Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. For the Climate Change Nazis

For the Climate Change Nazis

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
com
81 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Munchies_Matt

    Population increase in Britain is due entirely to immigration. Native birth rate is below maintenance.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    Population across the planet is increasing, as shown in the charts in the previous links. Mass migration is a symptom of this problem.

    Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.

    M N 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Population across the planet is increasing, as shown in the charts in the previous links. Mass migration is a symptom of this problem.

      Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Munchies_Matt
      wrote on last edited by
      #33

      Yes, it is increasing now, but in 20 years it will level off. Mass migration is a result of war, famine, repression, and a desire to make a better life in the west. Why would the migrants go from a less populated country to one that is more populated if overpopulation was a motivating factor? Clearly it isnt.

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Has Anyone Seen Mike Hunt wrote:

        Couldn't careless

        That is "care less"; careless has a totally different meaning. But I will excuse you as you are from foreign.

        enhzflepE Offline
        enhzflepE Offline
        enhzflep
        wrote on last edited by
        #34

        Richard MacCutchan wrote:

        But I will excuse you as you are from foreign.

        :laugh: Think you left something out there old boy. ;)

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • enhzflepE enhzflep

          Richard MacCutchan wrote:

          But I will excuse you as you are from foreign.

          :laugh: Think you left something out there old boy. ;)

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #35

          No, I deliberately ended that sentence where I did.

          enhzflepE 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            No, I deliberately ended that sentence where I did.

            enhzflepE Offline
            enhzflepE Offline
            enhzflep
            wrote on last edited by
            #36

            :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Didn't even consider the possibility. Nice work, hook, line and sinker. Hopefully I'm making some others in this place feel clever today. Dammit I feel stupid now. :-\ :thumbsup:

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • enhzflepE enhzflep

              :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Didn't even consider the possibility. Nice work, hook, line and sinker. Hopefully I'm making some others in this place feel clever today. Dammit I feel stupid now. :-\ :thumbsup:

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #37

              Ah well, I'll excuse you because you are from ... :laugh: :laugh:

              enhzflepE 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Ah well, I'll excuse you because you are from ... :laugh: :laugh:

                enhzflepE Offline
                enhzflepE Offline
                enhzflep
                wrote on last edited by
                #38

                The joint all your (really bright?) criminals were sent to? In fact, Dr Beeching was a relative. ;) :laugh:

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • enhzflepE enhzflep

                  The joint all your (really bright?) criminals were sent to? In fact, Dr Beeching was a relative. ;) :laugh:

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #39

                  Some of us managed to get away with it. ;)

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Le centriste

                    Munchies_Matt wrote:

                    Britain has some of the oldest housing in Europe. It needs a lot of heating. Without it it gets damp. Quickly. Mold grows, peoples lungs get infected. They die.

                    I don't think 10 pounds a month make a lot of difference.

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Munchies_Matt
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #40

                    It is enough to push people over the edge. Green taxes are killing people, right now, in the UK.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Some of us managed to get away with it. ;)

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #41

                      Richard MacCutchan wrote:

                      Some of us managed to get away with it. ;)

                      And you think you got the win? Dirty, dingy blighty or Oz, the smart ones got caught.

                      Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                      Richard DeemingR L 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • M Munchies_Matt

                        Yes, it is increasing now, but in 20 years it will level off. Mass migration is a result of war, famine, repression, and a desire to make a better life in the west. Why would the migrants go from a less populated country to one that is more populated if overpopulation was a motivating factor? Clearly it isnt.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #42

                        Munchies_Matt wrote:

                        Yes, it is increasing now, but in 20 years it will level off.

                        Thank goodness you can see the future! I love hearing accurate forecasts on what people will do.. :laugh:

                        Munchies_Matt wrote:

                        Mass migration is a result of war, famine, repression, and a desire to make a better life in the west.

                        Mass migration is a symptom of over-population - not enough resources to go around, so you get "war, famine, repression". It's also a lot easier to move and take what others have worked to achieve, rather than work and achieve for yourself.

                        Munchies_Matt wrote:

                        Why would the migrants go from a less populated country to one that is more populated if overpopulation was a motivating factor?

                        Because: It's a lot easier to move and take what others have worked to achieve, rather than work and achieve for yourself. :doh: And the statistics that show that the world population has increased dramatically shows (wait for it)... that the population has increased all over the world! (Surprise!) :wtf: So (and here's the big reveal) they're moving from one overpopulated country to another. [Edit] To be clear, each country has a maximum number of humans it can sustainably support. It's not necessarily down to the size of a country, but the resources that country has and the impact on the environment of each person in that country. So you may have two countries, A and B - A is smaller than B, but because of its agriculture, geography, energy resources, water availability, etc, it may be able to support more people than country B. So while country B may have less population than country A, country B may be overpopulated while country A (smaller and with a higher population) may be well within its limits. Every country does have a limit though.

                        Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Munchies_Matt wrote:

                          Yes, it is increasing now, but in 20 years it will level off.

                          Thank goodness you can see the future! I love hearing accurate forecasts on what people will do.. :laugh:

                          Munchies_Matt wrote:

                          Mass migration is a result of war, famine, repression, and a desire to make a better life in the west.

                          Mass migration is a symptom of over-population - not enough resources to go around, so you get "war, famine, repression". It's also a lot easier to move and take what others have worked to achieve, rather than work and achieve for yourself.

                          Munchies_Matt wrote:

                          Why would the migrants go from a less populated country to one that is more populated if overpopulation was a motivating factor?

                          Because: It's a lot easier to move and take what others have worked to achieve, rather than work and achieve for yourself. :doh: And the statistics that show that the world population has increased dramatically shows (wait for it)... that the population has increased all over the world! (Surprise!) :wtf: So (and here's the big reveal) they're moving from one overpopulated country to another. [Edit] To be clear, each country has a maximum number of humans it can sustainably support. It's not necessarily down to the size of a country, but the resources that country has and the impact on the environment of each person in that country. So you may have two countries, A and B - A is smaller than B, but because of its agriculture, geography, energy resources, water availability, etc, it may be able to support more people than country B. So while country B may have less population than country A, country B may be overpopulated while country A (smaller and with a higher population) may be well within its limits. Every country does have a limit though.

                          Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Munchies_Matt
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #43

                          Brent Jenkins wrote:

                          Thank goodness you can see the future

                          Why are you so childish? Look at the global birth rate: GLOBAL BIRTH RATE [^] Actually LOOK at it. Open the link and LOOK at what it is. What the trend has been. It is 2.4 children per family. That is at maintenance levels. When these kids become parents the result will be a lower population. Can you not understand the diagram? Can you not understand that 2.4 is the maintenance level globally? Can you not understand what effect a reduced birth rate has on population? But no, Brent has his own beliefs and will ignore all facts and logic, to defend them, including snide patronism. You really are a child you know. Grow up.

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Population across the planet is increasing, as shown in the charts in the previous links. Mass migration is a symptom of this problem.

                            Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.

                            N Offline
                            N Offline
                            Nelek
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #44

                            Brent Jenkins wrote:

                            Mass migration is a symptom of this problem.

                            Nope, IMHO mass migration is mostly a symptom of war. People don't usually leave all behind just for fun, at least not in such a scale.

                            M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Munchies_Matt

                              Brent Jenkins wrote:

                              Thank goodness you can see the future

                              Why are you so childish? Look at the global birth rate: GLOBAL BIRTH RATE [^] Actually LOOK at it. Open the link and LOOK at what it is. What the trend has been. It is 2.4 children per family. That is at maintenance levels. When these kids become parents the result will be a lower population. Can you not understand the diagram? Can you not understand that 2.4 is the maintenance level globally? Can you not understand what effect a reduced birth rate has on population? But no, Brent has his own beliefs and will ignore all facts and logic, to defend them, including snide patronism. You really are a child you know. Grow up.

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #45

                              Munchies_Matt wrote:

                              Why are you so childish?

                              Why are you so childish? :laugh: But seriously, you're telling me that you can say with 100% accuracy what will happen in 5 or 10 years time? The only fact on the table is that our population is approximately 8 times more now than it was 100 years ago and it's still increasing. Other than that, you're in the realm of guesswork.

                              Munchies_Matt wrote:

                              But no, Brent has his own beliefs and will ignore all facts and logic, to defend them, including snide patronism. You really are a child you know. Grow up.

                              For facts, get outside and take a look yourself at what's going on. The real world is very different to what's on the internet.

                              Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.

                              M J 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • M Munchies_Matt

                                effayqueue wrote:

                                we still have to take drastic steps to save humanity

                                Who is capable of living in the arctic, and the sahara, in temperatures of -50 C to + 50C Just what the hell is a 2C rise going to cause us to do, put on a bit more sun cream? Wake up and smell reality for gods sake. We are the MOST adaptable animal because of our technology.

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #46

                                Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                Just what the hell is a 2C rise going to cause us to do, put on a bit more sun cream? Wake up and smell reality for gods sake. We are the MOST adaptable animal because of our technology.

                                Heat has no effect on the levels of UV radiation getting through the atmosphere, so sun cream won't make a difference. Your "adaptable" arguments is fine for humans, but what about the rest of the natural food chain? You don't consider things in much depth, do you? :doh:

                                Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.

                                M 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                  Why are you so childish?

                                  Why are you so childish? :laugh: But seriously, you're telling me that you can say with 100% accuracy what will happen in 5 or 10 years time? The only fact on the table is that our population is approximately 8 times more now than it was 100 years ago and it's still increasing. Other than that, you're in the realm of guesswork.

                                  Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                  But no, Brent has his own beliefs and will ignore all facts and logic, to defend them, including snide patronism. You really are a child you know. Grow up.

                                  For facts, get outside and take a look yourself at what's going on. The real world is very different to what's on the internet.

                                  Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Munchies_Matt
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #47

                                  Why do you constantly ignore the fact the global birth rate has come down to 2.4, which is maintenance levels?

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                    Just what the hell is a 2C rise going to cause us to do, put on a bit more sun cream? Wake up and smell reality for gods sake. We are the MOST adaptable animal because of our technology.

                                    Heat has no effect on the levels of UV radiation getting through the atmosphere, so sun cream won't make a difference. Your "adaptable" arguments is fine for humans, but what about the rest of the natural food chain? You don't consider things in much depth, do you? :doh:

                                    Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Munchies_Matt
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #48

                                    You really can't recognise a facetious comment?

                                    Brent Jenkins wrote:

                                    what about the rest of the natural food chain

                                    You mean the most productive and fertile parts of the world, like the UK, Holland, Germany etc will have to stop using greenhouses? Oh no! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Munchies_Matt

                                      Why do you constantly ignore the fact the global birth rate has come down to 2.4, which is maintenance levels?

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lost User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #49

                                      The same reason you ignore the fact that the global population is still rising fast.

                                      Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.

                                      M J 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Munchies_Matt

                                        You really can't recognise a facetious comment?

                                        Brent Jenkins wrote:

                                        what about the rest of the natural food chain

                                        You mean the most productive and fertile parts of the world, like the UK, Holland, Germany etc will have to stop using greenhouses? Oh no! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #50

                                        Are you for real, or are you really this daft? The natural food chain isn't just what we grow or farm! :doh:

                                        Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          Are you for real, or are you really this daft? The natural food chain isn't just what we grow or farm! :doh:

                                          Now is it bad enough that you let somebody else kick your butts without you trying to do it to each other? Now if we're all talking about the same man, and I think we are... it appears he's got a rather growing collection of our bikes.

                                          M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Munchies_Matt
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #51

                                          Oh, so you have moved the argument from what people eat to all animals? The earth is 25% greener since 1980 due to CO2. That is what the animals will eat.

                                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups