Plurality - Modular Code Editor
-
Truth. For each type of work and need there is a more suitable tool . This forum is bug ¬¬
-
Truth. For each type of work and need there is a more suitable tool.
-
Gurigraphics wrote:
This forum is bug
Then report it in the proper place. However, it is more likely that your message got picked up by the Spam filter, and had to be released by someone with the right authority.
Okay. I post in one place and it appears in another. Thanks.
-
Sounds like you are looking for a problem to your solution. Yeah. The same problem solved by Stencyl, Scratch, Google Blockly, Game Maker, Unreal Engine and others visual editors.
-
Me too. That is why I often prefer Sublime than VS.
-
Me too. That is why I often prefer Sublime than VS.
-
Me too. That is why I often prefer S-ublime than V-S.
-
Making comparisons with VS does not change anything. Whoever prefers this approach simply uses it If this possibility exists. It is not a question of better or worse. It's a matter of wanting. https://forums.tigsource.com/index.php?topic=59097.0
-
Without a prototype I collected only criticism: It's not worth it, the images are MS-DOS, VS is better, nobody needs it.
-
Without a prototype I collected only criticism: It's not worth it, the images are MS-DOS, VS is better, nobody needs it.
-
Me too. That is why I often prefer Sublime than VS.
Gurigraphics wrote:
Me too. That is why I often prefer Sublime than VS.
Brilliant text-editor, but not a IDE.
Gurigraphics wrote:
Yeah. The same problem solved by Stencyl, Scratch, Google Blockly, Game Maker, Unreal Engine and others visual editors.
Problem is that those were not more efficient 'solutions' than the already existing ones.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
-
Gurigraphics wrote:
Me too. That is why I often prefer Sublime than VS.
Brilliant text-editor, but not a IDE.
Gurigraphics wrote:
Yeah. The same problem solved by Stencyl, Scratch, Google Blockly, Game Maker, Unreal Engine and others visual editors.
Problem is that those were not more efficient 'solutions' than the already existing ones.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
In many ways they are more efficient. But, as I said, I'm not interested in comparisons, better and worse, and that kind of teen discussion. P.s: That answer was for another question. This forum is lag.
-
If "graphics" is the only thing that is holding you back, there are plenty of FREE tools to make things more "shiny": Paint; Paint.NET; Gimp; POV-Ray; MS Blend; etc.
The graphics was just a rough draft. These days I found ready a part of what I need. And much better than I could do. jQquery sortable lists[^]
-
In many ways they are more efficient. But, as I said, I'm not interested in comparisons, better and worse, and that kind of teen discussion. P.s: That answer was for another question. This forum is lag.
Gurigraphics wrote:
In many ways they are more efficient
Name one.
Gurigraphics wrote:
I'm not interested in comparisons, better and worse, and that kind of teen discussion.
Happy new year :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
-
Gurigraphics wrote:
In many ways they are more efficient
Name one.
Gurigraphics wrote:
I'm not interested in comparisons, better and worse, and that kind of teen discussion.
Happy new year :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
Name one: Create games more fast. Happy New Year. (2 hours left here) ^ ^
-
Gurigraphics wrote:
In many ways they are more efficient
Name one.
Gurigraphics wrote:
I'm not interested in comparisons, better and worse, and that kind of teen discussion.
Happy new year :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
Name one: Create games more fast. Happy New Year. (2 hours left here) ^ ^
-
Gurigraphics wrote:
In many ways they are more efficient
Name one.
Gurigraphics wrote:
I'm not interested in comparisons, better and worse, and that kind of teen discussion.
Happy new year :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
C reate g ames m ore f ast. H appy N ew Y ear. (2 h ours l eft h ere) ^ ^ P.s: A ll I w rite is d eleted.
-
Gurigraphics wrote:
In many ways they are more efficient
Name one.
Gurigraphics wrote:
I'm not interested in comparisons, better and worse, and that kind of teen discussion.
Happy new year :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
To create games more fast. Happy New Year. (2h hours left here) ^ ^ P.s: All I write is deleted. ¬¬
-
Gurigraphics wrote:
In many ways they are more efficient
Name one.
Gurigraphics wrote:
I'm not interested in comparisons, better and worse, and that kind of teen discussion.
Happy new year :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
To create games more fast. HNY (2h hours left here) ^ ^ P.s: All I write is deleted. ¬¬
-
Gurigraphics wrote:
In many ways they are more efficient
Name one.
Gurigraphics wrote:
I'm not interested in comparisons, better and worse, and that kind of teen discussion.
Happy new year :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
To create g_ames more fast. HNY (There's still 2 hours left) ^ ^ P.s: This forum delete all my texts. ¬¬