Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Debate : Standard v Phillips (Allen, Torx)

Debate : Standard v Phillips (Allen, Torx)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
75 Posts 27 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R RedDk

    Simple. "Why would any modern product use a standard screw ... etc?" No modern product would use a standard screw. Any product using a standard screw is unevolved and neanderthalian. Natural selection, in it's most intelligent up- to-date form, socially darwinistic and all/etc, dictates that the evolution of the mind of the user enables this more informed buyer to make the right decision with respect to PURCHASING the engineered product that is more highly evolved. Economically, supply and demand takes over in this case. To do the math with respect to the genetic algorithm that generates the extinction of the standard screwdriver will be left to the high-minded developer who has the knowledge to implement it and test in realtime the actual blip on the radar which signals that event has really passed. In other words, extinction hasn't happened yet but venture capitalists will make sure that it does. Unless of course what you mean by "modern" is really some clock on some Roman soldiers villa wall.

    R Offline
    R Offline
    raddevus
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    I agree entirely and at least 95.2% (considering all standard deviation units). I believe this will fundamentally change AI in ways that haven't been foretold yet. No one can disagree.

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P PIEBALDconsult

      Ergo, don't friggin' call it "standard"!

      R Offline
      R Offline
      raddevus
      wrote on last edited by
      #26

      PIEBALDconsult wrote:

      Ergo, don't friggin' call it "standard"!

      I believe his name is RedDk. :rolleyes:

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R raddevus

        I agree entirely and at least 95.2% (considering all standard deviation units). I believe this will fundamentally change AI in ways that haven't been foretold yet. No one can disagree.

        R Offline
        R Offline
        RedDk
        wrote on last edited by
        #27

        "disagree" Ha! No matter when, there'll always be someone who'll disagree with you. Offer Geritol in copius doses and ... Bob's 'yer uncle.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          not forgetting hex, (and if you're smart you'll use wira bits for those).

          Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #28

          Lopatir wrote:

          not forgetting hex, (and if you're smart you'll use wira bits for those).

          As Griff said, Allen, the correct name for them.

          Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R raddevus

            Here's the question up for debate:

            Debate

            Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

            Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

            D Offline
            D Offline
            den2k88
            wrote on last edited by
            #29

            Slotted: easy to rebuild the slot in case it gets damaged. Philips: you can apply much more torque in case the srew gets stuck. The others: f*** them, their sons, their ancestors, their dogs and their teeth. Good as they may be you are certifiably 100% lacking the proper tool to disassemble them.

            GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R raddevus

              Here's the question up for debate:

              Debate

              Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

              Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

              A Offline
              A Offline
              AAC Tech
              wrote on last edited by
              #30

              Look, if you have ever tried a TRUE Robertson ALL the rest are painful. Note: Not to be confused with the inferior square heads. What is the difference? The taper which effectively locks the driver in to the screw head. When you think about it is so obviously the best way. Slots, Philips, etc. all chatter to some degree - even Allen keys. Even a cheaply made screw is held tightly because of the fundamental design - a taper.

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R raddevus

                Here's the question up for debate:

                Debate

                Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                M Offline
                M Offline
                MKJCP
                wrote on last edited by
                #31

                As far as I can see, this debate hasn't nailed much down.

                R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A AAC Tech

                  Look, if you have ever tried a TRUE Robertson ALL the rest are painful. Note: Not to be confused with the inferior square heads. What is the difference? The taper which effectively locks the driver in to the screw head. When you think about it is so obviously the best way. Slots, Philips, etc. all chatter to some degree - even Allen keys. Even a cheaply made screw is held tightly because of the fundamental design - a taper.

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  raddevus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  AAC Tech wrote:

                  if you have ever tried a TRUE Robertson ALL the rest are painful.

                  Interesting. I looked up robertson screw and stumbled upon the wiki on screws. wow, there are so many! List of screw drives - Wikipedia[^]

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M MKJCP

                    As far as I can see, this debate hasn't nailed much down.

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    raddevus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    Yeah, I should've probably asked "what is the best mixer" because I've done nothing more than stir things up. :rolleyes:

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D den2k88

                      Slotted: easy to rebuild the slot in case it gets damaged. Philips: you can apply much more torque in case the srew gets stuck. The others: f*** them, their sons, their ancestors, their dogs and their teeth. Good as they may be you are certifiably 100% lacking the proper tool to disassemble them.

                      GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      raddevus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      I like the two points and agree with them.

                      den2k88 wrote:

                      you are certifiably 100% lacking the proper tool to disassemble them

                      Agree with this too. So annoying. I remember wanting to take a old HDD which had crashed apart and I couldn't find a star driver to fit it anywhere. Look how many screws there are: quite terrible ==> List of screw drives - Wikipedia[^]

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

                        Do you mean "Phillips", or "Posidrive"? They need different bits as the angles are different. Use the wrong one, and you will chew up the head every time... [^] Intersetignly, Posidrive was partial developed and is partly owned by ... Phillips. :laugh: There is also Torx, Allen, Robertson, ClutchDrive, and a wide range of oddball "security screws" - including a number that are "tighten only"! Slotted are cheaper to make, and are useful for "historic jobs" where they should match existing screws - except in my Mercedes where the battery is under the drivers feet and accessed via a slotted screw that opens with a coin...

                        Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                        H Offline
                        H Offline
                        Harrison Pratt
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #35

                        I thought they were called "plus" and "minus" ...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R raddevus

                          Here's the question up for debate:

                          Debate

                          Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                          Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                          B Offline
                          B Offline
                          Bruce Patin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #36

                          IBM used to outlaw Phillips head screws. There could be many reasons, but Phillips head screws are very easy to strip. Also, there are screw starters for slotted screws, but none that I know of for Phillips. Torx is the only kind I really like. P.S. I'll have to check out the Robertson. I forgot to mention that it is easy to fashion a square head screw driver with a file and almost any piece of metal.

                          R A 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • W W Balboos GHB

                            I take out my Dremmel Moto-tool and cut a slot into all the stripped phillips, Torx, and Allen head screws so I can get the damn things out. That's why.

                            Ravings en masse^

                            "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                            "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            Bruce Patin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #37

                            One good thing about stripped Phillips head screws is that it the hole for your screw removal drill bit is already centered. :-)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • realJSOPR realJSOP

                              OriginalGriff wrote:

                              including a number that are "tighten only"!

                              I've only seen those on restroom stall doors. Ever since they started using those screws, my ability to add to my collection of restroom stall doors has pretty much stalled out.

                              ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                              -----
                              You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                              -----
                              When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

                              B Offline
                              B Offline
                              Bruce Patin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #38

                              I've seen them on some computer products. such as hard drives.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B Bruce Patin

                                IBM used to outlaw Phillips head screws. There could be many reasons, but Phillips head screws are very easy to strip. Also, there are screw starters for slotted screws, but none that I know of for Phillips. Torx is the only kind I really like. P.S. I'll have to check out the Robertson. I forgot to mention that it is easy to fashion a square head screw driver with a file and almost any piece of metal.

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                raddevus
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #39

                                Bruce Patin wrote:

                                it is easy to fashion a square head screw driver with a file and almost any piece of metal.

                                :thumbsup: That's a really great point.

                                W 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R raddevus

                                  Here's the question up for debate:

                                  Debate

                                  Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                                  Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  SeattleC
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #40

                                  Slot head screws are easier to take out when you don't have your toolbox with you. You can use the dumb little screwdriver head of your swiss army knife. You can use a nail file. You can use a kitchen knife. You can use a dime. Slot head screws are put there for people who don't spend a lot of time taking things apart.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R raddevus

                                    Here's the question up for debate:

                                    Debate

                                    Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                                    Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                                    W Offline
                                    W Offline
                                    W Balboos GHB
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #41

                                    One more note, based upon your "billions $$$ could be saved". A few flat blade screw drivers will fit pretty much anything you find. A little less so with phillps, but somewhat viable. There are hybrid screws, as well, which take both flat blade and phillips. For hex and torx? Another one for each and every size? I think "billions $$$ spent" would be more like it.

                                    Ravings en masse^

                                    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                                    "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R raddevus

                                      Bruce Patin wrote:

                                      it is easy to fashion a square head screw driver with a file and almost any piece of metal.

                                      :thumbsup: That's a really great point.

                                      W Offline
                                      W Offline
                                      W Balboos GHB
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #42

                                      As long as we've touched the waters of "in a pinch", I needed a small screwdriver to fix my glasses. Not anything around . . . wait . . . a paper clip and a rock (hammer, etc.). Bang bang. Now we have a micro flat-blade screwdriver!

                                      Ravings en masse^

                                      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                                      "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R raddevus

                                        Here's the question up for debate:

                                        Debate

                                        Why would any modern product use a standard (aka flat head) screw, which requires a standard (flat head) screw driver?

                                        Standard screws are far more difficult to use in a modern era where we have power screw drivers which spin at high RPMs. If you've ever tried this you know that a standard (or slotted screw) will quickly get off balance with each rotation which really creates a challenge. The very least that should be substituted would be the Phillips (+) type. It's much more balanced. I can see using a allen type or Torx or whatever but I just can't understand why slotted would still be used. Why are slotted screws still being produced? In my thinking they should outlaw them to save the sanity anyone who owns a toolbox. :) How many billions $$$ could be saved by such a change? :rolleyes: Counterpoint? Anyone with a counterpoint on why slotted is still valid?

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        Robert Not The Pirate
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #43

                                        You have way to much time on your hands.

                                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • W W Balboos GHB

                                          One more note, based upon your "billions $$$ could be saved". A few flat blade screw drivers will fit pretty much anything you find. A little less so with phillps, but somewhat viable. There are hybrid screws, as well, which take both flat blade and phillips. For hex and torx? Another one for each and every size? I think "billions $$$ spent" would be more like it.

                                          Ravings en masse^

                                          "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                                          "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          raddevus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #44

                                          W∴ Balboos wrote:

                                          I think "billions $$$ spent" would be more like it.

                                          Hmmm....I've created an industry. :rolleyes: Seriously though, I can agree with what you are saying. That's why The World must agree upon one standard immediately and outlaw all other types. :laugh:

                                          W 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups