Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. A terrible epidemic

A terrible epidemic

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
csharpcomtoolsquestion
94 Posts 17 Posters 6 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Munchies_Matt

    I see Kindergarden has kicked out.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    I see your arguments are still as golden as always :)

    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

      Munchies_Matt wrote:

      the car is a useful tool.

      Munchies_Matt wrote:

      a rifle is a useful tool

      Yes, cars are a tool. And because cars are very dangerous in the hands of idiots, drunks, the drugged out, the untrained, and the proven-too-stupid-to-allow-to-drive-anymore every country in the world requires you be tested, licensed (and generally insured), and that the car is kept and maintained to a specified standard. There are people who should not be allowed near the keys to a car! And guns, now ... Just sayin'.

      Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

      G Offline
      G Offline
      GuyThiebaut
      wrote on last edited by
      #23

      I would like to see drivers re-licensed every 5 years. I would certainly be prepared to pay for it as it would also assure me that my driving is still of a good standard. But more to the point it would deter some of the morons out there from developing the dangerously bad driving habits they seem to nurture. Plus it would be good income for the government.

      “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

      ― Christopher Hitchens

      F 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Munchies_Matt

        What do you suggest to solve the US problem with massacres? An MOT for rifles?

        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOP
        wrote on last edited by
        #24

        Munchies_Matt wrote:

        What do you suggest to solve the US problem with massacres?

        The death sentence. At the end of a very short trial.

        ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
        -----
        You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
        -----
        When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • realJSOPR realJSOP

          Munchies_Matt wrote:

          What do you suggest to solve the US problem with massacres?

          The death sentence. At the end of a very short trial.

          ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
          -----
          You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
          -----
          When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Munchies_Matt
          wrote on last edited by
          #25

          How about a more 'proactive' approach? HOw do you stop the massacre before it happens?

          realJSOPR H W 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

            Licensing for people? Inspection and testing of weapons and how they are stored? Compulsory training and testing? Restrictions on what you can use immediately, just like most countries restrict car drivers either by licence conditions or by cost of insurance? At the moment, it's "you want it, you got the money? You got it." And that means that people who shouldn't be allowed within 100 yards of a knife and fork can buy a semi automatic and a bump stock and go hog-wild. Why is it considered normal that you check into a hotel with 20-odd weapons and nobody goes "hang on a moment"? Yes, a gun is a tool: but tools can be dangerous unless they are in the hands of trained people.

            Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

            Z Offline
            Z Offline
            ZurdoDev
            wrote on last edited by
            #26

            OriginalGriff wrote:

            icensing for people? Inspection and testing of weapons and how they are stored? Compulsory training and testing? Restrictions on what you can use immediately, just like most countries restrict car drivers either by licence conditions or by cost of insurance?

            Unfortunately none of this would help because, generally speaking, it is criminals that do most of the killing and they'll get guns illegally.

            There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

            M Richard DeemingR J 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • M Munchies_Matt

              OriginalGriff wrote:

              At the moment, it's "you want it, you got the money? You got it."

              No, some states require a license, some states require you to wait before you get the gun by registration. In others assault rifles are banned. It varies a lot. I am not defending the US's approach to guns, but I am pointing out the simplistic hysteria adopted by some non Americans about weapons is just that, and is due in large part because they don't live in countries where weapons are useful (for many reasons). However Europe isn't the gun free place many think it is, each Swiss male is part of the militia, and has an assault rifle and ammunition in his house (this is a generalisation of course). Austrian gun laws are very relaxed, anyone over 18 can buy a rifle or shotgun without a license. But why would inspection and testing reduce gun violence? Surely making sure it worked is counter productive. :)

              realJSOPR Offline
              realJSOPR Offline
              realJSOP
              wrote on last edited by
              #27

              Munchies_Matt wrote:

              In others assault rifles are banned.

              there is no such thing as an "assault rifle".

              Munchies_Matt wrote:

              But why would inspection and testing reduce gun violence?

              It won't.

              ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
              -----
              You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
              -----
              When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

              M J 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • realJSOPR realJSOP

                Munchies_Matt wrote:

                In others assault rifles are banned.

                there is no such thing as an "assault rifle".

                Munchies_Matt wrote:

                But why would inspection and testing reduce gun violence?

                It won't.

                ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                -----
                You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                -----
                When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Munchies_Matt
                wrote on last edited by
                #28

                assault rifle - Recherche Google[^]

                realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  That only in the US people are seeing bears in big cities, and only there they own semi-automatic guns to hunt "squirrel".

                  Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Daniel Pfeffer
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  [Tom Lehrer - Hunting Song](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NfW2tYIn8-Q)

                  If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Munchies_Matt

                    How about a more 'proactive' approach? HOw do you stop the massacre before it happens?

                    realJSOPR Offline
                    realJSOPR Offline
                    realJSOP
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    Munchies_Matt wrote:

                    HOw do you stop the massacre before it happens?

                    You can't. Period. That's been proven time and again.

                    ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                    -----
                    You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                    -----
                    When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Munchies_Matt

                      assault rifle - Recherche Google[^]

                      realJSOPR Offline
                      realJSOPR Offline
                      realJSOP
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      "Assault rifle" is a term made up by the media to make military-styled rifles sound more scary. The media and anti-gun politicians even admitted it.

                      ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                      -----
                      You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                      -----
                      When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Jorgen Andersson

                        Don't forget that the cars has to be registered as well.

                        Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

                        realJSOPR Offline
                        realJSOPR Offline
                        realJSOP
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        In the US, you have a right to travel, but that right does not specify the manner in which you travel.

                        ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                        -----
                        You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                        -----
                        When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Yes, we already know how special the USA is; it's not like a Russian would meet a bear in the woods, or hyana's near your village in Africa. And then the idea that other countries "don't understand" how special the USA is - remarkably :) I'm not going to the States until I have at least a tank and two atomic bombs. For self-defense purposes ofcourse.

                          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

                          realJSOPR Offline
                          realJSOPR Offline
                          realJSOP
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #33

                          The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting or self-defense against a criminal element. It's intended to allow a citizen to defend oneself against a tyrannical government. The best way to learn about the Constitution and why it was written is to watch some KrisAnne Hall videos on YouTube. Specifically, the one discussing the "Genealogy of the Constitution".

                          ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                          -----
                          You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                          -----
                          When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                          L N 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • realJSOPR realJSOP

                            The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting or self-defense against a criminal element. It's intended to allow a citizen to defend oneself against a tyrannical government. The best way to learn about the Constitution and why it was written is to watch some KrisAnne Hall videos on YouTube. Specifically, the one discussing the "Genealogy of the Constitution".

                            ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                            -----
                            You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                            -----
                            When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #34

                            Again, a nonsense-argument; you owning a rifle does not change anything about your current government, and in case of a clash you'd still be outgunned. Is that why the US is "spreading democracy" all over the world? To rid us from our tyrannical governments? :D

                            Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

                            realJSOPR J 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • realJSOPR realJSOP

                              "Assault rifle" is a term made up by the media to make military-styled rifles sound more scary. The media and anti-gun politicians even admitted it.

                              ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                              -----
                              You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                              -----
                              When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Munchies_Matt
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #35

                              Invented by the Germans actually: StG 44 - Wikipedia[^] 'Storm trooper' was another of their terms, for an 'assault soldier', hence Sturmgewehr, 'assault rifle'.

                              Z 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Z ZurdoDev

                                OriginalGriff wrote:

                                icensing for people? Inspection and testing of weapons and how they are stored? Compulsory training and testing? Restrictions on what you can use immediately, just like most countries restrict car drivers either by licence conditions or by cost of insurance?

                                Unfortunately none of this would help because, generally speaking, it is criminals that do most of the killing and they'll get guns illegally.

                                There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Munchies_Matt
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #36

                                Quite. Gun laws in France did not stop the Paris massacre.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Z ZurdoDev

                                  OriginalGriff wrote:

                                  icensing for people? Inspection and testing of weapons and how they are stored? Compulsory training and testing? Restrictions on what you can use immediately, just like most countries restrict car drivers either by licence conditions or by cost of insurance?

                                  Unfortunately none of this would help because, generally speaking, it is criminals that do most of the killing and they'll get guns illegally.

                                  There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                                  Richard DeemingR Offline
                                  Richard DeemingR Offline
                                  Richard Deeming
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #37

                                  We shouldn't require drivers to pass a test, have a valid licence, or pay for insurance. The really dangerous drivers manage to drive without any of those things, so therefore they don't help. :rolleyes: But of course, we should refuse to take any action to control a dangerous activity unless it provides a perfect and complete solution to the problem. We wouldn't want to do anything to reduce crime without stopping it completely, would we?


                                  "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                                  "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                                  Z 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Munchies_Matt

                                    How about a more 'proactive' approach? HOw do you stop the massacre before it happens?

                                    H Offline
                                    H Offline
                                    HobbyProggy
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #38

                                    By shooting the shooter?

                                    Rules for the FOSW ![^]

                                    if(this.signature != "")
                                    {
                                    MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
                                    }
                                    else
                                    {
                                    MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
                                    }

                                    Z 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                                      We shouldn't require drivers to pass a test, have a valid licence, or pay for insurance. The really dangerous drivers manage to drive without any of those things, so therefore they don't help. :rolleyes: But of course, we should refuse to take any action to control a dangerous activity unless it provides a perfect and complete solution to the problem. We wouldn't want to do anything to reduce crime without stopping it completely, would we?


                                      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                                      Z Offline
                                      Z Offline
                                      ZurdoDev
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #39

                                      You have taken artistic license to what I said. :laugh:

                                      There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        So, the fact that cars cause more deaths (and suger probably too) means that it is suddenly acceptable to buy a weapon meant to kill people? How about opening the market for morphine/heroin? It doesn't kill as many people as cars do, after all :)

                                        Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

                                        N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        NoNotThatBob
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #40

                                        Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                                        How about opening the market for morphine/heroin?

                                        Nah. You can't make any money from Morphine/Heroin - without criminalisation, it's dirt cheap.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                          The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting or self-defense against a criminal element. It's intended to allow a citizen to defend oneself against a tyrannical government. The best way to learn about the Constitution and why it was written is to watch some KrisAnne Hall videos on YouTube. Specifically, the one discussing the "Genealogy of the Constitution".

                                          ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                          -----
                                          You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                          -----
                                          When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                                          N Offline
                                          N Offline
                                          NoNotThatBob
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #41

                                          John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                                          It's intended to allow a citizen to defend oneself against a tyrannical government.

                                          And yet Presidents sign Executive Orders and live. :-D

                                          realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups