Who vs Whome
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
Who - should be used to refer to the subject of a sentence. Whom - should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition.
-
Does anyone else see this parody as far too close to truth for many of the QA posts?
Parody? It's probably a quote... :sigh:
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
who code whom -- in a causal world whom code who -- in a acausal world :)
Find more in 1-NET: connects your resources anywhere[^].
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
Andy Lanng wrote:
for those who code
But [for whom the bell tolls](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg92QpjRcJk&feature=youtu.be&t=4s)?
-
Andy Lanng wrote:
It should be whome, right?
No, because "whome" is not a word. :-D /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
No, because "whome" is not a word. :-D
Maybe we are just ignorant and it's a word tht we don't know the meaning of. Yet. :-) Perhaps it's something to eat. Pass me the whomes, please.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
-
Ravi Bhavnani wrote:
No, because "whome" is not a word. :-D
Maybe we are just ignorant and it's a word tht we don't know the meaning of. Yet. :-) Perhaps it's something to eat. Pass me the whomes, please.
I am endeavoring, ma'am, to construct a mnemonic memory circuit using stone knives and bearskins.
Sorry, whome are you referring to? /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
-
Andy Lanng wrote:
for those who code
But [for whom the bell tolls](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg92QpjRcJk&feature=youtu.be&t=4s)?
-
For thems what code.
Thanks for the laugh ! :cool:
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
Or spy vs. spie, in this case.
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
-
Well, ofc I'm the later!
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
If you can answer who/whom question with "he" then it's "who", if you can answer it with "him" then it's Whom": Who wrote the code? He wrote the code. By whom was the code written? It was written by him.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
-
If you can answer who/whom question with "he" then it's "who", if you can answer it with "him" then it's Whom": Who wrote the code? He wrote the code. By whom was the code written? It was written by him.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
But it's a statement. The only quiestion I can get out of it is: Who codes? A1: he codes A2: him So you're saying that the question dictates the answer not the other way around? Ah I see. Ok. I'm fine with it now 😉
-
But it's a statement. The only quiestion I can get out of it is: Who codes? A1: he codes A2: him So you're saying that the question dictates the answer not the other way around? Ah I see. Ok. I'm fine with it now 😉
Andy Lanng wrote:
So you're saying that the question dictates the answer not the other way around?
It's more a case of the question helping to arrive at the answer, although both are dependent on each other and in that sense interchangeable - having said that, it looks like you have understood that :thumbsup:
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
-
My education is older that I am Ok then; whome = whom I guess I should've guessed that replies to my pedantic message would be pedantic
Have you really got two 'n's in your name?
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
-
Andy Lanng wrote:
It should be whome, right?
No, because "whome" is not a word. :-D /ravi
My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com
Isn't the W silent? Whomer Simpson? :-D
Nish Nishant Consultant Software Architect Ganymede Software Solutions LLC www.ganymedesoftwaresolutions.com
-
Fer us wot sndz cdz URGNTZZZZZ!!!!!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
what I've tried: womb, hoooome, hohum
Arguing with a woman is like reading the Software License Agreement. In the end, you ignore everything and click "I agree". Anonymous
-
Can I 5* this
You may, but can you?
-
Ok. So I look up the site daily on my phone. I'm not happy that the tag line is "for those who code". It should be whome, right? Just me? Maybe >_<
"Whom" is the object of a prepositional phrase, an indirect object, or a direct object. English only makes sense once you learn a different language. (less sense in most cases!) Here is how I verify... Translate to Spanish. If it is only "quien" (missing accent), then it is "who". If it is "de quien" (missing accent), then it is "whom". literally: "of whom, from whom, to whom"
