Interview On Monday [modified]
-
Do you think your Question posted here is more relevant then mine.
Develop2Program & Program2Develop
-
norm .net wrote:
Satips you're a fool, and I don't tolorate fools.
He is trying to change his presence here in the lounge. Let bygones be bygones.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
Rage wrote:
Because it is physically not possible or because you do not want to do that ?
Yeah, my "pretty" is wearing off fairly quickly now that I've gotten to the age of 51. Sure, I can put up a good front for a day or two, but after that, all bets are off. The only benefit to starting a new job that expects me to be pretty is that I can recycle a lot of the old spring dresses I haven't worn in a while.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
The only benefit to starting a new job that expects me to be pretty is that I can recycle a lot of the old spring dresses I haven't worn in a while.
Pictures please. :~
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
norm .net wrote:
Satips you're a fool, and I don't tolorate fools.
He is trying to change his presence here in the lounge. Let bygones be bygones.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopesJimmyRopes wrote:
He is trying to change his presence here in the lounge.
Hope, disagree, he needs to leave the lounge for at least 2 weeks and then reaccustom his self again.
Roger Irrelevant "he's completely hatstand"
-
JimmyRopes wrote:
He is trying to change his presence here in the lounge.
Hope, disagree, he needs to leave the lounge for at least 2 weeks and then reaccustom his self again.
Roger Irrelevant "he's completely hatstand"
norm .net wrote:
Hope, disagree, he needs to leave the lounge for at least 2 weeks and then reaccustom his self again.
Now that I see you are proposing a temporary ban, and not complete banishment, I agree a two week cooling down period (for the offended as well as the offender) is a reasonable solution for all concerned.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes
