I went to the soapbox to find lively conversation and found crickets
-
OK, so just up to now, is it a freak year or not? Still waiting for the data that shows: 1) Expanding desert 2) Shrinking rain forest (due to warming and not chainsaws) 3) Change in rainfall pattern Thanks for your definition of catastrophe. We can have a good laugh in a few years.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
OK, so just up to now, is it a freak year or not?
It is not according to data. It is warmer, yes, but that was expected. It will not be a "one off" event.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Still waiting for the data that shows: 1) Expanding desert 2) Shrinking rain forest (due to warming and not chainsaws) 3) Change in rainfall pattern
You can wait for an eternity for all I care :D Also, for rain it matters not if the rainforest is disappearing due to warming or chainsaws.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Thanks for your definition of catastrophe. We can have a good laugh in a few years.
Not "we", but I hope you will :) --edit I got plenty of time btw; I'm assuming you are having a holiday?
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
OK, so just up to now, is it a freak year or not?
It is not according to data. It is warmer, yes, but that was expected. It will not be a "one off" event.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Still waiting for the data that shows: 1) Expanding desert 2) Shrinking rain forest (due to warming and not chainsaws) 3) Change in rainfall pattern
You can wait for an eternity for all I care :D Also, for rain it matters not if the rainforest is disappearing due to warming or chainsaws.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Thanks for your definition of catastrophe. We can have a good laugh in a few years.
Not "we", but I hope you will :) --edit I got plenty of time btw; I'm assuming you are having a holiday?
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
It is not according to data.
What data? Care to provide this too?
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
ou can wait for an eternity for all I care
Ah, of course. I didnt expect you to. You make statements you cant substantiate with data of any kind. Well, you know what that makes you I am sure, and you dont need me to spell it our for you.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
It is not according to data.
What data? Care to provide this too?
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
ou can wait for an eternity for all I care
Ah, of course. I didnt expect you to. You make statements you cant substantiate with data of any kind. Well, you know what that makes you I am sure, and you dont need me to spell it our for you.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Care to provide this too?
Already done so; free download at the KNMI. Some other countries provide similar. So, I do not provide it, since it is not "my" data; they provide it, as an aggragate of the weather stations.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Ah, of course. I didnt expect you to. You make statements you cant substantiate with data of any kind.
Always the sofist; on the contrary, I'm using data that is publicly available and used by other institutes. Your arguments here (to convince the coders!) are mostly hit-and-run stuff that can be easily be dismissed; sometimes even by your own arguments.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Well, you know what that makes you I am sure, and you dont need me to spell it our for you.
It makes me the one with the raw facts, and you the one that keeps cherry-picking to find anything that remotely can be used to create more confusion. You are putting a lot of unpaid effort in this; so who is paying for your sandwich? :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Care to provide this too?
Already done so; free download at the KNMI. Some other countries provide similar. So, I do not provide it, since it is not "my" data; they provide it, as an aggragate of the weather stations.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Ah, of course. I didnt expect you to. You make statements you cant substantiate with data of any kind.
Always the sofist; on the contrary, I'm using data that is publicly available and used by other institutes. Your arguments here (to convince the coders!) are mostly hit-and-run stuff that can be easily be dismissed; sometimes even by your own arguments.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Well, you know what that makes you I am sure, and you dont need me to spell it our for you.
It makes me the one with the raw facts, and you the one that keeps cherry-picking to find anything that remotely can be used to create more confusion. You are putting a lot of unpaid effort in this; so who is paying for your sandwich? :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Already done so;
Ah, the old 'already done so' gambit. Care to provide a link to your post with a link to the data? Hmm?
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
So, I do not provide it
And now you admit to not providing it. Well well, you changed your mind fast!
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
I'm using data
Well please provide it to substantiate your assertions. Other wise be known for being full of shit.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
Already done so;
Ah, the old 'already done so' gambit. Care to provide a link to your post with a link to the data? Hmm?
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
So, I do not provide it
And now you admit to not providing it. Well well, you changed your mind fast!
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
I'm using data
Well please provide it to substantiate your assertions. Other wise be known for being full of shit.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Ah, the old 'already done so' gambit. Care to provide a link to your post with a link to the data?
Search CodeProject? Why would I give you a link I already gave you?
Munchies_Matt wrote:
And now you admit to not providing it. Well well, you changed your mind fast!
Just noting that it is not "my" data, but part of the public domain.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Well please provide it to substantiate your assertions. Other wise be known for being full of sh*t.
That's your place already :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Ah, the old 'already done so' gambit. Care to provide a link to your post with a link to the data?
Search CodeProject? Why would I give you a link I already gave you?
Munchies_Matt wrote:
And now you admit to not providing it. Well well, you changed your mind fast!
Just noting that it is not "my" data, but part of the public domain.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Well please provide it to substantiate your assertions. Other wise be known for being full of sh*t.
That's your place already :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
No, not going to cough up the data to support your assertions? Oh well, Full of Shit Eddie it will have to be then, :)
-
No, not going to cough up the data to support your assertions? Oh well, Full of Shit Eddie it will have to be then, :)
Munchies_Matt wrote:
No, not going to cough up the data to support your assertions?
It is public available from the mentioned institute. If you are too lazy to look up a link I already sent you, then you could opt for a search engine. It is not hidden or anything like that :D
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Oh well, Full of Sh*t Eddie it will have to be then, :)
Hehe, "moviprep"; and the name is "Eddy" :cool:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
No, not going to cough up the data to support your assertions?
It is public available from the mentioned institute. If you are too lazy to look up a link I already sent you, then you could opt for a search engine. It is not hidden or anything like that :D
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Oh well, Full of Sh*t Eddie it will have to be then, :)
Hehe, "moviprep"; and the name is "Eddy" :cool:
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
You never sent me a link, so come on, send it now. And the other data you have said exists, but suddenly cant deliver when asked. Getting to be a bit of a pattern with you isnt it.
-
You never sent me a link, so come on, send it now. And the other data you have said exists, but suddenly cant deliver when asked. Getting to be a bit of a pattern with you isnt it.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
You never sent me a link, so come on, send it now.
Oh, it is still on CodeProject; they don't throw away our conversations.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Getting to be a bit of a pattern with you isnt it.
Has been like this since we started. You come with nonsense, I explain it, you follow up with an ad-hominem.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
A single experiment is not enough to "prove" that CAGW is not real. Knowing you, it is a biased and cherry-picked piece of text, funded by some large corporation :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
Eddy Vluggen wrote:
A single experiment is not enough to "prove" that CAGW is not real.
He "proves" it all the time and in many and oddly weird ways.
-
Munchies_Matt wrote:
You never sent me a link, so come on, send it now.
Oh, it is still on CodeProject; they don't throw away our conversations.
Munchies_Matt wrote:
Getting to be a bit of a pattern with you isnt it.
Has been like this since we started. You come with nonsense, I explain it, you follow up with an ad-hominem.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
No, I give you well reasoned argument, backed up by solid evidence, and you jump all over the place, incapable of maintaining a consistent line of argument, and fail to provide one single link to back you up. And it is like this again and again and again. Any wonder I lose my patience with your sillyness?