brady Kelly

                              I have several important and private documents I would like to try 'scanning' with my digital camera. On or two very quick experiments shows image quality and size are excellent. Two problems I found though were the yellowing of white paper - I was advised not to use the flash, so the the ambient light colour in the room seems to have dominated. What should I do about lighting? Use an artificial electric lamp with a very white light, or use sunlight in a much more brightly lit room? My other problem is crinkles and folds in the documents that clearly show in the 'scans'. One's first though is to place a piece of glass over the document to flatten it, but that brings the risk of reflections. Is there some kind of material I can use in place of glass that is highly transparent, but non-reflective? Something I could get from a photography or art shop, or maybe a printing supply shop?

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Roger Wright
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #26

                              I've never had much luck with that, Brady. Glare, color shifts, keystoning, or some other damned thing always interferes. The best I've managed so far happened yesterday, when I needed to get a signed document on company letterhead to a government agency in a hurry. The scanner isn't working, the document is in Word format, and the fax machine is too poor quality to serve. So I signed the printed document, photographed my signature with my phone, emailed the picture to myself, cropped, resized, rotated and color-corrected the image on my desktop, then pasted it into the Word document. It looked as good as the original, so I pdf'd it and emailed it off, and no one has questioned its validity. :-D I do plan to keep my signature file locked in my safe, on a thumb drive, and no images of it on my desktop. :suss:

                              Will Rogers never met me.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Maximilien wrote:

                                Also, don't try to iron out the crinkles...

                                This is also sound advice on scrotum care.

                                Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends. Shed Petition[^]

                                B Offline
                                B Offline
                                Brisingr Aerowing
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #27

                                ChrisElston wrote:

                                Maximilien wrote:

                                Also, don't try to iron out the crinkles...

                                This is also sound advice on scrotum care.

                                Ouch. X|

                                Bob Dole

                                The internet is a great way to get on the net.

                                :doh: 2.0.82.7292 SP6a

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Nish Nishant

                                  You can use a white-balance correction tool during post-processing to get the yellow color whitened up :-)

                                  Regards, Nish


                                  My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

                                  B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  Brady Kelly
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #28

                                  What could I use for post procesing, that has nice white balance correction?

                                  N 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B Brady Kelly

                                    What could I use for post procesing, that has nice white balance correction?

                                    N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Nish Nishant
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #29

                                    Gimp is pretty good. Just take Colors / Auto / White Balance and it nearly always does a very good job.

                                    Regards, Nish


                                    My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B Brady Kelly

                                      I have several important and private documents I would like to try 'scanning' with my digital camera. On or two very quick experiments shows image quality and size are excellent. Two problems I found though were the yellowing of white paper - I was advised not to use the flash, so the the ambient light colour in the room seems to have dominated. What should I do about lighting? Use an artificial electric lamp with a very white light, or use sunlight in a much more brightly lit room? My other problem is crinkles and folds in the documents that clearly show in the 'scans'. One's first though is to place a piece of glass over the document to flatten it, but that brings the risk of reflections. Is there some kind of material I can use in place of glass that is highly transparent, but non-reflective? Something I could get from a photography or art shop, or maybe a printing supply shop?

                                      W Offline
                                      W Offline
                                      wizardzz
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #30

                                      Set the white balance on the camera. I'm shocked at how few people actually do this, or do it in editing.

                                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • W wizardzz

                                        Set the white balance on the camera. I'm shocked at how few people actually do this, or do it in editing.

                                        B Offline
                                        B Offline
                                        Brady Kelly
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #31

                                        Until today I couldn't figure where to set the white balance. It's greyed out in the normal settings, and you have to go into 'deep settings'.

                                        W 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • B Brady Kelly

                                          Until today I couldn't figure where to set the white balance. It's greyed out in the normal settings, and you have to go into 'deep settings'.

                                          W Offline
                                          W Offline
                                          wizardzz
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #32

                                          It's typically a very manual feature on most new cameras. I've pulled off some great shots using it. My professional photographer friend showed me that he carried around a white sheet of paper in his pocket. When in strange or bad lighting, he would whip it out at arm's length to set the white balance, then get his picture. I didn't mean it in a mean way, I'm just surprised at the amount of people that discuss the same issue on all sorts of forums, and rarely do people ever mention this feature.

                                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups