Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. I went to the soapbox to find lively conversation and found crickets

I went to the soapbox to find lively conversation and found crickets

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
77 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Munchies_Matt

    So now it isnt a freak year? Wow, you finally agree with me. Did you finally look at the UAH data I linked that shows 2018 is not that hot?

    Eddy Vluggen wrote:

    And yes, there is data that shows the growing of the desert, shrinking of the rainforest, and changing rain-patterns.

    Provide that data. Please give us a definition of the catastrophe you said would happen in a few years. Waiting for the data and definition now...

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    Munchies_Matt wrote:

    So now it isnt a freak year? Wow, you finally agree with me. Did you finally look at the UAH data I linked that shows 2018 is not that hot?

    2018 isn't finished, and we have set some new records. It is not a freak-year, since it is not an exception. It is in line with the trend, and as such, was expected.

    Munchies_Matt wrote:

    Provide that data.

    Haha :D Provide me with funding, and I might. If you want something for free, go beg somewhere else; I've already been educating for free for too long :thumbsup:

    Munchies_Matt wrote:

    Please give us a definition of the catastrophe you said would happen in a few years.

    Sure :) noun a sudden and widespread disaster: the catastrophe of war. any misfortune, mishap, or failure; fiasco: The play was so poor our whole evening was a catastrophe. a final event or conclusion, usually an unfortunate one; a disastrous end: the great catastrophe of the Old South at Appomattox.

    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Munchies_Matt wrote:

      So now it isnt a freak year? Wow, you finally agree with me. Did you finally look at the UAH data I linked that shows 2018 is not that hot?

      2018 isn't finished, and we have set some new records. It is not a freak-year, since it is not an exception. It is in line with the trend, and as such, was expected.

      Munchies_Matt wrote:

      Provide that data.

      Haha :D Provide me with funding, and I might. If you want something for free, go beg somewhere else; I've already been educating for free for too long :thumbsup:

      Munchies_Matt wrote:

      Please give us a definition of the catastrophe you said would happen in a few years.

      Sure :) noun a sudden and widespread disaster: the catastrophe of war. any misfortune, mishap, or failure; fiasco: The play was so poor our whole evening was a catastrophe. a final event or conclusion, usually an unfortunate one; a disastrous end: the great catastrophe of the Old South at Appomattox.

      Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Munchies_Matt
      wrote on last edited by
      #65

      OK, so just up to now, is it a freak year or not? Still waiting for the data that shows: 1) Expanding desert 2) Shrinking rain forest (due to warming and not chainsaws) 3) Change in rainfall pattern Thanks for your definition of catastrophe. We can have a good laugh in a few years.

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Munchies_Matt

        OK, so just up to now, is it a freak year or not? Still waiting for the data that shows: 1) Expanding desert 2) Shrinking rain forest (due to warming and not chainsaws) 3) Change in rainfall pattern Thanks for your definition of catastrophe. We can have a good laugh in a few years.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #66

        Munchies_Matt wrote:

        OK, so just up to now, is it a freak year or not?

        It is not according to data. It is warmer, yes, but that was expected. It will not be a "one off" event.

        Munchies_Matt wrote:

        Still waiting for the data that shows: 1) Expanding desert 2) Shrinking rain forest (due to warming and not chainsaws) 3) Change in rainfall pattern

        You can wait for an eternity for all I care :D Also, for rain it matters not if the rainforest is disappearing due to warming or chainsaws.

        Munchies_Matt wrote:

        Thanks for your definition of catastrophe. We can have a good laugh in a few years.

        Not "we", but I hope you will :) --edit I got plenty of time btw; I'm assuming you are having a holiday?

        Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Munchies_Matt wrote:

          OK, so just up to now, is it a freak year or not?

          It is not according to data. It is warmer, yes, but that was expected. It will not be a "one off" event.

          Munchies_Matt wrote:

          Still waiting for the data that shows: 1) Expanding desert 2) Shrinking rain forest (due to warming and not chainsaws) 3) Change in rainfall pattern

          You can wait for an eternity for all I care :D Also, for rain it matters not if the rainforest is disappearing due to warming or chainsaws.

          Munchies_Matt wrote:

          Thanks for your definition of catastrophe. We can have a good laugh in a few years.

          Not "we", but I hope you will :) --edit I got plenty of time btw; I'm assuming you are having a holiday?

          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Munchies_Matt
          wrote on last edited by
          #67

          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

          It is not according to data.

          What data? Care to provide this too?

          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

          ou can wait for an eternity for all I care

          Ah, of course. I didnt expect you to. You make statements you cant substantiate with data of any kind. Well, you know what that makes you I am sure, and you dont need me to spell it our for you.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Munchies_Matt

            Eddy Vluggen wrote:

            It is not according to data.

            What data? Care to provide this too?

            Eddy Vluggen wrote:

            ou can wait for an eternity for all I care

            Ah, of course. I didnt expect you to. You make statements you cant substantiate with data of any kind. Well, you know what that makes you I am sure, and you dont need me to spell it our for you.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #68

            Munchies_Matt wrote:

            Care to provide this too?

            Already done so; free download at the KNMI. Some other countries provide similar. So, I do not provide it, since it is not "my" data; they provide it, as an aggragate of the weather stations.

            Munchies_Matt wrote:

            Ah, of course. I didnt expect you to. You make statements you cant substantiate with data of any kind.

            Always the sofist; on the contrary, I'm using data that is publicly available and used by other institutes. Your arguments here (to convince the coders!) are mostly hit-and-run stuff that can be easily be dismissed; sometimes even by your own arguments.

            Munchies_Matt wrote:

            Well, you know what that makes you I am sure, and you dont need me to spell it our for you.

            It makes me the one with the raw facts, and you the one that keeps cherry-picking to find anything that remotely can be used to create more confusion. You are putting a lot of unpaid effort in this; so who is paying for your sandwich? :)

            Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Munchies_Matt wrote:

              Care to provide this too?

              Already done so; free download at the KNMI. Some other countries provide similar. So, I do not provide it, since it is not "my" data; they provide it, as an aggragate of the weather stations.

              Munchies_Matt wrote:

              Ah, of course. I didnt expect you to. You make statements you cant substantiate with data of any kind.

              Always the sofist; on the contrary, I'm using data that is publicly available and used by other institutes. Your arguments here (to convince the coders!) are mostly hit-and-run stuff that can be easily be dismissed; sometimes even by your own arguments.

              Munchies_Matt wrote:

              Well, you know what that makes you I am sure, and you dont need me to spell it our for you.

              It makes me the one with the raw facts, and you the one that keeps cherry-picking to find anything that remotely can be used to create more confusion. You are putting a lot of unpaid effort in this; so who is paying for your sandwich? :)

              Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Munchies_Matt
              wrote on last edited by
              #69

              Eddy Vluggen wrote:

              Already done so;

              Ah, the old 'already done so' gambit. Care to provide a link to your post with a link to the data? Hmm?

              Eddy Vluggen wrote:

              So, I do not provide it

              And now you admit to not providing it. Well well, you changed your mind fast!

              Eddy Vluggen wrote:

              I'm using data

              Well please provide it to substantiate your assertions. Other wise be known for being full of shit.

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Munchies_Matt

                Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                Already done so;

                Ah, the old 'already done so' gambit. Care to provide a link to your post with a link to the data? Hmm?

                Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                So, I do not provide it

                And now you admit to not providing it. Well well, you changed your mind fast!

                Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                I'm using data

                Well please provide it to substantiate your assertions. Other wise be known for being full of shit.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #70

                Munchies_Matt wrote:

                Ah, the old 'already done so' gambit. Care to provide a link to your post with a link to the data?

                Search CodeProject? Why would I give you a link I already gave you?

                Munchies_Matt wrote:

                And now you admit to not providing it. Well well, you changed your mind fast!

                Just noting that it is not "my" data, but part of the public domain.

                Munchies_Matt wrote:

                Well please provide it to substantiate your assertions. Other wise be known for being full of sh*t.

                That's your place already :)

                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Munchies_Matt wrote:

                  Ah, the old 'already done so' gambit. Care to provide a link to your post with a link to the data?

                  Search CodeProject? Why would I give you a link I already gave you?

                  Munchies_Matt wrote:

                  And now you admit to not providing it. Well well, you changed your mind fast!

                  Just noting that it is not "my" data, but part of the public domain.

                  Munchies_Matt wrote:

                  Well please provide it to substantiate your assertions. Other wise be known for being full of sh*t.

                  That's your place already :)

                  Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Munchies_Matt
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #71

                  No, not going to cough up the data to support your assertions? Oh well, Full of Shit Eddie it will have to be then, :)

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Munchies_Matt

                    No, not going to cough up the data to support your assertions? Oh well, Full of Shit Eddie it will have to be then, :)

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #72

                    Munchies_Matt wrote:

                    No, not going to cough up the data to support your assertions?

                    It is public available from the mentioned institute. If you are too lazy to look up a link I already sent you, then you could opt for a search engine. It is not hidden or anything like that :D

                    Munchies_Matt wrote:

                    Oh well, Full of Sh*t Eddie it will have to be then, :)

                    Hehe, "moviprep"; and the name is "Eddy" :cool:

                    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Munchies_Matt wrote:

                      No, not going to cough up the data to support your assertions?

                      It is public available from the mentioned institute. If you are too lazy to look up a link I already sent you, then you could opt for a search engine. It is not hidden or anything like that :D

                      Munchies_Matt wrote:

                      Oh well, Full of Sh*t Eddie it will have to be then, :)

                      Hehe, "moviprep"; and the name is "Eddy" :cool:

                      Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Munchies_Matt
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #73

                      You never sent me a link, so come on, send it now. And the other data you have said exists, but suddenly cant deliver when asked. Getting to be a bit of a pattern with you isnt it.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Munchies_Matt

                        You never sent me a link, so come on, send it now. And the other data you have said exists, but suddenly cant deliver when asked. Getting to be a bit of a pattern with you isnt it.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #74

                        Munchies_Matt wrote:

                        You never sent me a link, so come on, send it now.

                        Oh, it is still on CodeProject; they don't throw away our conversations.

                        Munchies_Matt wrote:

                        Getting to be a bit of a pattern with you isnt it.

                        Has been like this since we started. You come with nonsense, I explain it, you follow up with an ad-hominem.

                        Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          A single experiment is not enough to "prove" that CAGW is not real. Knowing you, it is a biased and cherry-picked piece of text, funded by some large corporation :)

                          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jschell
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #75

                          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                          A single experiment is not enough to "prove" that CAGW is not real.

                          He "proves" it all the time and in many and oddly weird ways.

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J jschell

                            Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                            A single experiment is not enough to "prove" that CAGW is not real.

                            He "proves" it all the time and in many and oddly weird ways.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #76

                            No proof yet that stands peer-review :thumbsup:

                            Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Munchies_Matt wrote:

                              You never sent me a link, so come on, send it now.

                              Oh, it is still on CodeProject; they don't throw away our conversations.

                              Munchies_Matt wrote:

                              Getting to be a bit of a pattern with you isnt it.

                              Has been like this since we started. You come with nonsense, I explain it, you follow up with an ad-hominem.

                              Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Munchies_Matt
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #77

                              No, I give you well reasoned argument, backed up by solid evidence, and you jump all over the place, incapable of maintaining a consistent line of argument, and fail to provide one single link to back you up. And it is like this again and again and again. Any wonder I lose my patience with your sillyness?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups