Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. I was very very wrong...

I was very very wrong...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpwcfxmlquestion
27 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Rage

    devenv.exe wrote:

    Is this even a syntax??

    Everything is a syntax for anyone.

    Do not escape reality : improve reality !

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Super Lloyd
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    Translated that to English for ya! :) Everything is a syntax to someone.

    A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Daniel Pfeffer

      I see you a DCOM, and raise you a JCL.

      Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

      D Offline
      D Offline
      dandy72
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      Daniel Pfeffer wrote:

      I see you a DCOM, and raise you a JCL.

      Corba? I don't know, I was made to sit down and read a book on it 20+ years ago. I still think this could've ended my developer career early on.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Daniel Pfeffer

        I see you a DCOM, and raise you a JCL.

        Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mycroft Holmes
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        Bloatus macro script - the original which was the same as the spreadsheet.

        Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

          I'll just leave this here:

          PXSelectBase<Account> query = new PXSelectJoinGroupBy<Account,
          LeftJoin<SalesOrder, On<SalesOrder.customerAccountID, Equal<Account.accountID>>,
          LeftJoin<OrderDetail, On<SalesOrder.orderNbr, Equal<OrderDetail.orderNbr>>,
          LeftJoin<Product, On<Product.productID, Equal<OrderDetail.productID>>>>>,
          Where<Account.companyType, Equal<CompanyTypes.customer>>,
          Aggregate<GroupBy<Account.accountID, GroupBy<Product.categoryCD, Sum<OrderDetail.extPrice>>>>>(this);

          A query using a custom ORM from a CRM product we were evaluating last year. It makes LINQ look positively beautiful by comparison. X|


          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

          N Offline
          N Offline
          Nathan Minier
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          I have a new appreciation for Expression Trees.

          "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D devenv exe

            I used to think WCF XML configurations were hell until i started working with SSAS MDX queries. How on earth am i going to understand this weird syntax :zzz: :zzz: Is this even a syntax??

            "Coming soon"

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Snorri Kristjansson
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            There happens to be an article about that here on CodeProject [^] - I used that some years ago when I had the pleasure to use MDX queries :)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

              I'll just leave this here:

              PXSelectBase<Account> query = new PXSelectJoinGroupBy<Account,
              LeftJoin<SalesOrder, On<SalesOrder.customerAccountID, Equal<Account.accountID>>,
              LeftJoin<OrderDetail, On<SalesOrder.orderNbr, Equal<OrderDetail.orderNbr>>,
              LeftJoin<Product, On<Product.productID, Equal<OrderDetail.productID>>>>>,
              Where<Account.companyType, Equal<CompanyTypes.customer>>,
              Aggregate<GroupBy<Account.accountID, GroupBy<Product.categoryCD, Sum<OrderDetail.extPrice>>>>>(this);

              A query using a custom ORM from a CRM product we were evaluating last year. It makes LINQ look positively beautiful by comparison. X|


              "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

              K Offline
              K Offline
              Kirk 10389821
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              New Rule... If your cool new "one liner" is more reminiscent of a perl trick... STOP!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Daniel Pfeffer

                Google "IBM JCL". Any further description (or link to such) would be more appropriate to the Soapbox. X|

                Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                B Offline
                B Offline
                Bruce Patin
                wrote on last edited by
                #24

                I taught IBM JCL for 2 years. After a while, I actually got to understand why they did things the way they did, and realized that present day classes and configurations are no better. BTW, IBM mainframes did not get hacked.

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Bruce Patin

                  I taught IBM JCL for 2 years. After a while, I actually got to understand why they did things the way they did, and realized that present day classes and configurations are no better. BTW, IBM mainframes did not get hacked.

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Daniel Pfeffer
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  Bruce Patin wrote:

                  IBM mainframes did not get hacked.

                  Given that TCP/IP was only designed in 1974, that the Internet ("World Wide Web") only took off in the early 1990's, and that very few people can afford to read their mail or surf the 'net on a mainframe, that's not really surprising.

                  Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Daniel Pfeffer

                    Bruce Patin wrote:

                    IBM mainframes did not get hacked.

                    Given that TCP/IP was only designed in 1974, that the Internet ("World Wide Web") only took off in the early 1990's, and that very few people can afford to read their mail or surf the 'net on a mainframe, that's not really surprising.

                    Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bruce Patin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    I thought that someone would come up with this, but the fact is that IBM mainframes had security built in that would make most current hacks impossible. I've recently read that some of those security features are now being considered for microprocessors. Sorry, I don't have the details in ready memory right now, but I had to both attend and lecture courses in which those hardware minutia were described in detail.

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Bruce Patin

                      I thought that someone would come up with this, but the fact is that IBM mainframes had security built in that would make most current hacks impossible. I've recently read that some of those security features are now being considered for microprocessors. Sorry, I don't have the details in ready memory right now, but I had to both attend and lecture courses in which those hardware minutia were described in detail.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Daniel Pfeffer
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      I stand corrected.

                      Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups