Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. When your customer plans on opening a branch on the moon...

When your customer plans on opening a branch on the moon...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
javascriptcloudcsharplinqcom
23 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H honey the codewitch

    GUIDs will roll over in 3072 or something like that. One time when the power went out at the Microsoft building I worked in due to a construction mishap, I ran through the halls yelling that guids had rolled over and we were all doomed. I got away with a lot.

    To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.

    Sander RosselS Offline
    Sander RosselS Offline
    Sander Rossel
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    I wonder how a construction mishap could end up with you working at Microsoft ;p I actually had an issue like that once. A service I wrote used an incremental int as ID. It probably generated a couple of 100 records a day, so an int would be large enough for the coming 14000 years at least. So the service worked well for a couple of months and then it started stuttering... Lots of calls would fail, but then a few would succeed and then it went well for a couple of days and then a batch of 100 failed again... It drove me mad, couldn't reproduce it in development, the failed messages were nothing out of the ordinary, a failed message could succeed a second time... And after weeks, maybe months, of searching, I finally found it! I don't remember why, but the auto-increment ID field rolled over to 1! It either used up all of its IDs due to a bug, or someone manually entered a really high ID and the auto-increment took it from there... The reason it sometimes worked is because a lot of IDs were missing, probably because I had to test a lot on production and I deleted those records. I'm pretty sure I was to blame, but I'd never thought about looking at a problem I did not expect to happen for the coming 14000 years. Found it on accident, but was able to fix it soon after that :laugh:

    Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

      So this was an actual conversation during a meeting yesterday. Person A is not technical, person B is somewhat technical. Person A: "The new API could return an ID so we can always find the file using that ID." Person B: "Yeah, maybe we can use a GUID for that, so we're sure the ID is unique." Me: "Yes, and if a GUID isn't good enough, we can always switch to a UUID!" Person B: "What's a UUID?" Me: "Universal, in case globally isn't unique enough." This made person A and B all enthusiastic :laugh: I'm not sure why we don't just use an incremental int, but sure, a GUID/UUID it is :laugh: I may even charge the big bucks to convert GUID to UUID, or maybe I'll just say it's a lot of work, but they're getting a good discount and I'll work the weekend so they'll have it by Monday ;p

      Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Marc Clifton
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Just use a sequential ID and convert it into a GUID with an 8 character hex representation of the ID and the rest random stuff. Or:

      Quote:

      There a 5 versions of GUIDs defined in RFC 4122, each with different properties.

      Ask them to pick a version and take a vacation for a week while they argue it out. :laugh:

      Latest Articles:
      ASP.NET Core Web API: Plugin Controllers and Services

      OriginalGriffO P Sander RosselS M 4 Replies Last reply
      0
      • M Marc Clifton

        Just use a sequential ID and convert it into a GUID with an 8 character hex representation of the ID and the rest random stuff. Or:

        Quote:

        There a 5 versions of GUIDs defined in RFC 4122, each with different properties.

        Ask them to pick a version and take a vacation for a week while they argue it out. :laugh:

        Latest Articles:
        ASP.NET Core Web API: Plugin Controllers and Services

        OriginalGriffO Offline
        OriginalGriffO Offline
        OriginalGriff
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        Use the sequential id as a seed for a RNG, and pick n values from there as the UID? :-D

        "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

        "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
        "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

          So this was an actual conversation during a meeting yesterday. Person A is not technical, person B is somewhat technical. Person A: "The new API could return an ID so we can always find the file using that ID." Person B: "Yeah, maybe we can use a GUID for that, so we're sure the ID is unique." Me: "Yes, and if a GUID isn't good enough, we can always switch to a UUID!" Person B: "What's a UUID?" Me: "Universal, in case globally isn't unique enough." This made person A and B all enthusiastic :laugh: I'm not sure why we don't just use an incremental int, but sure, a GUID/UUID it is :laugh: I may even charge the big bucks to convert GUID to UUID, or maybe I'll just say it's a lot of work, but they're getting a good discount and I'll work the weekend so they'll have it by Monday ;p

          Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

          R Offline
          R Offline
          RickZeeland
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          One of the reasons we stopped using SQL Server years ago was that our database that uses GUID's as Primary Keys got too slow. Nowadays there is a solution, see: NEWSEQUENTIALID (Transact-SQL) - SQL Server | Microsoft Docs[^] We have switched to PostgreSQL however, and are very pleased with the performance and ease of installation. :-\

          0 Sander RosselS Richard DeemingR 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • M Marc Clifton

            Just use a sequential ID and convert it into a GUID with an 8 character hex representation of the ID and the rest random stuff. Or:

            Quote:

            There a 5 versions of GUIDs defined in RFC 4122, each with different properties.

            Ask them to pick a version and take a vacation for a week while they argue it out. :laugh:

            Latest Articles:
            ASP.NET Core Web API: Plugin Controllers and Services

            P Offline
            P Offline
            PIEBALDconsult
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            Meh, get a 128-bit hash of the sequential ID.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R RickZeeland

              One of the reasons we stopped using SQL Server years ago was that our database that uses GUID's as Primary Keys got too slow. Nowadays there is a solution, see: NEWSEQUENTIALID (Transact-SQL) - SQL Server | Microsoft Docs[^] We have switched to PostgreSQL however, and are very pleased with the performance and ease of installation. :-\

              0 Offline
              0 Offline
              0x01AA
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              Which is hard to explain that random keys are slower than sequential generated. A sequence used as an index does need rebalancing the binary tree very often...?

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R RickZeeland

                One of the reasons we stopped using SQL Server years ago was that our database that uses GUID's as Primary Keys got too slow. Nowadays there is a solution, see: NEWSEQUENTIALID (Transact-SQL) - SQL Server | Microsoft Docs[^] We have switched to PostgreSQL however, and are very pleased with the performance and ease of installation. :-\

                Sander RosselS Offline
                Sander RosselS Offline
                Sander Rossel
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                I don't like GUIDs as IDs in any case. How often do you have to find something by ID and then type that huge GUID? It also doesn't say anything about when a record was created, at least you can say record 876231 came after 876230 and before 876232, could be a useful piece of information. So I'm not using GUIDs as internal IDs, but I can use them as external secondary IDs, like in URLs and such. Didn't know the NEWSEQUENTIALID :thumbsup:

                Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                R V 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                  So this was an actual conversation during a meeting yesterday. Person A is not technical, person B is somewhat technical. Person A: "The new API could return an ID so we can always find the file using that ID." Person B: "Yeah, maybe we can use a GUID for that, so we're sure the ID is unique." Me: "Yes, and if a GUID isn't good enough, we can always switch to a UUID!" Person B: "What's a UUID?" Me: "Universal, in case globally isn't unique enough." This made person A and B all enthusiastic :laugh: I'm not sure why we don't just use an incremental int, but sure, a GUID/UUID it is :laugh: I may even charge the big bucks to convert GUID to UUID, or maybe I'll just say it's a lot of work, but they're getting a good discount and I'll work the weekend so they'll have it by Monday ;p

                  Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                  O Offline
                  O Offline
                  obermd
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  The problem with GUID is "global" is limited to the machine that created the ID. This is in the definition details for GUIDs.

                  R M 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                    I don't like GUIDs as IDs in any case. How often do you have to find something by ID and then type that huge GUID? It also doesn't say anything about when a record was created, at least you can say record 876231 came after 876230 and before 876232, could be a useful piece of information. So I'm not using GUIDs as internal IDs, but I can use them as external secondary IDs, like in URLs and such. Didn't know the NEWSEQUENTIALID :thumbsup:

                    Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    RickZeeland
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    We don't type in GUID's, it's just to have a unique ID, if you can get away with using simple integers that will speed things up of course but can lead to other problems, e.g. when you have to merge information from other databases. You are correct in saying that a GUID is terrible for information about when a record was created (or sorting purposes!) that's precisely the reason why they came up with NEWSEQUENTIALID to solve this.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O obermd

                      The problem with GUID is "global" is limited to the machine that created the ID. This is in the definition details for GUIDs.

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      RickZeeland
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      So far for "Global domination", seems to be an actual theme at the moment :-\

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • 0 0x01AA

                        Which is hard to explain that random keys are slower than sequential generated. A sequence used as an index does need rebalancing the binary tree very often...?

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        RickZeeland
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        Well, maybe I'm mixing things up, it was years ago that we did the migration, but I know for sure that PostgreSQL handles GUID's as Primary Keys much better than SQL Server did. SQL Server also demanded a lot more maintenance of the indexes (which we don't even have to do on PostgreSQL)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                          So this was an actual conversation during a meeting yesterday. Person A is not technical, person B is somewhat technical. Person A: "The new API could return an ID so we can always find the file using that ID." Person B: "Yeah, maybe we can use a GUID for that, so we're sure the ID is unique." Me: "Yes, and if a GUID isn't good enough, we can always switch to a UUID!" Person B: "What's a UUID?" Me: "Universal, in case globally isn't unique enough." This made person A and B all enthusiastic :laugh: I'm not sure why we don't just use an incremental int, but sure, a GUID/UUID it is :laugh: I may even charge the big bucks to convert GUID to UUID, or maybe I'll just say it's a lot of work, but they're getting a good discount and I'll work the weekend so they'll have it by Monday ;p

                          Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                          B Offline
                          B Offline
                          BillWoodruff
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          see [^] for some interesting details on GUID/UUID.

                          «The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled» Plutarch

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R RickZeeland

                            One of the reasons we stopped using SQL Server years ago was that our database that uses GUID's as Primary Keys got too slow. Nowadays there is a solution, see: NEWSEQUENTIALID (Transact-SQL) - SQL Server | Microsoft Docs[^] We have switched to PostgreSQL however, and are very pleased with the performance and ease of installation. :-\

                            Richard DeemingR Offline
                            Richard DeemingR Offline
                            Richard Deeming
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            RickZeeland wrote:

                            Nowadays

                            By which you mean "since 2005". :laugh:


                            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Marc Clifton

                              Just use a sequential ID and convert it into a GUID with an 8 character hex representation of the ID and the rest random stuff. Or:

                              Quote:

                              There a 5 versions of GUIDs defined in RFC 4122, each with different properties.

                              Ask them to pick a version and take a vacation for a week while they argue it out. :laugh:

                              Latest Articles:
                              ASP.NET Core Web API: Plugin Controllers and Services

                              Sander RosselS Offline
                              Sander RosselS Offline
                              Sander Rossel
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              Marc Clifton wrote:

                              Ask them to pick a version

                              Or better yet, pick a version myself and see how all the managers disagree and want me to use another one of their uninformed choosing :D

                              Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                                I don't like GUIDs as IDs in any case. How often do you have to find something by ID and then type that huge GUID? It also doesn't say anything about when a record was created, at least you can say record 876231 came after 876230 and before 876232, could be a useful piece of information. So I'm not using GUIDs as internal IDs, but I can use them as external secondary IDs, like in URLs and such. Didn't know the NEWSEQUENTIALID :thumbsup:

                                Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                                V Offline
                                V Offline
                                vic11con
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                Cannot agree more.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                                  I wonder how a construction mishap could end up with you working at Microsoft ;p I actually had an issue like that once. A service I wrote used an incremental int as ID. It probably generated a couple of 100 records a day, so an int would be large enough for the coming 14000 years at least. So the service worked well for a couple of months and then it started stuttering... Lots of calls would fail, but then a few would succeed and then it went well for a couple of days and then a batch of 100 failed again... It drove me mad, couldn't reproduce it in development, the failed messages were nothing out of the ordinary, a failed message could succeed a second time... And after weeks, maybe months, of searching, I finally found it! I don't remember why, but the auto-increment ID field rolled over to 1! It either used up all of its IDs due to a bug, or someone manually entered a really high ID and the auto-increment took it from there... The reason it sometimes worked is because a lot of IDs were missing, probably because I had to test a lot on production and I deleted those records. I'm pretty sure I was to blame, but I'd never thought about looking at a problem I did not expect to happen for the coming 14000 years. Found it on accident, but was able to fix it soon after that :laugh:

                                  Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  davecasdf
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  Powered up control panel, powered up - one at a time tool controllers and set IP addresses ( they come set to 192.168.0.4 ) powered up 4 at once. NO communication. Spent hours - bad switch? funky cables? ??? finally found 4 or 5 of them still had the chip default MAC address. Wanna know how to really confuse a switch? Had to go buy a null modem cable to program the right MACs. Globally unique id fail.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Marc Clifton

                                    Just use a sequential ID and convert it into a GUID with an 8 character hex representation of the ID and the rest random stuff. Or:

                                    Quote:

                                    There a 5 versions of GUIDs defined in RFC 4122, each with different properties.

                                    Ask them to pick a version and take a vacation for a week while they argue it out. :laugh:

                                    Latest Articles:
                                    ASP.NET Core Web API: Plugin Controllers and Services

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Memtha
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    I have to maintain a dedicated microservice that just makes guids. What type? Oh "the most random type!" ``` string s4() { return random.Int.ToString(16)[0]; } string newGuid() { return s4() + s4() + s4() + s4() + s4() + s4() + s4() + "-" + s4() + s4() + s4() + s4() + "-" + s4() + s4() + s4() + s4() + "-" + s4() + s4() + s4() + s4() + s4() + s4() + s4(); } ``` Why? Because "this is the only method our security scanner accepts so it must be the best"

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • O obermd

                                      The problem with GUID is "global" is limited to the machine that created the ID. This is in the definition details for GUIDs.

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Memtha
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #23

                                      That depends on the type. In theory, one of the types (I forget which) includes the computer's mac address (of the primary interface) so some ms docs come with the caviot like > Each GUID generated by using NEWSEQUENTIALID is unique on that computer. GUIDs generated by using NEWSEQUENTIALID are unique across multiple computers only if the source computer has a network card." [sql server NEWSEQUENTIALID docs](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/functions/newsequentialid-transact-sql?view=sql-server-ver15)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups