Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. virtual??

virtual??

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
c++question
17 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Joel Holdsworth

    Does anyone know why the virtual keyword in C++ has this name? It doesn't seem like a very sensible title for it. There must be some history to it or somthing? Joel Holdsworth

    C Offline
    C Offline
    ColinDavies
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Unsure, But maybe it is that you can do thinks in a virtual class or function that you can't do in a base or derived one. Regardz Colin J Davies Attention: Watch this signature for an upcoming announcement that will affect you.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Daniel Turini

      After you understand virtual, please explain me static :-D Yes, even I am blogging now!

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Joel Holdsworth
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Yeah that's a good one - especiallly static functions :wtf:; what a stupid name! Joel Holdsworth

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Joel Holdsworth

        Does anyone know why the virtual keyword in C++ has this name? It doesn't seem like a very sensible title for it. There must be some history to it or somthing? Joel Holdsworth

        M Offline
        M Offline
        megaadam
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        If you have got a deep interest in the history of C++ the book you should get is "The Design And Evolution of C++" by Stroustrup (father of C++). http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index%3Dblended%26field-keywords%3Ddesign%252520and%252520evolution%252520c%25252B%25252B%26store-name%3Dall-product-search/102-0180251-2256166 As for virtual allow me to speculate. The Ada programming language that appeared AFAIK before C++ has got a keyword "generic", which might be slightly related to "virtual". :) Adam _____________________________________ Action without thought is not action Action without emotion is not life

        C A 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • M megaadam

          If you have got a deep interest in the history of C++ the book you should get is "The Design And Evolution of C++" by Stroustrup (father of C++). http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index%3Dblended%26field-keywords%3Ddesign%252520and%252520evolution%252520c%25252B%25252B%26store-name%3Dall-product-search/102-0180251-2256166 As for virtual allow me to speculate. The Ada programming language that appeared AFAIK before C++ has got a keyword "generic", which might be slightly related to "virtual". :) Adam _____________________________________ Action without thought is not action Action without emotion is not life

          C Offline
          C Offline
          ColinDavies
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          Very insightful. :-) :-) Regardz Colin J Davies Attention: Watch this signature for an upcoming announcement that will affect you.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Daniel Turini

            After you understand virtual, please explain me static :-D Yes, even I am blogging now!

            L Offline
            L Offline
            leppie
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            C/C++ C# ==================================== static private virtual abstract Anyways, thats how I understand it. :) top secret xacc-ide 0.0.1

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Joel Holdsworth

              Does anyone know why the virtual keyword in C++ has this name? It doesn't seem like a very sensible title for it. There must be some history to it or somthing? Joel Holdsworth

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jorgen Sigvardsson
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              I think you should ignore the fact that a virtual method may have a default implementation where it's declared. The function is there (declared) but not there at the same time (not implemented). It's virtually there. :) -- ...Coca Cola, sometimes war...

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                I think you should ignore the fact that a virtual method may have a default implementation where it's declared. The function is there (declared) but not there at the same time (not implemented). It's virtually there. :) -- ...Coca Cola, sometimes war...

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Joel Holdsworth
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Yeah that kinda makes sense... but it still seems a little flimsy. Why not overridable or somthing else... somthing more intuitive. Joel Holdsworth

                R P 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • J Joel Holdsworth

                  Does anyone know why the virtual keyword in C++ has this name? It doesn't seem like a very sensible title for it. There must be some history to it or somthing? Joel Holdsworth

                  B Offline
                  B Offline
                  Bob Stanneveld
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  From "The C++ programming language" by B. Stroustrup: The word virtual means: "may be redifined later in a class derived from this one."

                  A student knows little about a lot. A professor knows a lot about little. I know everything about nothing.

                  K 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Joel Holdsworth

                    Yeah that kinda makes sense... but it still seems a little flimsy. Why not overridable or somthing else... somthing more intuitive. Joel Holdsworth

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Roger Alsing 0
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    a friend of a friend *cough* said that that was a vb.net keyword you dont want to include vb keywords into c++ do you? //Roger

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M megaadam

                      If you have got a deep interest in the history of C++ the book you should get is "The Design And Evolution of C++" by Stroustrup (father of C++). http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index%3Dblended%26field-keywords%3Ddesign%252520and%252520evolution%252520c%25252B%25252B%26store-name%3Dall-product-search/102-0180251-2256166 As for virtual allow me to speculate. The Ada programming language that appeared AFAIK before C++ has got a keyword "generic", which might be slightly related to "virtual". :) Adam _____________________________________ Action without thought is not action Action without emotion is not life

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Anthony_Yio
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      "generic" makes more sense to me though, than "virtual" Sonork 100.41263:Anthony_Yio

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L leppie

                        C/C++ C# ==================================== static private virtual abstract Anyways, thats how I understand it. :) top secret xacc-ide 0.0.1

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Jon Hulatt
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        que? are you saying that static is the same as private, and virtual is the same as abstract?

                        #include <beer.h>

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Daniel Turini

                          After you understand virtual, please explain me static :-D Yes, even I am blogging now!

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          David Crow
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Daniel Turini wrote: please explain me static It simply means "lack of change." Another definition says it "lacks action or movement."


                          "When I was born I was so surprised that I didn't talk for a year and a half." - Gracie Allen

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B Bob Stanneveld

                            From "The C++ programming language" by B. Stroustrup: The word virtual means: "may be redifined later in a class derived from this one."

                            A student knows little about a lot. A professor knows a lot about little. I know everything about nothing.

                            K Offline
                            K Offline
                            Kastellanos Nikos
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Bob Stanneveld wrote: From "The C++ programming language" by B. Stroustrup: The word virtual means: "may be redifined later in a class derived from this one." My "English/C++ lexicon" said the same thing. :cool: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Memory leaks is the price we pay \0 01234567890123456789012345678901234

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Joel Holdsworth

                              Does anyone know why the virtual keyword in C++ has this name? It doesn't seem like a very sensible title for it. There must be some history to it or somthing? Joel Holdsworth

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              papaya_zm
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              virtual is virtual,no reason,no history!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Joel Holdsworth

                                Yeah that kinda makes sense... but it still seems a little flimsy. Why not overridable or somthing else... somthing more intuitive. Joel Holdsworth

                                P Offline
                                P Offline
                                palbano
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                Joel Holdsworth wrote: Why not overridable sorry, overridable is not the same. Joel Holdsworth wrote: somthing more intuitive.

                                public:
                                   intuitive void execute()=0;
                                

                                :-D

                                -- signature under construction --

                                -pete

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups