It is at the beginning of the struct and it is used as a discriminator. And yet it seems extremely accident prone, and I should add the docs do not clarify this. At worst there should be, IMO, a function to initialize the structure. At best, there should actually be two lv_img_set_src() functions - one for paths, and one for lv_img_dsc_t structs. Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

Still waiting for the first supply chain malware injection? Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012

I'll try that after I try another suggestion. It's not my favorite choice because it seems a bit laborious to go through a datasheet that way, but it's an idea, so I appreciate it. :) Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

Meanwhile GDI ans Windows Forms keep pulling 99% of desktop development. GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next

One of my ex-colleagues worked on one of the Apollo on-board computers. He had some interesting stories about the constraints they had to work within.

obermd wrote: I can understand no scroll bars on a smart phone, but not on a 1920x1200 monitor I know very little about CSS but I do know that designers can tell 1) what your device is 2) what your screen size is And more.Look at how Media Queries are defined (for just this purpose): Media queries - Wikipedia[^] Media queries is a feature of CSS 3 allowing content rendering to adapt to different conditions such as screen resolution (e.g. mobile and desktop screen size). It became a W3C recommended standard in June 2012,[1] and is a cornerstone technology of responsive web design (RWD). And, that is ancient technology. But no, the designers just design everything to a phone and forget about the rest. Annoying.

Here's an idea... Say you did do exactly that... you mined a coin in a very novel way. Since they are uniquely identifiable, you'd in a way be creating a kind of crypto-art. That is, your coins may actually be worth more kinda like real coin misprints and such can command more than face value. "Yes, but these coins were mined with an array of valves." Proof of authenticity is hairy, but still.

Sure thing! Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

If waving a dead chicken over the code doesn't work, try a live cat. :) Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

Many cars have that - they monitor the driver for signs of drowsiness and try to wake them up a bit for safety. The Merc version will apparently bring the car to a gentle stop, unlock all the doors, and call for emergency services if you don't respond in time ... :-D "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

Just for clarification, does that mean my suggestion would not produce a comparable view?

Peanuts is relative. Makerfabs units cost what devices sold out of the United States do, and have excellent build quality, good documentation, and now, out of date source code. Funny thing though, I contacted them. They got back to me and provided me updated code. Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

I just deleted a lot of what I just typed. I talk to much and make it over complicated according to my wife. :) define "large" database. Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

And yet even though there are probably 100 new languages a year that actually make it into some sort of larger visibility there are none like that. Which suggests to me at least that they just do not work. In the same way that I have seen, several different times, people attempt to 'improve' C/C++ by adding clever macros that serve as nothing but attempts to do custom enhancements to the language. For example adding 'begin' and 'end' as substitutions for open/closing brackets.

There can't be very good overlap with embedded and js when it comes to hiring. And I don't think it's a personal problem it's just that language is like that new article post with the human skin fake face out of Japan. It's an abomination.

That's why Lego exists and is so popular, even for adults... especially for adults! “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” ― Christopher Hitchens

I typically drive with the keyboard, but I will agree that that change in Windows 11 context menus is right up there on the asinine level of changes. Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.

I've been tinkering with these free AI tools for a while now, specifically ChatGPT, Copilot and codepal. The only one I've tried for generating code was codepal. Not very impressed: it only generates code snippets ('functions'), and after very few such short snippets it reaches the limit for free usage. For not code related questions, I found ChatGPT far better than Copilot. It used to be really bad just a few months ago, but it significantly improved. It reaches the limit for free usage pretty fast though, requiring a few hours of timeout. Copilot is just pathetic, in my experience, at this time. Both Copilot and ChatGPT give quite often wrong answers - they don't 'realize their own mistakes', but rather admit them when pointed out, leading to 'I apologize for the confusion/misunderstanding/frustration...'. Almost never 'for the wrong answer'! They're trained well ;) What they're not trained to say is 'I don't know', which I'd prefer, instead the constantly wrong answers. I usually know the correct answer, or at least I know when the answer is wrong, but what happens if I don't? They're nice toys, but not really useful and trustworthy in my opinion. Maybe I'm not very good at asking questions (they can understand), but I do it in a very clean manner and provide enough context, so I doubt that. I would be myself impressed with any decent answers (nevermind code generation), because my expectations are pretty low, but so far I'm not. Your Mileage definitely Varies!

We need a "wince" emoji... Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.