Whoever designed the CodeDOM should be forced to use it
-
If does have
goto, and i'm seriously considering it at this pointReal programmers use butterflies
Well, when there's a reason, and it's thought out properly, there's nothing wrong with a
goto."'Do what thou wilt...' is to bid Stars to shine, Vines to bear grapes, Water to seek its level; man is the only being in Nature that has striven to set himself at odds with himself." —Aleister Crowley
-
Well, when there's a reason, and it's thought out properly, there's nothing wrong with a
goto."'Do what thou wilt...' is to bid Stars to shine, Vines to bear grapes, Water to seek its level; man is the only being in Nature that has striven to set himself at odds with himself." —Aleister Crowley
I think the reason would hopefully be better than "someone at microsoft slacked off"
Real programmers use butterflies
-
Now I have to restructure some performance critical code entirely because of the lack "break" statement. I'm angry at their lack of effort.
Real programmers use butterflies
You could be starting a trend, here: Whoever designed AnnoyingProduct should be forced to use it I can think of several values for AnnoyingProduct, without even putting my mind to it
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
You could be starting a trend, here: Whoever designed AnnoyingProduct should be forced to use it I can think of several values for AnnoyingProduct, without even putting my mind to it
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
It's a good principle, IMO. :-D
Real programmers use butterflies
-
You could be starting a trend, here: Whoever designed AnnoyingProduct should be forced to use it I can think of several values for AnnoyingProduct, without even putting my mind to it
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
Eating your own dog food - Wikipedia[^]
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
-
If it had a
breakstatement, it would probably follow C++ and overload it. :mad: But surely it has...you know...goto. :laugh: -
Now I have to restructure some performance critical code entirely because of the lack "break" statement. I'm angry at their lack of effort.
Real programmers use butterflies
You could almost say it... Broke your code! Ba dum tish! :D
Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly
-
Eating your own dog food - Wikipedia[^]
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
Jörgen Andersson wrote:
Nice! It links to some fun articles, too.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
If does have
goto, and i'm seriously considering it at this pointReal programmers use butterflies
Do it.
breakis just a thinly-disguisedgotoanyway. :) Here's an article from 2007 with some alternatives for the unsupported features: CodeDom Assistant[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
What I meant was that C++ overloads
breakitself, although I suppose this can be debated. But it's annoying not to be able to exit a loop usingbreakwhen inside aswitchstatement that's embedded within that loop. -
Do it.
breakis just a thinly-disguisedgotoanyway. :) Here's an article from 2007 with some alternatives for the unsupported features: CodeDom Assistant[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
Thanks but I've got codedom assist covered (CodeDOM Go Kit: The CodeDOM is Dead, Long Live the CodeDOM)[^]
Real programmers use butterflies
-
What I meant was that C++ overloads
breakitself, although I suppose this can be debated. But it's annoying not to be able to exit a loop usingbreakwhen inside aswitchstatement that's embedded within that loop. -
(Shouldn't it have been 'bootstrap'?)
-
Well, when there's a reason, and it's thought out properly, there's nothing wrong with a
goto."'Do what thou wilt...' is to bid Stars to shine, Vines to bear grapes, Water to seek its level; man is the only being in Nature that has striven to set himself at odds with himself." —Aleister Crowley
