Canadians awarded gold medals
-
Yeah, but I'd make double-damn sure they didn't rub those medals on their bungholes before I bought them. :) "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
Man... You are a little odd did you know that? Rubbing Silver Medals with your bung hole eh? What the hell prompted you to say that?:confused:
-
OMG!!! It's harsh but at the same time you're kinda right. Why don't we add this to your list: - People on welfare when they could work (lazy SOBs). I wouldn't kill them, but at least don't give 'em money for beer and cigarettes! Give' em food stamps for milk and bread. And they'd have to work too (pick up garbage in the streets, etc...) Anyway, I'm getting off topic here, but you and I connect on so many ways! ;) --------------- http://www.edovia.com
Nope, if they're not contributing and productive members of society, they are obsolete, and are therefore on thie list of those to be terminated. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
-
Nope, if they're not contributing and productive members of society, they are obsolete, and are therefore on thie list of those to be terminated. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
-
Just by curiosity, are you a NRA member? ;) --------------- http://www.edovia.com
-
No, those little Shielas over at the NRA think I'm "too volatile". BTW, they're on my list, too. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
-
Man... You are a little odd did you know that? Rubbing Silver Medals with your bung hole eh? What the hell prompted you to say that?:confused:
Ed Worsfold wrote: You are a little odd did you know that? Watch it - the list can always get longer... :) Ed Worsfold wrote: Rubbing Silver Medals with your bung hole eh? What the hell prompted you to say that? On my planet, it is a sign of disrespect to rub something on your bunghole before returning it to the Olympic committee after such a gross mistake on their part. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
-
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: No, those little Shielas over at the NRA think I'm "too volatile". BTW, they're on my list, too. Too volatile? --------------- http://www.edovia.com
Yeah, they thnk I'm wound so tight that I could generate my own electric field. My invisible friends, of course, do not totally agree with that assessment. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
-
David Wulff wrote: John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Maybe the canadian athletes would have made a stronger statement if they had all just left the games en masse Who’d have noticed though? LOL Yeah, I guess three people leaving Salt Lake in a huff wouldn't be that noticable, eh? "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
-
Yeah, they thnk I'm wound so tight that I could generate my own electric field. My invisible friends, of course, do not totally agree with that assessment. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
-
Nope, if they're not contributing and productive members of society, they are obsolete, and are therefore on thie list of those to be terminated. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
Do I take this to mean old people, mentally retarded ( not VB programmers but the real sick ones ), cripples, etc.. Darwin basically says that you are obsolete after mating and rearing your young to where they are self supporting so I guess anyone over 40 is a fair target. Hey why not have a world wide contest every four years ( we can upstage the summer olympics ) and have everybody fight another person with the winner getting another four years and the loser getting killed. Do it by weight/gender like boxing. We could solve a lot of problems like that - hunger - energy - over population. Let the winner have all the losers money and property and we could also redistribute the wealth ( kinda like the Democrats like to do with taxes ) at the same time. Every 8 years we could have a big party and no killing ( except for those that really deserve it ) to let the population catch up with the killing. Fat people get killed automatically as well as those wearing glasses ( we can weed the gene pool like this see ) and anyone with an IQ lower than say 115. Short people are goners also. Man this could be fun. Richard If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar
-
Do I take this to mean old people, mentally retarded ( not VB programmers but the real sick ones ), cripples, etc.. Darwin basically says that you are obsolete after mating and rearing your young to where they are self supporting so I guess anyone over 40 is a fair target. Hey why not have a world wide contest every four years ( we can upstage the summer olympics ) and have everybody fight another person with the winner getting another four years and the loser getting killed. Do it by weight/gender like boxing. We could solve a lot of problems like that - hunger - energy - over population. Let the winner have all the losers money and property and we could also redistribute the wealth ( kinda like the Democrats like to do with taxes ) at the same time. Every 8 years we could have a big party and no killing ( except for those that really deserve it ) to let the population catch up with the killing. Fat people get killed automatically as well as those wearing glasses ( we can weed the gene pool like this see ) and anyone with an IQ lower than say 115. Short people are goners also. Man this could be fun. Richard If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar
I can see you have really thought this through. Also (1) Gays and Lesbians are not successful at reproducing so they should be included as well. Also (2) white peoples skin doesn't seem as useful for sun protection as brown and black people. So lets eliminate them as well. Also (3) People with brown eyes have never appeared attractive to me thus they are less likely make good mates, so they should go as well. I noticed short people in your list, whilst I don't disagree, why not include excessivly tall people as they are difficult to clothe and often have big feet. Is there anyone left ? Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle 'em with your bullsh*t P J Arends 0 = ( ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) + (x-1)^2) * ( (x-1)^2 + ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) ) - x^4 x != 0 0 = sqrt( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) - 5
-
Do I take this to mean old people, mentally retarded ( not VB programmers but the real sick ones ), cripples, etc.. Darwin basically says that you are obsolete after mating and rearing your young to where they are self supporting so I guess anyone over 40 is a fair target. Hey why not have a world wide contest every four years ( we can upstage the summer olympics ) and have everybody fight another person with the winner getting another four years and the loser getting killed. Do it by weight/gender like boxing. We could solve a lot of problems like that - hunger - energy - over population. Let the winner have all the losers money and property and we could also redistribute the wealth ( kinda like the Democrats like to do with taxes ) at the same time. Every 8 years we could have a big party and no killing ( except for those that really deserve it ) to let the population catch up with the killing. Fat people get killed automatically as well as those wearing glasses ( we can weed the gene pool like this see ) and anyone with an IQ lower than say 115. Short people are goners also. Man this could be fun. Richard If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar
Richard Stringer wrote: mentally retarded ( not VB programmers :laugh: That was kind of you to exclude them. :) Jon Sagara What about :bob:? Sonork ID: 100.9999 jonsagara
-
Richard Stringer wrote: mentally retarded ( not VB programmers :laugh: That was kind of you to exclude them. :) Jon Sagara What about :bob:? Sonork ID: 100.9999 jonsagara
Jon Sagara wrote: That was kind of you to exclude them. Do you know why they got a special exclusion, it bewilders me ? Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle 'em with your bullsh*t P J Arends 0 = ( ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) + (x-1)^2) * ( (x-1)^2 + ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) ) - x^4 x != 0 0 = sqrt( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) - 5
-
Jon Sagara wrote: That was kind of you to exclude them. Do you know why they got a special exclusion, it bewilders me ? Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle 'em with your bullsh*t P J Arends 0 = ( ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) + (x-1)^2) * ( (x-1)^2 + ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) ) - x^4 x != 0 0 = sqrt( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) - 5
Given the list that is building, no, I'm at a loss. Jon Sagara What about :bob:? Sonork ID: 100.9999 jonsagara
-
I can see you have really thought this through. Also (1) Gays and Lesbians are not successful at reproducing so they should be included as well. Also (2) white peoples skin doesn't seem as useful for sun protection as brown and black people. So lets eliminate them as well. Also (3) People with brown eyes have never appeared attractive to me thus they are less likely make good mates, so they should go as well. I noticed short people in your list, whilst I don't disagree, why not include excessivly tall people as they are difficult to clothe and often have big feet. Is there anyone left ? Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle 'em with your bullsh*t P J Arends 0 = ( ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) + (x-1)^2) * ( (x-1)^2 + ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) ) - x^4 x != 0 0 = sqrt( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) - 5
Actually blue eyes are more affected by UV than brown so they gotta go Tall people are OK within reason. I guess its according to where you are from. I'm 6'1 and thats about normal round here. If I were in Asia I would be pretty tall. As to whos left ? Well if the Eskimos can pass the IQ test they may squeak by Richard PS: Cobol programmers should die a slow death If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar
-
Richard Stringer wrote: mentally retarded ( not VB programmers :laugh: That was kind of you to exclude them. :) Jon Sagara What about :bob:? Sonork ID: 100.9999 jonsagara
They have sufficient problems without me adding to them:) Richard If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar
-
Actually blue eyes are more affected by UV than brown so they gotta go Tall people are OK within reason. I guess its according to where you are from. I'm 6'1 and thats about normal round here. If I were in Asia I would be pretty tall. As to whos left ? Well if the Eskimos can pass the IQ test they may squeak by Richard PS: Cobol programmers should die a slow death If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar
Richard Stringer wrote: Actually blue eyes are more affected by UV than brown so they gotta go OK no Brown eyed people or blue eyed people, Richard Stringer wrote: Tall people are OK within reason. I guess its according to where you are from. I'm 6'1 and thats about normal round here. If I were in Asia I would be pretty tall Sorry the cut off is 6 feet tall, We could possibly amputate, but you then wouldn't pass the physical fitness test. Richard Stringer wrote: Cobol programmers should die a slow death Ok us in The know use Capitals eg COBOL Damm I've sold myself out. Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle 'em with your bullsh*t P J Arends 0 = ( ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) + (x-1)^2) * ( (x-1)^2 + ( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) ) - x^4 x != 0 0 = sqrt( x^2 - (x-1)^2 ) - 5
-
Do I take this to mean old people, mentally retarded ( not VB programmers but the real sick ones ), cripples, etc.. Darwin basically says that you are obsolete after mating and rearing your young to where they are self supporting so I guess anyone over 40 is a fair target. Hey why not have a world wide contest every four years ( we can upstage the summer olympics ) and have everybody fight another person with the winner getting another four years and the loser getting killed. Do it by weight/gender like boxing. We could solve a lot of problems like that - hunger - energy - over population. Let the winner have all the losers money and property and we could also redistribute the wealth ( kinda like the Democrats like to do with taxes ) at the same time. Every 8 years we could have a big party and no killing ( except for those that really deserve it ) to let the population catch up with the killing. Fat people get killed automatically as well as those wearing glasses ( we can weed the gene pool like this see ) and anyone with an IQ lower than say 115. Short people are goners also. Man this could be fun. Richard If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. - Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar
-
Nope, if they're not contributing and productive members of society, they are obsolete, and are therefore on thie list of those to be terminated. "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: if they're not contributing and productive members of society, they are obsolete, and are therefore on thie list of those to be terminated. You're making a horde of unemployed programmers very nervous here. Some of them may wind up with the runs!
-
Man... You are a little odd did you know that? Rubbing Silver Medals with your bung hole eh? What the hell prompted you to say that?:confused:
The goat made him say it.
