Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. CP Animated Smileys

CP Animated Smileys

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
28 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Edbert P

    I've recently noticed that none of the CP smileys are getting animated when reading posts in the forums. They're all animating when writing a post (yeah, I can see the laughing smiley laughing as I write this post), but none of them are animating when reading posts. Check if they're animating on your browser: :laugh: ;P ;) :omg: :wtf: :-O [Edit]They're animating on the preview button, and animating as I posted this message. But they stopped animating after I hide the message (by clicking on the title bar) and show it again.[/Edit] They're fine when I use IE 6.0, but not when I'm using FF 1.0.6. Any ideas of what's happening? PS: CP's smileys are my favourites from all the forums I've seen. Edbert P. Sydney, Australia -- modified at 20:04 Sunday 13th November, 2005

    C Offline
    C Offline
    Chris Maunder
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    They are shy. They are OK when you are just previewing or concentrating on what you are writing and not staring at them directly, but once in a message they get a bit of stage fright and freeze up. Give 'em a break, OK? cheers, Chris Maunder

    CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

    V R 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • E Edbert P

      I've recently noticed that none of the CP smileys are getting animated when reading posts in the forums. They're all animating when writing a post (yeah, I can see the laughing smiley laughing as I write this post), but none of them are animating when reading posts. Check if they're animating on your browser: :laugh: ;P ;) :omg: :wtf: :-O [Edit]They're animating on the preview button, and animating as I posted this message. But they stopped animating after I hide the message (by clicking on the title bar) and show it again.[/Edit] They're fine when I use IE 6.0, but not when I'm using FF 1.0.6. Any ideas of what's happening? PS: CP's smileys are my favourites from all the forums I've seen. Edbert P. Sydney, Australia -- modified at 20:04 Sunday 13th November, 2005

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Andy Brummer
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      I have the same problem with 1.0.6. In 1.5 b2 they are working fine, but the Quote Selected Text button isn't working.


      I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E Edbert P

        I've recently noticed that none of the CP smileys are getting animated when reading posts in the forums. They're all animating when writing a post (yeah, I can see the laughing smiley laughing as I write this post), but none of them are animating when reading posts. Check if they're animating on your browser: :laugh: ;P ;) :omg: :wtf: :-O [Edit]They're animating on the preview button, and animating as I posted this message. But they stopped animating after I hide the message (by clicking on the title bar) and show it again.[/Edit] They're fine when I use IE 6.0, but not when I'm using FF 1.0.6. Any ideas of what's happening? PS: CP's smileys are my favourites from all the forums I've seen. Edbert P. Sydney, Australia -- modified at 20:04 Sunday 13th November, 2005

        B Offline
        B Offline
        Bruce Duncan
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Edbert P. wrote:

        they stopped animating after I hide the message (by clicking on the title bar) and show it again

        I can confirm this. With your message open, if I open the Reply link in a background tab, the smileys in your message start animating. When I collapse and then reopen your message they stop. Doesn't bother me really, animated gifs are annoying at the best of times.

        "Time sneaks up on you like a windshield on a bug."
        - John Lithgow

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Maunder

          They are shy. They are OK when you are just previewing or concentrating on what you are writing and not staring at them directly, but once in a message they get a bit of stage fright and freeze up. Give 'em a break, OK? cheers, Chris Maunder

          CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

          V Offline
          V Offline
          Vikram A Punathambekar
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          And the smileys don't get shy when you view them in IE? :suss: Cheers, Vikram.


          http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar

          Google talk: binarybandit

          After all is said and done, much is said and little is done.

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris LaQuerre

            David Stone wrote:

            And if you're adventurous enough, you can always try out Firefox 1.5 Release Candidate 2.

            I'm using Firefox 1.5 RC 2 and all is well with the smileys. I've only been using it for a few days but have been happy with this release so far. Chris LaQuerre eBusiness Projects Leader The statement below is true. The statement above is false.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jorgen Sigvardsson
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            I've been using it too. The only thing I'm annoyed at is the misrendering of the menubar. See how it wobbles when you select a menu? Not a big deal, but annoying nonetheless. :) --

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D David Stone

              Yeah. I hear it's really nice. I've been using Firefox trunk nightly builds forever, so I haven't checked out the 1.5 branch, but I hear rumors that it's more stable than my current trunk nightlies are. ;P


              Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jorgen Sigvardsson
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              David "Bleeding Edge" Stone. :-D --

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E Edbert P

                David Stone wrote:

                Also, you should probably update to 1.0.7 as there's a security fix that you're missing.

                Yeah, I know there has been critical updates. It's just that I usually wait for a while until all the extensions I use work with the latest release. I don't use FF I installed at work for any critical things like banking so I'm not too concerned. Upgrading FF is still PITA in my opinion :boo:, and the last time I installed night-build along with a stable version it broke my stable version. :sigh: The smileys problem still occur though, it only happens when (I'm assuming) setting division uuh, in this case a TD style to none and then displaying it again. I knew it was still working until a recent update to CP site. And no, it's not firefox config nor ZoneAlarm (I don't use ZA at work, we have Novell Border Manager). Anybody else has this problem? [Edit]Didn't Marc develop MyXaml? I thought it also includes webdev (ASP.Net)?[/Edit] Edbert P. Sydney, Australia -- modified at 22:30 Sunday 13th November, 2005

                J Offline
                J Offline
                J Dunlap
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                MyXaml is a generic object markup parser and instantiator, and as such, it can instantiate any .NET object that has a parameterless public constructor - including web controls. But it has nothing directly to do with web dev. Marc can do some web dev, but it's certainly not one of his areas of expertise - he mainly leaves that to me. :-D

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                  David "Bleeding Edge" Stone. :-D --

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  David Stone
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Totally. :-D For instance, they're working on a lot of the parsing code for CSS and HTML right now in the trunk builds, so some of the CSS rules are totally screwed up. As such, Gmail is completely unusable in the nice AJAXy view. So I've had to resort to the basic HTML view. And it's either Greasemonkey or CPhog, but one of the two has completely stopped working, so I'm typing this reply in the normal reply page. You live on the bleeding edge, you learn to deal with getting cut. ;)


                  Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                    And the smileys don't get shy when you view them in IE? :suss: Cheers, Vikram.


                    http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar

                    Google talk: binarybandit

                    After all is said and done, much is said and little is done.

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    David Stone
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Of course not. The icons know the bar is so low, that even they are better looking, more useful, and more secure than IE. :rolleyes:


                    Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson

                    V 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J J Dunlap

                      MyXaml is a generic object markup parser and instantiator, and as such, it can instantiate any .NET object that has a parameterless public constructor - including web controls. But it has nothing directly to do with web dev. Marc can do some web dev, but it's certainly not one of his areas of expertise - he mainly leaves that to me. :-D

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      David Stone
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      J. Dunlap wrote:

                      he mainly leaves that to me.

                      That's scary. I remember how the Fluid website looked before you ripped it all down. :omg:


                      Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson

                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                        I've been using it too. The only thing I'm annoyed at is the misrendering of the menubar. See how it wobbles when you select a menu? Not a big deal, but annoying nonetheless. :) --

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        Yeh, what is it with that? Tut, tut. Still, plenty of other themes to choose from... :)


                        The Rob Blog
                        Google Talk: robert.caldecott

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                          I have the same problem too. :( I use v1.0.4. Maybe David has a point - I'll try upgrading. Let me know if you overcome the problem, and I'll do the same. :) Cheers, Vikram.


                          http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar

                          Google talk: binarybandit

                          After all is said and done, much is said and little is done.

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          David Stone
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:

                          Maybe David has a point - I'll try upgrading.

