Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. MS has lost it all! Time to move on?

MS has lost it all! Time to move on?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpandroidcomgame-devquestion
32 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D DaveAuld

    Edo Tzumer wrote:

    but MS has definitely made life of developments and debugging MUCH easier and nicer

    Except when you hit F12 in IE compared to Chrome!!!

    Dave Find Me On: Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn


    Folding Stats: Team CodeProject

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Joezer BH
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    True except the F12 thingy (I stopped using IE and FF [as a user] mostly due to the dev features of early Chrome)

    Cheees, Edo

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D DaveAuld

      Mark_Wallace wrote:

      I don't use my real name for anything on the Internet

      So who are you then if you are not Mark Wallace?

      Dave Find Me On: Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn


      Folding Stats: Team CodeProject

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mark_Wallace
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Mark Wallace is a character in a story I wrote under the name Mark Wallace. I was hoping that by doing that, I'd disappear up my own backside (Goodbye, cruel world!), but it didn't work.

      I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Pete OHanlon

        Grasshopper.iics wrote:

        Try to get a pie in every segment where others are doing well.

        By that argument, Google shouldn't have released Android. What would you suggest? Should Microsoft be content to watch as tablets take off and they don't have a presence there. I've spoken to a lot of developers about W8 and the overlying opinion is that they might have given it a chance if Microsoft hadn't been so arrogant and switched off the start button and removed the boot straight to desktop option. Possibly Microsoft's biggest weakness right now is that it is so massively secretive. There are so many things that are going on that are heavily NDAd that teams are constrained from getting real feedback. Take the debacle over the release of the WP8 SDK. MS releases a major new platform, but doesn't provide the tooling for people to start developing for it until a couple of days before launch. Yet no one in the team saw fit to ask the question "wait a second, if we want quality applications in the store on day one, shouldn't we be getting this to people before the release"?

        Grasshopper.iics wrote:

        Someone give some sense to Mr. Steve Ballmer.

        As much as I think the man's a fool, historically it's not been Steve Ballmer who has been responsible for killing off product lines in Microsoft. Talking to insiders, the same story comes up time and time again; it's internal politics. One manager thinks another manager is encroaching on his or her space and they convince the level above to kill the project.

        I was brought up to respect my elders. I don't respect many people nowadays.
        CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier

        G Offline
        G Offline
        Grasshopper iics
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Good Point Made. Companies would try to explore new horizons and that's how technology and product companies survive. Apple is not trying to get into search business, they tried Map. :-D Google is not trying to make a Biz server. They are advertisement dependent. So they would try to enter into every Media thing where they can push advertisement, Search, Video, Social Network, News, Android, Adsense, Gmail and yes chrome is there to boost their advertisement revenue. They pushed Chrome to counter Firefox's turn off advertisement feature. Simple. Apple's business is their store, iTunes and Apps. They will follow a product line where people would need Apps, Tabs, iPad, iPod.... ( may be iWatch, iTV, iGame) etc. Don't be surprised to see an Apple product made especially for gaming or so. MS is on the other hand better off to it's License based Products. Office, OS, VS, Server OS. Now what they are trying to do? Enter into App market in the model of Apple and Enter into internet with the model of Google. They want a good Mobile platform. Why? So that they can push Bing and their App store. Historically Google has never dumped a popular product for another. Adsense is not killed for Android. Strategically they have combined their main business. But MS has faltered. They introduced Silverlight ( way smoother than Flash) only to kill it. They started with XNA, killed it. Can you claim for sure that WinRT is here to stay? But I can say that AdSense is going to be there in 2015, Youtube will also be there and so will the Android be ( Unless any of it is killed by severe competition). MS has given great products only to abandon it. I hope I made my point Pete.

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G Grasshopper iics

          Good Point Made. Companies would try to explore new horizons and that's how technology and product companies survive. Apple is not trying to get into search business, they tried Map. :-D Google is not trying to make a Biz server. They are advertisement dependent. So they would try to enter into every Media thing where they can push advertisement, Search, Video, Social Network, News, Android, Adsense, Gmail and yes chrome is there to boost their advertisement revenue. They pushed Chrome to counter Firefox's turn off advertisement feature. Simple. Apple's business is their store, iTunes and Apps. They will follow a product line where people would need Apps, Tabs, iPad, iPod.... ( may be iWatch, iTV, iGame) etc. Don't be surprised to see an Apple product made especially for gaming or so. MS is on the other hand better off to it's License based Products. Office, OS, VS, Server OS. Now what they are trying to do? Enter into App market in the model of Apple and Enter into internet with the model of Google. They want a good Mobile platform. Why? So that they can push Bing and their App store. Historically Google has never dumped a popular product for another. Adsense is not killed for Android. Strategically they have combined their main business. But MS has faltered. They introduced Silverlight ( way smoother than Flash) only to kill it. They started with XNA, killed it. Can you claim for sure that WinRT is here to stay? But I can say that AdSense is going to be there in 2015, Youtube will also be there and so will the Android be ( Unless any of it is killed by severe competition). MS has given great products only to abandon it. I hope I made my point Pete.

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Pete OHanlon
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          To a certain extent I agree, but I would debate with you about Google not killing products - they have been going through significant churn there. My point is just that Microsoft has had to adapt. They were complacent for a long time and, all of a sudden, the world has changed. Where Microsoft is really hampered is in the need to support legacy systems. If WinRT had been better named and a completely separate product, it might have been better received.

          I was brought up to respect my elders. I don't respect many people nowadays.
          CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Joezer BH

            Steve Ballmer may be a fool in your eyes but he was smart enough to become the second person after Roberto Goizueta to become a billionaire :cool: in U.S. dollars based on stock options received as an employee of a corporation in which he was neither a founder nor a relative of a founder!!

            Cheees, Edo

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Edo Tzumer wrote:

            Steve Ballmer may be a fool in your eyes but he was smart enough to become the second person after Roberto Goizueta to become a billionaire :cool: in U.S. dollars based on stock options received as an employee of a corporation in which he was neither a founder nor a relative of a founder!!

            I see you have misspelt lucky.

            Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Edo Tzumer wrote:

              Steve Ballmer may be a fool in your eyes but he was smart enough to become the second person after Roberto Goizueta to become a billionaire :cool: in U.S. dollars based on stock options received as an employee of a corporation in which he was neither a founder nor a relative of a founder!!

              I see you have misspelt lucky.

              Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Joezer BH
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Ahmmm, O :pause: K ... lucky ... Anyway, the clerk at Merriam Webster asked if you could please be so kind and send him the updated definition of lucky, it seems the world up till now has been misinformed. The way I see this is the exact example of achieving without luck. Lucky would be Ballmer's son.

              Cheees, Edo

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Joezer BH

                Ahmmm, O :pause: K ... lucky ... Anyway, the clerk at Merriam Webster asked if you could please be so kind and send him the updated definition of lucky, it seems the world up till now has been misinformed. The way I see this is the exact example of achieving without luck. Lucky would be Ballmer's son.

                Cheees, Edo

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                Edo Tzumer wrote:

                Anyway, the clerk at Merriam Webster...

                Faarrrkkkk off, that sunshine Webster can't spell for shite. It's Oxford or it's nothing.

                Edo Tzumer wrote:

                The way I see this is the exact example of achieving without luck.
                Lucky would be Ballmer's son.

                Ballmer is a knob jockey who lucked out into a company that went places and where he just missed out on being fired multiple times for being an embarrassing cock. On his own ability, he would be dressed in a chicken suit outside Kentucky Fried Chicken.

                Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G Grasshopper iics

                  http://www.scroogled.com/[^] I learnt a lesson in childhood which I follow like a religion. To make a line shorter, all you have to do is draw a bigger line. So if you want to beat competition, offer better product services. Rather than trying to be innovative, they tried to follow Mr. Steve Jobs way. Kill desktop and shift to tablets. Try to get a pie in every segment where others are doing well. Bad. Windows 8 tells the story. So MS has started crying like a child and shouting foul. Have we forgotten how you managed Netscape? I am convinced by every passing days that MS has it's golden days over. Android, Unity, Processing framework is looking more promising than any MS products. MS has officially stopped supporting XNA and God knows what else. Instead of spending millions in such stupid campaigns, if they had focused on spending constructively on developers, they would have had a better probability of catching up. I can't imagine life without Youtube, Gmail, Chrome and Google. It is same for Windows OS , Office Suite and C#. But as you have decided to dump products that I need, I have decided to move on. Someone give some sense to Mr. Steve Ballmer.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jschell
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Grasshopper.iics wrote:

                  I am convinced by every passing days that MS has it's golden days over.

                  Myself I was never under the impression that MS was an innovator. They buy it and/or copy it and then sell it. They are good at selling. Of course companies that are not good at selling do not last. Doesn't matter how much they innovate.

                  Grasshopper.iics wrote:

                  MS has officially stopped supporting XNA and God knows what else.

                  MS has stopped supporting a vast array of technologies over the years. Perhaps this is just the first time you noticed.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Grasshopper iics

                    http://www.scroogled.com/[^] I learnt a lesson in childhood which I follow like a religion. To make a line shorter, all you have to do is draw a bigger line. So if you want to beat competition, offer better product services. Rather than trying to be innovative, they tried to follow Mr. Steve Jobs way. Kill desktop and shift to tablets. Try to get a pie in every segment where others are doing well. Bad. Windows 8 tells the story. So MS has started crying like a child and shouting foul. Have we forgotten how you managed Netscape? I am convinced by every passing days that MS has it's golden days over. Android, Unity, Processing framework is looking more promising than any MS products. MS has officially stopped supporting XNA and God knows what else. Instead of spending millions in such stupid campaigns, if they had focused on spending constructively on developers, they would have had a better probability of catching up. I can't imagine life without Youtube, Gmail, Chrome and Google. It is same for Windows OS , Office Suite and C#. But as you have decided to dump products that I need, I have decided to move on. Someone give some sense to Mr. Steve Ballmer.

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jagz W
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    I am totally agree with you. What the question in my mind is, What are other options for developers? I have started my career six years back in programming with asp.net 1.1 and still working in asp.net 4.5 Code is important, but it's a small part the of overall process. Jagz W

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G Grasshopper iics

                      http://www.scroogled.com/[^] I learnt a lesson in childhood which I follow like a religion. To make a line shorter, all you have to do is draw a bigger line. So if you want to beat competition, offer better product services. Rather than trying to be innovative, they tried to follow Mr. Steve Jobs way. Kill desktop and shift to tablets. Try to get a pie in every segment where others are doing well. Bad. Windows 8 tells the story. So MS has started crying like a child and shouting foul. Have we forgotten how you managed Netscape? I am convinced by every passing days that MS has it's golden days over. Android, Unity, Processing framework is looking more promising than any MS products. MS has officially stopped supporting XNA and God knows what else. Instead of spending millions in such stupid campaigns, if they had focused on spending constructively on developers, they would have had a better probability of catching up. I can't imagine life without Youtube, Gmail, Chrome and Google. It is same for Windows OS , Office Suite and C#. But as you have decided to dump products that I need, I have decided to move on. Someone give some sense to Mr. Steve Ballmer.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      ClockMeister
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      That's one reason why I stay with VS2008 (the best version IMHO).

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C ClockMeister

                        That's one reason why I stay with VS2008 (the best version IMHO).

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        Grasshopper iics
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        So True! Especially does really well for business software.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Edo Tzumer wrote:

                          Anyway, the clerk at Merriam Webster...

                          Faarrrkkkk off, that sunshine Webster can't spell for shite. It's Oxford or it's nothing.

                          Edo Tzumer wrote:

                          The way I see this is the exact example of achieving without luck.
                          Lucky would be Ballmer's son.

                          Ballmer is a knob jockey who lucked out into a company that went places and where he just missed out on being fired multiple times for being an embarrassing cock. On his own ability, he would be dressed in a chicken suit outside Kentucky Fried Chicken.

                          Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Joezer BH
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          Ahh, forget it... why do I need to defend Ballmer anyway :wtf: ? Go on and hate him if it makes your world better in anyway, although I disagree with you on this one, there are probably things he'd done :^) that are "worth" feeling unhealthy feelings ;)

                          Cheees, Edo

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups