Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Heard on the radio this morning

Heard on the radio this morning

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questionphpvisual-studiocom
28 Posts 19 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N NormDroid

    Why not relocate the isolator switch near your front door, then you can throw the switch to the 'off' position when you leave the house, simple! (Think of all the pennies you'll save).

    WPF - Imagineers Wanted Follow your nose using DoubleAnimationUsingPath

    P Offline
    P Offline
    Ponytail Bob
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    I am going to spend several thousand $$$ to maximize efficiency in my home office, making sure that all electical outlets are controlled from a master console that will detect if I am using any electical apparatus. I figure to break even on my electric bill savings right about the time the sun goes supernova. :-D All that being said, most eletrical appliances do have some draw even when turned "off" The "Energy Star" certification here in the US has led to "low standby energy use" and the new rating in 2007 requires 80% power supply efficiency. BobP

    http://bobp1339.blogspot.com/

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L leppie

      Apparently, a cell phone charger still uses a substantial amount of electricity even it is not charging the phone. (this was received by the radio host by email, from a person in the UK). Now I only did 1st year engineering electronics, but that smells a lot like cow dung to me. The logical question is, where is the energy going if the phone is not charging? I can understand energy loss while the phone is being charged, but how is energy drained from the charger if it not charging?

      xacc.ide - now with IronScheme support
      IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 1 out now

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      'Substantial' probably means about 5% of charging power lost as heat.

      Visit http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/[^] and do something special today.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Frank Kerrigan

        go back and read your books leppie. A phone charger dependant on design converts AC votage 120/240 volts into DC votlage anywhere between 3 and 12 volts DC. The conversion is primary by a transformer which steps the high voltage down to a smaller voltage by transfer of an eletro-magnatic field. This field transfer incures loss through heat and inefficient transformers. So now we have an AC voltage of 5 volts say; this is then clipped so the negative voltage is lost(more heat loss) and the voltage is smoothed a bit using capicators so it near a constant voltage to charge your phone. All eletronics product heat and the cheaper they are the usually more wasteful they are. AC: Alternating Current a sine wave and changes on a based frequency 50-60 hetz (times per second)A 120 volt AC goes between -120 and +120. DC: Direct Voltage is a constant value ie like a battery.

        Grady Booch: I told Google to their face...what you need is some serious adult supervision. (2007 Turing lecture) http://www.frankkerrigan.com/[^]

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dan Neely
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Frank Kerrigan wrote:

        this is then clipped so the negative voltage is lost(more heat loss)

        It's only actually clipped in old very cheap power supplies. By using 4 diodes instead of one (full bridge rectifier) you can flip the negative peak of the input into a second positive peak. This almost doubles efficiency (the almost comes from extra voltage drop from passing through 2 diodes instead of one) and allows for the use of a smaller capacitor to smooth the output.

        Otherwise [Microsoft is] toast in the long term no matter how much money they've got. They would be already if the Linux community didn't have it's head so firmly up it's own command line buffer that it looks like taking 15 years to find the desktop. -- Matthew Faithfull

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Frank Kerrigan

          go back and read your books leppie. A phone charger dependant on design converts AC votage 120/240 volts into DC votlage anywhere between 3 and 12 volts DC. The conversion is primary by a transformer which steps the high voltage down to a smaller voltage by transfer of an eletro-magnatic field. This field transfer incures loss through heat and inefficient transformers. So now we have an AC voltage of 5 volts say; this is then clipped so the negative voltage is lost(more heat loss) and the voltage is smoothed a bit using capicators so it near a constant voltage to charge your phone. All eletronics product heat and the cheaper they are the usually more wasteful they are. AC: Alternating Current a sine wave and changes on a based frequency 50-60 hetz (times per second)A 120 volt AC goes between -120 and +120. DC: Direct Voltage is a constant value ie like a battery.

          Grady Booch: I told Google to their face...what you need is some serious adult supervision. (2007 Turing lecture) http://www.frankkerrigan.com/[^]

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Luc Pattyn
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Frank Kerrigan wrote:

          A 120 volt AC goes between -120 and +120.

          Actually 120V AC means the root mean square is 120 Volt, therefore the peak voltage is sqrt(2) times larger. :)

          Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


          This month's tips: - before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google; - the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get; - use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets.


          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L leppie

            I understand that. What I dont understand is the claim that a lot (or any non-nominal amount) of energy is lost on an open circuit.

            xacc.ide - now with IronScheme support
            IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 1 out now

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Luc Pattyn
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Hi, Think of how a permanent magnet attracks nails from a distance: there is no such thing as an open circuit in magnetism; flux lines are always closed, they don't need a "conductor", they search the path of least resistance, just like everything else in nature. Inserting the mobile unit just changes the path and the "resistance". :)

            Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


            This month's tips: - before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google; - the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get; - use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets.


            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L leppie

              I understand that. What I dont understand is the claim that a lot (or any non-nominal amount) of energy is lost on an open circuit.

              xacc.ide - now with IronScheme support
              IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 1 out now

              B Offline
              B Offline
              blackjack2150
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              leppie wrote:

              What I dont understand is the claim that a lot (or any non-nominal amount) of energy is lost on an open circuit.

              Again, In a voltage transformer there are 2 (two) circuits: the input and the output. There is no physical connection betwen them. Only a magnetic field. When a charger is not connected to the phone, but connected to the power supply, the input circuit is connected and looses power for heat.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L leppie

                I understand that. What I dont understand is the claim that a lot (or any non-nominal amount) of energy is lost on an open circuit.

                xacc.ide - now with IronScheme support
                IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 1 out now

                F Offline
                F Offline
                Frank Kerrigan
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                You need energy to maintain the magnetic field, the wee led, the diode which clips the voltage, the capictors have to discharge and charge on the upper wave. In short its lost transfering AC into DC. You could hook up an AMP meter to a cord extension and plug your charger into it. You might find it will only consume arround a few miliamps which is only a few pennies a month; but every little helps.

                DEVELOPER DAY SCOTLAND 10th MAY 2008 http://www.developerdayscotland.com/[^]

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L leppie

                  Apparently, a cell phone charger still uses a substantial amount of electricity even it is not charging the phone. (this was received by the radio host by email, from a person in the UK). Now I only did 1st year engineering electronics, but that smells a lot like cow dung to me. The logical question is, where is the energy going if the phone is not charging? I can understand energy loss while the phone is being charged, but how is energy drained from the charger if it not charging?

                  xacc.ide - now with IronScheme support
                  IronScheme - 1.0 alpha 1 out now

                  E Offline
                  E Offline
                  Ennis Ray Lynch Jr
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  I would imagine that the DC converter in the charger initiates a loss through heat death of the Universe.

                  Need a C# Consultant? I'm available.
                  Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know. -- Ernest Hemingway

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups