Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Comparison of 2 Web Hosts

Comparison of 2 Web Hosts

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpasp-netcomdata-structuressales
49 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R raddevus

    This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

    Quote:

    99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

    I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

    T Offline
    T Offline
    theoldfool
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    WinHost Site: 7.85 SmarterASP.net site: 2.075

    >64 Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T theoldfool

      WinHost Site: 7.85 SmarterASP.net site: 2.075

      >64 Some days the dragon wins. Suck it up.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      raddevus
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      Thanks very much. It looks like the difference is holding up around the world & is related to the host.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R raddevus

        This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

        Quote:

        99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

        I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

        F Offline
        F Offline
        Franc Morales
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        WinHost : 24.0 SmarterASP : 1.3 The DDOS exception is legit, imho.

        R L 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • F Franc Morales

          WinHost : 24.0 SmarterASP : 1.3 The DDOS exception is legit, imho.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          raddevus
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          Thanks for trying it out & posting. :thumbsup: It's amazing how extreme the difference was in your (case 24s versus 1.3s).

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R raddevus

            This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

            Quote:

            99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

            I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

            R Offline
            R Offline
            RDM Jr
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Cincinnati OH - WinHost 6.571 secs, SmarterASP 0.883 secs Through our corporate VPN (somewhere in Texas) WinHost 4.603 secs, SmarterASP 3.468 secs (but our VPN is slow at everything)

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Franc Morales

              WinHost : 24.0 SmarterASP : 1.3 The DDOS exception is legit, imho.

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lorenzo Bertolino
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              The DDOS exception is not being willing to find a solution to me, charge a bit more and put your website behind a CDN

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R raddevus

                This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                Quote:

                99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lorenzo Bertolino
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                To me (Italy) WinHost sits at 11.299 and SmarterASP.net at 10.812

                R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R raddevus

                  This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                  Quote:

                  99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                  I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                  I Offline
                  I Offline
                  ikhalif nrrc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:33 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                  endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:49:24 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                  171.89 seconds elapsed during load.

                  beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:32 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                  endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:48:31 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                  119.208 seconds elapsed during load.

                  OriginalGriffO R 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • I ikhalif nrrc

                    beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:33 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                    endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:49:24 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                    171.89 seconds elapsed during load.

                    beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:32 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                    endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:48:31 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                    119.208 seconds elapsed during load.

                    OriginalGriffO Offline
                    OriginalGriffO Offline
                    OriginalGriff
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    :omg: Are you still using dial-up?

                    "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

                    "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
                    "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R raddevus

                      This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                      Quote:

                      99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                      I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Paul Sanders the other one
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      WinHost: 12.8 SmarterASP.net: 1.6 So, night and day. If you're still looking for a decent Windows-based hosting service, try an outfit called Liquid Six. They are just great.

                      Paul Sanders http://www.alpinesoft.co.uk

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R raddevus

                        This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                        Quote:

                        99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                        I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Jonas Hammarberg
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        Winhost 47.179s vs SmarterASP 2.965s (Sweden)

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R raddevus

                          This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                          Quote:

                          99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                          I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                          N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Niels Holst
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          (1) 44.74 s (!) (2) 5.30 s Accessed from a superfast, optical connection.

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lorenzo Bertolino

                            To me (Italy) WinHost sits at 11.299 and SmarterASP.net at 10.812

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            raddevus
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            very interesting that both of them are in the same range from Italy. thanks very much for running the test. :thumbsup:

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • I ikhalif nrrc

                              beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:33 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                              endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:49:24 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                              171.89 seconds elapsed during load.

                              beginTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:46:32 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                              endTime: Tue Apr 05 2022 10:48:31 GMT+0300 (Arabian Standard Time)
                              119.208 seconds elapsed during load.

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              raddevus
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              Thanks very much for trying this & reporting the results. Wow! I was curious if times would be longer from other locations around the world (other than North America). Someone reported that Italy was longer time too, but over 100 seconds is hardly even usable.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P Paul Sanders the other one

                                WinHost: 12.8 SmarterASP.net: 1.6 So, night and day. If you're still looking for a decent Windows-based hosting service, try an outfit called Liquid Six. They are just great.

                                Paul Sanders http://www.alpinesoft.co.uk

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                raddevus
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                Thanks for trying it out & reporting. You saw similar differences that I & many others saw. I will look into Liquid Six. Thanks for the tip.

                                P 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J Jonas Hammarberg

                                  Winhost 47.179s vs SmarterASP 2.965s (Sweden)

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  raddevus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  Thanks for running the test & posting results. I see there's a large difference between the two in Sweden. :thumbsup:

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • N Niels Holst

                                    (1) 44.74 s (!) (2) 5.30 s Accessed from a superfast, optical connection.

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    raddevus
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    Another drastic difference in times. Thanks for running the test & posting.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R RDM Jr

                                      Cincinnati OH - WinHost 6.571 secs, SmarterASP 0.883 secs Through our corporate VPN (somewhere in Texas) WinHost 4.603 secs, SmarterASP 3.468 secs (but our VPN is slow at everything)

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      raddevus
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #29

                                      Thanks for running the tests & posting results. WinHost does seem to be consistently & drastically slower.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R raddevus

                                        Thanks for trying it out & reporting. You saw similar differences that I & many others saw. I will look into Liquid Six. Thanks for the tip.

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        Paul Sanders the other one
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        Do, you won't regret it, they are ace. (I'm not affiliated with them in any way, just a happy customer and a big, big fan.)

                                        Paul Sanders http://www.alpinesoft.co.uk

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R raddevus

                                          This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use. I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent. Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down. I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast. However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours. They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:

                                          Quote:

                                          99.9% Uptime Guarantee We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.

                                          I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it." So I decided to move to WinHost However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff. Super Slow? I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here. Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost. 1) Load page which includes 5MB image. 2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds) Comparison Snapshots Check out the difference in load times: Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^]. Loaded via WinHost web site[^]. Load Times SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯 Possible Difference SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again: SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results). Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds. Might You Try it For Me? Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for

                                          G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          Gary SC59
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #31

                                          Winhost approx 8 seconds. Smarter Asp approx 2 seconds. I suggest checking out Interserver.

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups