Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. When does it end?

When does it end?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comhelpquestionannouncementlearning
72 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Rob Graham

    So the crusades, the inquisition, the 19th century witch burnings and the current islamist terrorism are all myths? Or are you suggesting that religious zealotry was merely a tool manipulated to accomplish some political aim behind all of these? We need to graduate from the ridiculous notion that greed is some kind of elixir for capitalism - it's the downfall of capitalism. Self-interest, maybe, but self-interest run amok does not serve anyone. The core value of conscious capitalism is enlightened self-interest. Patricia Aburdene -- modified at 12:22 Sunday 7th May, 2006 (I really need to work on my typing skills)

    D Offline
    D Offline
    Diego Moita
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Personally, I would even add that Comunism and Fascism are also some kind of religions, with their own dogmas (class strugle, proletariat's dictature, vital space etc.) their own churches (the parties) their own messiahas (Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Il Duce, Hitler, Marx) their version of infidels (burgeoisie, jews and the other side) and their own promisse of paradise (the "classless society" and the Reich). Patriotism is the willingness to kill and be killed for trivial reasons. Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970) Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it. George Bernard Shaw (1856 - 1950) Patriotism is often an arbitrary veneration of real estate above principles. George Jean Nathan (1882 - 1958) Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. Samuel Johnson (1709 - 1784)

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stephen Hewitt

      I accept that politics is not always far from the minds of religious leaders. But that's the point - The church has turned many politcal issues into religious ones. Steve

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Christian Graus
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      Stephen Hewitt wrote:

      The church has turned many politcal issues into religious ones.

      I thought that was *my* point. The starting point is politics, religion is the excuse fed to the masses. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Stan Shannon

        Then you have nothing to complain about when you are offended by the church being offended. "You get that which you tolerate"

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        Frankly, I'm offended that you would think I would complain about being offended by the church being offended. I have a much more relaxed attitude about such things, and would certainly not be offended if the church was offended. I suggest you avoid such unscrupulous language in the future to avoid offending people such as myself! Good day to you sir! - F

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Christian Graus

          Stephen Hewitt wrote:

          The church has turned many politcal issues into religious ones.

          I thought that was *my* point. The starting point is politics, religion is the excuse fed to the masses. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Stephen Hewitt
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          Yes: but my point is that once the church adopts the issue it is a religious one. For example, many reliogious wars are over land but they are religious wars nethertheless. Steve

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Stephen Hewitt

            Yes: but my point is that once the church adopts the issue it is a religious one. For example, many reliogious wars are over land but they are religious wars nethertheless. Steve

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Christian Graus
            wrote on last edited by
            #45

            OK, in that case, your definition differs from mine, which is why we disagree. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Christian Graus

              OK, in that case, your definition differs from mine, which is why we disagree. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stephen Hewitt
              wrote on last edited by
              #46

              Here's the motivation behind my definition: if people join the cause because of their religion then I say it’s religious. In short if religion is used as a tool to recruit people into a cause I feel it must be considered religious; especially if it is sanctioned by the religious leaders. Steve

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stephen Hewitt

                Here's the motivation behind my definition: if people join the cause because of their religion then I say it’s religious. In short if religion is used as a tool to recruit people into a cause I feel it must be considered religious; especially if it is sanctioned by the religious leaders. Steve

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Christian Graus
                wrote on last edited by
                #47

                Fair enough. By that definition, you are right. My definition would be, if the action in question is sanctioned on grounds of religion, it's religious. If the prime motivation is power, or politics, then those motivations would exist in a world without religion, so religion is not the prime motivator or the reason for whatever action being discussed. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Christian Graus

                  Fair enough. By that definition, you are right. My definition would be, if the action in question is sanctioned on grounds of religion, it's religious. If the prime motivation is power, or politics, then those motivations would exist in a world without religion, so religion is not the prime motivator or the reason for whatever action being discussed. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  led mike
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #48

                  Christian Graus wrote:

                  If the prime motivation is power, or politics, then those motivations would exist in a world without religion, so religion is not the prime motivator

                  Not if the religions themselves are the source of the power and/or political issues.


                  "What classes are you using ? You shouldn't call stuff if you have no idea what it does" Christian Graus in the C# forum led mike

                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L led mike

                    Christian Graus wrote:

                    If the prime motivation is power, or politics, then those motivations would exist in a world without religion, so religion is not the prime motivator

                    Not if the religions themselves are the source of the power and/or political issues.


                    "What classes are you using ? You shouldn't call stuff if you have no idea what it does" Christian Graus in the C# forum led mike

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Christian Graus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #49

                    led mike wrote:

                    Not if the religions themselves are the source of the power and/or political issues.

                    Well, that seems true, but I can't think of an example, certainly none of the examples offered would qualify. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Tim Craig

                      Mel Gibson was only one who came to mind. I was also thinking of how a few years ago mainstream TV was criticized by the right wing christians of "neglecting" them and being too secular. Now we have this spate of pseudoreligious programming such as "Touched by an Angel" and, I think from the teasers I've seen, things like "Ghost Whisperer" and "Medium". The let's take a few religious ideas and spin them all over them map. But next thing you have entertainment giving "credence" to a lot of the fringe because some people can't tell the difference just like da Vinci Code.

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Ryan Roberts
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #50

                      Tim Craig wrote:

                      "Ghost Whisperer" and "Medium"

                      That can't be for a seriously christian audience surely? The occult isn't exactly popular with evangelicals. It must be targetted at credulous agnostics and the 'spiritual'. Ryan

                      "Michael Moore and Mel Gibson are the same person, except for a few sit-ups. Moore thought his cheesy political blooper reel was going to tell people how to vote. Mel thought that his little gay SM movie about his imaginary friend was going to help him get to heaven." - Penn Jillette

                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stan Shannon

                        Then you have nothing to complain about when you are offended by the church being offended. "You get that which you tolerate"

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #51

                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                        when you are offended

                        I'm not Why do I get the feeling you're just in the mood for an argument? "If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done." - Peter Ustinov

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Rob Graham

                          So the crusades, the inquisition, the 19th century witch burnings and the current islamist terrorism are all myths? Or are you suggesting that religious zealotry was merely a tool manipulated to accomplish some political aim behind all of these? We need to graduate from the ridiculous notion that greed is some kind of elixir for capitalism - it's the downfall of capitalism. Self-interest, maybe, but self-interest run amok does not serve anyone. The core value of conscious capitalism is enlightened self-interest. Patricia Aburdene -- modified at 12:22 Sunday 7th May, 2006 (I really need to work on my typing skills)

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Red Stateler
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #52

                          Rob Graham wrote:

                          the crusades

                          That was a war led by the Roman Cathoic Church to grab land and would not come anywhere near the savagry of China, Germany or the USSR.

                          Rob Graham wrote:

                          the inquisition

                          Historians agree that the inquisitions reputation exceeds its reality in both size and scope and would not come anywhere near the savagry of China, Germany or the USSR.

                          Rob Graham wrote:

                          the 19th century witch burnings

                          I think you have the wrong century.

                          Rob Graham wrote:

                          the current islamist terrorism

                          This is one you actually have right. Ironically islamofascism is derived from atheist governments. It's also non-Christian.

                          R M 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • D Diego Moita

                            Personally, I would even add that Comunism and Fascism are also some kind of religions, with their own dogmas (class strugle, proletariat's dictature, vital space etc.) their own churches (the parties) their own messiahas (Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Il Duce, Hitler, Marx) their version of infidels (burgeoisie, jews and the other side) and their own promisse of paradise (the "classless society" and the Reich). Patriotism is the willingness to kill and be killed for trivial reasons. Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970) Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it. George Bernard Shaw (1856 - 1950) Patriotism is often an arbitrary veneration of real estate above principles. George Jean Nathan (1882 - 1958) Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. Samuel Johnson (1709 - 1784)

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Red Stateler
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #53

                            So then you agree with my previous oft-fought opinion that atheism is, in fact, a religion. It's only difference is that it competes with other religions by masking itself as the absence of religion, which you seem to agree is not true.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Red Stateler

                              Rob Graham wrote:

                              the crusades

                              That was a war led by the Roman Cathoic Church to grab land and would not come anywhere near the savagry of China, Germany or the USSR.

                              Rob Graham wrote:

                              the inquisition

                              Historians agree that the inquisitions reputation exceeds its reality in both size and scope and would not come anywhere near the savagry of China, Germany or the USSR.

                              Rob Graham wrote:

                              the 19th century witch burnings

                              I think you have the wrong century.

                              Rob Graham wrote:

                              the current islamist terrorism

                              This is one you actually have right. Ironically islamofascism is derived from atheist governments. It's also non-Christian.

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              R Giskard Reventlov
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #54

                              espeir wrote:

                              Ironically islamofascism is derived from atheist governments.

                              Can you provide some background or justification for this assertion? home
                              bookmarks You can ignore relatives but the neighbours live next door

                              R 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Cardinal urges legal action against Da Vinci Code[^] In the latest Vatican broadside against "The Da Vinci Code," a leading cardinal says Christians should respond to the book and film with legal action because both offend Christ and the Church he founded. Cardinal Francis Arinze, a Nigerian who was considered a candidate for pope last year, made his strong comments in a documentary called "The Da Vinci Code-A Masterful Deception." Arinze's appeal came some 10 days after another Vatican cardinal called for a boycott of the film. Both cardinals asserted that other religions would never stand for offences against their beliefs and that Christians should get tough. "Christians must not just sit back and say it is enough for us to forgive and to forget," Arinze said in the documentary made by Rome film maker Mario Biasetti for Rome Reports, a Catholic film agency specializing in religious affairs. Since when does anybody/everybody have a "right" to not be offended? When mankind actually succeeds in killing itself off completely, I'll bet that it won't be a political issue or even an environmental one - I'd wager that religion and some moron/zealot feeling offended will be at the heart of it. "If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done." - Peter Ustinov

                                realJSOPR Offline
                                realJSOPR Offline
                                realJSOP
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #55

                                What's REALLY stupid is that Dan Brown said from the beginning that his book was a work of fiction. I think this cardinal is just pissed off because he wasn't promoted to popeness. He's got as much going on upstairs as that Venezuelan nutcase, Chavez... ------- sig starts "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R R Giskard Reventlov

                                  espeir wrote:

                                  Ironically islamofascism is derived from atheist governments.

                                  Can you provide some background or justification for this assertion? home
                                  bookmarks You can ignore relatives but the neighbours live next door

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Red Stateler
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #56

                                  Islamofascism. Saddam Hussein modelled his government primarily after Hitler's, with some communist features thrown in (link[^]). Iran's modern government was created through the backing and support of the USSR. Osama Bin Laden was brought about through war with the atheist USSR. In fact the entire region was rather temperate and venerable before the atheist influences of the USSR brought IslamoFascism into being.

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R Red Stateler

                                    Rob Graham wrote:

                                    the crusades

                                    That was a war led by the Roman Cathoic Church to grab land and would not come anywhere near the savagry of China, Germany or the USSR.

                                    Rob Graham wrote:

                                    the inquisition

                                    Historians agree that the inquisitions reputation exceeds its reality in both size and scope and would not come anywhere near the savagry of China, Germany or the USSR.

                                    Rob Graham wrote:

                                    the 19th century witch burnings

                                    I think you have the wrong century.

                                    Rob Graham wrote:

                                    the current islamist terrorism

                                    This is one you actually have right. Ironically islamofascism is derived from atheist governments. It's also non-Christian.

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Madmaximus
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #57

                                    Your points are correct and well put. If people would only learn history. As Cicero puts it: "He who does not know history is destined to remain a child." To add to your points, all the wars that the Roman Empire did in its conquests of the world accumulated to more savagery than any religion.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Christian Graus

                                      led mike wrote:

                                      Not if the religions themselves are the source of the power and/or political issues.

                                      Well, that seems true, but I can't think of an example, certainly none of the examples offered would qualify. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      led mike
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #58

                                      I must just be dense when it comes to this issue. Isn't most if not all of today's violence from Muslim fanatics based on religious doctrine?


                                      "What classes are you using ? You shouldn't call stuff if you have no idea what it does" Christian Graus in the C# forum led mike

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C Christian Graus

                                        The Crusades *used* religion to motivate the masses. They were not created for religious purposes. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #59

                                        That is the same thing bin Laden is also doing -- *use* Islam to try and take over a few Muslim countries. US and Britain are standing in the way by supporting Saudi Arabia (which I believe is his target, from what I have read).

                                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Red Stateler

                                          Islamofascism. Saddam Hussein modelled his government primarily after Hitler's, with some communist features thrown in (link[^]). Iran's modern government was created through the backing and support of the USSR. Osama Bin Laden was brought about through war with the atheist USSR. In fact the entire region was rather temperate and venerable before the atheist influences of the USSR brought IslamoFascism into being.

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          Ryan Roberts
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #60

                                          Let me get this right, you are blaming the 1400 year history of religiously sanctioned violence and despotism in the Islamic world on Atheism? P.S. Communism, Fascism and Atheism are not equivalent concepts.

                                          espeir wrote:

                                          In fact the entire region was rather temperate and venerable

                                          No, it was subdued by empire and too economically backward to offer any kind of threat. You might want to check out: The river war[^] And the 'shores of tripoli' bit from the Marine battle hymn[^] Ryan

                                          "Michael Moore and Mel Gibson are the same person, except for a few sit-ups. Moore thought his cheesy political blooper reel was going to tell people how to vote. Mel thought that his little gay SM movie about his imaginary friend was going to help him get to heaven." - Penn Jillette

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups