School shooting UK style
-
You dont get it do you? Let me repeat, the 'tool is not the cause of murder and the tool used does not correlate with murder'. Take away the gun and the murderer will use another tool. Therefore gun control will not work in the US, as it hasnt worked elsewhere.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Take away the gun and the murderer will use another tool.
Name one other commonly (and legally) available "murder tool" which can kill hundreds of people at a distance in a matter of seconds. (And no, "bombs" don't count. Making bombs is illegal. Nobody is trying to argue for the "right to bear bombs".)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
You dont get it do you? Let me repeat, the 'tool is not the cause of murder and the tool used does not correlate with murder'. Take away the gun and the murderer will use another tool. Therefore gun control will not work in the US, as it hasnt worked elsewhere.
-
people kill other people because 1. sense of duty to country or community (military, law enforcement) 2. self defense 3. accident 4. bat shit crazy (too many sub reasons to list) but includes murder. pick one. that is how I feel about this at a super high level. Number 4 is the reason that involves the gun ban debate. Edit: people kill themselves because they are bat shit crazy (many possible reasons here, severe depression being the main one)
Number 3 is an element of the debate too. For example, keeping guns in locked cases so that 3 year olds can't shoot their parents.
-
Number 3 is an element of the debate too. For example, keeping guns in locked cases so that 3 year olds can't shoot their parents.
Agreed, I will give you that. :thumbsup:
-
people kill other people because 1. sense of duty to country or community (military, law enforcement) 2. self defense 3. accident 4. bat shit crazy (too many sub reasons to list) but includes murder. pick one. that is how I feel about this at a super high level. Number 4 is the reason that involves the gun ban debate. Edit: people kill themselves because they are bat shit crazy (many possible reasons here, severe depression being the main one)
Actually, 2, 3, and 4 are all part of the debate, but the fact that a shooting as in self defense never seems to bubble to the surface when gun grabbers present statistics, and accidental shootings are almost as rarely cited.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013 -
Actually, 2, 3, and 4 are all part of the debate, but the fact that a shooting as in self defense never seems to bubble to the surface when gun grabbers present statistics, and accidental shootings are almost as rarely cited.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013The gun ban debate is really rooted from crimes committed by people who are crazy, not military people doing their jobs. Just saying...
-
Actually, 2, 3, and 4 are all part of the debate, but the fact that a shooting as in self defense never seems to bubble to the surface when gun grabbers present statistics, and accidental shootings are almost as rarely cited.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
gun grabbers present statistics
And this is why statistics should always be scrutinized and viewed with skepticism. You can base both sides of an argument from the exact same set of data. Not to mention, you can create info-graphics from carefully chosen data subsets that support your argument while excluding data that counters it. Typically, the only statistics I believe are the ones that I myself have generated. It's a real shame that all the good data on gun statistics is so hard to collate because not all parts of the U.S. keep the same levels data or report all gun related crimes. Without good data, trying to make sense of the data is futile.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
-
One rational suggestion I have heard for trying to stop school shootings is for kids to befriend the weird, eccentric, outcast kid who seems to have no friends. The reason being people are much less likely to kill their friends if they find themselves in a position of thinking or wanting to harm others.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
GuyThiebaut wrote:
kids to befriend the weird, eccentric, outcast kid who seems to have no friends.
Not only would that stop school shootings it would fix a lot of the world's problems. :thumbsup:
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
-
people kill other people because 1. sense of duty to country or community (military, law enforcement) 2. self defense 3. accident 4. bat shit crazy (too many sub reasons to list) but includes murder. pick one. that is how I feel about this at a super high level. Number 4 is the reason that involves the gun ban debate. Edit: people kill themselves because they are bat shit crazy (many possible reasons here, severe depression being the main one)
But what is behind the 'bat shit crazy'?
-
Works on smaller scales, possibly worked in Australia, strong theoretical justification to try, reasonable basis for harm reduction initiatives.
It has been tried elsewhere but it doesnt work. 37,000 knife attacks in the UK last year. That is as many as killed in the US by guns. Each one of these stabbings was an attempted murder. You dont stick a knife in someone but with one intent. If they had guns, they would have used them, and been more effective in all likelihood, but the intent to murder is still there and being acted on. And the UK is a relatively stable and safe place. As I said Ireland has 30 times the murder rate as the UK.
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Take away the gun and the murderer will use another tool.
Name one other commonly (and legally) available "murder tool" which can kill hundreds of people at a distance in a matter of seconds. (And no, "bombs" don't count. Making bombs is illegal. Nobody is trying to argue for the "right to bear bombs".)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
And, since you don’t get it, saying “no correlation in this example therefore no general causation” is the same general failure in reasoning as correlation = causation... :laugh:
You can attempt all the patronising mockery you want, you are wrong, can;t find the data that supports your argument and refuse to accept the fact that murder is the result of social/mental issues. Another attempted murder by knife in the UK: Horrific video shows stabbed teenager lying in blood-soaked clothes | Daily Mail Online[^] "A wave of violent crime has hit the UK recently with eight people dying in London in one week in March alone after a spate of stabbings and shootings" Yes, illegal guns are used in the UK.
-
But what is behind the 'bat shit crazy'?
Mental disorders of all kinds. Disorders that require serious medical attention. Now, how do we get these people that attention, whether they want help or not. By the way, I do believe in forced medical help for the seriously ill. To be clear, I am not disagreeing with you. I think we are both on the same page, more or less.
-
A car, truck etc as used in Nice a year or so back?
At a distance? You'd need a self-driving truck, and the ability to modify its programming. And it would need to be a damn big truck to take out hundreds of people.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
Mental disorders of all kinds. Disorders that require serious medical attention. Now, how do we get these people that attention, whether they want help or not. By the way, I do believe in forced medical help for the seriously ill. To be clear, I am not disagreeing with you. I think we are both on the same page, more or less.
But there are many supposedly sane people who seem to snap. What is the trigger? Take school kids, it is a stressful time of life, a lot of difficult issues to deal with, but they arent clinically insane (and yes, those who are should be forcibly locked up and cared for, the UK has been deeply negligent in this in the last 30 years). An interesting subtle shift in the UK recently, lead in large part by William and Harry, sons of Princess Diana, both have fought on the frontline in Afghanistan, and have experience of PTSD among fellow soldiers, has been towards greater acceptance and openness of mental issues. Hopefully by getting this into the open we can deal with it in a much more effective way. (As a true anti royalilst I am pleased to see them actually doing something useful for a change. :) )
-
At a distance? You'd need a self-driving truck, and the ability to modify its programming. And it would need to be a damn big truck to take out hundreds of people.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
No, you plough into a crowd, and those 30 ft in front of you are soon to get it. And yes, it was a big truck that killed what was it, 80 people in Nice?
-
But there are many supposedly sane people who seem to snap. What is the trigger? Take school kids, it is a stressful time of life, a lot of difficult issues to deal with, but they arent clinically insane (and yes, those who are should be forcibly locked up and cared for, the UK has been deeply negligent in this in the last 30 years). An interesting subtle shift in the UK recently, lead in large part by William and Harry, sons of Princess Diana, both have fought on the frontline in Afghanistan, and have experience of PTSD among fellow soldiers, has been towards greater acceptance and openness of mental issues. Hopefully by getting this into the open we can deal with it in a much more effective way. (As a true anti royalilst I am pleased to see them actually doing something useful for a change. :) )
The kid who did the last shooting (and most of the other shooters), was on a lot of radars and no one did shit. I say, stop talking about the kid/shooter and start talking about what we do as a society with people like the kid. IMHO, the kid/shooter actually plays a very small part in all of this compared to what we should be doing as a society with crazy people.
-
The kid who did the last shooting (and most of the other shooters), was on a lot of radars and no one did shit. I say, stop talking about the kid/shooter and start talking about what we do as a society with people like the kid. IMHO, the kid/shooter actually plays a very small part in all of this compared to what we should be doing as a society with crazy people.
Slacker007 wrote:
stop talking about the kid/shooter and start talking about what we do as a society with people like the kid
Absolutely, 100% agree. Schools especially need to have the mechanisms to catch this before it blows uup.
-
You can attempt all the patronising mockery you want, you are wrong, can;t find the data that supports your argument and refuse to accept the fact that murder is the result of social/mental issues. Another attempted murder by knife in the UK: Horrific video shows stabbed teenager lying in blood-soaked clothes | Daily Mail Online[^] "A wave of violent crime has hit the UK recently with eight people dying in London in one week in March alone after a spate of stabbings and shootings" Yes, illegal guns are used in the UK.
Gun violence is murder, suicide, accidents. Mental illness and reduction of gun violence and suicide: bringing epidemiologic research to policy[^]
Quote:
Policymaking at the interface of gun violence prevention and mental illness should be based on epidemiologic data concerning risk to improve the effectiveness, feasibility, and fairness of policy initiatives.
Guns, knives and pesticides: reducing access to lethal means[^]
Quote:
Firearms: Jurisdictions with restrictive firearms legislation and lower firearms ownership tend to have lower levels of gun violence. Measures include bans, licensing schemes, minimum ages for buyers, background checks and safe storage requirements. Such measures have been successfully implemented in countries such as Austria and Brazil and in a number of states in the United States of America. Introducing national legislation can be complicated, but much can be done at local level. Stiffer enforcement, amnesties and improved security for state supplies of firearms are some of the other promising approaches. Multifaceted strategies are also needed to reduce demand for guns – diverting vulnerable youth from gang membership, for instance.
NEJM - Guns and Suicide in the United States[^]
Quote:
Why might the availability of firearms increase the risk of suicide in the United States? First, many suicidal acts — one third to four fifths of all suicide attempts, according to studies — are impulsive. Among people who made near-lethal suicide attempts, for example, 24% took less than 5 minutes between the decision to kill themselves and the actual attempt, and 70% took less than 1 hour.2
Impulsivity is the same in homicide. And on, and on. But you disagree with these people because you googled some statistics, right? Forget NEJM or the WHO, you cite the Daily Mai
-
The evidence says reducing access to guns reduces the lethality of impulsivity. Take away the gun; less likely to complete the homicide or suicide. But just like GW, you “don’t believe” data.
