Microsoft's principal products running on nearly 90 percent of the world's computers
-
You are talking about Personal Computers, but the time are changing. Younger people have mostly a smartphone or tablet and on these devices is Android or iOS most of the times. Do you know Kodak?
Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany
KarstenK wrote:
Do you know Kodak?
Watzdat?
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time -
It's not only betting on the market-leader. You stay market-leader by providing better quality than your competitors. And quality in regards to operating systems includes more than just system stability. You have to consider the number of available software (and it's quality), backwards compatibility and so on as well. You can write a completely bug-free OS if you want and you won't sell a copy of it unless your customers are actually able to run the software they need on it. Of course software companies tend to write for operating system of the market-leader first, which in turn makes it kinda difficult for other OS publishers.
-
This is the wrong place for such questions. We don't have any psychics or crystal balls here. Only Crystal Reports sometimes.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a fucking golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?" "You mean like from space?" "No, from Canada." If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.CDP1802 wrote:
Only Crystal Reports sometimes.
Yeah, well, that's not psychic - that's sorcery or black magic! Nobody ever knows if it works - and how! And nobody wants to touch it with a 10 foot pole... :doh:
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time -
And what happens in future? Will there be any OS to compete with Windows and then change the scenario!!
Member 9441074 wrote:
Microsoft's principal products running on nearly 90 percent of the world's computers
Citation required... I would say from anecdotal evidence that the percentage is smaller... apparently...
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
-
HobbyProggy wrote:
invisible pink unicorns?
That's the desktop-theme of the latest Linux distro
The twitter handle for the EF team at MS is, yes, @efmagicunicorns. :laugh:
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
-
You are talking about Personal Computers, but the time are changing. Younger people have mostly a smartphone or tablet and on these devices is Android or iOS most of the times. Do you know Kodak?
Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany
-
Member 9441074 wrote:
Microsoft's principal products running on nearly 90 percent of the world's computers
Citation required... I would say from anecdotal evidence that the percentage is smaller... apparently...
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
-
It's not only betting on the market-leader. You stay market-leader by providing better quality than your competitors. And quality in regards to operating systems includes more than just system stability. You have to consider the number of available software (and it's quality), backwards compatibility and so on as well. You can write a completely bug-free OS if you want and you won't sell a copy of it unless your customers are actually able to run the software they need on it. Of course software companies tend to write for operating system of the market-leader first, which in turn makes it kinda difficult for other OS publishers.
Nicholas Marty wrote:
You have to consider the number of available software (and it's quality), backwards compatibility and so on as well.
That is way they will stay market-leader. If said manager has to look for application-software, he'll end up with Microsoft again. That means that most documentation and tutorials are aimed at, you guessed it, Microsoft products. It is one of the advantages of having a monopoly.
Nicholas Marty wrote:
You can write a completely bug-free OS
No, that is impossible. No software-vendor will have NASA's resources, and even they make mistakes that cost lives. So, unless you can beat NASA on a lower budget, you won't have bug-free software.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
-
You are talking about Personal Computers, but the time are changing. Younger people have mostly a smartphone or tablet and on these devices is Android or iOS most of the times. Do you know Kodak?
Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany
-
Since Windows 8 I prefer not to think about Mickeysoft.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a fucking golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?" "You mean like from space?" "No, from Canada." If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns. -
And what happens in future? Will there be any OS to compete with Windows and then change the scenario!!
http://xkcd.com/1508/[^] :rolleyes:
I'd rather be phishing!
-
Nicholas Marty wrote:
You have to consider the number of available software (and it's quality), backwards compatibility and so on as well.
That is way they will stay market-leader. If said manager has to look for application-software, he'll end up with Microsoft again. That means that most documentation and tutorials are aimed at, you guessed it, Microsoft products. It is one of the advantages of having a monopoly.
Nicholas Marty wrote:
You can write a completely bug-free OS
No, that is impossible. No software-vendor will have NASA's resources, and even they make mistakes that cost lives. So, unless you can beat NASA on a lower budget, you won't have bug-free software.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
Yeah, my criticism was more aimed at the "regardless of quality" bit of your first response. I'm just saying quality involves a lot of things (and is probably also pretty subjective). When I have to consider which OS I want, I factor many things in. All of which contribute to the "quality": - Does it run on my hardware? (And is there driver support from the hardware vendors for this OS?) - Is it reasonably stable? (I can live with an occasional software or system crash, as long as it doesn't occur too often) - Can it run programs X, Y and Z that I already use and like to continue use? - Is it providing a similiar User Interface that I'm already used to, so I will feel at home soon enough? - Are there known and open security flaws, and if there are, will they be fixed? and so on. I want the OS that suits my needs best (or in other words "has in my opinion the highest quality"). You could conclude, that being the market-leader is a part of their quality as well ;)
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
No, that is impossible.
In a hypotetical sense of course :laugh: And I think a completely bug-free OS IS possible. It just might not do anything (useful) at all ;)
-
One thing we think about is observing the gibberish you used to post. Use real words. Capitalization and spelling are also appreciated. This place isn't for posting in text formats, and despite all the squawking, not for tweet-style, either. In other words, use words!
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
The quality of grammar in the article pretty much spoke to me of the validity of the content: "Today, that company, Microsoft, has more than 125,000 employees, a sprawling 8-million-square-foot campus outside Seattle and its principal products running on nearly 90 percent of the world's computers. It's the third-most valuable company in the world, behind only oil giant Exxon Mobil and longtime competitor Apple." What is it with all those commas and hyphenated "8-million-square-foot" mumbo jumbo? The actual citation is from clickety[^]. The quote is about personal computers and not all computers." I am starting to think that CNET may be the Daily mail(British paper for those of limited intellect) of the IT world when it comes to journalism.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
-
One thing we think about is observing the gibberish you used to post. Use real words. Capitalization and spelling are also appreciated. This place isn't for posting in text formats, and despite all the squawking, not for tweet-style, either. In other words, use words!
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
Yeah, my criticism was more aimed at the "regardless of quality" bit of your first response. I'm just saying quality involves a lot of things (and is probably also pretty subjective). When I have to consider which OS I want, I factor many things in. All of which contribute to the "quality": - Does it run on my hardware? (And is there driver support from the hardware vendors for this OS?) - Is it reasonably stable? (I can live with an occasional software or system crash, as long as it doesn't occur too often) - Can it run programs X, Y and Z that I already use and like to continue use? - Is it providing a similiar User Interface that I'm already used to, so I will feel at home soon enough? - Are there known and open security flaws, and if there are, will they be fixed? and so on. I want the OS that suits my needs best (or in other words "has in my opinion the highest quality"). You could conclude, that being the market-leader is a part of their quality as well ;)
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
No, that is impossible.
In a hypotetical sense of course :laugh: And I think a completely bug-free OS IS possible. It just might not do anything (useful) at all ;)
Nicholas Marty wrote:
When I have to consider which OS I want, I factor many things in.
Yeah, same list as I was thought in school, but that is not how the world works. There's no testing on stability, no stats to compare. If it runs Microsoft Office, then it is accepted. Bing, welcome Windows.
Nicholas Marty wrote:
Is it providing a similiar User Interface that I'm already used to, so I will feel at home soon enough?
Yeah, it saves money if you don't have to re-educate the users, saves time, frustration - but marketing will tell you that no-one will buy it if it looks "old". See Win8 and its start-menu. See Vista and Aero.
Nicholas Marty wrote:
You could conclude, that being the market-leader is a part of their quality as well ;)
No, I'll conclude that having a monopoly-position nearly guarantees a monopoly-position. Unless you're an IBM or Netscape, in which case even that is not enough to survive.
Nicholas Marty wrote:
And I think a completely bug-free OS IS possible.
Only in theory. You'd need a bigger budget than NASA (already clear on that point it would not be commercial), and you would still not be able to prove that it does not contain bugs.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
-
And what happens in future? Will there be any OS to compete with Windows and then change the scenario!!
-
This is the wrong place for such questions. We don't have any psychics or crystal balls here. Only Crystal Reports sometimes.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a fucking golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?" "You mean like from space?" "No, from Canada." If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.CDP1802 wrote:
Only Crystal Reports sometimes.
Oh my, thanks a lot for reminding me that I must revisit Hades and make a deal with the landlord in order to figure out the bare essential distributable libraries needed for CR XI through field definitions. This is not a programming question, merely an expression of disgust! :) Edit: There is a reason I reference the CrystalRuntime.Application object as 'crAp'! :laugh:
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
-
I am informed that this is the year of the Linux Desktop.
I think the Apple Watch is dumb, but I can all but guarantee it will sell more copies than the installed base of Linux on the Desktop within a month of its release.
-
I am informed that this is the year of the Linux Desktop.
It's been the year of the Linux desktop for me for the past 6 years; everytime I produce a reasonably straight doze machine somebody buys it from me. Most recently I bombed a W7 machine from ebay back to the stone age, with only 70G of free space(from 250 G disk) it was obviously a mule full of paedo stuff or simply another terrible case of windows bloat. Sold it at a profit. To nuns. In Yorkshire. You have been warned. :wtf: