:thumbsup:

honey the codewitch wrote: Any of you have ideas? lol.... Classroom. Every students computer has the tiny display facing the teacher. So the teacher can make sure they are messing with what they should be and staying away from what they shouldn't. Consider it as the teacher wanders around the room aimlessly.

It is a way to simplify your deployment. The trade-off is it might cost you more money or save you some money depending on the traffic. It should always help with uptime/server-overload. If you are supporting traffic that sees incredible spikes, then this could auto-scale to help support the load. (Think Black Friday/Cyber Monday for retailers) If you have moderate, steady traffic, then it might not be worth it.

honey the codewitch wrote: A webserver is a fancy string processing engine. You're out of line, but you're right :laugh: Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

Reading through all the responses just confirms to me that today nobody really understands anymore what OOP was supposed to be. And yes, the basic concept of OOP doesn't have a single "inventor", most certainly not Stroustrup, he is rather guilty of obfuscating the whole thing. People that had influence on the initial development of the OOP concept would rather be Alan Kay, Edsger Dykstra and Nikolaus Wirth. As for the scope of a class, it is quite difficult to give a quick example, but for the way I learned OOP, you professor would be wrong. Code abstraction is certainly one of the initial intends of OOP, but one of the fallacies that some people are going overboard with the level of abstraction. A single method and/or properties is just leading to obfuscation of the overall code, specially if that resulting class is used only in a single instance. Code abstraction is intended to help with the safely being able to reuse code and ease maintenance. Abstracting too much and you are just ending up in inheritance hell. That different implementations in different programming languages have different approaches to this is what makes OOP as it is often implemented today such a PITA...

honey the codewitch wrote: Shedding on the fresh laundry (prior to being evicted from the room)[^] Now that's a cat who feels right at home. :-)

Maybe a slider control could be useful. Edit: I see it's already been suggested, and you already have one :)

It ain't the fall that kills you, it's that sudden stop! I don't think before I open my mouth, I like to be as surprised a everyone else. PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.3.0 JaxCoder.com Latest Article: SimpleWizardUpdate

bryanren wrote: Rabbit holes - Making and watching makers One I find fascinating is Allen Millyard. He builds his own 'bikes and engines out of other 'bikes and engines - mostly Kawasaki but others, too - in his home garage using hand tools and a couple of machines. So he has built a V12 out of a pair of Z1300 straight sixes, lots of straight sixes out of fours, a V-twin out of part of an aero engine, a V10 bike with a Dodge Viper motor ... you get the idea.

Normally, these mysteries boil down to… I turned off the autobuild setting!

Quote: there are bits I don't understand 😱 "Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I

I’ll have to send that one to my sister. She’s an OB/GYN so I’m sure she’ll get a kick out of it.

i know you have it working, and I think your solution is not to far off from this… This reminds me of working with Windows GDI Brush objects. They were standard fill patterns, but you had to “realize” the brush against your target GDI context before you could use it to fill a shape on that context.

I really want to see you interface one of your little IOT widgets to an old-school Centronics line printer, or even better, a KSR33 teletype! Software Zen: delete this;

Ummm ... it's Tuesday today? :-D "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

Arial goes to a bar, orders three thingamabobs and a dinglehopper.

Another problem is that a MFT sensor is smaller than full-frame format (usual in traditional 35 mm camera's), so the image will be cropped and the lenses will not be used to their full potential.

Have you considered explaining the problem to a rubber duck? Maybe try to explain the problem to someone without any technical skills. They are likely to think about the problem in a different way unbound from the technical constraints. Best of luck. :-)

SVG FTW ! :java: "If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"