Help! I'm trapped inside a large, red, fluffy sweater!
-
P.S. Not really as a response to you, but as further thought your response have provoked. Regarding "green great dragon": If the writer has established "great dragon" as a thing, then I can see "green great dragon" being acceptable. The castle is guarded by three great dragons. The main drawbridge is guarded by a green great dragon. Upon the keep sits a red great dragon, watching all directions. And deep in the dungeon lurks a blue great dragon.
Doesn’t that make “great dragon” more of a title than an attribute, like in “grand master”? Just a thought.
Mircea
-
Doesn’t that make “great dragon” more of a title than an attribute, like in “grand master”? Just a thought.
Mircea
Yeah, kinda maybe. But more like [hot dog] and [ugly sweater] act as nouns rather than as a noun with an adjective.
-
P.S. Not really as a response to you, but as further thought your response have provoked. Regarding "green great dragon": If the writer has established "great dragon" as a thing, then I can see "green great dragon" being acceptable. The castle is guarded by three great dragons. The main drawbridge is guarded by a green great dragon. Upon the keep sits a red great dragon, watching all directions. And deep in the dungeon lurks a blue great dragon.
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
The castle is guarded by three great dragons. The main drawbridge is guarded by a green great dragon. Upon the keep sits a red great dragon, watching all directions. And deep in the dungeon lurks a blue great dragon.
It just sounds wrong when you say it, even though I was previously unaware of this rule.
-
Check this :) Why the green great dragon can't exist[^]
Mircea
-
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
The castle is guarded by three great dragons. The main drawbridge is guarded by a green great dragon. Upon the keep sits a red great dragon, watching all directions. And deep in the dungeon lurks a blue great dragon.
It just sounds wrong when you say it, even though I was previously unaware of this rule.
I know. But I can English with the best of 'em.
-
My vote goes to 'fluffy large red sweater' but my vote doesn't count as I'm not a native and, no matter how much I enjoy learning the intricacies of this million-word mastodon, I'll never have a native's feeling (or accent) for it :)
Richard Deeming wrote:
Sometimes I think 90% of the English language was invented to torture ESL students!
As I've said in a previous message, not long ago, English doesn't properly have a grammar: more a collection of use cases and exceptions :)
Mircea
Mircea Neacsu wrote:
more a collection of use cases and A LOT OF exceptions :)
FTFY
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Did that sound right to you? It does to me. As a native (U.S.) English speaker, I was of course not taught that there is a rule guideline to how we order adjectives -- but ESL students are taught a rule. As I was lay awake this morning I thought about this. I think the above is in accordance with the rule. But what if I drop the "large" -- I would describe it as a "fluffy, red sweater" rather than a "red, fluffy sweater". I know there are many highly fluent non-native English speakers in the room -- what does your experience tell you? Can both be "correct"? Is there a nuance to the rule which swaps these? If both size and color are specified, do they gravitate together? (And don't get me started on separating adjectives with COMMAs.)
Tactile versus visual? Objective versus subjective? Large, fluffy, red ... The label also says Large (L); but makes no reference to fluffy or red; though fluffy might be implied in the material and washing instructions. "Non-white" is implied if told to wash separately with like colors.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
-
Did that sound right to you? It does to me. As a native (U.S.) English speaker, I was of course not taught that there is a rule guideline to how we order adjectives -- but ESL students are taught a rule. As I was lay awake this morning I thought about this. I think the above is in accordance with the rule. But what if I drop the "large" -- I would describe it as a "fluffy, red sweater" rather than a "red, fluffy sweater". I know there are many highly fluent non-native English speakers in the room -- what does your experience tell you? Can both be "correct"? Is there a nuance to the rule which swaps these? If both size and color are specified, do they gravitate together? (And don't get me started on separating adjectives with COMMAs.)
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
As I was lay awake this morning
In terms of two people speaking to each other... The real value is in the word 'trapped'. The rest provides only limited value in the context to the other person. After all for example if it was small versus large would that really change anything? But if I was the other person I would be more curious as to why you were laying in bed wearing a sweater like that in the first place. And if you were not in fact wearing it then why were you thinking about it in the first place.
-
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
As I was lay awake this morning
In terms of two people speaking to each other... The real value is in the word 'trapped'. The rest provides only limited value in the context to the other person. After all for example if it was small versus large would that really change anything? But if I was the other person I would be more curious as to why you were laying in bed wearing a sweater like that in the first place. And if you were not in fact wearing it then why were you thinking about it in the first place.
I'm guessing you've never lain awake in the morning. Hmm?
-
Did that sound right to you? It does to me. As a native (U.S.) English speaker, I was of course not taught that there is a rule guideline to how we order adjectives -- but ESL students are taught a rule. As I was lay awake this morning I thought about this. I think the above is in accordance with the rule. But what if I drop the "large" -- I would describe it as a "fluffy, red sweater" rather than a "red, fluffy sweater". I know there are many highly fluent non-native English speakers in the room -- what does your experience tell you? Can both be "correct"? Is there a nuance to the rule which swaps these? If both size and color are specified, do they gravitate together? (And don't get me started on separating adjectives with COMMAs.)
As a native English speaker, I've never consciously thought about the order of adjectives, but your observation is interesting. It seems like there's a natural inclination to say "fluffy, red sweater" rather than "red, fluffy sweater" when both size and color are specified. Theorder might indeed follow an unspoken rule, at least in common usage.
Reflecting on it, I'd say both could be correct, but there might be a subtle nuance to consider. Perhaps the order could be influenced by emphasis or personal preference. I'd be curious to hear the perspectives of those who learned English as a second language—whether there's a formal rule in their teaching or if it's something they've intuited through experience. Language can be wonderfully flexible, and these nuances add to its richness!
-
Did that sound right to you? It does to me. As a native (U.S.) English speaker, I was of course not taught that there is a rule guideline to how we order adjectives -- but ESL students are taught a rule. As I was lay awake this morning I thought about this. I think the above is in accordance with the rule. But what if I drop the "large" -- I would describe it as a "fluffy, red sweater" rather than a "red, fluffy sweater". I know there are many highly fluent non-native English speakers in the room -- what does your experience tell you? Can both be "correct"? Is there a nuance to the rule which swaps these? If both size and color are specified, do they gravitate together? (And don't get me started on separating adjectives with COMMAs.)
Whatever order sounds most like a band name is correct.
Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
-
Whatever order sounds most like a band name is correct.
Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
Oddly enough, I had Soft, White Underbelly on my mind yesterday. :thumbsup:
-
Did that sound right to you? It does to me. As a native (U.S.) English speaker, I was of course not taught that there is a rule guideline to how we order adjectives -- but ESL students are taught a rule. As I was lay awake this morning I thought about this. I think the above is in accordance with the rule. But what if I drop the "large" -- I would describe it as a "fluffy, red sweater" rather than a "red, fluffy sweater". I know there are many highly fluent non-native English speakers in the room -- what does your experience tell you? Can both be "correct"? Is there a nuance to the rule which swaps these? If both size and color are specified, do they gravitate together? (And don't get me started on separating adjectives with COMMAs.)
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
I'm trapped inside a large, red, fluffy sweater ...
On a cold, dark, winter evening, with my soft, furry, ginger cat 😺 on my lap.
-
Did that sound right to you? It does to me. As a native (U.S.) English speaker, I was of course not taught that there is a rule guideline to how we order adjectives -- but ESL students are taught a rule. As I was lay awake this morning I thought about this. I think the above is in accordance with the rule. But what if I drop the "large" -- I would describe it as a "fluffy, red sweater" rather than a "red, fluffy sweater". I know there are many highly fluent non-native English speakers in the room -- what does your experience tell you? Can both be "correct"? Is there a nuance to the rule which swaps these? If both size and color are specified, do they gravitate together? (And don't get me started on separating adjectives with COMMAs.)
I think it depends on what the word "fluffy" is describing. If it's related to material, then it's a large red fluffy sweater. It's made of something fluffy, but it could be wool, cotton, nylon, etc. It could also simply be referring the class of objects known as "fluffy sweaters".
I've got a large red fluffy sweater and a small green fluffy sweater.
In this case, dropping the "large", I could still say "a red fluffy sweater"! If it's the shape, then it's a large fluffy red sweater.
I've got a large fluffy red sweater and a small furry green sweater.
If it's opinion, then it's a fluffy large red sweater. This use would indicate the speaker is emphasizing the fluffiness.
"Is this a nice large red sweater?" "Well, it's definitely a fluffy large red sweater!"
Of course, rules are made to be broken, so the size-color order can be overridden if you're specifically referring to "large sweaters".
I've several large sweaters, but my green large sweater is being washed, so I'll wear my fluffy red large sweater.
-
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
I'm trapped inside a large, red, fluffy sweater ...
On a cold, dark, winter evening, with my soft, furry, ginger cat 😺 on my lap.
(Kneazle.)
-
Did that sound right to you? It does to me. As a native (U.S.) English speaker, I was of course not taught that there is a rule guideline to how we order adjectives -- but ESL students are taught a rule. As I was lay awake this morning I thought about this. I think the above is in accordance with the rule. But what if I drop the "large" -- I would describe it as a "fluffy, red sweater" rather than a "red, fluffy sweater". I know there are many highly fluent non-native English speakers in the room -- what does your experience tell you? Can both be "correct"? Is there a nuance to the rule which swaps these? If both size and color are specified, do they gravitate together? (And don't get me started on separating adjectives with COMMAs.)
-
Did that sound right to you? It does to me. As a native (U.S.) English speaker, I was of course not taught that there is a rule guideline to how we order adjectives -- but ESL students are taught a rule. As I was lay awake this morning I thought about this. I think the above is in accordance with the rule. But what if I drop the "large" -- I would describe it as a "fluffy, red sweater" rather than a "red, fluffy sweater". I know there are many highly fluent non-native English speakers in the room -- what does your experience tell you? Can both be "correct"? Is there a nuance to the rule which swaps these? If both size and color are specified, do they gravitate together? (And don't get me started on separating adjectives with COMMAs.)
At least you are keeping the indefinite article. Leaving out definite or indefinite article from sentences gets my goat :laugh:
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
-
At least you are keeping the indefinite article. Leaving out definite or indefinite article from sentences gets my goat :laugh:
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
It's definitely an article of clothing.
-
It's definitely an article of clothing.
I think that would be "indefinitely".
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
-
I think that would be "indefinitely".
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
For an indefinite period, sure. Maybe only until the asteroid hits.
