In the doghouse
-
well and truly. All I did yesterday was ask a junior colleague if there was any need for a hard coded string value in the call to the
base("yadda")
constructor from a derived class. SVN tells me who did it and when, so there's no use claiming it was someone else. Nice try though. All I need to know is does this hardcoded string have any significance to any functionality, because if it does I'll have to fix the bug that only produces files with a "yadda" prefix regardless of what you put in the textbox some other way. There's really no need to go all red, start crying and shout at me. She's not talking to me at all today. -
well and truly. All I did yesterday was ask a junior colleague if there was any need for a hard coded string value in the call to the
base("yadda")
constructor from a derived class. SVN tells me who did it and when, so there's no use claiming it was someone else. Nice try though. All I need to know is does this hardcoded string have any significance to any functionality, because if it does I'll have to fix the bug that only produces files with a "yadda" prefix regardless of what you put in the textbox some other way. There's really no need to go all red, start crying and shout at me. She's not talking to me at all today.Be a good "senior" colleague and do the teaching; do not simply chastise, explain the "why" it is an error and the "how" to fix it. ;)
Nihil obstat
-
well and truly. All I did yesterday was ask a junior colleague if there was any need for a hard coded string value in the call to the
base("yadda")
constructor from a derived class. SVN tells me who did it and when, so there's no use claiming it was someone else. Nice try though. All I need to know is does this hardcoded string have any significance to any functionality, because if it does I'll have to fix the bug that only produces files with a "yadda" prefix regardless of what you put in the textbox some other way. There's really no need to go all red, start crying and shout at me. She's not talking to me at all today. -
well and truly. All I did yesterday was ask a junior colleague if there was any need for a hard coded string value in the call to the
base("yadda")
constructor from a derived class. SVN tells me who did it and when, so there's no use claiming it was someone else. Nice try though. All I need to know is does this hardcoded string have any significance to any functionality, because if it does I'll have to fix the bug that only produces files with a "yadda" prefix regardless of what you put in the textbox some other way. There's really no need to go all red, start crying and shout at me. She's not talking to me at all today.I would persist if I were you. This is one of those cases where equality really does need to mean equality. If you'd ask the question of a male colleague, you should be able to ask it of a female colleague. It's not an offensive one - you are merely seeking clarification on functionality. I'd also have a word that shouting is not what you'd expect in a professional environment. The only thing I would say - have witnesses to the conversation.
I was brought up to respect my elders. I don't respect many people nowadays.
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier -
well and truly. All I did yesterday was ask a junior colleague if there was any need for a hard coded string value in the call to the
base("yadda")
constructor from a derived class. SVN tells me who did it and when, so there's no use claiming it was someone else. Nice try though. All I need to know is does this hardcoded string have any significance to any functionality, because if it does I'll have to fix the bug that only produces files with a "yadda" prefix regardless of what you put in the textbox some other way. There's really no need to go all red, start crying and shout at me. She's not talking to me at all today. -
well and truly. All I did yesterday was ask a junior colleague if there was any need for a hard coded string value in the call to the
base("yadda")
constructor from a derived class. SVN tells me who did it and when, so there's no use claiming it was someone else. Nice try though. All I need to know is does this hardcoded string have any significance to any functionality, because if it does I'll have to fix the bug that only produces files with a "yadda" prefix regardless of what you put in the textbox some other way. There's really no need to go all red, start crying and shout at me. She's not talking to me at all today.Quote:
In the doghouse
Now, in my experience, this term is usually used when there is a relationship. So, is there? Boy, that could really make the story interesting. :)
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Not if he referred to her as the junior. No married man would be so stupid as to suggest that about his wife.
I was brought up to respect my elders. I don't respect many people nowadays.
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier -
Be a good "senior" colleague and do the teaching; do not simply chastise, explain the "why" it is an error and the "how" to fix it. ;)
Nihil obstat
-
Quote:
In the doghouse
Now, in my experience, this term is usually used when there is a relationship. So, is there? Boy, that could really make the story interesting. :)
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
well and truly. All I did yesterday was ask a junior colleague if there was any need for a hard coded string value in the call to the
base("yadda")
constructor from a derived class. SVN tells me who did it and when, so there's no use claiming it was someone else. Nice try though. All I need to know is does this hardcoded string have any significance to any functionality, because if it does I'll have to fix the bug that only produces files with a "yadda" prefix regardless of what you put in the textbox some other way. There's really no need to go all red, start crying and shout at me. She's not talking to me at all today. -
Could have been worse:
base("yolo")
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
-
if I can't ask a simple question without the resulting drama and waterworks then there's no chance
-
well and truly. All I did yesterday was ask a junior colleague if there was any need for a hard coded string value in the call to the
base("yadda")
constructor from a derived class. SVN tells me who did it and when, so there's no use claiming it was someone else. Nice try though. All I need to know is does this hardcoded string have any significance to any functionality, because if it does I'll have to fix the bug that only produces files with a "yadda" prefix regardless of what you put in the textbox some other way. There's really no need to go all red, start crying and shout at me. She's not talking to me at all today.jim lahey wrote:
She
You should know better. No matter how right you are, you're obviously wrong. Don't get married until you fully understand that rule.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
It looks really close to a japanese word 'yada' or 'iyada' ('嫌だ') with meaning close to 'i dont want to'
Iyada, iyada, I don' wanna? Looks like I might actually remember that word.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
it was a simple closed question with only yes/no as possible options and I didn't chastise anyone. had I lost my rag with her I could understand her point but I have had more heated discussions with my toothbrush.
Yes, but when was the last time your toothbrush talked to you? :-D
-
Yes, but when was the last time your toothbrush talked to you? :-D
-
jim lahey wrote:
She
You should know better. No matter how right you are, you're obviously wrong. Don't get married until you fully understand that rule.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Perhaps he needs to demonstrate an act of kindness and, ahem, perhaps he might dip his pen's nib in her inkwell, so to speak.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
-
Perhaps he needs to demonstrate an act of kindness and, ahem, perhaps he might dip his pen's nib in her inkwell, so to speak.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
Have you just got a letter from Liz or what?
Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol "Nagy, you have won the internets." - Keith Barrow
-
well and truly. All I did yesterday was ask a junior colleague if there was any need for a hard coded string value in the call to the
base("yadda")
constructor from a derived class. SVN tells me who did it and when, so there's no use claiming it was someone else. Nice try though. All I need to know is does this hardcoded string have any significance to any functionality, because if it does I'll have to fix the bug that only produces files with a "yadda" prefix regardless of what you put in the textbox some other way. There's really no need to go all red, start crying and shout at me. She's not talking to me at all today.jim lahey wrote:
SVN tells me who did it and when, so there's no use claiming it was someone else.
Ah, but our SVN started with who knows what, went to CVS, was converted from a monolithic project to one that was componentized. The senior guy that did the checkins for these steps is named as the "author", but vehemently denies being such for many of the files. In one case, the file went back so far, we have no idea who originally wrote it. Not that it matters, they're long gone. (Two companies ago, when I converted a CVS repository to something else, I made sure that unknown users were declared administrator precisely to avoid this.)