Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Comparison of 2 Web Hosts

Comparison of 2 Web Hosts

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpasp-netcomdata-structuressales
49 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

    First try:

    WinHost: 10.387 seconds elapsed during load.
    SmarterASP: 4.331 seconds elapsed during load.

    Second time load:

    WinHost: 0.006 seconds elapsed during load.
    SmarterASP: 0.008 seconds elapsed during load.

    Probably because the image has been cached locally.

    "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

    R Offline
    R Offline
    raddevus
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Thanks so much for doing the test. It really helps me out. I had a friend in Virginia try it and he got 23.xxx seconds for winhost & 1.2 seconds for SmarterASP. It's crazy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R raddevus

      This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

      Quote:

      99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

      I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

      FreedMallocF Offline
      FreedMallocF Offline
      FreedMalloc
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Run from Yankton, SD Winhost beginTime: Mon Apr 04 2022 11:41:00 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) endTime: Mon Apr 04 2022 11:41:20 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) 20.029 seconds elapsed during load. SmarterASP beginTime: Mon Apr 04 2022 11:44:01 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) endTime: Mon Apr 04 2022 11:44:11 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) 10.146 seconds elapsed during load.

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • FreedMallocF FreedMalloc

        Run from Yankton, SD Winhost beginTime: Mon Apr 04 2022 11:41:00 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) endTime: Mon Apr 04 2022 11:41:20 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) 20.029 seconds elapsed during load. SmarterASP beginTime: Mon Apr 04 2022 11:44:01 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) endTime: Mon Apr 04 2022 11:44:11 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) 10.146 seconds elapsed during load.

        R Offline
        R Offline
        raddevus
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Thanks very much, I really appreciate you taking time to do this for me. It's very interesting data and looks like WinHost is at the very least 2X slower than SmarterASP.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Matthew Dennis

          You might try using [WebPageTest - Website Performance and Optimization Test](https://www.webpagetest.org/)

          "Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."

          R Offline
          R Offline
          raddevus
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          That is a fantastic service. Wow! And it showed that yes the WinHost site is far slower & gets a far worse metric on the speedindex (15.196) where SmarterASP got (5.767).

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R raddevus

            This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

            Quote:

            99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

            I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Southmountain
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            your benchmark is really good reference for me!:rose:

            diligent hands rule....

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R raddevus

              This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

              Quote:

              99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

              I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

              T Offline
              T Offline
              theoldfool
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              WinHost Site: 7.85 SmarterASP.net site: 2.075

              >64 Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T theoldfool

                WinHost Site: 7.85 SmarterASP.net site: 2.075

                >64 Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                raddevus
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Thanks very much. It looks like the difference is holding up around the world & is related to the host.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R raddevus

                  This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                  Quote:

                  99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                  I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                  F Offline
                  F Offline
                  Franc Morales
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  WinHost : 24.0 SmarterASP : 1.3 The DDOS exception is legit, imho.

                  R L 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • F Franc Morales

                    WinHost : 24.0 SmarterASP : 1.3 The DDOS exception is legit, imho.

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    raddevus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    Thanks for trying it out & posting. :thumbsup: It's amazing how extreme the difference was in your (case 24s versus 1.3s).

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R raddevus

                      This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                      Quote:

                      99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                      I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      RDM Jr
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Cincinnati OH - WinHost 6.571 secs, SmarterASP 0.883 secs Through our corporate VPN (somewhere in Texas) WinHost 4.603 secs, SmarterASP 3.468 secs (but our VPN is slow at everything)

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Franc Morales

                        WinHost : 24.0 SmarterASP : 1.3 The DDOS exception is legit, imho.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lorenzo Bertolino
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        The DDOS exception is not being willing to find a solution to me, charge a bit more and put your website behind a CDN

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R raddevus

                          This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                          Quote:

                          99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                          I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lorenzo Bertolino
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          To me (Italy) WinHost sits at 11.299 and SmarterASP.net at 10.812

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R raddevus

                            This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                            Quote:

                            99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                            I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                            I Offline
                            I Offline
                            ikhalif nrrc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:33 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                            endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:49:24 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                            171.89 seconds elapsed during load.

                            beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:32 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                            endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:48:31 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                            119.208 seconds elapsed during load.

                            OriginalGriffO R 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • I ikhalif nrrc

                              beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:33 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                              endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:49:24 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                              171.89 seconds elapsed during load.

                              beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:32 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                              endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:48:31 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                              119.208 seconds elapsed during load.

                              OriginalGriffO Offline
                              OriginalGriffO Offline
                              OriginalGriff
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              :omg: Are you still using dial-up?

                              "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                              "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
                              "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R raddevus

                                This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                                Quote:

                                99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                                I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                                P Offline
                                P Offline
                                Paul Sanders the other one
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                WinHost: 12.8 SmarterASP.net: 1.6 So, night and day. If you're still looking for a decent Windows-based hosting service, try an outfit called Liquid Six. They are just great.

                                Paul Sanders http://www.alpinesoft.co.uk

                                R 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R raddevus

                                  This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                                  Quote:

                                  99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                                  I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Jonas Hammarberg
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  Winhost 47.179s vs SmarterASP 2.965s (Sweden)

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R raddevus

                                    This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                                    Quote:

                                    99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                                    I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                                    N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Niels Holst
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    (1) 44.74 s (!) (2) 5.30 s Accessed from a superfast, optical connection.

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lorenzo Bertolino

                                      To me (Italy) WinHost sits at 11.299 and SmarterASP.net at 10.812

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      raddevus
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #24

                                      very interesting that both of them are in the same range from Italy. thanks very much for running the test. :thumbsup:

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • I ikhalif nrrc

                                        beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:33 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                                        endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:49:24 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                                        171.89 seconds elapsed during load.

                                        beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:32 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                                        endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:48:31 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                                        119.208 seconds elapsed during load.

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        raddevus
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        Thanks very much for trying this & reporting the results. Wow! I was curious if times would be longer from other locations around the world (other than North America). Someone reported that Italy was longer time too, but over 100 seconds is hardly even usable.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • P Paul Sanders the other one

                                          WinHost: 12.8 SmarterASP.net: 1.6 So, night and day. If you're still looking for a decent Windows-based hosting service, try an outfit called Liquid Six. They are just great.

                                          Paul Sanders http://www.alpinesoft.co.uk

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          raddevus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          Thanks for trying it out & reporting. You saw similar differences that I & many others saw. I will look into Liquid Six. Thanks for the tip.

                                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups