Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. A terrible epidemic

A terrible epidemic

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
csharpcomtoolsquestion
94 Posts 17 Posters 6 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Same reason as you; because I can.

    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Munchies_Matt
    wrote on last edited by
    #57

    And did you read the flow of my discussion or leap in in complete ignorance, 'just because you can'?

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Munchies_Matt

      Is this your point or you taking 'note' of what you assume to be an argument I made?

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #58

      No, it is a summary. My apologies, was it too complicated? :)

      Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Munchies_Matt

        And did you read the flow of my discussion or leap in in complete ignorance, 'just because you can'?

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #59

        Being familiar with your line of reasoning I felt safe in skipping it :)

        Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          No, it is a summary. My apologies, was it too complicated? :)

          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Munchies_Matt
          wrote on last edited by
          #60

          A summary of your views, or someone else's? You didn't make it clear.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            No, because we're better people. Not just tougher laws, but also not as widely available for procurement.

            Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

            Z Offline
            Z Offline
            ZurdoDev
            wrote on last edited by
            #61

            Eddy Vluggen wrote:

            also not as widely available for procurement.

            You just gave me a business idea. ;) :-\

            There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Being familiar with your line of reasoning I felt safe in skipping it :)

              Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Munchies_Matt
              wrote on last edited by
              #62

              Thought you were trolling.

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Z ZurdoDev

                Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                also not as widely available for procurement.

                You just gave me a business idea. ;) :-\

                There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #63

                :laugh:

                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Munchies_Matt

                  Thought you were trolling.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #64

                  No, just bored, and I know you want the last word on it :rolleyes:

                  Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Munchies_Matt

                    Invented by the Germans actually: StG 44 - Wikipedia[^] 'Storm trooper' was another of their terms, for an 'assault soldier', hence Sturmgewehr, 'assault rifle'.

                    Z Offline
                    Z Offline
                    ZurdoDev
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #65

                    Munchies_Matt wrote:

                    Storm trooper'

                    Wrong. It was George Lucas. ;P

                    There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G GuyThiebaut

                      I would like to see drivers re-licensed every 5 years. I would certainly be prepared to pay for it as it would also assure me that my driving is still of a good standard. But more to the point it would deter some of the morons out there from developing the dangerously bad driving habits they seem to nurture. Plus it would be good income for the government.

                      “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

                      ― Christopher Hitchens

                      F Offline
                      F Offline
                      Foothill
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #66

                      As if the government needs any more money. They have proven it impossible to manage the money they get now without corruption draining copious amounts of tax dollars right out the bottom of the treasury: A.K.A. legalized theft via government.

                      if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); } Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • realJSOPR realJSOP

                        NoNotThatBob wrote:

                        And yet Presidents sign Executive Orders and live.

                        I am not a fan of the "executive order". In my opinion, it's a violation of the separation of powers in that it allows the President to legislate, which should not be within his sphere of influence. Even the DOJ should not be allow to *make* law, but look at the unconstitutional free reign to do so given to the EPA, TSA, and BATFE. The government, as a whole has strayed far from the intent and design of the framers. "Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes." Madison "None but an armed nation can dispense with a standing army. To keep ours armed and disciplined is therefore at all times important." - Jefferson "If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist." - Hamilton "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. the supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States." - Webster "This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty. . . . The right of self defence is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction." - Tucker If you think the nature of governments has changed since 1796, you are as stupid as they come.

                        F Offline
                        F Offline
                        Foothill
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #67

                        I'm not arguing against any of the points you raised but I would like to expand on one, if I may.

                        John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                        "None but an armed nation can dispense with a standing army. To keep ours armed and disciplined is therefore at all times important." - Jefferson

                        I would like to say the a majority of gun owners are lacking in the discipline department. This in conjuncture with:

                        2nd Amendment

                        A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

                        This can be interpreted that the founding fathers wanted the people to be able to defend themselves from any enemy and that they best way they could do that is if the states maintained militias that could be called up in case of emergency. In recent times, that responsibility has been shifted to the National Guard. At that point, the militia, comprised of various members of the community, was rendered obsolete. To get to my point, since state and local militias were replaced by the national guard, there are limited options for individuals to obtain the necessary training to handle firearms correctly. Also, the natural consequence of having militias is that most members of the community will own similar weapons with similar ammunition which makes supplying the militia in times of war a little bit simpler than having each member supply their own ammunition. They could easily run out of their special ammo rendering them ineffective on the battlefield. I do believe that militia training and structure was the discipline Jefferson was getting at.

                        if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); } Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016

                        realJSOPR J 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • realJSOPR realJSOP

                          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                          Again, a nonsense-argument;

                          That's because you're ignorant of the reasons. Check out the video I mentioned above. It explains everything. Of course, you have to be willing to hear the truth.

                          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                          you owning a rifle does not change anything about your current government

                          A bunch of cave dwellers in Afghanistan have proven this idea invalid. Besides that, 100 million gun owners in this country would present a sizable force.

                          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                          and in case of a clash you'd still be outgunned

                          Which is why the 2nd Amendment doesn't specify restrictions on the types of arms you can keep/bear. The founders knew that in order to defend against a tyrannical government, the citizens would be required to have access to battlefield-capable weapons of the day.

                          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                          Is that why the US is "spreading democracy" all over the world? To rid us from our tyrannical governments?

                          Again, the government does not necessarily represent the will of the people they govern. The US isn't a democracy - it's (supposed to be) a constitutional republic. Look it up. Beyond that, the US government is not interested in spreading democracy, and anyone with any self-awareness at all readily recognizes that fact.

                          ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                          -----
                          You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                          -----
                          When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Slacker007
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #68

                          Eddy is a craptastic troller and he is kicking your ass 3 ways to sundown on this. Ignore the bugger. Just saying...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Z ZurdoDev

                            Munchies_Matt wrote:

                            Storm trooper'

                            Wrong. It was George Lucas. ;P

                            There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Munchies_Matt
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #69

                            Now come on, dont tell me he wasnt inspired by the Nazis!!! Look at the damn helmets man!! :)

                            N 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              No, just bored, and I know you want the last word on it :rolleyes:

                              Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^][](X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett)

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Munchies_Matt
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #70

                              You are right, you are boring. ;P

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Foothill

                                I'm not arguing against any of the points you raised but I would like to expand on one, if I may.

                                John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                                "None but an armed nation can dispense with a standing army. To keep ours armed and disciplined is therefore at all times important." - Jefferson

                                I would like to say the a majority of gun owners are lacking in the discipline department. This in conjuncture with:

                                2nd Amendment

                                A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

                                This can be interpreted that the founding fathers wanted the people to be able to defend themselves from any enemy and that they best way they could do that is if the states maintained militias that could be called up in case of emergency. In recent times, that responsibility has been shifted to the National Guard. At that point, the militia, comprised of various members of the community, was rendered obsolete. To get to my point, since state and local militias were replaced by the national guard, there are limited options for individuals to obtain the necessary training to handle firearms correctly. Also, the natural consequence of having militias is that most members of the community will own similar weapons with similar ammunition which makes supplying the militia in times of war a little bit simpler than having each member supply their own ammunition. They could easily run out of their special ammo rendering them ineffective on the battlefield. I do believe that militia training and structure was the discipline Jefferson was getting at.

                                if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); } Meus ratio ex fortis machina. Simplicitatis de formae ac munus. -Foothill, 2016

                                realJSOPR Offline
                                realJSOPR Offline
                                realJSOP
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #71

                                Foothill wrote:

                                John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                                "None but an armed nation can dispense with a standing army. To keep ours armed and disciplined is therefore at all times important." - Jefferson

                                I would like to say the a majority of gun owners are lacking in the discipline department. This in conjuncture with:

                                That's what the first clause of the 2nd Amendment means - "A well regulated militia": Back when the framers wrote that, a standing army was comprised of what they called "regulars". "Regulars were men that were well trained, disciplined, and provisioned, as opposed to militias which were generally NOT as well trained or provisioned.

                                Foothill wrote:

                                This can be interpreted that the founding fathers wanted the people to be able to defend themselves from any enemy and that they best way they could do that is if the states maintained militias that could be called up in case of emergency. In recent times, that responsibility has been shifted to the National Guard. At that point, the militia, comprised of various members of the community, was rendered obsolete.

                                No, the National Guard is comprised of military members. Why else would they be deployed overseas? The founding fathers never expected nor specified that the states maintain militias. The intent of the 2nd was to instill in all citizens that they are responsible for their own freedoms, and that they be willing/able to fight alone or as part of an organized militia. The 2nd Amendment is as necessary today as it was when it was enumerated, and for the same reasons.

                                ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                -----
                                You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                -----
                                When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                  NoNotThatBob wrote:

                                  And yet Presidents sign Executive Orders and live.

                                  I am not a fan of the "executive order". In my opinion, it's a violation of the separation of powers in that it allows the President to legislate, which should not be within his sphere of influence. Even the DOJ should not be allow to *make* law, but look at the unconstitutional free reign to do so given to the EPA, TSA, and BATFE. The government, as a whole has strayed far from the intent and design of the framers. "Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes." Madison "None but an armed nation can dispense with a standing army. To keep ours armed and disciplined is therefore at all times important." - Jefferson "If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist." - Hamilton "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. the supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States." - Webster "This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty. . . . The right of self defence is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction." - Tucker If you think the nature of governments has changed since 1796, you are as stupid as they come.

                                  N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  NoNotThatBob
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #72

                                  John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                                  In my opinion, it's a violation of the separation of powers in that it allows the President to legislate

                                  Precisely. Tyranny!! Hence: "And yet Presidents sign Executive Orders and live. :-D " How do you construe that as my thinking: the nature of governments hasn't changed since 1796, rather than: the citizens appear to happily leave their tyrants unshot?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Munchies_Matt

                                    How about a more 'proactive' approach? HOw do you stop the massacre before it happens?

                                    W Offline
                                    W Offline
                                    WiganLatics
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #73

                                    Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                    HOw do you stop the massacre before it happens?

                                    Maybe solitary confinement for everyone? :laugh:

                                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • W WiganLatics

                                      Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                      HOw do you stop the massacre before it happens?

                                      Maybe solitary confinement for everyone? :laugh:

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      Daniel Pfeffer
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #74

                                      WiganLatics wrote:

                                      Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                      How do you stop the massacre before it happens?

                                      Maybe solitary confinement for everyone? :laugh:

                                      Too expensive. Kill everyone; let God sort them out! :)

                                      If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

                                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D Daniel Pfeffer

                                        WiganLatics wrote:

                                        Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                        How do you stop the massacre before it happens?

                                        Maybe solitary confinement for everyone? :laugh:

                                        Too expensive. Kill everyone; let God sort them out! :)

                                        If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

                                        W Offline
                                        W Offline
                                        WiganLatics
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #75

                                        So we're curing the Cancer by killing the patient? :laugh:

                                        W 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                                          Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                          the car is a useful tool.

                                          Munchies_Matt wrote:

                                          a rifle is a useful tool

                                          Yes, cars are a tool. And because cars are very dangerous in the hands of idiots, drunks, the drugged out, the untrained, and the proven-too-stupid-to-allow-to-drive-anymore every country in the world requires you be tested, licensed (and generally insured), and that the car is kept and maintained to a specified standard. There are people who should not be allowed near the keys to a car! And guns, now ... Just sayin'.

                                          Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          jschell
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #76

                                          OriginalGriff wrote:

                                          Yes, cars are a tool.

                                          But, unlike guns, they are not in the US Constitution.

                                          OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups