Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Good grief MS, why?

Good grief MS, why?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
beta-testingjsonperformancequestion
47 Posts 36 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

    Dij the Cat just walked across my keyboard and somehow found the "Calculator" key I'd forgotten all about (it's a Logitech keyboard with a number of additional keys, most of which I don't use) And that brought up the Windows 10 calculator. First time I've seen it, and my word but that's bad. Tell me Mr Microsoft Developer: What possible reason is there for replacing the old (working) Win7 Calculator with a new one that almost fills a 22 inch monitor with a 20 button calculator (with memory) and 2cm high result display? Do you seriously think I am going so blind that I need to see numbers in huge mode (despite the rest of the system showing me "normal" text under 3mm high)? And not making it resizable? Even if you switch the stupid thing to "programmer mode" it's the same damn size, and frankly not a lot more use... For elephant's sake - how does this kind of rubbish get through their QA? :confused:

    Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

    D Offline
    D Offline
    devenv exe
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    OriginalGriff wrote:

    one that almost fills a 22 inch monitor with a 20 button calculator (with memory) and 2cm high result display?

    it is a Single-Page Application.

    "Coming soon"

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

      How big are their fingers? :omg: Each button is two inches (5cm) wide, by 1 1/4 inches (3.2cm) high! Are MS employing Manatees as designers now? :laugh:

      Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Daniel Pfeffer
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      They designed it that way in order to cater to all their thumb-fingered engineers. :)

      If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

        Dij the Cat just walked across my keyboard and somehow found the "Calculator" key I'd forgotten all about (it's a Logitech keyboard with a number of additional keys, most of which I don't use) And that brought up the Windows 10 calculator. First time I've seen it, and my word but that's bad. Tell me Mr Microsoft Developer: What possible reason is there for replacing the old (working) Win7 Calculator with a new one that almost fills a 22 inch monitor with a 20 button calculator (with memory) and 2cm high result display? Do you seriously think I am going so blind that I need to see numbers in huge mode (despite the rest of the system showing me "normal" text under 3mm high)? And not making it resizable? Even if you switch the stupid thing to "programmer mode" it's the same damn size, and frankly not a lot more use... For elephant's sake - how does this kind of rubbish get through their QA? :confused:

        Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Duke Carey
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        That's odd. On my 23 inch monitor it takes up only about 1/6th the screen width and a little over half the screen height. If I maximize it, though, it's grotesque in its appearance. Perhaps yours is opening maximized?

        D Z 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

          Dij the Cat just walked across my keyboard and somehow found the "Calculator" key I'd forgotten all about (it's a Logitech keyboard with a number of additional keys, most of which I don't use) And that brought up the Windows 10 calculator. First time I've seen it, and my word but that's bad. Tell me Mr Microsoft Developer: What possible reason is there for replacing the old (working) Win7 Calculator with a new one that almost fills a 22 inch monitor with a 20 button calculator (with memory) and 2cm high result display? Do you seriously think I am going so blind that I need to see numbers in huge mode (despite the rest of the system showing me "normal" text under 3mm high)? And not making it resizable? Even if you switch the stupid thing to "programmer mode" it's the same damn size, and frankly not a lot more use... For elephant's sake - how does this kind of rubbish get through their QA? :confused:

          Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Rage
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          OriginalGriff wrote:

          and frankly not a lot more use...

          Yep : Calculator[^]

          Do not escape reality : improve reality !

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Duke Carey

            That's odd. On my 23 inch monitor it takes up only about 1/6th the screen width and a little over half the screen height. If I maximize it, though, it's grotesque in its appearance. Perhaps yours is opening maximized?

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Daniel Pfeffer
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            :wtf: Why should it even be possible to maximize a calculator window? In the ideal case, it would detect the physical size of the screen (based on the system device parameters), and resize itself so that the buttons were always the same physical size! (There should probably be some configuration options for vision-impaired people, but that should be it!)

            If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D den2k88

              OriginalGriff wrote:

              how does this kind of rubbish get through their QA?

              Through our QA.

              GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver "When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey "just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Daniel Pfeffer
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              den2k88 wrote:

              Through our QA.

              :omg: :wtf: X|

              If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                Dij the Cat just walked across my keyboard and somehow found the "Calculator" key I'd forgotten all about (it's a Logitech keyboard with a number of additional keys, most of which I don't use) And that brought up the Windows 10 calculator. First time I've seen it, and my word but that's bad. Tell me Mr Microsoft Developer: What possible reason is there for replacing the old (working) Win7 Calculator with a new one that almost fills a 22 inch monitor with a 20 button calculator (with memory) and 2cm high result display? Do you seriously think I am going so blind that I need to see numbers in huge mode (despite the rest of the system showing me "normal" text under 3mm high)? And not making it resizable? Even if you switch the stupid thing to "programmer mode" it's the same damn size, and frankly not a lot more use... For elephant's sake - how does this kind of rubbish get through their QA? :confused:

                Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                Richard DeemingR Offline
                Richard DeemingR Offline
                Richard Deeming
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                OriginalGriff wrote:

                And not making it resizable?

                It's resizable on my machine. Are you sure you haven't got it maximized?


                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Duke Carey

                  That's odd. On my 23 inch monitor it takes up only about 1/6th the screen width and a little over half the screen height. If I maximize it, though, it's grotesque in its appearance. Perhaps yours is opening maximized?

                  Z Offline
                  Z Offline
                  ZurdoDev
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  Duke Carey wrote:

                  Perhaps yours is opening maximized?

                  Way to ruin the rant with logic. :doh:

                  There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                    OriginalGriff wrote:

                    And not making it resizable?

                    It's resizable on my machine. Are you sure you haven't got it maximized?


                    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                    OriginalGriffO Offline
                    OriginalGriffO Offline
                    OriginalGriff
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    Certain - it covered most but not all of my screen. And it wasn't resizable - I got no size bars when trying the first time - but it is now, which is weird...:confused:

                    Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                    "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
                    "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

                    9 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                      Dij the Cat just walked across my keyboard and somehow found the "Calculator" key I'd forgotten all about (it's a Logitech keyboard with a number of additional keys, most of which I don't use) And that brought up the Windows 10 calculator. First time I've seen it, and my word but that's bad. Tell me Mr Microsoft Developer: What possible reason is there for replacing the old (working) Win7 Calculator with a new one that almost fills a 22 inch monitor with a 20 button calculator (with memory) and 2cm high result display? Do you seriously think I am going so blind that I need to see numbers in huge mode (despite the rest of the system showing me "normal" text under 3mm high)? And not making it resizable? Even if you switch the stupid thing to "programmer mode" it's the same damn size, and frankly not a lot more use... For elephant's sake - how does this kind of rubbish get through their QA? :confused:

                      Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Marc Clifton
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      OriginalGriff wrote:

                      Dij the Cat just walked across my keyboard

                      The irony of that is that just as I clicked on the subject line to read your post, MY cat walked on the keyboard and activated Team Viewer! Marc

                      Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Daniel Pfeffer

                        den2k88 wrote:

                        Through our QA.

                        :omg: :wtf: X|

                        If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        den2k88
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #23

                        I has to make a calc Universal Apps code plz

                        GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver "When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey "just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                          Certain - it covered most but not all of my screen. And it wasn't resizable - I got no size bars when trying the first time - but it is now, which is weird...:confused:

                          Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                          9 Offline
                          9 Offline
                          9082365
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #24

                          OriginalGriff wrote:

                          I got no size bars when trying the first time

                          Well you wouldn't if it was maximised! :doh:

                          I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Daniel Pfeffer

                            :wtf: Why should it even be possible to maximize a calculator window? In the ideal case, it would detect the physical size of the screen (based on the system device parameters), and resize itself so that the buttons were always the same physical size! (There should probably be some configuration options for vision-impaired people, but that should be it!)

                            If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            Dan Neely
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #25

                            Because running full screen on a 5" phone makes sense, on an 8" tablet it may/may not be reasonable; and putting an arbitrary cannot be maximized on screens larger than size X constraint on would result in an equally huge number of "What The Elephant!!!!!11!11one11!elventyone1!!1"s from the peanut gallery. Personally, for the number of times I've sworn at an MS dialog for *NOT* being resizable; I'd very strongly prefer they err on the side of making everything resizable even if it'll leave some people scratching their heads.

                            Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt

                            D D 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                              Dij the Cat just walked across my keyboard and somehow found the "Calculator" key I'd forgotten all about (it's a Logitech keyboard with a number of additional keys, most of which I don't use) And that brought up the Windows 10 calculator. First time I've seen it, and my word but that's bad. Tell me Mr Microsoft Developer: What possible reason is there for replacing the old (working) Win7 Calculator with a new one that almost fills a 22 inch monitor with a 20 button calculator (with memory) and 2cm high result display? Do you seriously think I am going so blind that I need to see numbers in huge mode (despite the rest of the system showing me "normal" text under 3mm high)? And not making it resizable? Even if you switch the stupid thing to "programmer mode" it's the same damn size, and frankly not a lot more use... For elephant's sake - how does this kind of rubbish get through their QA? :confused:

                              Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              ledtech3
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #26

                              Some one Actually Likes the Crap, thats how.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                                Dij the Cat just walked across my keyboard and somehow found the "Calculator" key I'd forgotten all about (it's a Logitech keyboard with a number of additional keys, most of which I don't use) And that brought up the Windows 10 calculator. First time I've seen it, and my word but that's bad. Tell me Mr Microsoft Developer: What possible reason is there for replacing the old (working) Win7 Calculator with a new one that almost fills a 22 inch monitor with a 20 button calculator (with memory) and 2cm high result display? Do you seriously think I am going so blind that I need to see numbers in huge mode (despite the rest of the system showing me "normal" text under 3mm high)? And not making it resizable? Even if you switch the stupid thing to "programmer mode" it's the same damn size, and frankly not a lot more use... For elephant's sake - how does this kind of rubbish get through their QA? :confused:

                                Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                                Mike HankeyM Offline
                                Mike HankeyM Offline
                                Mike Hankey
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #27

                                OriginalGriff wrote:

                                For elephant's sake - how does this kind of rubbish get through their QA?

                                You mean they have a QA department? Now that they have complete control of peoples machines I guess they figure they can do any damn thing they want. And from the looks of lounge posts this morning that's exactly what they're doing.

                                New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.1 Beta
                                Coffee I need...or kill you I will!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D Dan Neely

                                  Because running full screen on a 5" phone makes sense, on an 8" tablet it may/may not be reasonable; and putting an arbitrary cannot be maximized on screens larger than size X constraint on would result in an equally huge number of "What The Elephant!!!!!11!11one11!elventyone1!!1"s from the peanut gallery. Personally, for the number of times I've sworn at an MS dialog for *NOT* being resizable; I'd very strongly prefer they err on the side of making everything resizable even if it'll leave some people scratching their heads.

                                  Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Daniel Pfeffer
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #28

                                  Fair enough. Reasonable people may disagree on this point.

                                  If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Duncan Edwards Jones

                                    OriginalGriff wrote:

                                    one that almost fills a 22 inch monitor with a 20 button calculator (with memory) and 2cm high result display?

                                    It's for "Big Data".

                                    G Offline
                                    G Offline
                                    Gary Wheeler
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #29

                                    :laugh: Imagine a calculator program that includes Hadoop support for arbitrarily large numbers with an arbitrary amount of precision.

                                    Software Zen: delete this;

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                                      Dij the Cat just walked across my keyboard and somehow found the "Calculator" key I'd forgotten all about (it's a Logitech keyboard with a number of additional keys, most of which I don't use) And that brought up the Windows 10 calculator. First time I've seen it, and my word but that's bad. Tell me Mr Microsoft Developer: What possible reason is there for replacing the old (working) Win7 Calculator with a new one that almost fills a 22 inch monitor with a 20 button calculator (with memory) and 2cm high result display? Do you seriously think I am going so blind that I need to see numbers in huge mode (despite the rest of the system showing me "normal" text under 3mm high)? And not making it resizable? Even if you switch the stupid thing to "programmer mode" it's the same damn size, and frankly not a lot more use... For elephant's sake - how does this kind of rubbish get through their QA? :confused:

                                      Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #30

                                      It's missing the date calculation functions too (or at least was the last time I looked at it). FYI There's a mod somewhere that installs the Windows 7 calculator on Windows 10. That was almost the first thing I did after installing Windows 10, though I can't remember where I got it off the top of my head.

                                      Anna (@annajayne) Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P peterkmx

                                        To make things worse , their QA approved it because it is a new standard ... :-)

                                        D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        DJ van Wyk
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #31

                                        Which in turn is used as an example and proof that the new standard is "out there" and we should all use it.

                                        My plan is to live forever ... so far so good

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • D Dan Neely

                                          Because running full screen on a 5" phone makes sense, on an 8" tablet it may/may not be reasonable; and putting an arbitrary cannot be maximized on screens larger than size X constraint on would result in an equally huge number of "What The Elephant!!!!!11!11one11!elventyone1!!1"s from the peanut gallery. Personally, for the number of times I've sworn at an MS dialog for *NOT* being resizable; I'd very strongly prefer they err on the side of making everything resizable even if it'll leave some people scratching their heads.

                                          Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          den2k88
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #32

                                          Dan Neely wrote:

                                          Personally, for the number of times I've sworn at an MS dialog for *NOT* being resizable

                                          Also titled: 16:9 monitors and tall option windows. Often hiding only the Apply-Ok-Cancel buttons... :grrrr:

                                          GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver "When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey "just eat it, eat it"."They're out to mold, better eat while you can" -- HobbyProggy

                                          D 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups