Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Canadians awarded gold medals

Canadians awarded gold medals

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
48 Posts 18 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • realJSOPR realJSOP

    David Wulff wrote: I'm beginning to notice a disturbing trend in your messages. John, are you a psychopathicial maniac? Nope, I'm just not afraid to suggest that we put someone out of our misery. My list of people we should shoot on the spot goes something like this: - Illegal aliens caught crossing our borders without the proper paerwork - People caught driving drunk - People caught raping (1st offense), murdering (1st offense), sexual child abuse (1st offense), armed robbery (first offense), - Religious fanatics that have the nerve to sell their hypocritical bullshit door-to-door. - People who don't use their damn turn signals. - The guy who tailgated me all the way home yesterday. - The people responsible for "Survivor", and all the copycat shows that seem to spring unrestrained from Hollywood's bunghole. - Anyone that thinks COM is easy to code. The list goes on, but I actually start naming individuals, so it's probably a good idea to stop where we are. :) I don't think I'm crazy at all, and all of my invisible friends seem to agree with me (except for Gary, but I think he's gay, so if I could, I'd shoot him too). "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

    L Offline
    L Offline
    LukeV
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    OMG!!! It's harsh but at the same time you're kinda right. Why don't we add this to your list: - People on welfare when they could work (lazy SOBs). I wouldn't kill them, but at least don't give 'em money for beer and cigarettes! Give' em food stamps for milk and bread. And they'd have to work too (pick up garbage in the streets, etc...) Anyway, I'm getting off topic here, but you and I connect on so many ways! ;) --------------- http://www.edovia.com

    realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • realJSOPR realJSOP

      Yeah, but I'd make double-damn sure they didn't rub those medals on their bungholes before I bought them. :) "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

      E Offline
      E Offline
      Ed Worsfold
      wrote on last edited by
      #27

      Man... You are a little odd did you know that? Rubbing Silver Medals with your bung hole eh? What the hell prompted you to say that?:confused:

      realJSOPR R 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • L LukeV

        OMG!!! It's harsh but at the same time you're kinda right. Why don't we add this to your list: - People on welfare when they could work (lazy SOBs). I wouldn't kill them, but at least don't give 'em money for beer and cigarettes! Give' em food stamps for milk and bread. And they'd have to work too (pick up garbage in the streets, etc...) Anyway, I'm getting off topic here, but you and I connect on so many ways! ;) --------------- http://www.edovia.com

        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOP
        wrote on last edited by
        #28

        Nope, if they're not contributing and productive members of society, they are obsolete, and are therefore on thie list of those to be terminated. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

        L R R 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • realJSOPR realJSOP

          Nope, if they're not contributing and productive members of society, they are obsolete, and are therefore on thie list of those to be terminated. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

          L Offline
          L Offline
          LukeV
          wrote on last edited by
          #29

          Just by curiosity, are you a NRA member? ;) --------------- http://www.edovia.com

          realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L LukeV

            Just by curiosity, are you a NRA member? ;) --------------- http://www.edovia.com

            realJSOPR Offline
            realJSOPR Offline
            realJSOP
            wrote on last edited by
            #30

            No, those little Shielas over at the NRA think I'm "too volatile". BTW, they're on my list, too. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • realJSOPR realJSOP

              No, those little Shielas over at the NRA think I'm "too volatile". BTW, they're on my list, too. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

              L Offline
              L Offline
              LukeV
              wrote on last edited by
              #31

              John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: No, those little Shielas over at the NRA think I'm "too volatile". BTW, they're on my list, too. Too volatile? --------------- http://www.edovia.com

              realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Ed Worsfold

                Man... You are a little odd did you know that? Rubbing Silver Medals with your bung hole eh? What the hell prompted you to say that?:confused:

                realJSOPR Offline
                realJSOPR Offline
                realJSOP
                wrote on last edited by
                #32

                Ed Worsfold wrote: You are a little odd did you know that? Watch it - the list can always get longer... :) Ed Worsfold wrote: Rubbing Silver Medals with your bung hole eh? What the hell prompted you to say that? On my planet, it is a sign of disrespect to rub something on your bunghole before returning it to the Olympic committee after such a gross mistake on their part. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L LukeV

                  John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: No, those little Shielas over at the NRA think I'm "too volatile". BTW, they're on my list, too. Too volatile? --------------- http://www.edovia.com

                  realJSOPR Offline
                  realJSOPR Offline
                  realJSOP
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #33

                  Yeah, they thnk I'm wound so tight that I could generate my own electric field. My invisible friends, of course, do not totally agree with that assessment. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • realJSOPR realJSOP

                    David Wulff wrote: John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Maybe the canadian athletes would have made a stronger statement if they had all just left the games en masse Who’d have noticed though? LOL Yeah, I guess three people leaving Salt Lake in a huff wouldn't be that noticable, eh? "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jacksonh
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #34

                    I think they would notice if the Canadian hockey team dissapeared.

                    V 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • realJSOPR realJSOP

                      Yeah, they thnk I'm wound so tight that I could generate my own electric field. My invisible friends, of course, do not totally agree with that assessment. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Rick York
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #35

                      I am not so sure about shooting those you have listed but we certainly should not let them propogate.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • realJSOPR realJSOP

                        Nope, if they're not contributing and productive members of society, they are obsolete, and are therefore on thie list of those to be terminated. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Richard Stringer
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #36

                        Do I take this to mean old people, mentally retarded ( not VB programmers but the real sick ones ), cripples, etc.. Darwin basically says that you are obsolete after mating and rearing your young to where they are self supporting so I guess anyone over 40 is a fair target. Hey why not have a world wide contest every four years ( we can upstage the summer olympics ) and have everybody fight another person with the winner getting another four years and the loser getting killed. Do it by weight/gender like boxing. We could solve a lot of problems like that - hunger - energy - over population. Let the winner have all the losers money and property and we could also redistribute the wealth ( kinda like the Democrats like to do with taxes ) at the same time. Every 8 years we could have a big party and no killing ( except for those that really deserve it ) to let the population catch up with the killing. Fat people get killed automatically as well as those wearing glasses ( we can weed the gene pool like this see ) and anyone with an IQ lower than say 115. Short people are goners also. Man this could be fun. Richard If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar

                        C J realJSOPR 3 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • R Richard Stringer

                          Do I take this to mean old people, mentally retarded ( not VB programmers but the real sick ones ), cripples, etc.. Darwin basically says that you are obsolete after mating and rearing your young to where they are self supporting so I guess anyone over 40 is a fair target. Hey why not have a world wide contest every four years ( we can upstage the summer olympics ) and have everybody fight another person with the winner getting another four years and the loser getting killed. Do it by weight/gender like boxing. We could solve a lot of problems like that - hunger - energy - over population. Let the winner have all the losers money and property and we could also redistribute the wealth ( kinda like the Democrats like to do with taxes ) at the same time. Every 8 years we could have a big party and no killing ( except for those that really deserve it ) to let the population catch up with the killing. Fat people get killed automatically as well as those wearing glasses ( we can weed the gene pool like this see ) and anyone with an IQ lower than say 115. Short people are goners also. Man this could be fun. Richard If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          ColinDavies
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #37

                          I can see you have really thought this through. Also (1) Gays and Lesbians are not successful at reproducing so they should be included as well. Also (2) white peoples skin doesn't seem as useful for sun protection as brown and black people. So lets eliminate them as well. Also (3) People with brown eyes have never appeared attractive to me thus they are less likely make good mates, so they should go as well. I noticed short people in your list, whilst I don't disagree, why not include excessivly tall people as they are difficult to clothe and often have big feet. Is there anyone left ? Regardz Colin J Davies

                          Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

                          If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle 'em with your bullsh*t P J Arends 0 = ( ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) + (x-1)^2) * ( (x-1)^2 + ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) ) - x^4 x != 0 0 = sqrt( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) - 5

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Richard Stringer

                            Do I take this to mean old people, mentally retarded ( not VB programmers but the real sick ones ), cripples, etc.. Darwin basically says that you are obsolete after mating and rearing your young to where they are self supporting so I guess anyone over 40 is a fair target. Hey why not have a world wide contest every four years ( we can upstage the summer olympics ) and have everybody fight another person with the winner getting another four years and the loser getting killed. Do it by weight/gender like boxing. We could solve a lot of problems like that - hunger - energy - over population. Let the winner have all the losers money and property and we could also redistribute the wealth ( kinda like the Democrats like to do with taxes ) at the same time. Every 8 years we could have a big party and no killing ( except for those that really deserve it ) to let the population catch up with the killing. Fat people get killed automatically as well as those wearing glasses ( we can weed the gene pool like this see ) and anyone with an IQ lower than say 115. Short people are goners also. Man this could be fun. Richard If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jon Sagara
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #38

                            Richard Stringer wrote: mentally retarded ( not VB programmers :laugh: That was kind of you to exclude them. :) Jon Sagara What about :bob:? Sonork ID: 100.9999 jonsagara

                            C R 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • J Jon Sagara

                              Richard Stringer wrote: mentally retarded ( not VB programmers :laugh: That was kind of you to exclude them. :) Jon Sagara What about :bob:? Sonork ID: 100.9999 jonsagara

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              ColinDavies
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #39

                              Jon Sagara wrote: That was kind of you to exclude them. Do you know why they got a special exclusion, it bewilders me ? Regardz Colin J Davies

                              Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

                              If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle 'em with your bullsh*t P J Arends 0 = ( ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) + (x-1)^2) * ( (x-1)^2 + ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) ) - x^4 x != 0 0 = sqrt( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) - 5

                              J 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C ColinDavies

                                Jon Sagara wrote: That was kind of you to exclude them. Do you know why they got a special exclusion, it bewilders me ? Regardz Colin J Davies

                                Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

                                If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle 'em with your bullsh*t P J Arends 0 = ( ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) + (x-1)^2) * ( (x-1)^2 + ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) ) - x^4 x != 0 0 = sqrt( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) - 5

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jon Sagara
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #40

                                Given the list that is building, no, I'm at a loss. Jon Sagara What about :bob:? Sonork ID: 100.9999 jonsagara

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C ColinDavies

                                  I can see you have really thought this through. Also (1) Gays and Lesbians are not successful at reproducing so they should be included as well. Also (2) white peoples skin doesn't seem as useful for sun protection as brown and black people. So lets eliminate them as well. Also (3) People with brown eyes have never appeared attractive to me thus they are less likely make good mates, so they should go as well. I noticed short people in your list, whilst I don't disagree, why not include excessivly tall people as they are difficult to clothe and often have big feet. Is there anyone left ? Regardz Colin J Davies

                                  Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

                                  If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle 'em with your bullsh*t P J Arends 0 = ( ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) + (x-1)^2) * ( (x-1)^2 + ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) ) - x^4 x != 0 0 = sqrt( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) - 5

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Richard Stringer
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #41

                                  Actually blue eyes are more affected by UV than brown so they gotta go Tall people are OK within reason. I guess its according to where you are from. I'm 6'1 and thats about normal round here. If I were in Asia I would be pretty tall. As to whos left ? Well if the Eskimos can pass the IQ test they may squeak by Richard PS: Cobol programmers should die a slow death If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J Jon Sagara

                                    Richard Stringer wrote: mentally retarded ( not VB programmers :laugh: That was kind of you to exclude them. :) Jon Sagara What about :bob:? Sonork ID: 100.9999 jonsagara

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    Richard Stringer
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #42

                                    They have sufficient problems without me adding to them:) Richard If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Richard Stringer

                                      Actually blue eyes are more affected by UV than brown so they gotta go Tall people are OK within reason. I guess its according to where you are from. I'm 6'1 and thats about normal round here. If I were in Asia I would be pretty tall. As to whos left ? Well if the Eskimos can pass the IQ test they may squeak by Richard PS: Cobol programmers should die a slow death If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      ColinDavies
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #43

                                      Richard Stringer wrote: Actually blue eyes are more affected by UV than brown so they gotta go OK no Brown eyed people or blue eyed people, Richard Stringer wrote: Tall people are OK within reason. I guess its according to where you are from. I'm 6'1 and thats about normal round here. If I were in Asia I would be pretty tall Sorry the cut off is 6 feet tall, We could possibly amputate, but you then wouldn't pass the physical fitness test. Richard Stringer wrote: Cobol programmers should die a slow death Ok us in The know use Capitals eg COBOL Damm I've sold myself out. Regardz Colin J Davies

                                      Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

                                      If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle 'em with your bullsh*t P J Arends 0 = ( ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) + (x-1)^2) * ( (x-1)^2 + ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) ) - x^4 x != 0 0 = sqrt( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) - 5

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R Richard Stringer

                                        Do I take this to mean old people, mentally retarded ( not VB programmers but the real sick ones ), cripples, etc.. Darwin basically says that you are obsolete after mating and rearing your young to where they are self supporting so I guess anyone over 40 is a fair target. Hey why not have a world wide contest every four years ( we can upstage the summer olympics ) and have everybody fight another person with the winner getting another four years and the loser getting killed. Do it by weight/gender like boxing. We could solve a lot of problems like that - hunger - energy - over population. Let the winner have all the losers money and property and we could also redistribute the wealth ( kinda like the Democrats like to do with taxes ) at the same time. Every 8 years we could have a big party and no killing ( except for those that really deserve it ) to let the population catch up with the killing. Fat people get killed automatically as well as those wearing glasses ( we can weed the gene pool like this see ) and anyone with an IQ lower than say 115. Short people are goners also. Man this could be fun. Richard If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar

                                        realJSOPR Offline
                                        realJSOPR Offline
                                        realJSOP
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #44

                                        Now there's a man that understands the spirit of the new law. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                          Nope, if they're not contributing and productive members of society, they are obsolete, and are therefore on thie list of those to be terminated. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          Roger Wright
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #45

                                          John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: if they're not contributing and productive members of society, they are obsolete, and are therefore on thie list of those to be terminated. You're making a horde of unemployed programmers very nervous here. Some of them may wind up with the runs!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups