Arrogant or merely delusional?
-
Optimistic.
GCS d-- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
Delusionally Optimistic. Is that a word?
cheers Chris Maunder
-
I made several thousand code changes over a couple of hundred files and I wholeheartedly believed all my unit tests would just work. I hate it when my serene view of reality doesn't align with what the rest of the world considers reasonable.
cheers Chris Maunder
I'll go with delusional. :)
Everyone has a photographic memory; some just don't have film. Steven Wright
-
I did that the day before yesterday, made changes in about 120 files and committed. A few minutes later someone behind me is banging their head on the table why the page isn't working. Looked like I missed a few .cshtml references. But I think I'm just confident of my skills :-\
GKP1992 wrote:
made changes in about 120 files and committed
See? That's how Real Programmers do it. Have a beer :beer:
cheers Chris Maunder
-
Just blame the closest, innocent, programmer. Works for me.
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
-
I made several thousand code changes over a couple of hundred files and I wholeheartedly believed all my unit tests would just work. I hate it when my serene view of reality doesn't align with what the rest of the world considers reasonable.
cheers Chris Maunder
-
Delusionally Optimistic. Is that a word?
cheers Chris Maunder
That's probably a better state than being optimistically delusional.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
I did it once for a name change. They wanted to rename an internal project, including filenames, strings, menus, resources, and everything else that had the old name. My project lead didn't think I'd get it to work on the first try. Glad I was able to prove him wrong.
I did that once to change an upper case M to a lower case m in a product name, when the bastitches who requested the change were the ones who spelled it wrong in the first place.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
I made several thousand code changes over a couple of hundred files and I wholeheartedly believed all my unit tests would just work. I hate it when my serene view of reality doesn't align with what the rest of the world considers reasonable.
cheers Chris Maunder
-
I made several thousand code changes over a couple of hundred files and I wholeheartedly believed all my unit tests would just work. I hate it when my serene view of reality doesn't align with what the rest of the world considers reasonable.
cheers Chris Maunder
My advice: avoid web development :-\
-
believe in yourself: as long as it compiles - surely your code must be ok. next step is delegation - get a junior to fix the tests [results].
Message Signature (Click to edit ->)
Lopatir wrote:
get a junior to fix the tests [results].
I believe you will find that most of those people are currently employed by BMW! :doh:
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain -
I did that once to change an upper case M to a lower case m in a product name, when the bastitches who requested the change were the ones who spelled it wrong in the first place.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
I made several thousand code changes over a couple of hundred files and I wholeheartedly believed all my unit tests would just work. I hate it when my serene view of reality doesn't align with what the rest of the world considers reasonable.
cheers Chris Maunder
Chris Maunder wrote:
when my serene view of reality doesn't align with what the rest of the world considers reasonable.
That's my normal state. However, I've come to realize that what the rest of the world considers reasonable is actually quite unreasonable.
Chris Maunder wrote:
all my unit tests would just work
But that's what unit tests are for -to destroy your serene view of reality. You should be celebrating!
Latest Article - A Concise Overview of Threads Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
-
I made several thousand code changes over a couple of hundred files and I wholeheartedly believed all my unit tests would just work. I hate it when my serene view of reality doesn't align with what the rest of the world considers reasonable.
cheers Chris Maunder
Unit test? Isn't that what production is for?
-
I made several thousand code changes over a couple of hundred files and I wholeheartedly believed all my unit tests would just work. I hate it when my serene view of reality doesn't align with what the rest of the world considers reasonable.
cheers Chris Maunder
obligatory Star Trek reference: [...maybe there's something wrong with the universe - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek23bXq23pY)
I'd rather be phishing!
-
obligatory Star Trek reference: [...maybe there's something wrong with the universe - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek23bXq23pY)
I'd rather be phishing!
Quote:
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
I made several thousand code changes over a couple of hundred files and I wholeheartedly believed all my unit tests would just work. I hate it when my serene view of reality doesn't align with what the rest of the world considers reasonable.
cheers Chris Maunder
The difference between arrogant and confident is success. So, I guess over confidence could be labeled as arrogance. ;) I once inherited a C code base and discovered, to my surprise, that most of the functions declared an 'int' return type, but there were no return statements for success. :wtf: A successful result would have been whatever happen to be in the AX register after the call was complete. The compiler was not happy and generated lots of warnings. :( I went through an uncounted number of functions and added the return statements. The compiler was very happy, no errors or warnings. :) But, the code would no longer work. :doh: I decided that I had more import things to do than fix code that worked, so I dropped the whole idea and lived with the warnings. :-O Besides, 80 percent of the time they were not checking the return type any way. :sigh:
INTP "Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence." - Edsger Dijkstra "I have never been lost, but I will admit to being confused for several weeks. " - Daniel Boone
-
The difference between arrogant and confident is success. So, I guess over confidence could be labeled as arrogance. ;) I once inherited a C code base and discovered, to my surprise, that most of the functions declared an 'int' return type, but there were no return statements for success. :wtf: A successful result would have been whatever happen to be in the AX register after the call was complete. The compiler was not happy and generated lots of warnings. :( I went through an uncounted number of functions and added the return statements. The compiler was very happy, no errors or warnings. :) But, the code would no longer work. :doh: I decided that I had more import things to do than fix code that worked, so I dropped the whole idea and lived with the warnings. :-O Besides, 80 percent of the time they were not checking the return type any way. :sigh:
INTP "Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence." - Edsger Dijkstra "I have never been lost, but I will admit to being confused for several weeks. " - Daniel Boone
Quote:
I once inherited a C code base and discovered, to my surprise, that most of the functions declared an 'int' return type, but there were no return statements for success.
Please don't tell me that. It's an abomination. I cannot believe a
Cprogrammer could have done such a thing. :omg: -
I made several thousand code changes over a couple of hundred files and I wholeheartedly believed all my unit tests would just work. I hate it when my serene view of reality doesn't align with what the rest of the world considers reasonable.
cheers Chris Maunder
Chris Maunder wrote:
what the rest of the world considers reasonable
The rest of the world isn't always right. A lot of great inventors were called arrogant, delusional, and even mad, yet they invented airplanes, discovered America, discovered that the earth was round and that the sun was the center of the galaxy... You, however, might just need another coffee to clear your head ;p
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Continuous Integration, Delivery, and Deployment arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
I made several thousand code changes over a couple of hundred files and I wholeheartedly believed all my unit tests would just work. I hate it when my serene view of reality doesn't align with what the rest of the world considers reasonable.
cheers Chris Maunder
Maybe just feeling lucky! :laugh: It's a nice challenge isn't it? It's either a fist pump or a quick swearing fit followed by bug hunting, usually followed by more swearing fits and disbelief that I could have made such stupid mistakes/overlooked the obvious. I'll settle for lots of little victories! :laugh:
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
-
I made several thousand code changes over a couple of hundred files and I wholeheartedly believed all my unit tests would just work. I hate it when my serene view of reality doesn't align with what the rest of the world considers reasonable.
cheers Chris Maunder
Unit tests - pffff ;P The only unit tests I have are the end users droids units who test my code.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
