Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Crystal Reports 10

Crystal Reports 10

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpvisual-studiowpfwcftutorial
13 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mirano
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    ...I just saw the ad on your page, maybe it would also be good to allow us to leave some comments under the page advertising Crystal Reports 10. I could say I lot about the monster that you can not use in small projects, complicated binding (especially under the .Net), rampaging licensing, amateur exporting etc. While it is good for big projects that center around the print previewing and reporting, almost all other projects that need accasional reporting would find it an overkill to use CR. A classical example of a nice little reporting tool becoming a monster...and an ugly one. TO MICROSOFT -> please get some programmers to re-code and make available the Access reports for Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .Net etc.

    J M K K M 7 Replies Last reply
    0
    • M mirano

      ...I just saw the ad on your page, maybe it would also be good to allow us to leave some comments under the page advertising Crystal Reports 10. I could say I lot about the monster that you can not use in small projects, complicated binding (especially under the .Net), rampaging licensing, amateur exporting etc. While it is good for big projects that center around the print previewing and reporting, almost all other projects that need accasional reporting would find it an overkill to use CR. A classical example of a nice little reporting tool becoming a monster...and an ugly one. TO MICROSOFT -> please get some programmers to re-code and make available the Access reports for Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .Net etc.

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jeremy Falcon
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      While I've never used Ver. 10, I've used Crystal Reports since 7.0 through 8.5 and for the most part it's a nice product. And, I don't think it's overkill as they have always made it (fairly) easy to use. However it does have its issues that I think hinder it.

      1. It has always been buggy. It has quirks that will drive you nuts until you figure what's going on. And, sometimes it can corrupt .rpt files just by editing the things in the designer.

      2. Its documentation sucks - they really need to improve in that area. While, it's straightforward to use CR, finding out how to do it in the first place (or learning something new) is a nightmare.

      3. I don't mind the licensing issues (implementation that is), but it is way overpriced for what it does.

      Jeremy Falcon

      M N 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • M mirano

        ...I just saw the ad on your page, maybe it would also be good to allow us to leave some comments under the page advertising Crystal Reports 10. I could say I lot about the monster that you can not use in small projects, complicated binding (especially under the .Net), rampaging licensing, amateur exporting etc. While it is good for big projects that center around the print previewing and reporting, almost all other projects that need accasional reporting would find it an overkill to use CR. A classical example of a nice little reporting tool becoming a monster...and an ugly one. TO MICROSOFT -> please get some programmers to re-code and make available the Access reports for Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .Net etc.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Member 96
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I agree, we used it for years and dumped it recently because of the ongoing re-distribution nightmare of their own creation, bloated size, horrible licensing and pricing for the report designer component and last but not least the fact that we switched to .net for all our new apps and there are much better products out there for .net based reporting that suffer from none of the above problems, are cheaper and are built *in* .net making them a "slam dunk" choice over Crystal Reports. We tried to work with Crystal for years and despite having a rather large distribution for our software were never able to wangle a deal with them better than the going off the shelf price for their report designer component. They are a company that is really focused on large enterprise and now more so than ever, nothing really surprising I guess considering that aspect. Let's leave Microsoft out of this one shall we?;) There are too many other nice products for .net that I would hate to see stomped.


        An election is nothing more than the advanced auction of stolen goods. - Ambrose Bierce

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M mirano

          ...I just saw the ad on your page, maybe it would also be good to allow us to leave some comments under the page advertising Crystal Reports 10. I could say I lot about the monster that you can not use in small projects, complicated binding (especially under the .Net), rampaging licensing, amateur exporting etc. While it is good for big projects that center around the print previewing and reporting, almost all other projects that need accasional reporting would find it an overkill to use CR. A classical example of a nice little reporting tool becoming a monster...and an ugly one. TO MICROSOFT -> please get some programmers to re-code and make available the Access reports for Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .Net etc.

          K Offline
          K Offline
          Kant
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          We dumped it for SQL Server 2000 Reporting Services[^]
          Promise only what you can do. And then deliver more than what you promised.
          This signature was created by "Code Project Quoter".

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M mirano

            ...I just saw the ad on your page, maybe it would also be good to allow us to leave some comments under the page advertising Crystal Reports 10. I could say I lot about the monster that you can not use in small projects, complicated binding (especially under the .Net), rampaging licensing, amateur exporting etc. While it is good for big projects that center around the print previewing and reporting, almost all other projects that need accasional reporting would find it an overkill to use CR. A classical example of a nice little reporting tool becoming a monster...and an ugly one. TO MICROSOFT -> please get some programmers to re-code and make available the Access reports for Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .Net etc.

            K Offline
            K Offline
            KevinMac
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I have moved two clients to ActiveReports because of the licensing issues ($$$$$) and I have one more client looking at the MS Sql server reporting. Crystal use to be the way to go but anymore they are to expensive for what you get.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Kant

              We dumped it for SQL Server 2000 Reporting Services[^]
              Promise only what you can do. And then deliver more than what you promised.
              This signature was created by "Code Project Quoter".

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Michael P Butler
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Kant wrote: We dumped it for SQL Server 2000 Reporting Services[^] I've been wanting to test that, but couldn't get the thing to install on my W2k server. Is it as good as people say? Next time I rebuild my server, I'll try again. Michael CP Blog [^]

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M mirano

                ...I just saw the ad on your page, maybe it would also be good to allow us to leave some comments under the page advertising Crystal Reports 10. I could say I lot about the monster that you can not use in small projects, complicated binding (especially under the .Net), rampaging licensing, amateur exporting etc. While it is good for big projects that center around the print previewing and reporting, almost all other projects that need accasional reporting would find it an overkill to use CR. A classical example of a nice little reporting tool becoming a monster...and an ugly one. TO MICROSOFT -> please get some programmers to re-code and make available the Access reports for Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .Net etc.

                M Offline
                M Offline
                mirano
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I am glad to see that it is not only me being frustrated with CR. Thanks. .

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M mirano

                  ...I just saw the ad on your page, maybe it would also be good to allow us to leave some comments under the page advertising Crystal Reports 10. I could say I lot about the monster that you can not use in small projects, complicated binding (especially under the .Net), rampaging licensing, amateur exporting etc. While it is good for big projects that center around the print previewing and reporting, almost all other projects that need accasional reporting would find it an overkill to use CR. A classical example of a nice little reporting tool becoming a monster...and an ugly one. TO MICROSOFT -> please get some programmers to re-code and make available the Access reports for Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .Net etc.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Yeah, we tried using it but found the documentation both on paper and on their website rubbish. Oh and my mate who worked for them just got made redundant after the takeover so i'm avoiding the product at all costs.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jeremy Falcon

                    While I've never used Ver. 10, I've used Crystal Reports since 7.0 through 8.5 and for the most part it's a nice product. And, I don't think it's overkill as they have always made it (fairly) easy to use. However it does have its issues that I think hinder it.

                    1. It has always been buggy. It has quirks that will drive you nuts until you figure what's going on. And, sometimes it can corrupt .rpt files just by editing the things in the designer.

                    2. Its documentation sucks - they really need to improve in that area. While, it's straightforward to use CR, finding out how to do it in the first place (or learning something new) is a nightmare.

                    3. I don't mind the licensing issues (implementation that is), but it is way overpriced for what it does.

                    Jeremy Falcon

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Maximilian Hanel
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    I can't agree more! It has always been buggy That's by far the worst thing of CR. If they only could make it running the way it should. btw don't talk about deployment of CR...

                    "All languages allow you to write crap code, VB just makes it easier (IMO)." Michael P Butler

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Jeremy Falcon

                      While I've never used Ver. 10, I've used Crystal Reports since 7.0 through 8.5 and for the most part it's a nice product. And, I don't think it's overkill as they have always made it (fairly) easy to use. However it does have its issues that I think hinder it.

                      1. It has always been buggy. It has quirks that will drive you nuts until you figure what's going on. And, sometimes it can corrupt .rpt files just by editing the things in the designer.

                      2. Its documentation sucks - they really need to improve in that area. While, it's straightforward to use CR, finding out how to do it in the first place (or learning something new) is a nightmare.

                      3. I don't mind the licensing issues (implementation that is), but it is way overpriced for what it does.

                      Jeremy Falcon

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      netclectic
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Haven't played with 10 but if you're happy with 8.5 then whatever you do, DO NOT upgrade to 9!!!

                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N netclectic

                        Haven't played with 10 but if you're happy with 8.5 then whatever you do, DO NOT upgrade to 9!!!

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        jonathan15
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        We use 8.0 and are far from happy with it. The Viewer control takes loads of memory but wont give it back :mad: We are looking at upgrading (in the vain hope that the next version or the next version after that may be better). Unfortunatly we are not using .net yet and there are few other alternatives. Jon

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M mirano

                          ...I just saw the ad on your page, maybe it would also be good to allow us to leave some comments under the page advertising Crystal Reports 10. I could say I lot about the monster that you can not use in small projects, complicated binding (especially under the .Net), rampaging licensing, amateur exporting etc. While it is good for big projects that center around the print previewing and reporting, almost all other projects that need accasional reporting would find it an overkill to use CR. A classical example of a nice little reporting tool becoming a monster...and an ugly one. TO MICROSOFT -> please get some programmers to re-code and make available the Access reports for Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .Net etc.

                          N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Nicholas Butler
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          <Shameless plug> If you don't like CR, you can buy my product, EasiReports[^], and help support a fellow CPian :-D It's small, cheap and comes with a year's support and upgrades. The next version will include the full source code, and support for any datasource. </Shameless plug> ---------------------------- Be excellent to each other :)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Maximilian Hanel

                            I can't agree more! It has always been buggy That's by far the worst thing of CR. If they only could make it running the way it should. btw don't talk about deployment of CR...

                            "All languages allow you to write crap code, VB just makes it easier (IMO)." Michael P Butler

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jeremy Falcon
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Maximilian Hänel wrote: btw don't talk about deployment of CR... LOL! I know what you mean, and those generic error messages don't help when you're trying to figure the problem out. Jeremy Falcon

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups