Windows XP
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
Super Lloyd wrote:
my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU...
That's my problem with W10. All I really needed was XP + support for modern peripherals + better security (patches, bug fixes, etc.). I did not need all of the cruft that comes with Windows 10, and that requires the "monster modern CPU".
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
Super Lloyd wrote:
my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU...
That's my problem with W10. All I really needed was XP + support for modern peripherals + better security (patches, bug fixes, etc.). I did not need all of the cruft that comes with Windows 10, and that requires the "monster modern CPU".
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
Win10 is also the first Microsoft OS I think it is a step back (but for the One-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named, but I think nobody talks about it anymore). What I utmost hate is the flat design and the redesign of the settings - To me a true step back. Developers stop caring about resources years ago because they are cheap. So yes, you need the big monster modern PC to run anything. A printer driver 4Gb ? A pdf reader 2Gb ? An ... OS 122 Gb ? As you may know, I am the IT guy of my local school - Teachers are using interactive applications, which are sometimes nothing else than encapsulated HTML5 or pdf viewers; one of them is sucking up 220Gb of disk space (you read that well) and need more than 10Gb RAM to run. To merely DISPLAY things on the screen, and it is slow as hell.
-
Win10 is also the first Microsoft OS I think it is a step back (but for the One-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named, but I think nobody talks about it anymore). What I utmost hate is the flat design and the redesign of the settings - To me a true step back. Developers stop caring about resources years ago because they are cheap. So yes, you need the big monster modern PC to run anything. A printer driver 4Gb ? A pdf reader 2Gb ? An ... OS 122 Gb ? As you may know, I am the IT guy of my local school - Teachers are using interactive applications, which are sometimes nothing else than encapsulated HTML5 or pdf viewers; one of them is sucking up 220Gb of disk space (you read that well) and need more than 10Gb RAM to run. To merely DISPLAY things on the screen, and it is slow as hell.
Rage wrote:
... the first Microsoft OS I think it is a step back (but for the One-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named, but I think nobody talks about it anymore).
So that'll be ... DOS 4.0? Windows RT? Windows NT? Vista? Win 8? Am I warm yet? :laugh:
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
Rage wrote:
... the first Microsoft OS I think it is a step back (but for the One-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named, but I think nobody talks about it anymore).
So that'll be ... DOS 4.0? Windows RT? Windows NT? Vista? Win 8? Am I warm yet? :laugh:
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
... Vista ... Dos 4.0 was awesome, I still miss WinNt to some extent, Win8 ? What is win8 ;-)
DOS 4 was so buggy, IBM refused to install it on their PCs! :laugh: It used a load more of my precious 640K base memory, and crashed daily. And MS ignored all beta tester input as usual. 4.01 was OK .. but still not the multitasking OS MS had been promising us ... :sigh:
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
-
I still remember when you wrote: "What I really needed was DOS 6.22 + support for dishwashers and better security (padlock on floppy disks, etc.) ..." ;P
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto
Link and photo, or it didn't happen. :)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
Super Lloyd wrote:
my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU...
That's my problem with W10. All I really needed was XP + support for modern peripherals + better security (patches, bug fixes, etc.). I did not need all of the cruft that comes with Windows 10, and that requires the "monster modern CPU".
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
My personal assertion is W10 does not need a monster CPU and is quite good... But, however, I cant be really sure... However my CPU however is around a few percent everytime I look at it... so... I have a hard time it is a performance hog....
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
Win10 is also the first Microsoft OS I think it is a step back (but for the One-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named, but I think nobody talks about it anymore). What I utmost hate is the flat design and the redesign of the settings - To me a true step back. Developers stop caring about resources years ago because they are cheap. So yes, you need the big monster modern PC to run anything. A printer driver 4Gb ? A pdf reader 2Gb ? An ... OS 122 Gb ? As you may know, I am the IT guy of my local school - Teachers are using interactive applications, which are sometimes nothing else than encapsulated HTML5 or pdf viewers; one of them is sucking up 220Gb of disk space (you read that well) and need more than 10Gb RAM to run. To merely DISPLAY things on the screen, and it is slow as hell.
as for the look itself.. I think it's like fashion, its core value is to be different from the few guy just before.. hate or love it.. Both are valid.. and it's not really for me a selling point either way..
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
For my Money the best version of Windows, the 'embedded' version XPe worked nearly every time even if the board had damage if it could. The desktop version aside from the odd BLue Screen was stable, all was right with the world ;)
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
I thought 7 was a definite improvement over XP. I don't want to have to learn enough to be qualified for tech support. But XP sometimes required that, whereas 7 rarely did. So I also didn't think 10 was much of an improvement on 7.
Robust Services Core | Software Techniques for Lemmings | Articles
The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing. -
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
XP is super for me. Once a year. I run it in a VM to print my Christmas card labels in Visual Foxpro. Then, I shut it down for a year. 10 is fine, runs faster because it is on much faster hardware. I can still run my Office 2000 on it (except LookOut) I think my favorite was 2K. None are my main OS. All via VM. Whatever works, works :)
If you can keep your head while those about you are losing theirs, perhaps you don't understand the situation.
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
Super Lloyd wrote:
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist
Perhaps the best response possible to your own post.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010
-
Win10 is also the first Microsoft OS I think it is a step back (but for the One-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named, but I think nobody talks about it anymore). What I utmost hate is the flat design and the redesign of the settings - To me a true step back. Developers stop caring about resources years ago because they are cheap. So yes, you need the big monster modern PC to run anything. A printer driver 4Gb ? A pdf reader 2Gb ? An ... OS 122 Gb ? As you may know, I am the IT guy of my local school - Teachers are using interactive applications, which are sometimes nothing else than encapsulated HTML5 or pdf viewers; one of them is sucking up 220Gb of disk space (you read that well) and need more than 10Gb RAM to run. To merely DISPLAY things on the screen, and it is slow as hell.
This is sooo true. Look at where Linux distros have gone. It used to be that you could install a linux flavor on anything older and it would work. Now alot of them require almost as much memory and harddrive space as windows. Dev's don't care anymore about space other than honey. because space and CPU power are cheap at the moment comparatively.
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
XP with the classic UI (none of that Fisher Price thing) was pretty good back in its day, but I wouldn't run it today because by now there's gotta be hundreds of known exploits that are never gonna get patched. 7 is also headed down that road. I tolerate 10, but looking at the process list in Task Manager is appalling to say the least, and more and more apps are making things worse - if there's a memo that went out that said it was now okay to have 8 instances of the same EXE running (I'm looking at you, Chrome, Edge and Teams) then I didn't get it. In terms of UI, it's definitely a step back. Hiding scrollbars, window edges so thin I have a hard time grabbing onto them to resize windows, the lack of contrast so you can't even tell where one window ends and the other starts, undiscoverable UI elements...none of these increased usability.
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
Super Lloyd wrote:
So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10!
It's not; it's just really quick, because lots of functionality that I'm used to is missing/not being loaded in XP. Because it didn't exist back then. And got more programs open now than in the XP days; alt-tab away. Two different browsers, each with some tabs, Oxygen not included and Warcraft in the background, plus their respective launchers. Some messengers, discord, spotify, and an application that I'm testing to stream my games on youtube. Yes, it takes it's time to boot, where XP was there in under 20 seconds. But then I stopped turning the machine of, and resuming an active session takes less than 20 seconds. Lots of bloat? True. Do I care? Nope, not a bit :)
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
-
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain. However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10? However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU... So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10! I am just curious to see if I can be swayed... EDIT for clarity I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure... Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
A new .NET Serializer All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar Taking over the world since 1371!
This (and the update issue, which hasn't affected me in the last 6 months) is the biggest detriment to Win10 I have: [The Weird and The Wonderful: SSD use](https://www.codeproject.com/Feature/WeirdAndWonderful.aspx?msg=5796515#xx5796515xx) - run one of the programs in that thread and you will think things have gone insane!
The Science of King David's Court | Object Oriented Programming with C++
-
DOS 4 was so buggy, IBM refused to install it on their PCs! :laugh: It used a load more of my precious 640K base memory, and crashed daily. And MS ignored all beta tester input as usual. 4.01 was OK .. but still not the multitasking OS MS had been promising us ... :sigh:
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