                          Yay! :-D 1.5 really is nice. The trunk nightlies I use have all the same features, so I know for a fact that the new features are cool. 1.5 is just a lot more stable than the release I'm currently running. ;P Here are the new 1.5 features: Firefox 1.5 Release Notes[^]. One of the coolest features is the new update system. They've built in binary diff patching, so now, instead of downloading a whole 6MB nightly build every day, I get tiny ~400K binary diff patches that get applied by the new update system the next time I restart Firefox. It's a lot better than the current 1.0.x style of updates. Also, the bfcache feature is awesome. (That's what they're talking about when they say that the back and forward buttons have been improved.) Now, the rendered page is cached when you navigate to a different page, so when you click back or forward, it doesn't have to re-render the page from source. It just pulls up the rendered version and displays it. Very cool stuff. :)


                          Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson

                          V 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Yeh, what is it with that? Tut, tut. Still, plenty of other themes to choose from... :)


                            The Rob Blog
                            Google Talk: robert.caldecott

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            David Stone
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            Heh. That's because of this. There's a patch that changes Firefox to use native theme rendering for the menus that's currently only on the trunk: Native Theme Rendering for Windows XP Menus, toolbars. But there's no way this is going to land on the branch between now and release of 1.5, seeing as how the target milestone is the Gecko 1.9 / Firefox 2.0 timeframe. (Gecko is the rendering engine, Firefox is one of the apps that uses it.


                            Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D David Stone

                              J. Dunlap wrote:

                              he mainly leaves that to me.

                              That's scary. I remember how the Fluid website looked before you ripped it all down. :omg:


                              Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              J Dunlap
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              Sheesh, man, that was done a long time ago! ;-P :-O Now, I do stuff like this:

                              V 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D David Stone

                                Of course not. The icons know the bar is so low, that even they are better looking, more useful, and more secure than IE. :rolleyes:


                                Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson

                                V Offline
                                V Offline
                                Vikram A Punathambekar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                How dare you insult CP's icons? :mad: ;P :Vikram resigns himself to the fact that the tongue emoticon he's just typed will show up frozen: Cheers, Vikram.


                                http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar

                                Google talk: binarybandit

                                After all is said and done, much is said and little is done.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J J Dunlap

                                  Sheesh, man, that was done a long time ago! ;-P :-O Now, I do stuff like this:

                                  V Offline
                                  V Offline
                                  Vikram A Punathambekar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  Justin, Can you please link to images instead? Not everybody on CP has broadband, you know. :) So says the guy who's got an image in his own sig. But in my defense, my image is less than 1 KB. Cheers, Vikram.


                                  http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar

                                  Google talk: binarybandit

                                  After all is said and done, much is said and little is done.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D David Stone

                                    Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:

                                    Maybe David has a point - I'll try upgrading.

                                    Yay! :-D 1.5 really is nice. The trunk nightlies I use have all the same features, so I know for a fact that the new features are cool. 1.5 is just a lot more stable than the release I'm currently running. ;P Here are the new 1.5 features: Firefox 1.5 Release Notes[^]. One of the coolest features is the new update system. They've built in binary diff patching, so now, instead of downloading a whole 6MB nightly build every day, I get tiny ~400K binary diff patches that get applied by the new update system the next time I restart Firefox. It's a lot better than the current 1.0.x style of updates. Also, the bfcache feature is awesome. (That's what they're talking about when they say that the back and forward buttons have been improved.) Now, the rendered page is cached when you navigate to a different page, so when you click back or forward, it doesn't have to re-render the page from source. It just pulls up the rendered version and displays it. Very cool stuff. :)


                                    Picture a huge catholic cathedral. In it there's many people, including a gregorian monk choir. You know, those who sing beautifully. Then they start singing, in latin, as they always do: "Ad hominem..." -Jörgen Sigvardsson

                                    V Offline
                                    V Offline
                                    Vikram A Punathambekar
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    Sounds nice, esp the update and navigation features. :) Cheers, Vikram.


                                    http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar

                                    Google talk: binarybandit

                                    After all is said and done, much is said and little is done.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Chris Maunder

                                      They are shy. They are OK when you are just previewing or concentrating on what you are writing and not staring at them directly, but once in a message they get a bit of stage fright and freeze up. Give 'em a break, OK? cheers, Chris Maunder

                                      CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      Raj Lal
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      shy....... hahahahahaha that was funny :-D "Not everything that counts can be counted..." -Albert Einstein

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups