A terrible epidemic
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
What do you suggest to solve the US problem with massacres?
The death sentence. At the end of a very short trial.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013How about a more 'proactive' approach? HOw do you stop the massacre before it happens?
-
Licensing for people? Inspection and testing of weapons and how they are stored? Compulsory training and testing? Restrictions on what you can use immediately, just like most countries restrict car drivers either by licence conditions or by cost of insurance? At the moment, it's "you want it, you got the money? You got it." And that means that people who shouldn't be allowed within 100 yards of a knife and fork can buy a semi automatic and a bump stock and go hog-wild. Why is it considered normal that you check into a hotel with 20-odd weapons and nobody goes "hang on a moment"? Yes, a gun is a tool: but tools can be dangerous unless they are in the hands of trained people.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
OriginalGriff wrote:
icensing for people? Inspection and testing of weapons and how they are stored? Compulsory training and testing? Restrictions on what you can use immediately, just like most countries restrict car drivers either by licence conditions or by cost of insurance?
Unfortunately none of this would help because, generally speaking, it is criminals that do most of the killing and they'll get guns illegally.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
At the moment, it's "you want it, you got the money? You got it."
No, some states require a license, some states require you to wait before you get the gun by registration. In others assault rifles are banned. It varies a lot. I am not defending the US's approach to guns, but I am pointing out the simplistic hysteria adopted by some non Americans about weapons is just that, and is due in large part because they don't live in countries where weapons are useful (for many reasons). However Europe isn't the gun free place many think it is, each Swiss male is part of the militia, and has an assault rifle and ammunition in his house (this is a generalisation of course). Austrian gun laws are very relaxed, anyone over 18 can buy a rifle or shotgun without a license. But why would inspection and testing reduce gun violence? Surely making sure it worked is counter productive. :)
Munchies_Matt wrote:
In others assault rifles are banned.
there is no such thing as an "assault rifle".
Munchies_Matt wrote:
But why would inspection and testing reduce gun violence?
It won't.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
Munchies_Matt wrote:
In others assault rifles are banned.
there is no such thing as an "assault rifle".
Munchies_Matt wrote:
But why would inspection and testing reduce gun violence?
It won't.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
[Tom Lehrer - Hunting Song](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NfW2tYIn8-Q)
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill
-
How about a more 'proactive' approach? HOw do you stop the massacre before it happens?
Munchies_Matt wrote:
HOw do you stop the massacre before it happens?
You can't. Period. That's been proven time and again.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
"Assault rifle" is a term made up by the media to make military-styled rifles sound more scary. The media and anti-gun politicians even admitted it.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
Don't forget that the cars has to be registered as well.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
In the US, you have a right to travel, but that right does not specify the manner in which you travel.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
Yes, we already know how special the USA is; it's not like a Russian would meet a bear in the woods, or hyana's near your village in Africa. And then the idea that other countries "don't understand" how special the USA is - remarkably :) I'm not going to the States until I have at least a tank and two atomic bombs. For self-defense purposes ofcourse.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting or self-defense against a criminal element. It's intended to allow a citizen to defend oneself against a tyrannical government. The best way to learn about the Constitution and why it was written is to watch some KrisAnne Hall videos on YouTube. Specifically, the one discussing the "Genealogy of the Constitution".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting or self-defense against a criminal element. It's intended to allow a citizen to defend oneself against a tyrannical government. The best way to learn about the Constitution and why it was written is to watch some KrisAnne Hall videos on YouTube. Specifically, the one discussing the "Genealogy of the Constitution".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013Again, a nonsense-argument; you owning a rifle does not change anything about your current government, and in case of a clash you'd still be outgunned. Is that why the US is "spreading democracy" all over the world? To rid us from our tyrannical governments? :D
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
-
"Assault rifle" is a term made up by the media to make military-styled rifles sound more scary. The media and anti-gun politicians even admitted it.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013Invented by the Germans actually: StG 44 - Wikipedia[^] 'Storm trooper' was another of their terms, for an 'assault soldier', hence Sturmgewehr, 'assault rifle'.
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
icensing for people? Inspection and testing of weapons and how they are stored? Compulsory training and testing? Restrictions on what you can use immediately, just like most countries restrict car drivers either by licence conditions or by cost of insurance?
Unfortunately none of this would help because, generally speaking, it is criminals that do most of the killing and they'll get guns illegally.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Quite. Gun laws in France did not stop the Paris massacre.
-
OriginalGriff wrote:
icensing for people? Inspection and testing of weapons and how they are stored? Compulsory training and testing? Restrictions on what you can use immediately, just like most countries restrict car drivers either by licence conditions or by cost of insurance?
Unfortunately none of this would help because, generally speaking, it is criminals that do most of the killing and they'll get guns illegally.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
We shouldn't require drivers to pass a test, have a valid licence, or pay for insurance. The really dangerous drivers manage to drive without any of those things, so therefore they don't help. :rolleyes: But of course, we should refuse to take any action to control a dangerous activity unless it provides a perfect and complete solution to the problem. We wouldn't want to do anything to reduce crime without stopping it completely, would we?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
How about a more 'proactive' approach? HOw do you stop the massacre before it happens?
-
We shouldn't require drivers to pass a test, have a valid licence, or pay for insurance. The really dangerous drivers manage to drive without any of those things, so therefore they don't help. :rolleyes: But of course, we should refuse to take any action to control a dangerous activity unless it provides a perfect and complete solution to the problem. We wouldn't want to do anything to reduce crime without stopping it completely, would we?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
So, the fact that cars cause more deaths (and suger probably too) means that it is suddenly acceptable to buy a weapon meant to kill people? How about opening the market for morphine/heroin? It doesn't kill as many people as cars do, after all :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
How about opening the market for morphine/heroin?
Nah. You can't make any money from Morphine/Heroin - without criminalisation, it's dirt cheap.
-
The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting or self-defense against a criminal element. It's intended to allow a citizen to defend oneself against a tyrannical government. The best way to learn about the Constitution and why it was written is to watch some KrisAnne Hall videos on YouTube. Specifically, the one discussing the "Genealogy of the Constitution".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
Quite. Gun laws in France did not stop the Paris massacre.
It didn't. Now lets compare the amount of incidents with guns in Europe to the US; you'll find that there are a lot less incidents here. So no, while it does not guarantee anything (as if ever), it does keep the amount of incidents lower. Another argument of yours in the dustbin.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
-
It didn't. Now lets compare the amount of incidents with guns in Europe to the US; you'll find that there are a lot less incidents here. So no, while it does not guarantee anything (as if ever), it does keep the amount of incidents lower. Another argument of yours in the dustbin.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
you'll find that there are a lot less incidents here.
And you think that is because of tougher gun laws?
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
