Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Whoever designed the CodeDOM should be forced to use it

Whoever designed the CodeDOM should be forced to use it

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
performance
20 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Mark_Wallace

    You could be starting a trend, here: Whoever designed AnnoyingProduct should be forced to use it I can think of several values for AnnoyingProduct, without even putting my mind to it

    I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jorgen Andersson
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Eating your own dog food - Wikipedia[^]

    Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Greg UtasG Greg Utas

      If it had a break statement, it would probably follow C++ and overload it. :mad: But surely it has...you know...goto. :laugh:

      CPalliniC Offline
      CPalliniC Offline
      CPallini
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      You cannot overload the break statement in C++.

      In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

      Greg UtasG 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H honey the codewitch

        Now I have to restructure some performance critical code entirely because of the lack "break" statement. I'm angry at their lack of effort.

        Real programmers use butterflies

        Sander RosselS Offline
        Sander RosselS Offline
        Sander Rossel
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        You could almost say it... Broke your code! Ba dum tish! :D

        Best, Sander sanderrossel.com Migrating Applications to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript Object-Oriented Programming in C# Succinctly

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Jorgen Andersson

          Eating your own dog food - Wikipedia[^]

          Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mark_Wallace
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Jörgen Andersson wrote:

          Eating your own dog food - Wikipedia[^]

          Nice! It links to some fun articles, too.

          I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H honey the codewitch

            If does have goto, and i'm seriously considering it at this point

            Real programmers use butterflies

            Richard DeemingR Offline
            Richard DeemingR Offline
            Richard Deeming
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Do it. break is just a thinly-disguised goto anyway. :) Here's an article from 2007 with some alternatives for the unsupported features: CodeDom Assistant[^]


            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

            H 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • CPalliniC CPallini

              You cannot overload the break statement in C++.

              Greg UtasG Offline
              Greg UtasG Offline
              Greg Utas
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              What I meant was that C++ overloads break itself, although I suppose this can be debated. But it's annoying not to be able to exit a loop using break when inside a switch statement that's embedded within that loop.

              <p><a href="https://github.com/GregUtas/robust-services-core/blob/master/README.md">Robust Services Core</a>
              <em>The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.</em></p>

              CPalliniC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                Do it. break is just a thinly-disguised goto anyway. :) Here's an article from 2007 with some alternatives for the unsupported features: CodeDom Assistant[^]


                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                H Offline
                H Offline
                honey the codewitch
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                Thanks but I've got codedom assist covered (CodeDOM Go Kit: The CodeDOM is Dead, Long Live the CodeDOM)[^]

                Real programmers use butterflies

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Greg UtasG Greg Utas

                  What I meant was that C++ overloads break itself, although I suppose this can be debated. But it's annoying not to be able to exit a loop using break when inside a switch statement that's embedded within that loop.

                  CPalliniC Offline
                  CPalliniC Offline
                  CPallini
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  OK, now I got it. I think I've used the break statement millions times without ever considering its 'double' nature (I mean, I knew and eccepted it blindly)! :) Thank you for the explanation.

                  In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D David ONeil

                    (Shouldn't it have been 'bootstrap'?)

                    The forgotten roots of science | C++ Programming | DWinLib

                    Greg UtasG Offline
                    Greg UtasG Offline
                    Greg Utas
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Or maybe "reboot"!

                    <p><a href="https://github.com/GregUtas/robust-services-core/blob/master/README.md">Robust Services Core</a>
                    <em>The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.</em></p>

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Brady Kelly

                      Well, when there's a reason, and it's thought out properly, there's nothing wrong with a goto.

                      "'Do what thou wilt...' is to bid Stars to shine, Vines to bear grapes, Water to seek its level; man is the only being in Nature that has striven to set himself at odds with himself." —Aleister Crowley

                      O Offline
                      O Offline
                      obermd
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Brady Kelly wrote:

                      Well, when there's a reason, and it's thought out properly, there's nothing wrong with a goto.

                      Just document what the goto is in there for. Even Dykstra said goto has a place.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups